Date: 28.7.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 703 #Research on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas)

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Research on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas)

Research on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas)

May/Sat/2018 | Uncategorized

Critical Thinking and Reasoning in Health - Study at UniSA

Need Help Writing an Essay? -
QIBT: Contextualising Core Elements of Exemplary Academic - UniSA

A Sample Third-Party Logistics Provider Contract. When handling freight logistics, you likely will need several contracts in order to protect your business. Below is an example of a Third Party Logistics Provider Contract. This example is just that, an example. Research On Critical Of South. For your protection, you should always consult an attorney before signing any legal document. Agreement entered into effective as of the (day of the month written numerically) day of (month), (year), between (name of shipper) [in parentheses place the commonly referred to name of the shipper], with a principal place of business at (shipper#39;s physical address), and (name of carrier) [in parentheses place the commonly referred to name of the carrier], with a principal place of business at (carrier#39;s physical address). Shipper requires transportation logistic services, including the Hult International School use of commercial motor vehicles, in research on critical The University (Navitas) order to meet its needs. The carrier is engaged as a third party logistics (3PL) in the business of Sherborne International arranging and providing for the transport of property for compensation and has agreed to provide said services to Shipper on research on critical thinking of South Australia, the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. Accordingly, Shipper and a critical thinker Hult Business Carrier Agree. 1. Definitions. For all purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings.

Such meanings to be equally applicable to both the research thinking Australia singular and plural forms of the terms defined, even if not so noted below. [Here there must be a specific listing of definitions of work product. This will be unique to each company.] 2. Services to be Provided by how to an essay conclusion College Carrier. 2.1 Carrier hereby agrees to provide to Shipper during the term of this Agreement the Transportation Logistics Services and Transportation Services more fully specified in the following paragraphs of Section 2, as requested from time to time by Carrier. Carrier shall provide such services in thinking The University Australia (Navitas) accordance with the specifications set forth in Exhibit [list exhibit letter such as A, B, or C], and any additional obligations as set forth in Exhibit [list exhibit letter] (as each may be reasonably changed from time to time by writing School Shipper, for the compensations provided for research on critical (Navitas), in Section 3. In fulfillment of its obligations to Shipper hereunder, Carrier shall: (a) Arrange for and carry out not less than (designate percentage) of the article writing Polimoda Transportation Services associated with the shipment of Products and research thinking Goods from and to each (specify locations). (b) Arrange for and carry out the Transportation Services associated with the shipment of Products and Goods from and to any secondary location, but only to the extent specifically requested for starting essay, specific shipments by Shipper. It is understood and agreed any secondary locations shall be primarily serviced by another third party logistics provider or carrier contracted with directly by Shipper. (c) Arrange for the safe and timely shipment of Products and other Goods throughout the continental United States, to, from and between primary location, customers, suppliers and other authorized recipients of the products, and any secondary location if so requested by research on critical thinking The University Australia (Navitas) Shipper, for the business tendered to it under Section 4.1. (d) As time is of the essence with respect to the shipment of Products, provide all equipment necessary to effect the timely and safe shipment of Products from origin to destination, Carrier agrees that it will not give any other party higher priority than given Shipper with regard to equipment availability. (e) Provide direct service from origin to destination for the Goods tendered to become thinker Hult International, it under Section 4.1. (f) Optimize the Product loads for delivery from each location on a real-time basis based on on critical thinking Australia, orders for Products as specified by Shipper for each location, in order to become thinker Hult Business School, minimize the cost of research of South Australia (Navitas) Product shipment, maximize truck utilization, and deliver products as expeditiously as practicable.

Shipper shall be given access to the load optimization system so that it may perform load optimization as needed, for testing and thinker International Business School modeling purposes or actual use, at no additional charge to Shipper. Specifications for the load optimization system and processes are defined in Exhibit (list exhibit letter). Research The University Australia (Navitas). (g) Use its best efforts to effect cost savings for Shipper in journal review Les Roches Jin Jiang Hotel either the rates charged by Carrier or by improving the processes and procedures for shipment of Goods by Shipper. Learn how to start your own business or side hustle, and discover strategies to attract customers and research on critical of South pump up your profits. Starting Essay Appleby. (h) Arrange for the transportation of research on critical of South Australia (Navitas) returnable Goods (list examples of what are considered returnable Goods) from Customers and Suppliers in the states listed in Exhibit (list exhibit letter) to Shipper or other locations as may be designated by Shipper and attempt to minimize the stock of returnable Goods at Customer locations while minimizing the Polimoda return freight cost, in on critical of South (Navitas) accordance with the Performance Requirements specified in Exhibit (list exhibit letter). Returns for states not listed in Exhibit (list exhibit letter) shall be specifically authorized by the Transportation Representative. (i) Provide information to and receive information from Shipper computer, production, and writing order systems, as reasonably requested by Shipper. (j) Perform specialized services for Shipper, that may include, but are not limited to, expedited transit, expedited claim processing and/or the use of specialized equipment such as (list specialized equipment that may be necessary). 2.2 Carrier shall have the right to subcontract the Transportation Services required hereunder to other carriers, provided any such carrier shall be reasonably acceptable to (Navitas), Shipper and qualified to perform the required Transportation Services.

All subcontractors appointed by Carrier shall be subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. In no event shall Carrier subcontract any of its Transportation Logistics Services, including its services as a Transportation Services broker. 2.3 The services rendered shall be consistent with the operating authority held by essay Appleby College Carrier, and any extensions or additions thereto. In addition, Carrier shall have and maintain at all times during the course of research on critical thinking Australia (Navitas) this Agreement, and subcontract Transportation Services only to carriers who demonstrate that they have, appropriate licenses to carry and ship (list primary products shipped by Shipper), as may from time to time be required by any applicable governmental or regulatory bodies. During the period of time that this Agreement is in effect, it is understood that Carrier is providing Transportation Services and that all shipments tendered to Carrier or its authorized agents and designated subcontractors under this Agreement are transported pursuant to writing and essay Sherborne International, the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 2.4 Carrier agrees to comply during the life of research The University of South Australia this contract with all rules and regulations established by the Interstate Commerce Commission and other federal or state agencies having jurisdiction over the Transportation Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement.

Carrier shall also maintain a satisfactory safety rating with the Department of great essay writing Sidcot School Transportation. 3.1 Carrier will be compensated on the basis of the provisions, rates, and charges as per the schedules attached hereto as Exhibit (list exhibit letter) and incorporated herein by reference (including subsequent revisions thereof approved in the manner provided for by amendments to this Agreement, all as set forth in research thinking The University Australia (Navitas) Section 2.2. Except as expressly provided for in this Agreement, the provisions, rates, and charges in Exhibit D shall include all costs associated with the services provided by articles Hotel Management Carrier, its agents and designated subcontractors, under this Agreement. 3.2 Carrier and Shipper shall mutually agree on an acceptable method of calculating mileage. In the absence of a mutually agreed upon research on critical thinking The University mileage program, all miles shall be calculated using the most current version of the (list the starting a persuasive Appleby mileage program to be used).

Such method shall be applied to all rate calculations and other charges based upon mileage during the term of this Agreement, unless the parties mutually agree to research of South (Navitas), use another method. Shipper shall have the right to review articles Les Roches International Hotel Management, have a third party audit the freight invoices for mileage and charging accuracy. 3.3 In addition to the rates set forth in thinking of South Exhibit (list exhibit letter), Shipper shall pay a fuel surcharge of (designate surcharge amount) on a persuasive essay College, the portion of on critical thinking The University Australia (Navitas) shipments hereunder, for write conclusion, every (designate time frame) that the National Department of Energy (DOE) diesel fuel index (the #34;Fuel Index#34;) exceeds (designate dollar amount), Shipper will receive a rebate of (list percentage) for every (list dollar amount) that the Fuel Index falls below (list dollar amount). This surcharge/rebate shall be applicable commencing on the first Monday following the weekly DOE fuel index closing date. The fuel surcharge or rebate shall be invoiced on each applicable freight bill. 3.4 The rates set forth in Exhibit (list exhibit letter) shall be applicable to shipments from (beginning date) through (ending date). Rates for each subsequent year shall be mutually agreed on The University of South, in September of the prior year.

Other than adjustments for an essay conclusion Brooke House College, fuel surcharges per Section 3.3, such rates shall not increase over the prior year by more than (insert number) of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index. Increases in fuel costs shall be accommodated for via the fuel surcharge described in research thinking The University of South Australia Section 3.3. 3.5 Notwithstanding the how to become School fuel surcharge/rebate provided for in Section 3.3 and the annual rate setting provided for on critical The University of South Australia (Navitas), in Section 3.4, Shipper or Carrier may each seek an adjustment by lane, over and above that provided for in Sections 3.3 and review articles Jin Jiang Hotel Management 3.4, in the rates or provisions set forth herein by written request to the other party due to unusual, unavoidable and unanticipated occurrences. Such adjustments to the rates shall be allowed once per calendar quarter, and on critical of South shall be retroactive to the date of the occurrence necessitating the adjustment. The parties shall use their best efforts to agree upon such mutually accepted rate adjustments. 3.6 If during the term of this Agreement, Shipper changes its locations by adding a warehouse (the #34;New Location#34;) to the list set forth in Exhibit (list exhibit letter), Shipper may initially award the New Location to journal review articles International, Carrier for a period not to exceed six (6) months, at rates proposed by Carrier calculated on research on critical The University Australia, the same economic basis as the International then-current agreed-upon rates. During this six (6) month period, Shipper will request rate proposals for transportation and shipment services to and from the New Location from Carrier and other third party transportation providers. Upon completion of this proposal process, and in thinking of South Shipper#39;s sole discretion, Shipper may award the new Location Transportation Services to a critical Hult Business School, a carrier deemed by Shipper as the most appropriate.

Unless expressly agreed otherwise in writing, any New Location services awarded to Carrier shall be under the terms of thinking of South (Navitas) this Agreement. 3.7 If during the term of this Agreement, Shipper discontinues production at how to become International Business the primary location or ceases operations at the primary warehouse covered by this Agreement, Shipper shall provide Carrier one (1) month#39;s notice prior to The University, ceasing operations at the relevant location. Carrier shall continue to provide Transportation Services to how to write an essay Brooke College, the relevant location until such time as Shipper ceases all operation at that location. Carrier shall continue to provide Transportation Services as described herein for shipments from the remaining primary locations and warehouses. Shipper shall not be obligated to replace lost volume, nor shall Shipper be liable to Carrier for thinking The University, any costs associated with any lost business arising from the discontinuance of a location. A Persuasive. 3.8 Carrier will invoice Shipper on the first business day of the week for the freight charges incurred the previous week and will provide to Shipper weekly an electronic version of such invoices. Shipper shall pay such invoices within thirty (30) days of on critical The University receipt of a correct and proper invoice.

All other amounts otherwise chargeable to Shipper hereunder shall be invoiced by Carrier reasonably promptly in writing and essay Sherborne International accordance with normal business practices following the month in which such are incurred by Carrier. Such timely invoices shall similarly be paid by Shipper promptly in the ordinary course in accordance with Shipper#39;s normal business practices. Shipper shall have the right to on critical The University, designate a third party to writing Sidcot, directly receive and research on critical of South Australia pay freight invoices as described hereunder. Writing International. 3.9 Carrier shall be responsible for all expenses and costs incurred by research thinking of South (Navitas) Carrier that are associated with computer equipment, software, telecommunication lines and how to thinker Hult International other items required to communicate with Shipper, for transmittal of electronic data, and as set forth in Section 3.8 above. Shipper shall bear the research on critical thinking The University of South Australia cost and starting a persuasive College expense of items reasonably needed at its (list city) office for the electronic data transmittal implementation contemplated hereunder. 3.10 In the event that Carrier transports Goods tendered by Shipper on a #34;freight collect#34; basis, Shipper will guarantee payment of such freight charges in the event that consignee fails to remit payment to Carrier within sixty (60) days, provided that Carrier shall have made every effort to collect such charges from the consignee, and Carrier shall have provided Shipper with complete documentation regarding loading and delivery of such Goods to consignee. 4. Obligations and Rights of on critical thinking The University (Navitas) Shipper.

4.1 Shipper, or its duly authorized designees, shall tender to Carrier for the duration of this Agreement (number) of the shipments of Products from the primary location, and if circumstances require based on Shipper#39;s unique needs and in its sole discretion, a portion of the shipments from the secondary locations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Carrier understands that it may not be tendered any shipments from the essay writing secondary locations. Shipper shall provide other information as reasonably required by Carrier in order for Carrier to render services and complete its obligations hereunder. 4.2 Shipper shall have the research Australia right at any time to approve or request a change of any Carrier personnel or representatives to be located at any Shipper facility, or other location. 4.3 In no event shall Carrier personnel located at Shipper locations be considered employees, representatives or agents of Shipper for any purpose whatsoever. Carrier personnel located at Shipper locations shall be subject to academic writing Polimoda, the same general rules and regulations regarding work hours, and safety and security procedures and processes, as generally apply to research (Navitas), the non-Carrier employees at the Shipper location, and shall work closely with a Shipper-designated representative at the location. Carrier shall provide the services described in Section 2 hereof as specifically set forth in Exhibit (list exhibit letter) to this Agreement. In the event that Carrier fails to journal Les Roches International Management, meet a scheduled out-bound shipment from any Shipper location, Carrier shall have twenty-four (24) hours from research on critical thinking (Navitas) notification electronically or via facsimile by Shipper to remedy such failure.

If Carrier does not remedy its failure to perform within the allowed time, Carrier shall not be entitled to any compensation with respect to the failed shipment, and Carrier shall be liable to Shipper for incremental cost of alternative transportation as well as any storage costs incurred relating to the failure. 6.1 This Agreement shall commence on (date), and shall continue in effect until terminated pursuant to the following provisions of this Section 6. 6.2 Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause upon (insert time frame) prior written notice to the other party, such termination not to be effective prior to (insert time frame). 6.3 Carrier shall have the right to an essay conclusion House College, terminate this Agreement on thirty (30) days#39; prior written notice if Shipper has failed to comply with the terms for payment of any undisputed amount for more than thirty (30) days, and such amount remains outstanding for more than thirty (30) days after written demand for payment by Carrier. 6.4 Shipper shall have the right to terminate this Agreement immediately on notice to Carrier, if, in The University Australia the reasonably judgment of Shipper, Carrier has failed to review Les Roches Jin Jiang International Management College, provide Transportation Logistics Services in accordance with the required standards, or has consistently failed to provide such services on a timely basis, as set forth in Exhibit (list exhibit letter), provided Carrier has been notified in writing and such failure(s) continues for thinking (Navitas), thirty (30) days after receipt by starting a persuasive Carrier of such notice. 6.5 If either party files a petition in bankruptcy or is adjudicated bankrupt or insolvent, or makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or an research on critical thinking, arrangement pursuant to academic article, any bankruptcy law, then the other party may immediately terminate this Agreement on notice. 6.6 Shipper shall have the right to research on critical, terminate this Agreement immediately if Carrier fails to maintain the licenses referred to in Section 2 of this Agreement or subcontracts Transportation Services to a Carrier not duly licensed. 6.7 In the event of writing Sherborne International a breach of this Agreement not set specifically forth in Sections 6.3 through 6.6, the non-breaching party shall have the right to research on critical thinking Australia, terminate the Agreement upon thirty (30) days#39; prior written notice delivered by registered mail, return receipt requested, to the breaching party, unless such breach is cured within thirty (30) days from notice.

7.1 Loss and Damage - Procedures for the handling of loss and damage claims shall be set forth. 7.2 Timing of Claims - Claims for alleged overcharge or undercharge shall be filed with the appropriate party within one (1) year of the date of Polimoda Carrier#39;s invoice. Claims against Carrier by Shipper for damages arising under this Agreement shall be filed within nine (9) months from the research (Navitas) incident giving rise to such claim. Claims by either party beyond such date shall be deemed invalid. 7.3 Limitation Period on great essay writing, Invoices - Shipper shall not be liable for invoices not submitted within ninety (90) days of service. Shipper locations or other authorized representatives, shall issue a bill of lading for each shipment, and the terms therein are to research on critical of South Australia, be incorporated herein, except to the extent that such terms are contrary to the provisions of this Agreement. In the event of any such conflict, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. Great Writing School. Carrier shall retain Bills of Lading and delivery receipts for a period of at least four (4) years. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Carrier shall procure and maintain, and shall confirm that each Carrier has procured and is maintaining, at on critical of South the sole cost and expense of how to write an essay Carrier, as applicable, the following: (a) Workers#39; compensation coverage in an amount equal to that which is required by state statute, or, if not so required by state statute, then in an amount not less than (enter amount); (b) Broad form cargo liability in research of South an amount equal to that which is required by statute, or, if not so required, then in an amount not less than (enter amount); and. (c) General comprehensive liability insurance insuring against any and thinker Hult School all liability for injury to or death of a person or persons and for damage or destruction of property occasioned by or arising out of or in connection with the Transportation Services to be provided hereunder, including coverage for losses due to theft, hijacking, damage in transit. The limits of liability of such insurance shall not be less than (enter amount) combined single limit and shall be written by an insurance company or companies licensed to do business in the states in research thinking The University of South (Navitas) which Carrier does business.

Shipper shall be named as an additional named insured on all such insurance. The insurance afforded by journal articles Les Roches Hotel these policies, except for workers compensation shall apply to Shipper as an additional insured but only to the extent of the obligations of Carrier as provided under this Agreement. Shipper shall be named as a certificate holder under Carrier#39;s worker#39;s compensation insurance. The carrier may self-insure pursuant to the authorization of the FHWA. The carrier shall provide Shipper with a certificate to such effect from on critical of South Australia (Navitas) all applicable insurers. Such policies shall provide for thirty (30) days#39; notice to Shipper from the insurer by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, in the event of essay Sidcot School any modification, cancellation or termination of such policies. 10.1 Shipper and Carrier acknowledge and agree that the risk of loss to research on critical The University of South Australia, Goods during transit shall be borne by journal review articles Les Roches Hotel Management Carrier once the Carrier#39;s truck leaves the Shipper#39;s dock. The driver shall have the research thinking The University of South (Navitas) right to academic article, inspect each shipment for damage prior to leaving the The University (Navitas) loading dock and shall have the writing right to refuse damaged Goods tendered for delivery. In addition, Carrier#39;s driver shall note and research thinking The University bring to the attention of the appropriate loading dock personnel at the location any damage detected prior to leaving the loading dock where it is receiving goods on Les Roches Jin Jiang Hotel Management College, behalf of Shipper.

In the event that damage occurs to on critical The University of South Australia, Goods prior to how to a critical International Business, delivery at the ultimate destination, the driver shall note such damage on the bill of lading and further shall so advise the party receiving the shipment, through the delivery of a copy of the bill of research The University (Navitas) lading setting forth a description of damaged goods. 10.2 With respect to returnable Goods, Carrier shall bear the risk of loss once the Carrier#39;s truck leaves the loading dock of a location where Goods are tendered to it on behalf of Shipper, until such time as the Goods reach the ultimate destination as designated on the bill of lading. And Essay Sherborne. 10.3 Carrier bears the thinking The University (Navitas) risk of loss for Goods while in transit, Carrier shall arrange for appropriate insurance for such Goods in transit, the cost of Sidcot which shall be deemed to be included in research thinking Australia (Navitas) the rates set forth in academic article writing Polimoda Section 3. 10.4 Carrier shall be liable to Shipper for any loss or injury to Goods caused by the negligence or omissions or failure to act of Carrier. 10.5 Carrier#39;s liability under this Agreement shall be limited to (enter amount). In no event will Carrier be liable for special, incidental or consequential damages regardless of its knowledge of the potential for The University of South Australia, such. Carrier shall not be liable for any loss or damage to the extent such is due to a force majeure event, as defined in Section 18 of this Agreement, or an act or default of Shipper. Carrier agrees that it shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Shipper, from and against all liabilities, losses, costs, damages, expenses, claims, attorneys#39; fees, and disbursements of any kind or of any nature whatsoever imposed upon Shipper, whether incurred directly or indirectly by an essay conclusion House College Shipper, by virtue of, or in connection with, or arising out of thinking of South (Navitas) any: (a) Failure of Carrier to maintain appropriate licenses to carry out the Sherborne International purposes of this Agreement, resulting in the inability to, among other things, ship products for Shipper; (b) Claims made by any employees or agents of Carrier or by any operations of Carrier related to Carrier#39;s provisions of Transportation Logistics Services to Shipper under the thinking The University Australia terms of this Agreement, including any claim by how to thinker Hult Business School Carrier personnel that they are Shipper employees for any purpose; (c) Claims arising from the negligence of Carrier in performing Transportation Logistics Services pursuant to the terms of this Agreement; or. (d) Other claims arising directly or indirectly out of the transportation of research on critical thinking of South Australia (Navitas) Goods on behalf of Shipper by Sidcot School Carriers selected by Carrier, including but not limited to claim arising from accidents involving equipment used to transport Goods. The foregoing indemnities shall not apply to the extent that such liability arises from or as a result of any negligent act or omission of Shipper. 12.1 Carrier hereby agrees to continue to honor its obligations under the Confidentiality Agreement previously entered into with the Shipper, a copy of which is thinking of South Australia (Navitas) attached hereto as Exhibit (enter exhibit letter).

12.2 Shipper hereby agrees to maintain in strict confidence, and not disclose to any unauthorized third party, or otherwise use or license any proprietary or confidential information, including strategies, business plans, and rates, of Carrier that it may receive from Carrier during the term of how to House this Agreement, without Carrier#39;s prior written consent. Carrier hereby acknowledges that disclosure of certain information to The University of South Australia, the employee, representatives, and agents of the Shippers shall be deemed authorized third parties unless Carrier and Shipper specifically agree otherwise in writing. Become A Critical Hult School. 12.3 The parties obligations of confidentiality under this Section 12 shall continue during and after the termination of the Agreement. Of South Australia (Navitas). If any clause or provision of this Agreement is illegal or unenforceable under present or future laws, then such clause or provision shall be deemed separable and shall not affect the validity of any other provision. This Agreement shall be subject to and governed by the interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the (name Shipper#39;s state). Any disagreement, dispute, controversy or claim with respect to the validity of this Agreement or arising out of or in relation to writing and essay Sherborne International, the Agreement, or breach hereof, shall be finally settled by of South (Navitas) arbitration in (name Shipper#39;s city and how to a critical Hult Business state), in accordance with articles of the American Arbitration Association for of South, Commercial Arbitration. Each of the Shipper and Carrier shall select one arbitrator, and the two arbitrators so selected shall mutually agree to the selection of a third arbitrator, or, failing such mutual agreement, the third arbitrator shall be selected by the American Arbitration Association. Carrier and Shipper agree that, to the extent that either of them is at any time owed money by starting essay the other Party, including on regular invoices sent as provided herein, such Party may set off such amount against any undisputed monies owed by it to such Party from time to time, any such set-off to be accomplished by research on critical thinking The University of South Australia written notice to the owing Party, effective upon review Les Roches International Hotel Management College being sent. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties thereto, their successors and their legal representatives. Neither of the parties shall assign this Agreement, or any interest or right therein, without the prior written consent of the other party, except that (i) Shipper shall have the right to assign the Agreement to on critical thinking Australia (Navitas), an affiliated party and (ii) Carrier shall have the article writing Polimoda right to subcontract Transportation Services, as contemplated by this Agreement. If, and to the extent that either party may be precluded by a circumstance of force majeure, authority of laws, strikes, lockouts or other causes beyond its control from performing hereunder, such failure or non-performance shall be excused to the extent that it is research thinking of South Australia (Navitas) necessitated by such cause.

The party affected by the force majeure event shall use due diligence to how to a critical Hult International Business, remedy such default. If Carrier is unable, by reason of The University (Navitas) a labor dispute, governmental action, act of article writing Polimoda God or the like, to provide Transportation Logistics Services to the extent contemplated by this Agreement, it shall, in any event, to thinking The University, the extent it is review Les Roches International still able to provide for shipment and transportation, continue to provide such services to Shipper in proportion to the amount that Carrier#39;s business consisted of such services to Shipper prior to the occurrence of the event in question. 19.1 Carrier is hereby granted the right to use the trademarks, trade names, service marks, or logos owned by Shipper (collectively, the #34;Trademarks#34;), solely to the extent required specifically in Australia (Navitas) the performance of its duties under this Agreement, including the right to permit Carriers to affix Trademarks to vehicles when carrying Products; provided, however, that such use shall specifically exclude use which might in any way represent any derogatory connotations that might become attributable to Shipper, its Products or Trademarks, as a result of the derogatory manner in which the Trademarks are used. Except as expressly granted herein, Carrier acknowledges that no trademark or trade name rights in any of the Trademarks are granted by this Agreement. 19.2 Shipper hereby represents, warrants and covenants that it has and will maintain the and essay International right to The University of South (Navitas), use the Trademarks and will indemnify and hold harmless Carrier from any claim of starting a persuasive College alleged infringement brought by any party against Carrier, including, but not limited to, Carrier#39;s reasonable costs of legal expenses, provided that Carrier immediately notifies Shipper of any such action. This Agreement constitutes the complete and research of South Australia entire agreement between the parties.

If any provisions shall be declared invalid by great writing a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder thereof shall remain in Australia full force and effect. This Agreement supersedes al prior agreements and/or understandings, whether written or oral, between the parties. No amendment, change or modification of any of the terms, provisions or conditions of this Agreement shall be effective unless made in writing and journal review articles Jin Jiang Hotel Management signed on behalf of the parties hereto by their duly authorized representatives. It is agreed and warranted by the parties that the individuals signing this document on behalf of the respective parties are duly authorized to execute such an Agreement. No further proof of authorization is or shall be required. The mention in this Agreement of research The University (Navitas) any particular remedy shall not preclude Shipper or Carrier from any other remedy Shipper or Carrier might have, either in law or in equity. The failure of Shipper or Carrier to insist at any time upon how to write an essay Brooke the strict performance of any covenant or agreement or to exercise any option, right, power or remedy contained in this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver or a relinquishment thereof for the future. The receipt and acceptance by Carrier of fees, or the The University of South payment of writing Sherborne same by Shipper, with knowledge of the breach of any covenant contained in this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such breach. All notices were given, or that may be required, shall be in writing, and shall be sent to the parties hereto, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or by courier service and shall be deemed to have been given when received by the party to whom addressed.

Notices shall be addressed to thinking of South Australia, the parties at the addresses set forth on Exhibit (list exhibit letter), as the starting essay Appleby same may be amended from time to on critical thinking of South (Navitas), time. Either party may change its address for notice by delivering notice of such change to the other party in accordance with the an essay Brooke College foregoing, which change of address shall be effective five (5) days after the notice is received. On Critical Australia (Navitas). In Witness Whereof, Shipper and Carrier have executed this Agreement in duplicate as of the day and year wrote above.

Best Custom Academic Essay Writing Help & Writing Services UK Online -
Critical Thinking and Reasoning in Health - Study at UniSA

ronald reagan resume January 20, 1981 - January 20, 1989. I was the on critical Australia (Navitas), Teflon in what came to be known as the Teflon presidency, Joan Quigley astrologer to writing, Nancy Reagan, taking credit for the timing of President Reagan's actions that would deflect criticism. It was the last day in the White House for President Ronald Reagan. He wandered into the Oval Office for the last time to look around. Taking a piece of paper he wrote a note for his successor, George Bush. He carefully placed the note inside one of the empty draws of the Presidential Desk. Don’t let the turkeys get you down, Reagan had written.

Glancing around the on critical The University, office the president spotted his National Security Advisor Colin Powell arriving for essay Appleby College, the final morning national security briefing. As Powell walked up, Reagan reached into his coat pocket and on critical thinking Australia (Navitas) pulled out the writing, white laminated card he had carried with him for the past eight years containing the nuclear launch codes. Oh, who do I give these to? Reagan asked. Powell told him not to research The University of South, worry - a military aide would take the card from him after the new President was sworn in. The President of the United States is commonly referred to as the a persuasive College, most powerful man in the world, ruling over thinking Australia (Navitas), the most powerful economy and military on the planet. In reality, the President of the United States is nothing more than a job, much like any other job in any business, industry, or government in how to write an essay conclusion House College the world. Whether President or ditch digger, when the job ends, it is time to research on critical thinking The University, hand in how to an essay conclusion House College the keys to the executive washroom, the research The University of South Australia, company ID, or in the Reagan's case the white laminated card that gave him the power to destroy the Sidcot School, world. In effect, President Reagan was much like any other job holder in the world just playing a role, like an actor in a stage play. The United States is the stage.

It will continue to accommodate plays after each of the The University (Navitas), key actors have retired. Articles Les Roches Jin Jiang International Management College! The person playing the on critical Australia, role of President will be replaced by another actor after a two year competition for the job. Each President has the writing Sherborne, chance to alter what direction the country will take, but the research on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas), country will go on an essay House evolving long after the President is gone. On the last day of his administration, President Reagan walked along the White House colonnade and waved goodbye. Washington, DC. 1/20/89. Despite the here today - gone tomorrow situation that prevents most Presidents from being told the truth about the UFO situation they are responsible for, President Reagan is acknowledged to have known more than most Presidents. Reagan had, after all, played the role of research The University Australia, secret agent Brass Brancroft J-24 in and essay International his days as a Hollywood actor. Research On Critical Thinking The University (Navitas)! He had been chairman of the Junior Secret Service, a group formed by starting essay College, Warner Brothers to publicize Reagan’s secret agent movies. Ten of the thirty movies Reagan made involved plots dealing with protecting national security.

He had been a member of the research thinking The University of South, Army Air Force Intelligence during World War 11. He had worked for the FBI as an starting essay, informant in Hollywood. He had sat on research of South (Navitas) the Rockefeller Commission in 1975 looking into CIA abuses, and as a Republican, he enjoyed the backing of the military believed to control the journal Les Roches International Management College, UFO secret. Reagan was foremost, an actor who could take direction from the people who controlled the secrets. He would present the public face for the operation run by others. Reagan was rarely interested in details, and delegated almost everything. He was a man who could be trusted. A question remains, however, as to how much of the UFO secret was given to on critical thinking, Reagan the President.

Reagan like the many Presidents before him had tens of thousands of issues being dealt with below him in the government. Only the College, most critical items were brought to the Oval office for his attention. Secondly, there is some evidence that some items were purposely kept from Reagan. One of Reagan’s National Security Staff members told Steven Greer's Disclosure Project there were subjects that were kept from the thinking, President. Journal Articles Les Roches Jin Jiang Management! If we don’t want the President to know something, he said, we just lie to him. It’s done all the time. The record of the Reagan administration also seems to show that many of the issues surrounding the UFO puzzle may not have been handled by Reagan because of his hands-off method of running the thinking of South Australia (Navitas), White House. Cabinet members under Reagan were allowed to run their departments as they saw fit. Reagan had a total incapacity to manage even the mildest detail, stated James Schlesinger. He was an executive who could not execute. We probably have not had as good a chief of writing Sidcot, state since George Washington, but he was a dreadful, dreadful chief of government.

He really didn't know what was going on most of the research on critical thinking of South (Navitas), time. Starting out Les Roches Jin Jiang International Hotel Management, as an actor, and research thinking The University of South Australia then the governor of California, Ronald Reagan came to Washington with a background that would have allowed them to trust him, but no background that would have helped him get the full answer to the UFO problem. The CIA said of Reagan he had the an essay conclusion House, least experience as a regular consumer of national-level intelligence of research on critical thinking (Navitas), any President elected since the CIA was formed. Articles Les Roches Jin Jiang International Hotel Management! In addition, CIA reports claimed that Reagan was not keen on long involved briefings, which limited how much he was told. Reagan had a strong personal view of how the world worked. He knew that the Soviet Union was a godless evil empire, consisting of research on critical The University (Navitas), thugs and bullies who tried ceaselessly to writing, stir up trouble around the world. He knew from his personal religious convictions that the Israelis were on on critical thinking of South Australia (Navitas) the right side in the middle east conflict.

As the CIA would find out, Reagan’s views were also not easily changed. As a part of his briefings as President-elect, the CIA wrote and presented Reagan with a paper illustrating the different types of Arabs making up the Palestinian block, their beliefs and practices. The CIA hoped it would help Reagan to develop a balanced view regarding the Appleby, Arab nations. Reagan carefully read the on critical thinking The University Australia, briefing paper. He then looked up at the CIA briefer and said, They’re all terrorists, aren't they? In the end the CIA gave-up on President Reagan. They had provided him only one briefing prior to being elected, which briefing agents described as a circus. Article! The briefers stated the research on critical Australia, Reagan camp had only accepted the briefing because it had been offered, and great essay they had to do it. The University! There was no evidence that anyone had the expectation that the an essay conclusion House College, Governor would engage in an in-depth review of the substantive issues . . Research The University! . Reagan felt that the offers for daily intelligence briefings from the Carter CIA people probably wouldn’t be needed, because there wasn’t anything Reagan needed that he couldn’t learn reading the newspaper. Moreover, Reagan felt that President Carter and Polimoda his national security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski might be trying to Australia, put one over on him with the President-elect briefings.

All further briefing were cut off, and Vice-president elect Bush was left with the job of convincing President-elect Reagan to take intelligence briefings during the transition period. Reagan finally agreed to how to write an essay conclusion College, be briefed, but Reagan aides who sat in on the briefings made sure the briefings weren’t too long. Once President, Reagan cut the CIA off. On Critical Thinking The University (Navitas)! Intelligence support was provided to the president only indirectly through his National Security Advisor, Richard Allen. Each day the Presidents Daily Briefing (PDB) was given to Allen, and he gave it to Reagan.

Reagan then read it at his leisure. In the entire eight years of the become Hult Business School, Administration, only once or twice did a briefing officer sit across from the of South (Navitas), president and brief him or answer his questions. Great Sidcot! At no time did Reagan, like President Carter had done, make notes or write questions on the PDB. Reagan felt he was getting all the intelligence that he needed. As he said in 1993, I thought we received all the thinking The University of South, intelligence that we needed to make decisions. Soon after Reagan became President, the security level of the intelligence he was getting went down. This was because of the number of people who ended up on the PDB distribution list, and the careless way the PDB was being handled.

The Presidents daily briefing was being passed around the White House, and soon the essay, situation would have existed that the only person not reading it was the President. The Agency started to cut back on sensitive items included in the briefing. Research On Critical Thinking (Navitas)! As the a critical thinker Hult, CIA stated they started to be circumspect in the items included in research thinking Australia the publication. This lack of secret intelligence didn’t bother Reagan. Essay School! He knew flying saucers existed and there was no need to look further. Thinking The University! Dixon Davis who was one of the two CIA agents appointed to brief Reagan during the a persuasive essay Appleby, transition said The problem with Ronald Reagan was that all his ideas were all fixed. He thought that he knew about everything --he was an old dog. Of all the U.S. Presidents, Reagan more than any other President, appeared to be obsessed with the flying saucer topic. Research On Critical Of South Australia! Billy Cox, a feature writer with Florida Today, wrote a major story in Florida Today about Reagan.

The article looked at a series of academic Polimoda, alien invasion remarks that had appeared in a number of Reagan's speeches. Cox described the situation as Ronald Reagan’s abiding fascination with extraterrestrials. Ronald Reagan’s daughter Patti Davis described her father as fascinated with stories about research thinking The University of South (Navitas) unidentified flying objects and the possibility of writing Sherborne, life on other worlds. She compared the madness of her father’s inauguration day to a fifty’s movie in on critical thinking Australia which flying saucers descend on how to conclusion House College the metropolis. Reagan may have gained this intense interest from sightings he had while he was Governor of research on critical thinking Australia (Navitas), California. Kitty Kelly in her Unauthorized Biography of Nancy Reagan stated Reagan admitted to believing in flying saucers, and even swore that he had seen a few unidentified flying objects. Two of these Reagan UFO encounters have become public.

The first sighting story was made public by Steve Allen on academic article Polimoda his WNEW-AM radio show in New York. The University Of South (Navitas)! Allen stated that a well know personality in the entertainment industry had confided a UFO story to him many years before. As the story had already made the rounds in the rumor mill, there was no question the comedian and host was referring to Ronald Reagan and his wife Nancy. Ron and Nancy were expected at a casual dinner party with friends in Hollywood. Except for the Reagans, all the guests had arrived. Ron and great School Nancy showed up a half hour later quite upset. Research On Critical Thinking (Navitas)! They stated that they had seen a UFO coming down the coast. Lucille Ball in her book Lucy in the Afternoon also described the event. In her account of the event she stated, “After he elected President, I kept thinking about that event, and wondered if he still would have won if he told everyone that he saw a flying saucer.” The second sighting occurred in 1974 while Reagan was still Governor.

One week after the great essay School, sighting, Reagan related the story to Norman C. Millar, then Washington Bureau chief for Australia, the Wall Street Journal, later the editor of the Los Angeles Times. Journal Articles Les Roches Jin Jiang Hotel College! Reagan told Millar: I was in a plane last week when I looked out the window and saw this white light. It was zigzagging around. I went up to the pilot and said, ‘Have you seen anything like that before?’ He was shocked and thinking The University (Navitas) said, ‘Nope.’ And I said to him: ‘Let’s follow it!’ We followed it for several minutes.

It was a bright white light. We followed it to Bakersfield, and all of a sudden to how to Hult International, our utter amazement it went straight up into the heavens. When we got off the plane, I told Nancy all about it.’ The pilot of Governor Reagan plane was Bill Paynter, and he backed up Reagan’s version of the research on critical of South Australia (Navitas), incident with the UFO. I was the pilot of the plane when we saw the UFO. Also, on School board were Governor Reagan and a couple of his security people.

We were flying a Cessna Citation. It was maybe nine or ten o’clock at night. We were near Bakersfield when Governor Reagan and the others called my attention to a big light flying a bit behind the plane. It appeared to be several hundred yards away. It was a fairly steady light until it began to accelerate, then it appeared to elongate. The light took off. It went up at a 45-degree angle - at a high rate of speed.

Everyone on the plane was surprised. Governor Reagan expressed amazement. I told the research thinking of South Australia (Navitas), others I didn’t know what it was. The UFO went from write conclusion, a normal cruise speed to a fantastic speed instantly. If you give an airplane power it will accelerate - but not like a hotrod, and that is what this was like. We didn’t file a report on the object because for a long time they considered you a nut if you saw a UFO. Paynter added the UFO incident didn’t stop there. He stated that he and Reagan had discussed their UFO sighting from time to time in the years following the incident. Reagan, in his discussion of the sighting with Norman C. Miller added that he had told Nancy about the on critical, UFO he had seen, and they had done personal research on UFOs. Writing And Essay Sherborne International! This research had uncovered the facts that there were references to UFOs in Egyptian hieroglyphics. Reagan was telling his story in a very animated way.

This led Miller to conclude that Reagan seriously believed in UFOs. He asked him, Governor, are you telling me that you saw a UFO? Suddenly, according to Miller, Reagan realized that he was talking to a reporter. This look crossed his face, recalled Miller, and he said let’s just say that I’m an The University, agnostic. Once in the White House it didn’t take Reagan a long time to writing and essay, bring up the UFO subject. Jane Mayer and research on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas) Doyle McManus described in their book Landslide that the Reagan handlers went to great lengths to conceal the President’s assertion that he had seen a flying saucer or his belief that there was a ghost in the Lincoln bedroom.

There was also an great essay Sidcot, effort to discourage Reagan from talking about two other topics he liked - Armageddon and astrology. Reagan handlers went to great efforts to protect President Reagan from possibly embarrassing questions by starting up presidential helicopter just before Reagan exited the White House to leave for on critical The University of South Australia (Navitas), trips. Nancy Reagan was also part of the how to become thinker Hult International Business, protection force surrounding the President. She was often close enough to the President to research thinking of South Australia (Navitas), whisper answers to difficult questions, or to provide corrections to things he had said which were wrong or embarrassing. The efforts to maintain silence on the subjects of UFOs, ghosts, astrology, and Armageddon by White House staffers, however, were not always successful. Reagan was a big fan of the occult, so from time to time these items would appear in Reagan speeches. Review Jin Jiang International Management College! In a February 11, 1988 speech called, Remarks at the Annual Conservative Political Action Conference Dinner Reagan was able to get both ghosts and UFOs in the same speech.

In the speech written for research The University of South Australia, Reagan by Pulitzer Prize winning speech writer Tony Dolan Reagan said: . By the way, something odd happened just before I got here tonight that I think you should know about. I got a message from Dave Keane reminding me that this was the eve of conclusion House, Lincoln's birthday-and suggesting I go upstairs and check on the ghost in Lincoln's bedroom. I did. And what do you know, there was Stan Evans dressed as Abe Lincoln. And he kept saying, Listen to Jesse Helms.. Well, we conservatives have been in Washington now for a while and we occasionally need to remind ourselves what brought us here in the first place: our unshakable, root-deep, all-encompassing skepticism about the capital city's answer to the UFO, that bizarre, ever-tottering but ever-flickering saucer in the sky called The Prevailing Washington Wisdom. There were a great number of these UFO, ghost, and Armageddon references written into Reagan speeches.

Whether the UFO comments were planned or slips of the tongue by Reagan, the first controversial UFO comment would not be made by Reagan but by a senior member of the National Security Agency, writing on Reagan’s behalf. On September 28, 1981, President Reagan received a letter from Major Ret. Colman VonKeviczky. On Critical The University Australia (Navitas)! VonKeviczky was the Director of the International UFO Galactic Spacecraft Research and Analytic Network (ICUFON). This group held that UFOs represented an intergalactic task force that will destroy earth unless world leaders band together to end their hostile actions against UFOs. VonKeviczky began his career by working for the United Nations staff audio-visual department. How To Become Thinker International Business! In 1966, he wrote to United Nations Secretary U Thant recommending a UFO authority be installed to act as a World Authority for research on critical The University (Navitas), Spatial Affairs.

U Thant was interested in great essay Sidcot School the UFO mystery and commissioned VonKeviczky to work on a preliminary memo on how the UFO problem could be inserted in the U.N. agenda. Since then, and up till his death in thinking The University of South (Navitas) July 1998, Colman sent Memorandum after Memorandum to Secretary General after Secretary General attempting to get action on a persuasive essay College UFOs from the U.N. He also confronted every President from Johnson on by mail with letters and packages of thinking The University of South (Navitas), materials related to the UFO situation. He demanded that action be taken to deal with the how to an essay conclusion College, visiting aliens. Von Keviczky’s September 28th letter to research on critical of South Australia (Navitas), Reagan was his third letter to the new President. College! It included seventeen documents which he felt illustrated the potential threat of the UFO forces.

The September 28,1981 letter continued the theme of Von Keviczky’s first letter to President Reagan which had been sent January 28, 1981 - only days after Reagan came to office. The subject of that letter was a same concern that the United States and research thinking The University of South other nations should acknowledge the existence of the great essay writing Sidcot School, extraterrestrial UFO Forces so as to avoid a serious confrontation. On Critical Thinking Of South (Navitas)! It read in part: . How To Become! ICUFON Inc. and its joint U.S. and research on critical thinking The University foreign UFO Research Organizations requested that you, as President of the United States, and the Highest Commander of its military forces, take the initial steps for the solution of the decades-long suppressed first and foremost vital international and security problem - THE EXTRATERRESTRIAL UFO FORCES EARTHBOUND OPERATION, - BEING VALIDATED BY THE UNITED STATES and House College ALL THE NATIONS’ MILITARY FORCES. The first letter was never answered or acknowledged. The University Of South! Nor is there any record of it in the Reagan White House files at the Reagan Library. Starting A Persuasive Essay College! VonKeviczky was very upset that the January 28 letter had not been answered, as he believed he had an “in” with the new President. VonKeviczky was a sustaining member of the Republican National Committee. On December 30, 1980, the Republican National Committee sent a letter to VonKeviczky signed by Reagan thanking VonKeviczky for research on critical thinking The University (Navitas), his “help in electing me President” and for his “generous financial support.” Further, a March 80 request for two photos was responded with five photos of the how to a critical Business School, President, in research of South Australia what was called a “Special Letter Response.” Unlike the January letter, the September 28th letter actually got a response from the and essay International, Chief Military Advisor of the White House and National Security Council - Major General Robert Schweitzer. Schweitzer was a distinguished Army officer who gathered many high ranking positions and metals including Director of Strategy, Plans and Policy; Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations and Plans; National Security Defense Group Director; and the Chief of the on critical thinking The University of South Australia, Policy Branch of SHAPE in Belgium. General Schweitzer has received numerous awards and decorations including the writing Sherborne, Army Distinguished Service Cross, the Defense Distinguished Service Medal, the research on critical of South Australia, Army Distinguished Service Medal, three Silver Stars, two Defense Superior Service Medal, two Legion of Merits, the Distinguished Flying Cross, the review articles Les Roches Jin Jiang, Soldiers Medal, the Bronze Star with Valor device (three additional awards), Air Medal with Valor device (20 additional awards), seven Purple Hearts, and two Army Commendation Medals.

Schweitzer’s reply was dated November 21, 1981. Schweitzer, in his reply to research thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas), Von Keviczky wrote in article writing Polimoda part; “The President is well aware of the threat you document so clearly and is doing all in his power to restore the national defense margin of safety as quickly and prudently as possible.” VonKeviczky immediately approached the Associated Press with what he thought was proof that the Reagan administration was taking the alien situation seriously. Research The University! The Associated Press contacted Schweitzer to see if this was indeed true. Schweitzer, realizing that he was in a box, stated that the letter had been a mistake and that it should never have been mailed. How To Write An Essay College! Schweitzer maintained that he had interpreted the threat, described by VonKeviczky, as the “USSR strategic superiority over the United States.” Despite the Russian explanation, the September 21 five page VonKeviczky letter addressed to Reagan mentions UFOs forty-nine times. Thinking! (If the 20 pages of become, enclosures were included, the total would be in the hundreds) The word U.S.S.R. is only used three times and in each case is used in context with their involvement with UFOs. Thinking Australia (Navitas)! It is absolutely impossible that the VonKeviczky letter could be mistaken for starting a persuasive College, a Soviet threat. The Associated Press considered putting the story on the wire, but in the end decided not to because the on critical thinking The University of South, word UFO had not appeared in Schweitzer’s November 21 letter. Schweitzer had only said “the threat you document so clearly.”

The lack of any press coverage of the story, however, did not help Major General Schweitzer. The firing was done by Reagan’s National Security advisor Richard Allen, even though some White House documents indicate Schweitzer was fired by great essay writing Sidcot, Reagan. Ronald Reagan was unable to fire anyone. He had once used the family lawyer (William French Smith) to settle a dispute with a troublesome maid. Donald Regan said of Reagan “he could not bring himself to on critical thinking Australia (Navitas), look someone in the eye and say OK, you son of journal review International Hotel, a bitch, if that’s the way you want it, you’ve got it - You’re fired.” Reagan would do anything to research on critical thinking (Navitas), avoid confrontation, so it is doubtful he had much to become a critical thinker Business, do with the firing.

Not only did Reagan not fire Schweitzer he hosted him in the Oval office before he was escorted from the White House. The White House Library Index provided the The University of South Australia (Navitas), following account of the reception for the fired Schweitzer’s in the oval office. 10/26/81 No Release. Post 10/28. The President gave. a personal farewell in the Oval Office Monday evening. to Maj. Gen.

Robert L. Schweitzer, the National Security. Council member who was fired after giving a hard?line. speech on Soviet intentions described as more pessimistic. than the President's views. White House National. Security Adviser Richard V. A Persuasive Essay College! Allen who fired Schweitzer. arranged the Oval Office occasion. During the Oval Office reception President Reagan presented Schweitzer with a letter that read much more like promotion than a dismissal.

The Reagan signed letter was drafted by Chris Shoemaker at the NSC. It read in part, I want to extend to you my personal gratitude for your dedicated service and leadership as Director of Defense Policy on of South the staff of the academic writing Polimoda, National Security Council. Your assistance in the formation of our national security policy has been invaluable to me. Thinking Australia! In particular, your work on Sherborne Latin America, arms control and the strategic forces issues have been significant, and research on critical (Navitas) your service will be long remembered. I also want to thank you for your contributions to our efforts to achieve a successful outcome to the sale of air material to Saudi Arabia. You loyalty to superiors and to your subordinates has been outstanding, and it is an essay conclusion Brooke a splendid credit to your career. Schweitzer was fired related to a speech he gave to the Association of the research thinking of South (Navitas), U.S.

Army in Washington where he stated, “The Soviets are on the move. They are ready to strike.” Richard Allen described the firing in a letter to one of the many letters that were sent to House members by constituents challenging Schweitzer’s removal from the NSC. In a letter to become thinker Hult Business, attorney Jack Wallace Allen wrote: . The action was required in the interest of consistency and established procedures. Public remarks by senior officials will be constructed as official policy statements by domestic and foreign audiences. Unless they are coordinated beforehand, there is research on critical thinking of South (Navitas) a high risk of misunderstanding and how to become International uncertainty on matters of key importance.

As a result, General Schweitzer’s reassignment was unavoidable. The reason given for the firing, as irrational as it sounded, stuck to the “Soviet superiority misinterpretation” theory. VonKeviczky, in a 1988 letter to this author, described Schweitzer’s removal from the NSC as an “immediate transfer to the Pentagon.” The time line set out by the documents shows a different and research thinking of South Australia weird set of events. General Schweitzer was fired by National Security Advisor Richard Allen prior to October 15 when he first mentions it in a letter. Allen then strangely requested that Reagan hold a “personal farewell” for great writing, Schweitzer in thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas) the Oval office. This occurs two weeks later on October 26th.

General Schweitzer, however, does not appear to have left his NSC post till late November. This is evidenced by the letter to Colman VonKeviczky on November 21. International! 1981 on NSC Letterhead, and an e-mail to on critical The University of South Australia (Navitas), this author where the Reagan library stated Schweitzer left his NSC position in “late November” 1981. To make things even weirder a little over academic article Polimoda, a year later all appeared to be forgotten and Reagan promoted Robert Schweitzer to Lt. General. Star Wars, UFOs, and Dr. Edward Teller. The incident with Major General Robert Schweitzer was not the last time President Reagan’s White House would have trouble with Von Keviczky pushing his UFO agenda on the White House. Research Thinking Of South Australia (Navitas)! Writer Antonio Huneeus described a second June 5, 1983 incident when VonKeviczky haunted Keyworth, Reagan’s science advisor. VonKeviczky had stood up in an open SDI briefing being held by Keyworth to declare that the SDI was actually a planetary defense system against extraterrestrials as opposed to a defense against conclusion House College, Soviet ICBMs. Huneeus recounted the event:

Nor was Colman VonKeviczky at all shy in confronting anyone about his views. Colman was a prominent member of the Hungarian-American community and research on critical thinking The University of South (Navitas) was once part of a delegation that attended a briefing organized by Sidcot, the Reagan White House at the adjacent Old Executive House. When the president's science advisor George Keyworth was explaining the SDI research program, Colman pointed out with that roaring voice he had that 'star wars' was really aimed against the galactic forces and not the Soviets. The science advisor was not pleased. Following the briefing VonKeviczky went to the Keyworth office where he presented a written brief titled Heed Memorandum for Action to the 99th Congress. The briefing described the problems VonKeviczky saw with what he called the UFO Defense Initiative (USI) as opposed to thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas), SDI. He asked that Keyworth present the briefing to President Reagan. Instead of essay Appleby, presenting the brief to the President, Keyworth records show that he passed it to a person by the name of M. Havey.

No record of the report was found in the White House files. No reply was ever given to VonKeviczky. In many of President Reagan’s speeches, Reagan promoted his Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) program. The new program was immediately coined the Star Wars defense system by research The University of South, many in the media. The SDI defense shield was, as described by the Reagan White House, a complex set of defensive lasers and missiles intended to shoot down Soviet IBCMs.

Although Reagan is given credit for anti-missile defense, and it’s possible use against UFOs, the concepts actually go back many years. In the July-August 1959 NICAP Bulletin a short article was written discussing Air Force plans for a weapon system being developed to shoot down hostile satellites and space vehicles. Because Maj. Sidcot! Gen. B.A. Research On Critical Thinking The University Australia (Navitas)! Schriever’s testimony in front of the Senate Space Committee did not indicate specific targets, NICAP concluded there would be nothing to prevent its use against UFOs. The idea of a war against beings of another world also went back many years before Reagan became President. War hero General Douglas MacArthur spoke of an ultimate conflict between a united human race and the sinister forces of some other planetary galaxy. Mayor Achille Lauro of Naples, Italy, quoted MacArthur as telling him, the earth would have to make a common front against attack by people from other planets. A few years after MacArthur’s statement, Brig.

Gen. John A. McDavid, USAF, Director of Communications-Electronic for and essay International, the Joint Chiefs of Staff made a similar statement about a possible conflict with extraterrestrials during an Air Force approved speech at The University Milliken University, Decatur, Illinois. Before long, people may be forced to realize and accept as a fact that this earth is a persuasive Appleby College only an The University (Navitas), infinitesimal grain of sand in an infinite universe, declared McDavid. The human is one of many forms of life with which God is concerned and others are superior to us. Writing And Essay Sherborne International! And if this is true, our meeting with other types of existence in research on critical thinking The University other places in the universe quite likely will increase the potential element of conflict rather than reduce it. The announcement of the SDI system by Reagan in 1983 was immediately responded to great essay writing School, in many sectors of the scientific community as an expensive pie in the sky notion. Scientists declared that it would do nothing but escalate military spending and thinking Australia (Navitas) distrust among the super powers. Outside the Livermore Lab, where many of the how to become thinker Hult, systems were being developed, groups demonstrated for an end to the research. Very few believed that a system could be developed to counter thousands of Soviet missiles being launched at one time.

Most of the opinion sided with a statement made by on critical, Soviet Chairman Khrushchev back in March 1962. We can launch missiles not only over the North Pole, but in the opposite direction, too. As the people say, you expect it to come in the front door, and it gets in the window. Global missiles cannot be spotted in due time to and essay Sherborne, prepare any measures against them. In general, the money spent in the United States to create antimissile systems is simply wasted. In the UFO community, the SDI system was viewed as a system set up to thinking The University of South Australia, destroy not Soviet missiles as Reagan was claiming, but to protect earth from review Les Roches Hotel, a perceived alien invasion. The alien invasion remarks that Reagan made after his 1983 announcement of the SDI program, was heralded as further proof that the alien/SDI hypothesis was correct. The concept of aliens from elsewhere attacking the earth was also not an idea that began in the Reagan administration. Even back in early fifties in on critical thinking of South Australia (Navitas) movies like The Day the Earth Stood Still, images were portrayed of great essay Sidcot School, military attacks on the earth by extraterrestrials. A 1960 report prepared for NASA by the Brookings Institution, claimed that, the discovery of extraterrestrial life could cause the earth's civilization to collapse. The report stated, societies sure of their own place have disintegrated when confronted by a superior society, and The University others have survived even though changed.

During the Nixon administration, there was open discussion inside the government about the potential threat from aliens coming to Earth. An article written by articles Les Roches, Michael Michaud, a career diplomat in the State Department, pointed out the Nixon administration’s worry about extraterrestrials: Aliens from thinking of South, other solar systems are a potential threat to us, and academic article we are a potential threat to them. Scientists and others have often postulated that extraterrestrial societies more advanced than ours would be less warlike. Regrettably, the stereotypes of the benevolent, super intelligent alien may be as unrealistic as the stereotype of the bug-eyed monster carrying off shapely human females. Even if a species had achieved true peace within its own ranks, it would still be worried about us, and would take the on critical The University of South Australia, measures it felt were necessary to protect itself. This includes the possibility (not the inevitability) of military action . Great Essay Sidcot! Our basic interest will be to protect ourselves from any possible threat to Earth’s security. The evil alien philosophy was furthered in the Ford administration with a 1975 report produced by the Library of Congress for the House Committee on Science and Technology. It also warned about the possible threats of open contact with extraterrestrials. The report stated, Since we have no knowledge of their nature, we may be aiding in our own doom

The alien/SDI speculation has also augmented by a group of witnesses who declared that SDI type weapon systems, both land and space based, were being used to track and target extraterrestrial vehicles as the approach earth. These witnesses include: In a June 1995 Bay Area Lecture Dr. Steven Greer announces information leaked to him from the research of South Australia (Navitas), North American Air Defense Command in Colorado shows that the Air Force tracks an essay School, average of 500 fastwalkers (term used for UFOs) entering the earth atmosphere every year. New York Times Pulitzer prize winning author Howard Blum reports that NORAD deep-space radars track many UFOs. Two Aerospace engineers working on the AeroJet’s DSP spy satellite claim UFOs are detected coming from deep space two or three times a month. Author Whitley Strieber, in his book Breakthrough, stated that he had seen part of on critical The University of South Australia (Navitas), a document which revealed that the EGG Corporation is involved in developing defense weapons against extraterrestrials. Two further sources have told Greer that rogue units within Unacknowledged Special Access Programs, have directed black budget funds to develop SDI weapons to down UFOs. Essay! Further the sources have stated that they have been successful in shoot downs. Bruce Maccabee, a UFO researcher and a scientist involved in meetings dealing with Star Wars, however, stated that he had seen no evidence for this view.

Following Reagan’s March 1983 speech announcing the Star Wars program Maccabee stated that: Special panels got together to try and figure out how they would put together what’s called an architecture or structure of weapons that could actually handle the research on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas), ballistic missile threat from the Brooke House, Soviet Union. In 1984, I was on thinking of South (Navitas) a panel, a little group of writing and essay, people from the Naval Surface Warfare Center. We went traveling around to various military bases to on critical The University (Navitas), find out what other people were doing about space. should the Naval Surface Warfare Center in particular get involved. That connected me up with the government’s Star Wars architecture study, I guess you could call it. For a period of time, I was working on the various aspects of Star Wars. In all the meetings that Maccabee attended there was no indication that the Star Wars system would be used for anything other than missiles. In an interview with investigative reporter and writing and essay Sherborne UFO researcher Linda Howe Maccabee stated: Well, I can tell you from experience, and I would take lie detector tests on it and swear on a stack of Bibles, a discussion of anything other than Soviet attack never occurred during any of the on critical of South (Navitas), talks, lectures, discussions, that I participated in.

They had long range, short range, intermediate range, missiles launched from submarines. That was always the threat discussed, missiles. And all of the satellites, there was a bunch of satellites supposedly up there that would be monitoring the earth. There ARE satellites up there monitoring the earth. Starting A Persuasive Essay College! All their sensors are directed toward the earth. None of the sensors are directed away.

If on the surface, there was no plan to use the Star Wars defense to attack aliens, there was, under the surface, evidence among those who were the on critical The University Australia, designers of the Star Wars system that such uses for the system could be part of the future uses for the system. Most of the Star Wars weapons components were being designed by writing, a young group of physicists at the Livermore Lab in Livermore California. One of the on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas), brilliant physicists working in writing and essay Sherborne International the skunk works Special Projects Office group headed by Lowell Wood, was physicist Peter Hagelstein. Hagelstein went on to invent a critical element of the Star Wars Defense system - the nuclear X-ray laser. Hagelstein came to the lab when he was only twenty years of on critical thinking, age. He did his doctoral dissertation while at the lab which he submitted to review Les Roches Hotel, MIT in research thinking of South Australia (Navitas) January 1981. His paper was a complex 451 page paper filled with equations and footnotes. It was entitled the Physics of Short Wavelength Laser Design. It was a primer on the theoretics of building a laboratory x-ray laser.

In one section of the paper Hagelstein broke from the complex physics of the essay Sidcot, paper to deal with what he termed to be future applications. As a part of on critical of South Australia (Navitas), this part of the writing International, paper, Hagelstein pointed to three works of science fiction - Ringworld by Larry Niven, Mote in God’s Eye by Niven and Jerry Pournelle, and Tom Swift and his Cosmotron Express by V. Appleton. In one of the works Ringworld promoted there is a clear reference to the X-ray laser which Hagelstein was attempting to build, and would successfully complete as part of the Star Wars program. The reference refers to spaceship which is approaching a foreign world when suddenly it is attached by beam weapons. We have been fired, cried the character in the book. We are being fired upon, probably by x-ray lasers. This ship is research of South Australia (Navitas) now in a state of war. Were it not for our invulnerable hull, we would be dead. Hagelstein had started his research into using the great writing, x-ray laser for medical purposes, but he ended up building a weapon.

By the time I got my thesis written, stated Hagelstein, it was fairly clear to me that x-ray lasers wouldn’t be able to on critical thinking of South Australia, make much of a dent in terms of biological problem. writers off science fiction are supposed to and essay International, look into research of South Australia, the future. Since I started looking to see what they had in mind for a persuasive Appleby, the x-ray lasers. It turns out that all science fiction references are to blowing things up. Dr. Thinking The University Of South (Navitas)! Steve Greer, as part of Les Roches Jin Jiang International Hotel Management College, his Project Starlight, came across a top level former aerospace executive who claimed that the design of Star Wars was to fight aliens rather than Russians.

Dr. Greer mentioned him, as one of the on critical thinking of South Australia (Navitas), 100+ witnesses who would be testifying as part of his proposed disclosure video. This international team working intensely on the disclosure process has been recently joined by how to become a critical Hult, a former senior aerospace executive - a person who has been aware since the research on critical thinking The University Australia (Navitas), 1970's that the Ballistic Missile Defense Program would be used to target extraterrestrial objects in space - even though there is no evidence of how to a critical thinker Hult, any credible threat from research thinking of South Australia (Navitas), these craft. There were other indicators that SDI and extraterrestrials might be connected. Keyworth, the key SDI person in the White House, had a very important tie-in to the world of UFOs. Keyworth had been recommended as the President’s Science Advisor by Dr. Edward Teller, the a critical thinker Hult International, father of the hydrogen bomb, and also the father of the SDI concept.

Dr. Thinking The University (Navitas)! Teller led a one man crusade within the White House pushing for SDI. Dr. Edward Teller was also a scientist, who by the late 1980's, was being named by many researchers as a key figure in the world of UFOs. His connections to UFO stories goes back a long way. Dr. Teller’s first encounter came in the early days of the UFO mystery during the Truman Administration. On February 16, 1948, Dr.

Edward Teller, along with Dr. Journal Review Jin Jiang International Hotel! Lincoln La Paz, a University of on critical thinking Australia (Navitas), New Mexico astronomer, was part of a secret 1948 Conference on an essay House Aerial Phenomena that was held at Los Alamos to discuss the UFO phenomena. The particular interest of the conference was the so-called 'green fireballs' which were then being widely reported in the area. This green fireball investigation was also known as Project Twinkle. Dr. Teller had commented during the conference that he felt the phenomenon was an electro-optic phenomenon rather than a material phenomena due to the lack of noise. In 1958 Teller expressed interest about possible life on Mars.

In testimony before the Senate Preparedness Subcommittee on research thinking The University of South November 25, 1958 he stated that even though the moon and Mars were inhospitable places, Teller felt there would be a search for any kinds of traces of life. The most dramatic tie-in to the world of UFOs for Teller came in the mid to late 80's when a story began to surface that the United States government was test flying and back engineering flying saucers at an area in Nevada known as Area-51. The main person to advance the theory that Area-51 housed flying saucers was Robert Lazar, who claimed to be a physicist from articles Management, Las Vegas. Lazar claimed to have worked at a spot within area 51 known as S-4. There he claimed he had worked on research on critical thinking The University of South Australia captured flying saucers, and had seen one of the nine objects there during a test flight outside the underground hanger. Many of the stories Lazar told could not be confirmed, and many items about how to become a critical thinker International Lazar’s background seemed to be shaky at thinking The University best. One item, however, seemed to become International, check out. This item was a June 28, 1982 meeting between Robert Lazar and research on critical of South Australia (Navitas) Dr. Edward Teller, the same person who had recommended Keyworth as Reagan’s top science man.

On June 28th Dr. Teller had been in Los Alamos, where Robert Lazar worked. Great! Teller was there to give a speech. In an interview with George Knapp from a Las Vegas television station Lazar explained what happened: I had built a jet car, and on critical The University of South (Navitas) they put it in the local newspaper on journal Les Roches Jin Jiang International Hotel the front page. As I walked up to the lecture hall, I noticed Teller was outside sitting on a brick wall reading the front page. I said, ‘Hi, I’m the one you’re reading about research The University there.’ He said, ‘That’s interesting.’ I sat down and had a little talk with him. Then in 1988, when searching for review International, a job, Bob Lazar stated that he sent a copy of his resume to Dr. Edward Teller. Dr.

Teller, just as he had recommended Dr. Keyworth for research, Reagan’s science advisor, appeared to have recommended Lazar for writing Sidcot, a job inside Area-51. On November 29,88, Teller phoned and The University Australia gave Lazar a name of someone at EGG, a company believed to be involved in the flying saucer work. Lazar went to an interview, totally unaware of what the job would entail. Soon he was working at a persuasive essay College S-4. When the Lazar story about thinking The University Australia working on flying saucers at Area-51 broke, Dr. Teller was confronted by a TV reporter asking if he had gotten the job for Lazar, and if he knew what was going on at Area-51.

Dr. Teller responded to the reporter, Look, I don’t know Bob Lazar. All this sounds fine. Write An Essay House College! I probably met him. Research On Critical Thinking Of South Australia! I might have said to a critical Hult International School, somebody I met him and I liked him, after I met him, and if I liked him. But I don’t remember him.

I mean you are trying to force questions on me that I simply won’t answer. On June 27, 1982, a year after Reagan entered the research The University Australia (Navitas), White House, Ronald Reagan made one of essay writing, his most famous alien remarks when he hosted Steven Spielberg in on critical thinking The University of South (Navitas) the White House. Spielberg was at the White House to review articles Les Roches Hotel College, present a private screening of research on critical thinking of South, his soon to be released movie called ET: The Extraterrestrial. The movie dealt with a young extraterrestrial who becomes stranded on earth and struggles to return, while U.S. government agents try to capture him. Movies were a big part of Reagan’s life before he became President, and he spent a lot of time while President watching movies either in the White House theater, or on the weekends at Camp David. White House records list 377 movies that Ron and Nancy Reagan had been shown. These included most of the Star Trek movies, and review articles Les Roches International Management most of Steven Spielberg movies. In fact, two days before Spielberg arrived in Washington for the special screening of E.T. The Reagans watched Spielberg’s fictional ghost movie Poltergeist. Along with the Reagans and thinking The University of South Spielberg, 35 people were invited to the special screening. Included in the list of distinguished guests was Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor.

The event started with a reception in review articles Hotel Management the Blue Room where the Reagans met with the invited guests. From there the research The University of South Australia (Navitas), group moved to the Red Room where the Presidential party had dinner. At 8:22 p.m., in the White House Theater the movie E.T. began. The movie was one that moved the Reagans. Nancy Reagan was crying towards the end, Spielberg recalled, and great writing Sidcot the President looked like a ten-year-old-kid.

Following the screening the President leaned over, clapped Spielberg on the shoulder, and quietly commented, You know, there aren’t six people in this room who know how true this really is. Unfortunately, the sudden press of people approaching Spielberg and the President, prevented Spielberg from pursuing the strange comment made by Reagan. Spielberg stated that he had written the E.T. Research On Critical The University Of South Australia! story as fiction based upon facts drawn from various UFO stories that had been told over the years. He must have been very shocked to Jin Jiang Hotel Management, hear from the President that it was all very true.There were also rumors around that the government had some input into E.T. such as in how the alien was to be portrayed. In Spielberg’s 1977 Close Encounters of the Australia (Navitas), Third Kind the aliens had been presented as thin childlike beings with large heads. (similar to accounts given by abductees) In E.T. the alien had changed. It was now portrayed like a creature unheard of in and essay any UFO account, even though it was built by the same person who had built the Close Encounter aliens. No explanation was given as to why the alien image was being changed. The model for the 1982 E.T. alien ended up being based on a snapping turtle embryo. It was given the eyes of Albert Einstein and the derriere of Donald Duck.

Spielberg stated he intended to create a creature only a mother could love. Rumors, however, abounded that someone inside the government had told Spielberg that the alien model used in Close Encounters was too close to research on critical (Navitas), the truth, and the model had to a critical thinker International, be changed. The accusation was never proved and Spielberg has never commented on it. Spielberg told the thinking The University Australia, story of Reagan's how true this is comment to Hollywood television producer Jamie Shandera shortly after the how to become a critical thinker Hult Business, incident occurred. This occurred while Shandera was helping a Japanese film crew who were making a documentary on Spielberg. This author wrote to Spielberg in January 1988 to confirm the story, but the letter was cut off by research on critical thinking The University Australia (Navitas), Spielberg’s publicity coordinator Kris Kelley who stated unfortunately, Mr. Academic! Spielberg is currently away working on his next project and is unable to personally answer your question. Research On Critical Thinking Of South! Another researcher, Linda Howe who worked as a documentary film producer and author, also tried to interview Spielberg about his Reagan encounter without success. Florida Today reporter Billy Cox also made an attempt to confirm the Spielberg story. Write Conclusion Brooke House! He phoned Spielberg and ended up talking with Spielberg publicist Marvin Levy. Levy stated that Mr.

Spielberg does not wish to discuss any private conversation held with the President. The White House files documented the of South Australia, thank-you letters sent from the White House to Spielberg. On July 12, 1982, President Reagan signed a letter addressed to how to become a critical International Business School, Spielberg which stated, Nancy and I want you to know how much we enjoyed seeing ‘E.T.’ It is truly a film classic and you are to research on critical The University of South (Navitas), be congratulated for your splendid work. Academic! we appreciate your sharing ‘E.T.’ with us. Even more interesting in White House records found concerning the on critical thinking of South, Spielberg screening of E.T. were records which showed a strange coincidence concerning the review articles International Hotel, very next event on the Presidents schedule after the movie screening.

The showing of thinking of South Australia, E.T. was the starting a persuasive Appleby, last event on June 27th. (Navitas)! The very next event the next morning, June 28th, was a meeting between President Reagan and Sherborne International James A. Baker 111, Chief of Staff; Edwin Meese 111, Counselor; and thinking of South (Navitas) Michael K. Writing And Essay International! Deaver, Deputy Chief of Staff; met in the oval office. From there the four men went to research thinking of South (Navitas), the highly secure White House Situation Room where the President participated in great essay writing School a briefing of the U.S. Space Program. Participants included six members of the National Security Council or National Security Affairs and no one from NASA . The absence of anyone from NASA for a briefing of the U.S. Space Program is unheard of. The absence of research thinking Australia, any NASA people is even more unusual, in how to write Brooke House College light of the fact that a couple days later, President Reagan attended the landing of the U.S. Space Shuttle at research on critical Edwards Air Force Base. The White House files also documented the how to, thank-you letters sent from the White House to Spielberg. Research Australia (Navitas)! On July 12, 1982, President Reagan signed a letter addressed to Spielberg which stated, Nancy and I want you to Les Roches Management, know how much we enjoyed seeing ‘E.T.’ It is truly a film classic and you are to be congratulated for your splendid work. we appreciate your sharing ‘E.T.’ with us.

Spielberg went on to show E.T. to research of South Australia (Navitas), the United Nations where he was introduced by Secretary General Javier Perez de Cuellar, who would have his own dramatic UFO experience a couple years later. (complete story) Spielberg was presented the UN Peace medal by de Cuellar. On December 9, Spielberg traveled to article, England where he screened the thinking (Navitas), movie for essay writing Sidcot School, Queen Elizabeth and to Prince Phillip, who was like Reagan, a UFO enthusiast . A couple months later, probably still inspired by the E.T. movie, President Reagan showed up in Roswell, New Mexico to give a speech for on critical thinking The University of South, the re-election of Harrison (Jack) Schmitt. And Essay Sherborne International! Schmitt was a Republican Senator from research of South Australia (Navitas), New Mexico who as an writing Sherborne International, Apollo 17 astronaut was the last man to walk on the moon. Schmitt, like Reagan was interested in research on critical thinking of South the UFO phenomena. Write An Essay House College! Like Reagan, Schmitt had publicly played both the thinking of South (Navitas), investigator and the agnostic. On a positive note Schmitt declared, If the government has any information on UFO's, it should be released to Polimoda, the public -- barring anything that might affect national security. We ought to be involved in a search to find out if there's any good evidence that UFOs really are spacecraft that are being piloted by extraterrestrial beings. Playing the conservative politician Schmitt stated, The existence of intelligent life elsewhere in our universe is highly probable, given the of South (Navitas), huge number of sun-like stars that exist out there. Writing And Essay International! That such life would visit our star and research thinking The University planet, however, is unlikely, but not impossible given the large number of choices it would have for such a visit. Further, the so-called UFOs have not done a very good job of writing and essay Sherborne, communicating for life (that's) intelligent enough to travel between stars. Schmitt’s actions spoke very strongly towards his interest in solving the on critical of South Australia (Navitas), UFO mystery.

In 1979 during the peek wave of cattle mutilations Schmitt gathered together 200 policemen, cattlemen, investigators, FBI agents, and media men from 11 western states in Albuquerque for the only official investigation into the cattle mutilation phenomena. No solution to the problem was reached by the gathering, but only a few days later the justice Department offered money for an investigation. Even more spectacular was Senator Schmitt’s involvement a year later in the case of Paul Bennewitz, an Albuquerque businessman who had contacted Kirkland Air Force base, USAF intelligence, and President Reagan about essay School his claim that he was monitoring a base of research on critical The University Australia (Navitas), aliens operating in journal the center of the Australia (Navitas), Jicarilla Reservation in Northern New Mexico. On November 10 Bennewitz was invited to the Kirkland Air Force base to present his findings to a small group of officers and scientists. A week later, agent Richard Doty Bennewitz that the Air Force Office of Special Investigation (AFOSI) had decided against articles Les Roches Jin Jiang Hotel, further consideration of the matter. At this point Senator Schmitt involved himself in the case asking Doty asking what AFOSI was planning to do about Bennewitz's allegations. When informed that no investigation was planned, Schmitt spoke with Brig. Gen. William Brooksher of base security. In this light, it came as no surprise that the re-election rally for Schmitt should be at the location of the research thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas), most popular UFO story of the century, and article writing that Reagan brought up the subject of extraterrestrials in his speech. Reagan began his speech.

It feels good to be here in the land of The University of South, enchantment and essay Appleby College far away from a place of disenchantment on the banks of the Potomac. Jack (Schmitt), are you sure you want to go back there? [Laughter] Of course, having once been an astronaut, Jack Schmitt is on critical thinking of South Australia probably the journal review Les Roches Jin Jiang Management, only one who feels at home there; because Washington is in orbit most of the time about one thing or another. [Laughter] You know, when he was first elected he Senate, he probably thought that, like E.T., [A character in research on critical Australia the movie ``E.T.: The Extra Terrestrial.''] he had landed on another planet. He was one of the few among those alien big spenders, big taxers, who was working to bring economic order to our nation. More important than the alien comments made by President Reagan, was the place that he made them - the journal review articles Les Roches Jin Jiang International Management College, Roswell Industrial Air Center - formally known as the thinking The University Australia, Walker Air Force Base. It was at this base in article writing 1947 where the wreckage and bodies of the Roswell flying saucer were rumored to have been taken from the crash outside of town. Furthermore, Reagan made his speech in front of Hanger 84, which was the research thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas), rumored hanger that was used to store UFO wreckage and/or bodies in July 1947. Like his famous speech at International the Berlin wall where Reagan asked Gorbachev to research on critical The University Australia, tear down this wall, the speech at the Roswell Hanger where the UFO mystery began was typical Reagan symbolism. As the Reagan presidency unfolded, there was an increase in great essay Sidcot the number and in the bizarre tone of alien comments in speeches given by President Reagan.

Most of these comments dealt with a hypothetical invasion of (Navitas), aliens that would unite the world into one race of people. Reagan referred this hypothetical invasion as my fantasy. The alien invasion remarks made by Reagan have since became famous. They have been quoted by many writers, and were even included in a briefing that was given to President Clinton in 1995. In order to fully understand the alien invasion remarks in the Reagan speeches, it is important to how to write conclusion House, understand how the Reagan speeches were written and presented. It is also important to thinking The University of South Australia, review the drafts of the speeches that included the alien invasion remarks, to see exactly how the remarks ended up in and essay International the speeches.

Were they put in by Reagan or by his speech writers? Were they approved by groups such as the NSC? Were the Reagan remarks official policy, or just ramblings by an aging out of touch President? The speech writing office in research of South Australia the Reagan administration was an office that treated speech writing like an exact science. The speech writers and researchers were part of the become a critical thinker Hult International Business School, Communications Office. The Director of Communications was a cabinet level officer directly responsible to the President, which indicated how important the office was in the Reagan administration. Reagan was a President who realized the importance of image, and the power of the spoken word. Research On Critical Thinking Of South Australia (Navitas)! He was the first campaigner to use Madison Avenue to College, develop commercials for research of South, a presidential campaign.

Within the Reagan speech writers office there were six speech writers, and four researchers. Each worked ten hours a day, seven days a week. They were all carefully screened to make sure that their world view agreed with the conservative world view held by President Reagan. Writing Sherborne International! Speech writer Peggy Noonan, for example, was considered a liberal because she had written for Dan Rather at CBS. During her interview for research thinking, the Reagan speech writing job she had been asked to produce everything that she had ever written. The speech writers wrote all the Reagan speeches and remarks, except in rare circumstances. Reagan would have active input into great writing School, the drafts of the on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas), speeches prepared for him, but other than this input he basically read whatever was given to him by the Communications Office. How To Brooke College! The President wrote very few of his speeches. This is why the research on critical thinking The University of South (Navitas), political leaning of the speech writers was so closely checked before they were hired. Their political beliefs had to agree with Reagan’s.

Unlike most other Presidents, Reagan very rarely met with his speech writers. Like with other departments, Reagan used hands-off management to run the speech writers office. There was a period after Noonan arrived that Reagan did not meet with the College, speech writers for of South (Navitas), over a year. The process for producing a finished Reagan speech was as follows: Usually one or two weeks before a speech a speech would be assigned to one speech writer and one researcher. Speech topics were given randomly to writers and researchers.

There were no specialists. Each writer would be expected to write on any subject. Starting Appleby! Some speeches were given longer lead times such as a State of the Union address which might have a lead time of up to a year. The researcher would contact all the research on critical thinking Australia, experts from the various departments that might be affected by great School, the speech. On Critical Thinking The University (Navitas)! In a foreign policy speech, for example, State, Defense, and NSC would be contacted for ideas, and for direction about essay writing Sidcot School what points they would like to research The University (Navitas), make in the speech. In a given speech 25-30 people and departments would have oversight and input over a Reagan speech. The researcher would collect all the pertinent facts for the speech from a reference library in the office, and from experts in each affected department. These facts would be passed to the writer. The writer would then begin the long process of writing the starting, speech. Thinking The University! It would usually go through about five drafts and then go to the staffing stage where experts in the various departments would check it, and provide input. This was the period when according to journal review Les Roches Jin Jiang International Management, Noonan it was time to duck.

The phone would ring and all the departments involved would phone to complain, demand changes, or present drafts prepared by speech writers in The University of South their department. Depending on the importance of the speech and the number of departments with connections to the speech topic, a speech could go through as many as 30 drafts. One of the main staffing inputs in checking the draft of a speech came from the research department. Write An Essay Brooke House! They performed a word by word check of the accuracy of the facts in the speech. This system had been copied from Time magazine which used the same process for its writers.

Above every word except the and on critical thinking of South Australia (Navitas) a there would be a mark to show that the word had been checked for essay writing, accuracy. Research On Critical Thinking The University Of South Australia (Navitas)! In the how to write an essay conclusion Brooke College, margins of the on critical The University (Navitas), speech the researchers would write in how to become a critical footnotes for major points of thinking The University Australia, fact in each line. Julie cave, a researcher, gave an example of how the how to write an essay Brooke, checking was done. If there was a line in a speech which said, Good morning, Mr. On Critical The University Australia (Navitas)! Smith, it’s good to be back in become thinker International Peoria, it would be checked as follows. A) Good morning- researcher would check if the research on critical thinking The University Australia (Navitas), speech was being given in the morning. Starting A Persuasive Essay Appleby! A footnote of the thinking Australia (Navitas), time of the speech might be in the margin. B) Mr. Smith - is International it Smith or Smyth? C) Check of the word back- researcher would check to make sure the President has been in Peoria before. This previous visit would be footnoted in the margin.

D) Peoria- researcher would check to make sure the thinking The University of South Australia, speech is in Peoria. The lawyers for the President would review the speech for legal items, and public liaison checked for how to become a critical thinker Hult School, problems they envisioned by its delivery. One of the last people to research on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas), sign off on the speech would be President Reagan. He would usually see the speech a day or two before it’s delivery. After his changes were made the speech would be signed off by the Deputy Chief of Staff. The speech copy would then be typed up. At this point President Reagan would block off the speech copy showing where he planned to Polimoda, pause, and where he planned to emphasize a word or phrase. He also made last minute hand-written changes which were made up to minutes before the speech. Finally, and most importantly, if Reagan wished to add or change part of the speech he could and did change the speech as he was giving it.

On one occasion he threw out the research on critical Australia, speech at the last moment and talked off the top of his head. This change got him in trouble, and usually wasn’t encouraged. The outline of how the Reagan speeches were put together, shows that the Reagan administration took great efforts to make sure that the speeches followed a careful systematic plan of action. In light of these strict guidelines many UFO references were still found in Reagan speeches and comments. The question is why they were there. The first series of essay Appleby College, alien comments made by research on critical of South (Navitas), President Reagan came during the November 1985 Geneva Summit between Ronald Reagan and U.S.S.R. General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev. During a series of impromptu toasts on November 19, President Reagan began his toast by discussing an invasion of aliens approaching on Halley’s Comet. Great Essay! A Memorandum of Conversation from the United States Department of State recorded Reagan’s comment. Reagan said that while the on critical The University Australia, General Secretary was speaking, he had been thinking of various problems being discussed at the talks. He said that previous to the General Secretary’s remarks, he had been telling Foreign Minister Shevardnadze (who was sitting to the President’s right) that if the people of the world were to find out academic article writing, that there was some alien life form that was going to attack the Earth approaching on Halley’s Comet, then that knowledge would unite all the peoples of the world.

Further, the President observed that General Secretary Gorbachev had cited a Biblical quotation,and the President is also alluding to the Bible, pointed out that Acts 16 refers to the fact that we are all of one blood regardless of The University of South Australia (Navitas), where we live on the Earth, and we should never forget that. In reviewing the remark made during the Geneva toast, it is writing Polimoda important to keep in thinking of South (Navitas) mind that President Reagan was a very religious man who believed that aliens were visiting the Earth. He not only believed that aliens might be invading the Earth, but that the Bible supported this world view. To the chagrin of journal review articles Les Roches International Hotel Management College, his White House handlers, Reagan also spoke often of Armageddon. Research Thinking The University Of South Australia! He believed that the signs showed it was near. Therefore, aliens, Armageddon, and a single Earth race facing the invasion, were all part of a divine plan in write House College Ronald Reagan’s mind. The speech writer’s files at the Reagan library show no mention of this toast. It is therefore safe to assume that this alien invasion remark in the toast was an ad-lib comment by thinking The University of South (Navitas), the President. The same would hold true for the alien invasion remark made to Shevardnadze.

They were not, as some have espoused, carefully drafted attempt by the White House or some MJ-12 type group to lead or mislead the great writing School, public. There was a third mention of the alien invasion hypothesis made at the Geneva Summit. It was made by Reagan to Gorbachev during the five hours of personal conversations that the two leaders conducted while in Geneva. The Memorandums of research Australia (Navitas), Conversation from the Summit do not mention the remark, but it is evident from the number of pages in the NSC file that not everything in journal review articles Jin Jiang Management College the five hours of conversations was recorded. The mention of the alien invasion remark to Gorbachev was made public by Reagan himself in on critical thinking Australia (Navitas) a speech that President Reagan made shortly after arriving back in the U.S. Great Essay Sidcot School! from the summit. On December 4, 1985, Ronald Reagan made a speech at Fallston High School, Harford County, Maryland. The school was located in a strong Republican riding which voted four to one for research on critical thinking, the President. The school had the highest attendance rate (96.2%0, lowest retention rate (loses the fewest number of write College, students per year), and the lowest drop out research on critical, rate (less than 1%) in articles Les Roches Jin Jiang International Hotel College the country. The school had 1,470 students and 100 full-time staff.

During the speech President Reagan reflected on thinking of South his meeting with Gorbachev in Geneva two weeks before. He spent much of the articles Les Roches Hotel Management, speech talking about the exchange of research thinking The University Australia, scholars, scientists, and write government officials between the research on critical (Navitas), U.S.A. and journal Jin Jiang International Hotel the U.S.S.R. that he and Gorbachev had discussed. These exchanges would allow the citizens of the two countries to on critical thinking of South Australia (Navitas), get to know each other without the government getting in the way. This would allow the writing and essay, people of the on critical The University of South Australia, world to know we are all part of one world. At the very end of the how to write an essay Brooke House, speech, Reagan stated that during five hours of private conversations with Gorbachev in Geneva, he had brought up the alien scenario: I couldn’t help but - when you stop to think that we’re all God’s children, wherever we live in the world, I couldn’t help but say to research on critical Australia, him (Gorbachev) just how easy his task and mine might be if suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species from Sherborne, another planet outside in the universe. We’d forget all the research thinking The University of South Australia, little local differences that we have between our countries and we would find out article, once and for all that we really are all human beings here on this Earth together. Well I guess we can wait for some alien race to come down and threaten us, but I think that between us we can bring about research The University of South that realization.

A review of the speech writer files from the Fallston speech show that the alien invasion reference was not in the drafts of the speech nor in the speech copy. Reagan had simply added his recollection of his alien invasion comment to Gorbachev while he was speaking. Following the speech there was a question and answer session in one of the and essay, school’s classrooms. After the The University of South Australia (Navitas), alien invasion remark such an event was probably a nightmare for the Reagan’s handlers. The problem with a question and answer is, it would allow for some student doing a UFO project for a science fair to start a chain of alien questions for his UFO science project which could really cause trouble. High school audiences were the how to conclusion House College, group that those around Reagan feared the most. In fact, just prior to the alien invasion speech at research Australia Fallston High School Mike Deaver had vetoed a Q and A with another high school on the theory that Reagan would be ‘too loose’ and speak too freely. Writing Polimoda! Former White House aide Judi Buckelew summed up the White House fear of high school students: The staff was always trying to keep him away from these high school groups that would come in to have their pictures taken, because he would stand around and answer all their questions, saying all kinds of things. The staff would literally tug him away from these kids.

The fears of the Reagan handlers about the research The University Australia (Navitas), Fallston question and answer session were well founded. President Reagan was asked a question was asked how the President felt about SDI and how to a critical Hult Business School the nuclear arms race, and how they affect the on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas), billions of great essay writing Sidcot School, people in the world. Reagan took the opportunity to talk about President Lincoln’s ghost. I have come to understand very much why Abraham Lincoln once said that he had been driven to his knees many times because he had no other place to go. As I say, I’ve come to understand very much what Mr. Lincoln meant. He’s supposed to research on critical, be around the White House, you know, now and then.

The March 4, 1985 alien comments to Fallston High School did not make big headlines but they did produce a reply from Gorbachev. Whether inspired through his conversations with President Reagan, or through information provided by his own intelligence people, Gorbachev appeared to have his own interest in UFOs. On February 16, 1987, in an important speech, at a conference at Grand Kremlin Palace in Moscow on the Survival of Humanity, Gorbachev appeared to respond to President Reagan: At our meeting in Geneva, the U.S. President said that if the earth faced an invasion by extraterrestrials, the United states and the Soviet Union would join forces to repel such an invasion. I shall not dispute the hypothesis, although I think it’s early yet to worry about how to conclusion House such an intrusion. On Critical Thinking (Navitas)! It is much more important to and essay Sherborne, think about the problems that have entered in our common home.

In May 1990, after Reagan had left office, and shortly before the fall of the Soviet Union Gorbachev made a second more direct statement about on critical thinking The University Australia (Navitas) UFOs.The phenomenon of UFOs does exist, he stated, and it must be treated seriously. Not to be outdone by Gorbachev raising the issue of the invading aliens in the Kremlin, rather than in writing a high school, Reagan brought up the invading aliens again. This time he did it in front of the research on critical The University Australia (Navitas), United Nations General Assembly. Toward the Sidcot School, end of research on critical thinking of South, his speech to how to conclusion House, the Forty-second general assembly of the United Nations on September 21, 1987 , Reagan said; In our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the The University of South Australia, members of writing, humanity. Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from thinking The University (Navitas), outside of this world.

And yet I ask - is not an alien force already among us? In the draft to the United Nations speech, Reagan requested that the alien invasion piece be added. Great Essay Writing School! In response to a September 17, 1987 note from Rhett Dawson, asistant to the President, Reagan made a hand-written request for on critical thinking The University, the inclusion of my fantasy. Review Articles Jin Jiang Hotel College! (the alien invasion remark tht has become so famous) The next day Speechwriter to the President, Clark S. Judge wrote a memo to President Reagan stating, Your fantasy is included. Please see Page 16, paragraph at the top of the page. Later in the same month Reagan talked once more about the alien threat. This time he broached the subject for the second time with Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze while Shevardnadze’s was in Washington to sign the The University, INF Treaty on September 15, 1987.

According to the New republic magazine who reported the starting a persuasive essay Appleby College, story: Near the end of his lunch with Shevardnadze Reagan wondered aloud what would happen if the world was faced with an ‘alien threat’ from outer space. ‘Don’t you think the United States and the Soviet Union would be together Reagan asked? Shevardnadze said yes, absolutely. And we wouldn’t need our defense ministers to meet. Reagan’s fourth and final alien invasion reference was made on research May 4, 1988. It was the how to become Hult International Business School, day after Donald Regan, the former Reagan Chief of on critical thinking The University of South, staff revealed Virtually every move and decision the Reagans made during my time as White House Chief of Staff was cleared in advance with a woman in essay College San Francisco who drew up horoscopes to make sure the planets were in a favorable alignment for the enterprise. Reagan made his alien reference in on critical thinking Australia (Navitas) a question and answer period following a speech to the National Strategy Forum in the Chicago Palmer House Hotel.

It was dubbed the space invader speech by the media, and was written up in media stories as only a sidelight to the astrology revelations that had broken the day before. Significantly, the statement was made in response to Business School, the question - What do you consider to be the most important need in (Navitas) International Relations? Reagan replied: I’ve often wondered. what if all of us in how to become thinker Hult International School the world discovered that we were threatened by an outer - a power from outer space, from another planet. Wouldn’t we all of a sudden find that we didn’t have any differences between us at all, we were all human beings, citizens of the world, and wouldn’t we come together to fight that particular threat. The number of times Reagan brought up the alien threat seemed to mean something more than just a passing thought of the possible existence of extraterrestrials. Dr. Research The University Of South! Scott Jones, an aid to Senator Claiborne Pell at the time, and a person who was doing work for how to thinker International, the Foreign relations Committee in the Soviet Union, saw significance in Reagan statements.

Looking carefully at research on critical The University (Navitas) Reagan's assumptions, said Jones, they tell us much about the a persuasive Appleby College, man and about possible government policy on thinking (Navitas) the subject. The most important assumption is that there is become thinker a ‘threat’ to the world. Explicitly it is an ‘alien’ threat, from some ‘other species,’ not human. This was the president of the research on critical thinking The University of South (Navitas), United States speaking publicly for the record, and the subject was confirmed by another head of state. Because it was repeated three times over a period of nearly two years, it has the earmarks of an official statement. Very few papers anywhere covered the strange alien invasion exchange between Reagan and Gorbachev. A reason for this was put forward by Dr. Journal Review Management College! Scott Jones.

The short answer is research on critical thinking Australia (Navitas) that the press has effectively been taken out of the loop by the success of a counterintelligence program targeted against School, the American public and the press. The government wants no restrictions on how it attempts to handle what we are calling UFO phenomena. One of the few reporters to pick up on the alien invasion remarks was Billy Cox, a reporter for Florida today. He wrote the White House asking for an explanation, but did not receive a reply. Receiving no reply, Billy Cox had asked this author why the evidence for UFOs always seemed to fall away under examination. On Critical The University Of South (Navitas)! The answer is provided by Dr. Scott Jones, who had studied the thinker Hult International School, Reagan remarks while employed as an assistant to Senator Claiborne Pell. He stated: To get this freedom of The University of South, action, a clamp of secrecy and stealth intimidation of the press has been employed. The program has been so successful against the press, that it doesn't even recognize the wound.

The process apparently was to stage a number of UFO events, get the press charging to the bait and then with fanfare show that it was either a hoax or misinterpretation of natural phenomena. When print editors hear:UFO, UFO, we get the journal review Les Roches Jin Jiang Management College, same response from them that the village finally gave the young sheep herder who cried Wolf too many times. I challenged Cox as a reporter to step up and ask the President directly, rather than the commonly posed reporter questions as what type of dishes does Nancy Reagan buy for research The University of South Australia (Navitas), the White House. I told him that reporters like him had the opportunity. People like myself do not have a chance to get close to the President to ask.

Moreover, Reagan would be the ideal person to International School, ask. If any President were to hesitate, or better yet, actually answer the question honestly - it was Reagan. Billy Cox agreed that given the chance he would ask. On August 5, a few months later Billy Cox learned that he might actually get to ask President Reagan the on critical The University of South Australia (Navitas), alien question face to face. Cox was to receive a journalism award at the American Legion convention in Louisville in how to become a critical thinker Hult International early September. The presidential campaigners usually attended, because every campaigner wanted the veteran vote. This would mean that George Bush would be there as well. George Bush had already gone on the record saying he would release all the UFO information.

It’s a long shot, wrote Cox, but I may get to meet George Bush. Wonder what I should ask him. Research The University Of South Australia (Navitas)! Unfortunately Cox did not get to approach either Reagan or Bush. How To Become Thinker Hult International Business School! By this time the Republicans had learned that the less open exposure the GOP candidate had - the research (Navitas), better. Journal Review Articles Les Roches Jin Jiang! Music was started the minute the Bush speech was over, and neither Bush nor Reagan was taking questions. The White House presidential aides had learned to do this to protect Reagan, and Reagan from himself. Research On Critical The University! It was common practice to start up the engines of the and essay Sherborne, helicopter on the White House lawn just as Reagan exited. In this way Reagan couldn’t hear the questions being yelled by on critical Australia (Navitas), reporters, and the government security people would be spared any more alien invasion remarks. Reagan aides tried to institute a new rule banning questions during daily photo opportunities. The White House Press office sometimes even cleaned up his oral meanderings before a text was released for public consumption. This practice had to be cut out and essay, when the writers were caught altering an interview Reagan had given with the Wall Street Journal.

In this interview, done in 1985, Reagan began to talk about thoughts he had earlier in the morning about Armageddon, and research on critical of South (Navitas) how many theologians believed the prophecies were coming together. This idea of the write an essay House College, coming Armageddon being spoken of by a leader with his finger on on critical of South the nuclear button was too much for the White House. When the White House transcripts of the become Hult School, interview were released the references to Armageddon were gone. The University! The Wall Street Journal exposed the omission, and Sidcot the White House publicity people scrambled to explain that the writers had accidentally omitted the references to Armegeddon Reagan had made. Ronald Reagan for those around him, was like a time bomb set to research on critical Australia (Navitas), go off. The scariest part was there was no clock on this bomb. It could go off at any time. Donald Regan, Reagan Chief of Staff, summed up the White House fear of what Reagan might say. Reagan said, the goddamnedest things would come out of him. As the great essay writing Sidcot School, Reagan’s administration came to a close, most UFO researchers were aware of the alien invasion remarks that had been made by Reagan in many speeches. The UFO Cover-up: Live TV special was aired in October just before the election.

It dealt with a lot of rumors that were rattling around in the UFO community. One rumor that they failed to deal with was one about Ronald Reagan appearing on research The University of South (Navitas) TV with a live alien. This event was supposed to occur after the election when Reagan, the great fan of the world of UFOs would not have to worry about great effecting the election, or his own survival as President. The rumor stated that the alien would be a grey, but no one was sure if it would be a grey with grey eyes or one with yellow eyes with slits. The appearance with the on critical of South, live alien and Reagan never took place. Bush took office and the world continued on. There still was no proof of the extraterrestrial presence. The UFO security handlers had survived President Reagan. The UFO phenomena, however, did not disappear. The sightings continued around the journal Les Roches International Hotel Management, world, and new rumored stories of the cover-up led by an MJ-12 type group surfaced on a regular basis.

The Bush presidency held great hopes for the UFO community as Bush had been the former Director of Central Intelligence. Reagan seemed to have made talking about aliens acceptable. Many researchers felt Bush would bring disclosure.

Best Custom Academic Essay Writing Help & Writing Services UK Online -
Diploma of Computing & IT Studies - Eynesbury - Navitas

The Right Format for an Easy-to-Sign Proposal. Choosing the right writing format for on critical The University Australia (Navitas) a business proposal can be quite challenging. You have to an essay, get it right the first time, so it can be understandably nerve-wracking to try to put together a cohesive business proposal that is also in the correct format for optimal readability. Writing a business proposal is on critical thinking of South Australia further complicated by a critical thinker Hult School, the fact that it is an research thinking of South, exercise not only in writing, but also in editing, layout, and design – as well as a fully-involved sales process, on top of it all! The format you choose can greatly affect how your reader interprets your proposal. This means that you will want to give great consideration to all the elements of your proposal’s format before tendering it to journal review International Hotel College, your prospective customer.

Your business depends on research on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas), the effectiveness of your proposals, so the School last thing you want is to let bad format choices get in the way. Fortunately, there are some best practices you can keep in mind when it comes to choosing a winning writing format. We have discussed writing winning proposals quite a bit around these parts (to say the least!), covering various aspects of planning and proposal writing at length. So this month, I thought we would take the business of writing to a discussion on a deeper level, exploring the nuts and bolts of choosing the right form and style to win, again and again. While further exploring much of what we’ve already perused in older posts, we’re honing in on some of the research of South Australia (Navitas) make-or-break elements of writing and essay Sherborne, business writing. Here’s what we’ll cover:

Implementing a sales-friendly format in proposal writing Layout and design format considerations Writing format for business proposals. Implementing a sales-friendly format in proposal writing. We’ve talked about it extensively before, but it’s always worth repeating that a business proposal is a sales tool before. With that in mind as you begin writing, your proposal should adhere to research of South Australia (Navitas), the steps in the sales process. Every sales interaction has distinct greeting, qualifying, offering, and articles, closing phases, and you likely already know that your proposal should generally follow those steps from start to finish. The Wikipedia entry for “proposal (business)” says the following: Business proposals are often a key step in the complex sales process—i.e., whenever a buyer considers more than price in a purchase. While that is true, we here at the Quote Roller HQ have a slightly different take on the way a proposal relates to on critical thinking The University Australia (Navitas), sales. We prefer to think that business proposals should follow a writing format that mirrors the well-established selling format, in how to become a critical International Business School, addition to fitting within the “complex sales process” overall.

In this way, the research (Navitas) business proposal writing both fits into your sales process, and mirrors it . You can put the sales process to academic Polimoda, work in writing your proposal, right down to the sections of the proposal itself. Consider the on critical thinking The University of South following as you plan your proposal writing: First section: Greeting Second section: Qualifying Third section: Offering Fourth section: Closing. Take a look at one of our sample proposals and you’re likely to notice that it contains a separate section that addresses each part of the sales process – even if it doesn’t appear to do so obviously, at first glance. A winning proposal follows a writing format that compartmentalizes each step of the sales process. There’s nothing to be afraid of when it comes to choosing the sequence of the sections in your proposal writing. If you know sales, you automatically know the basic format for writing a winning business proposal. How To An Essay Conclusion! It’s easy to keep your proposal on-track, just by following the well-established sales format in your proposal writing. Give the reader a chance to respond. One thing you’ll want to do differently from most real-world sales processes is to The University Australia, offer the customer an how to an essay conclusion Brooke House, opportunity to respond directly to your business on every page, and thus at every step in the sales process. Whether you opt for research on critical of South Australia a contact form, a simple hyper-linked button (connected to writing Sidcot, your email), or allow them to annotate right there in your Quote Roller web-based proposal, you want to give the reader the ability to ask a question on each page of your proposal.

Think of landing pages on research of South (Navitas), modern websites – there’s a way to get in contact with the articles Les Roches Jin Jiang business on every page. Your business will benefit from adhering to the same format in research on critical (Navitas), your proposal writing efforts, since the same logic applies in any text-based sales process in the digital space. Journal Review Les Roches Jin Jiang International Hotel College! There is research of South Australia (Navitas) also support for the idea that, in general, more landing pages equate to more sales. The pages of your proposal are not inbound landing pages, but there are certain corollaries, especially when it comes to offering contact buttons in-page. When you offer a contact point on every page of your proposal, you open up your proposal to more chances to Les Roches Jin Jiang International Hotel Management College, be accepted. This keeps the sales process involved in the proposal interactive, allowing for two-way communication. Speaking of free proposal templates, please note that we’ve got more than 35 sector-specific templates to help you get started in the right direction when crafting proposals. If you check out our samples, you’ll start to see a few trends emerge.

While our various templates do not follow a rigid format — wedding planning is of South very different from construction, web design quite different from cleaning services – they all have a lot in common, while adapting to suit various specific types of businesses. Here are a few key points to review articles Jin Jiang Management College, consider during proposal writing: 10 -12 point fonts are used (plus larger headings) Funky or non-standard fonts are avoided (if you decide to send it the research on critical thinking The University (Navitas) old school Word doc way, imagine if your client can’t read it at starting essay Appleby, all because they don’t have that font?) Sub-heading are bolded Each page has its own sub-title. Of course, do note that Quote Roller can automate all the textual formatting for you, allowing you to focus on the actual sales message in on critical thinking of South Australia (Navitas), your writing. It’s like with your C.V./resume. Have you ever opened it on different computers and you get irritated that the formatting you spent so much time on looks like a disaster? If you send it as an online doc or PDF, it doesn’t distort. You want the same thing for your business proposals. Make your proposal dynamic memorable with multimedia formatting. Proposal writing should follow a document-like design format, but that does not mean that you cannot dress up your proposals, so long as you do so tastefully . One of the great things about writing and sharing proposals in a digital format is that you can incorporate mixed media, like video and HTML, in interesting and engaging ways. How To Become Thinker Business! While it’s tempting to turn your proposal into a multimedia extravaganza, a little restraint is probably the best recipe for success.

If you would like to integrate mixed media into your proposal, keep the following in mind: Media should be supported by text Media elements should be limited to one per on critical thinking of South Australia (Navitas), section of the how to a critical thinker International proposal If your first page is a letter, don’t use any media. Mixed media can really fix up a drab proposal, but you don’t want to ignore the research The University of South Australia (Navitas) time-honored usefulness of images. Images are a great way to convey an idea succinctly in a proposal. Here are some design considerations for use in Sherborne International, business proposals:

Support images with captions (ideally, action captions) Choose images that are memorable – humans use visuals to on critical thinking of South Australia (Navitas), help them remember Favor relevant graphs and flowcharts over generic images (as in clip art) If you use a third-party infographic, as we all do these days, be sure to give credit where credit is starting a persuasive essay College due – cite your sources If you work in some sort of creative field, use images or video wisely to show off your work (A photo really says more than a thousand words of boring proposal text.) If you work in research thinking The University of South (Navitas), any type of service, a video testimonial from how to become a critical International Business a satisfied customer is a good way to offer your company credibility And if you sell a something — especially a pretty one — feel free to (Navitas), integrate the photos in academic, with your pricing catalog. No matter what type of media you opt to add to your proposal, you want to make sure it both supports and is supported by the message you are trying to convey to your audience and the best way to do that is with thoughtful formatting. Writing format for business proposals. We’ve touched on the topic of the on critical thinking of South Australia (Navitas) sales writing format, itself, in the past, but here are a few detailed ideas to help take your proposal writing to great essay, the next level. Since every aspect of on critical of South (Navitas), writing the proposal matters, right down to starting a persuasive essay, the tone and verbiage used in writing the research on critical thinking The University Australia proposal, you’ll want to make sure you’re using a winning format when you write your next business proposal. KISS is the writer’s code: Keep It Simple, Stupid. A business proposal is not place for long-form prose.

Concision trumps all when it comes to how to become Hult International Business School, writing business proposals. Research On Critical Thinking Of South Australia! For me, the “bible” of writing in article, a sales-friendly format has always been Claude C. On Critical Thinking The University Of South (Navitas)! Hopkins’ Scientific Advertising , though there are many other great resources out review Les Roches Jin Jiang Hotel Management College there that tell much the same story. In short, as any great copy writer would tell you, writings intended to sell – or in our world, to get a deal signed – should be free from superfluous language and research on critical The University, should speak directly to the actions you would like the customer to take. Sidcot School! The best format for your proposal, as Hopkins and others will tell you, is a simple one which is able to be understood by on critical thinking of South Australia, as many readers as possible. Here are some of the compositional formatting elements that work in business proposal writing: Use simple sentences as much as possible (Trust us, the long, run-ons don’t make you sound as clever as you think!) Use clear language, avoiding allusions and become thinker Hult International School, figures of speech Use short paragraphs, usually no more than three sentences. In addition to working well for sales, concise writing has the additional benefit of being easier on the reader’s eyes, which is always a plus, as it guarantees they will keep on on critical (Navitas), reading.

One of the many great takeaways from Scientific Advertising is the need to reduce word count by eliminating ineffectual adjectives from write an essay conclusion House College your writing. One of my favorite passages in Hopkins’ book comes at the start of chapter seven, “Be Specific”: “Platitudes and generalities roll off the human understanding like water from a duck. They leave no impression whatever. To say, ‘Best in the world,’ ‘Lowest price in existence,’ etc. are at best simply claiming the expected. But superlatives of that sort are usually damaging. Research Thinking! They suggest looseness of Hult Business School, expression, a tendency to exaggerate, a careless truth. They lead readers to research on critical thinking The University of South (Navitas), discount all the Jin Jiang College statements that you make.” The biggest problem with the research on critical thinking of South (Navitas) use of platitudes in the context of a sales writing format, as Hopkins alludes to above, is that they compromise the element of starting essay College, trust needed in business relationships. Research (Navitas)! When a reader reaches a platitude, he or she begins to doubt what is being read, and that can spell disaster in a business proposal. You have to work hard to gain and retain trust in your proposal writing, don’t let platitudes destroy the International trust you’ve worked so hard to earn.

Choose the of South (Navitas) right (grammatical) person. One of the first choices you have to academic writing Polimoda, make when it comes to on critical Australia, writing a business proposal is that of grammatical person. Sorry to take you back to how to become a critical, composition class, but proposal writers should be aware that the concept of grammatical person is on critical thinking of South Australia described as “the relationship between the article speaker and research of South, other participants.” The rules of journal review articles Les Roches Management College, grammatical person help you to be able to choose the appropriate personal pronoun in a given sentence. Thinking The University (Navitas)! As you can imagine, grammatical person is great essay writing very important in writing a business proposal. Grammatical person has an effect on on critical thinking of South, the overall tone of a piece of writing. The use of first and second grammatical person throughout a piece of writing sets a conversational tone, which may very well be appropriate in some situations. Likewise, use of the third person tends to impart a formal tone for the reader (the use of a persuasive Appleby, third person is research thinking of South often even called “formal style” as a result). An objective, or third person, writing style is write House appropriate in many business settings. So how do you decide what format is appropriate to on critical thinking The University Australia, use in and essay Sherborne International, writing your proposal? That depends loosely on a few factors, including the of South Australia type of business you are conducting and who your recipient is. Here are a few pointers.

Reasons to use the first/second-person format: Your business is just one person (such as a freelancer), not a team of writing Sherborne International, people Your recipient is thinking Australia (Navitas) a single-person business If a conversational tone fits your business’ overall strategy/culture/ethos If your services offered are person-to-person (such as care giving, physical therapy, etc.) You have an journal Les Roches Jin Jiang International Management, established relationship with your recipient, even if an on critical The University (Navitas), organization. Reasons to use third-person format: If the recipient is a government organization If the recipient is a corporation, non-profit, or other large organization If you operate in one of the many business-to-business fields where formality is generally expected If you do not have an established relationship with the recipient (even if it is just one person) You may also find a reason to switch between grammatical persons within your proposal writing.

For example, if you choose to include a cover letter or personal statement as the introductory page, you might use first/second person throughout that page, but switch to the third person objective style for the remaining pages in the proposal. As a caveat to choosing the Jin Jiang Management College right grammatical person overall, note that the rules for personal pronouns also help readers understand when a person is being referred to versus when a business entity is being referenced. Many business proposal writers make rampant mistakes when referring to organizations. For example, “Microsoft” is always gender neutral ( it/its ), whereas “Bill Gates” always adopts the masculine personal pronouns ( he, his, him ) and can function in research on critical of South, pluralities of academic Polimoda, people ( we/us/our/they/them/theirs ). Any person can potentially constitute the addressee of the second person ( you/yours ). This is a detail that will greatly improve the overall readability of your proposal. Keep your eyes ( and theirs ) on the prize. Okay, grammar lesson over, back to business. You may be tempted to (Navitas), throw everything and the kitchen sink into your proposal writing efforts, but the best advice is to keep the readers focused on the ultimate prize of winning the bid . The foremost proposal writing tip that I have to offer is: keep it in a neat, clear format.

If you overload the proposal with anything, be it writing, images, or media, you run the risk of writing Sidcot School, having it read like a hot mess , for lack of a better term. Your proposal is meant to cause an “actionable outcome” (as is popular to say these days), so it should follow a format that is shaped around resulting in a buying action. If your proposal assumes a format that keeps your offer clear, its benefit to research thinking of South Australia (Navitas), the prospect, and makes it easy to be awarded, you’ve done your job. Impart all the singularity of purpose you can to your proposal writing and you will win more bids. Are you writing in essay Sidcot School, the right format? Writing anything can be an arduous process. Half the battle is found in understanding the research on critical The University of South Australia format you need to be working in.

When it comes to proposal writing, following a sales format is the writing and essay Sherborne International first step. Compound that sales format to a clear, concise, and grammatically correct writing format, and you will have a recipe for thinking The University of South (Navitas) success. This is a place where creative entrepreneurs and business owners can find useful information, advice, insights, tips, tools, case studies and sample library to win their next project. We help you win more deals by writing and presenting irresistible proposals. Quote Roller Inc.

More than 50+ pages of proposal creation wisdom awaits! Join our newsletter now and get instant guide on Everything You Need to Know to Get Started with Your Winning Proposal!

Write my Paper for Cheap in High Quality -
Diploma of Computing & IT Studies - Eynesbury - Navitas

20+ Professional Resume Themes for WordPress. The days of the on critical thinking The University of South, resume in the post are long gone #8212; job-hunters today are more frequently turning to journal review Les Roches College online resumes as a nice, eye-catching way to grab the attention of potential employees. With so many themes available today, it not a surprise that there are hundreds of WordPress resume themes to choose from. With an emphasis on clean and professional design, these resume themes offer an on critical, engaging way to display your work experience, education, portfolio, and skills #8212; in a persuasive essay other words, everything you need to land your dream job! Today I want to introduce you to my favorite handpicked WordPress resume themes for you to choose from. I guess it won#8217;t be easy for you to pick one as all of them look fabulous! Premium Layers -Wordpress vCard Resume Theme. Premium Layers is simple WordPress theme.

It features 8 pre-built skins in dark and light color schemes and all it will look great on any mobile device because of research thinking of South its responsive design. Portfolio section in School this theme is filterable and comes with a great looking animation effects. If you are looking for on critical The University (Navitas), a boxed design then this is worth your look as nowadays it is become thinker Hult International Business School, hard to research thinking (Navitas) find these kind of themes. It also gives you the Les Roches Jin Jiang International Hotel, ability to write about latest industry news in the blog which is included with this theme. Other features include contact form, fully integrated Google Maps, Google Font and Font Awesome icons. Promotion is a modern WordPress vCard theme. Its clean design allows the visitor to focus on your resume.

It is retina ready and comes with unlimited color options. Almost all of the elements in this theme are animated. If you are a creative person then you will appreciate video background and full background photo slider options. It is research on critical The University (Navitas), also ready to be translated in any language you want. If you#8217;re looking to stand out from the crowd, look no further than ResumeX, which has all you need to build a complete online resume. The theme allows you to academic article writing Polimoda create stunning one-page resumes, with dedicated sections for research on critical The University Australia, a full page slider, about me, skills, education, portfolio, map, social media, and writing and essay Sherborne, even a blog. You can showcase your work experience through its nice dedicated timeline module.

Testimonials are organized in a nice slider. Adding each section to the one-page design is as simple as hitting an on critical Australia, on/off button from the admin panel, and an intuitive drag-and-drop interface makes it easy to reorder your page. The theme is mobile friendly, as well as supporting an how to become a critical thinker Hult Business, endless number of research on critical of South Australia (Navitas) color options and over 600 Google fonts. BookCard WP is a beautiful 3D animated WordPress vCard theme. It lets you create an interactive, fold-out resume, which potential clients can open up #8212; this is one of the most eye-catching ways of presenting your resume I#8217;ve ever seen. The theme essentially consists of a four page booklet, including a front cover. You can add employment, education, a downloadable CV, skills, services, testimonials, social media buttons, and a contact form to writing and essay Sherborne International your pages. And of course, what would be resume without portfolio, it opens with a gorgeous animation and research thinking Australia, your work in it will look professional. The theme comes with plenty of customization options: you have countless colors, 600+ Google fonts, nine cover styles, 11 paper styles, and become a critical thinker Business School, 28 backgrounds to choose from, which allows you to on critical thinking Australia create a highly personalized cv. Personage is a stunning one-page resume theme.

At the top of the page you can include a full page image slider or background video, and review College, all of the element on the page is fully animated #8212; this makes your site feel dynamic, and that is bound to research on critical thinking of South (Navitas) impress your clients. Articles College! The theme supports endless color options, 600+ Google fonts to research thinking of South (Navitas) choose from, and a critical Hult Business, includes a light and dark skin. The theme is also mobile friendly, retina ready, and on critical thinking The University Australia (Navitas), can be translated into International, multiple languages. Profiler is a stylish resume theme. The theme is fully responsive, and research The University Australia (Navitas), supports several custom page types, including an how to write an essay conclusion House, about page, resume page, awards page, gallery page, and contact page. The theme is simple and stylish, with the anchored left-hand sidebar clearly inspired by on critical thinking, the popular Twenty Fourteen theme. You can place a set of nice social media buttons and your contact details in the sidebar, which makes it easy for your clients to writing reach you.

The Person is one of the most modern resume themes I#8217;ve seen. The University Of South (Navitas)! It lets you create professional looking resume websites with plenty of customization options to add your own flair. The links to the different sections of write an essay conclusion Brooke College your resume are positioned randomly over the top of the featured image #8212; you can upload your own image, use custom colored stripes, or a colorful pyramid. The theme supports plenty of typography choices, plus you can add your own picture or icons next to the text links. When a visitor clicks one of the links, the image expands and the relevant section of your website is displayed. This fully responsive resume theme supports a resume section (complete with animated work experience, education, and skills), contact form, portfolio, and blog.

The Person can also be used to create an online shop, with the Easy Digital Downloads eCommerce plugin integrated with the theme. If you want to keep it simple, check out the LETA theme, a stylish vCard theme for on critical Australia (Navitas), WordPress. The theme is fully responsive, and comes with over 600 Google fonts, unlimited colors, and over 20 background patterns. The theme allows you to build a vCard with five separate tabs. Journal Review Articles Les Roches International College! As well as a main details tab (the homepage), you can also add a resume (complete with skills, work experience, and education details), portfolio, blog, and a contact tab which includes a contact form and on critical thinking of South Australia, map. Visitors can also download a copy of your CV by journal review International College, hitting a simple button. Research On Critical (Navitas)! If you want to create a resume page without all the fluff, LETA could be the theme for you. If versatility is important to you, I would highly recommend the modern, stylish Clean Slide theme. The theme can be used is built for personal or corporate use, and how to International School, comes with three homepage style options.

All three look great, and the theme is also big on customization options #8212; it comes with 30 color presets, 15 background patterns, and 50+ vCard patterns. Thinking The University (Navitas)! The theme also includes 30 shortcodes to writing International help you create the different sections of your resume. You can add buttons, latest projects, team members, skills, and thinking The University Australia (Navitas), much more. Many shortcode elements also include stylish animations to writing Polimoda make your website feel more interactive. The theme is fully responsive and includes a nice portfolio section, too. Me theme, a stunning, minimal, one-page WordPress theme. Because it uses an elegant minimalist design, the customization options are more limited #8212; however this doesn#8217;t feel like a limitation. You are still able to choose from over thinking The University (Navitas) 70 fonts, font size, and font color. You can also set the writing, background color and menu color if the default styles don#8217;t suit you. The theme supports a number of sections: about, services, portfolio, and contact form.

It#8217;s fully responsive and comes with comprehensive documentation and tutorials to help you get the The University, most from it. Vertica is a simple and well-made resume theme perfect for a personal resume. It is a one-page theme and it allows you to show add modules like portfolio, skills, experience, contact form, profile, and interests. It is writing and essay Sherborne, fully responsive and will look good even on high-resolution screens as it is retina ready. CeeVee is a professional vCard WordPress theme built for research on critical, those who love great design. If you are a creative person then this theme is made for starting a persuasive essay Appleby, you. Research Thinking The University Of South Australia (Navitas)! It is a colorful theme with a unique layout which looks just amazing. CeeVee comes in light and dark versions. When you are looking for a resume theme you most likely don#8217;t need a lot of features. In most cases it has to be a simple and clean theme which gives most emphasis on the content and Robert Smith theme does just that.

You can configure it in one-page and multi-page website. A Critical Thinker School! This theme is retina ready meaning all its graphical elements are made ultra sharp so they look good on HD screens. You never know from The University (Navitas), what kind of device visitors will open your website and academic article, nowadays there are so many resolution screens available so its good to know that this theme is also responsive. Its layout will adjust automatically to the screen size on thinking The University of South (Navitas) which its viewed. Robert Smith theme is Sherborne International, built to highlight your professional skills, experience and education. You can also add your portfolio and testimonials from previous clients. If you don#8217;t like the font used on demo website you can always choose from on critical of South (Navitas), more than 600 google fonts via theme options. This single page resume and personal portfolio theme is best suitable for designers, developers and freelancers.

First impressions matter and although Genio is minimal theme it keeps professional look and your work surely will not leave bad impression to your potential employers or clients. It has 6 different skins and 4 home page layouts. Via live preview customizer you can change background image of the Hult, header, customize the widgets, change fonts, colors, and do a lot more. Thinking Australia! It should be mentioned that Genio is responsive which makes your website compatible with any mobile device. Essay Writing! I hope you found this collection of the best WordPress CV themes useful. If you want to separate yourself and stand out from the crowd #8212; not to The University (Navitas) mention showing off your web design skills #8212; building an article Polimoda, online resume is a great way to grab the attention of research The University Australia (Navitas) employers and potential clients. If you#8217;re still yet to land your dream job, give it a go! What is your favorite WordPress resume theme? Let us know in the comments section below! We never spam. Subscribe to receive inspiration, news, and ideas in your inbox.

Shaun Quarton is a freelance blogger from the UK, with a passion for academic article Polimoda, online entrepreneurship, content marketing, and all things WordPress. Disclosure: Some of the links included in this post are affiliate links, which means that if you click on the link and purchase the item, we may receive an research on critical The University of South, affiliate commission. All opinions on this page are our own and we don't receive payments for positive reviews. Guide to Getting Started with WordPress. Twelve free easy-to-follow blog posts covering all the essay writing Sidcot, essentials every WordPress user needs to know.

We never spam. Research Thinking The University Of South Australia (Navitas)! Subscribe to how to a critical receive inspiration, news, and ideas in your inbox. 20+ Best WordPress Directory Themes. Plugins and Workflows for Getting the on critical thinking of South, Most Out of the WordPress Dashboard. I delight in, lead to I found just what I was looking for. You#8217;ve ended my four day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a nice day. ©2016 Cohhe Themes. All Rights Reserved.

All our themes are GPL.

Custom Academic Paper Writing Services -
The University of Adelaide College: Pathway to the University of

contract essay law As I was born a citizen of a free State, and a member of the Sovereign, I feel that, however feeble the influence my voice can have on on critical thinking The University, public affairs, the right of voting on them makes it my duty to study them: and I am happy, when I reflect upon governments, to great essay writing, find my inquiries always furnish me with new reasons for loving that of my own country. M AN is born free; and everywhere he is in chains. One thinks himself the thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas) master of others, and still remains a greater slave than they. How did this change come about? I do not know. An Essay Brooke College? What can make it legitimate?

That question I think I can answer. If I took into account only force, and the effects derived from it, I should say: As long as a people is compelled to obey, and obeys, it does well; as soon as it can shake off the yoke, and shakes it off, it does still better; for, regaining its liberty by the same right as took it away, either it is justified in resuming it, or there was no justification for those who took it away. But the social order is a sacred right which is the basis of all other rights. Nevertheless, this right does not come from nature, and must therefore be founded on conventions. Before coming to research thinking, that, I have to prove what I have just asserted. T HE most ancient of all societies, and the only one that is essay writing Sidcot natural, is the family: and research on critical The University of South (Navitas), even so the children remain attached to the father only International, so long as they need him for their preservation. As soon as this need ceases, the natural bond is dissolved. The children, released from the obedience they owed to the father, and the father, released from the care he owed his children, return equally to independence.

If they remain united, they continue so no longer naturally, but voluntarily; and the family itself is research on critical The University Australia then maintained only by convention. This common liberty results from the nature of man. His first law is to provide for his own preservation, his first cares are those which he owes to himself; and, as soon as he reaches years of discretion, he is the sole judge of the become a critical International proper means of research thinking of South Australia (Navitas) preserving himself, and consequently becomes his own master. The family then may be called the first model of how to become Hult Business School political societies: the ruler corresponds to the father, and the people to the children; and research thinking The University of South, all, being born free and equal, alienate their liberty only for their own advantage. The whole difference is that, in the family, the love of the father for his children repays him for the care he takes of them, while, in the State, the write an essay Brooke House College pleasure of (Navitas) commanding takes the place of the love which the starting a persuasive chief cannot have for on critical thinking The University of South the peoples under him. Grotius denies that all human power is established in favour of the governed, and quotes slavery as an example. Journal Articles Les Roches International? His usual method of reasoning is research The University Australia (Navitas) constantly to establish right by how to, fact. 1 It would be possible to employ a more logical method, but none could be more favourable to tyrants. It is then, according to Grotius, doubtful whether the human race belongs to a hundred men, or that hundred men to research on critical The University, the human race: and, throughout his book, he seems to incline to the former alternative, which is also the view of Hobbes. On this showing, the human species is divided into great writing School so many herds of cattle, each with its ruler, who keeps guard over them for the purpose of research thinking of South Australia devouring them. As a shepherd is of a nature superior to that of his flock, the shepherds of an essay conclusion Brooke men, i.e., their rulers, are of a nature superior to that of the peoples under them.

Thus, Philo tells us, the Emperor Caligula reasoned, concluding equally well either that kings were gods, or that men were beasts. The reasoning of Caligula agrees with that of Hobbes and Grotius. Thinking Of South? Aristotle, before any of them, had said that men are by no means equal naturally, but that some are born for slavery, and others for starting essay College dominion. Aristotle was right; but he took the effect for the cause. Nothing can be more certain than that every man born in slavery is born for slavery. Slaves lose everything in their chains, even the desire of escaping from them: they love their servitude, as the comrades of Ulysses loved their brutish condition. 2 If then there are slaves by nature, it is because there have been slaves against nature.

Force made the research of South Australia (Navitas) first slaves, and their cowardice perpetuated the review Jin Jiang International Hotel Management condition. I have said nothing of King Adam, or Emperor Noah, father of the three great monarchs who shared out the universe, like the children of Saturn, whom some scholars have recognised in them. I trust to research on critical The University of South Australia, getting due thanks for academic writing my moderation; for, being a direct descendant of one of these princes, perhaps of the research The University eldest branch, how do I know that a verification of titles might not leave me the legitimate king of the human race? In any case, there can be no doubt that Adam was sovereign of the academic article world, as Robinson Crusoe was of his island, as long as he was its only inhabitant; and this empire had the research thinking of South (Navitas) advantage that the monarch, safe on his throne, had no rebellions, wars, or conspirators to fear. T HE strongest is Jin Jiang International Hotel never strong enough to be always the master, unless he transforms strength into right, and obedience into duty. Hence the right of the strongest, which, though to all seeming meant ironically, is really laid down as a fundamental principle. On Critical Thinking The University (Navitas)? But are we never to have an explanation of this phrase? Force is a physical power, and I fail to see what moral effect it can have. To yield to force is an act of necessity, not of will #x2014; at the most, an act of prudence. Become A Critical International Business? In what sense can it be a duty? Suppose for a moment that this so-called right exists.

I maintain that the sole result is a mass of research on critical The University of South Australia inexplicable nonsense. For, if force creates right, the effect changes with the cause: every force that is greater than the first succeeds to and essay Sherborne International, its right. As soon as it is possible to disobey with impunity, disobedience is legitimate; and, the strongest being always in the right, the only thing that matters is to act so as to become the strongest. On Critical? But what kind of right is that which perishes when force fails? If we must obey perforce, there is no need to obey because we ought; and if we are not forced to obey, we are under no obligation to do so. Clearly, the word right adds nothing to academic article writing, force: in this connection, it means absolutely nothing. Obey the powers that be. On Critical Of South? If this means yield to force, it is a good precept, but superfluous: I can answer for its never being violated. All power comes from God, I admit; but so does all sickness: does that mean that we are forbidden to call in become a critical Business, the doctor? A brigand surprises me at the edge of a wood: must I not merely surrender my purse on compulsion; but, even if I could withhold it, am I in conscience bound to research on critical thinking Australia (Navitas), give it up?

For certainly the pistol he holds is also a power. Let us then admit that force does not create right, and that we are obliged to Jin Jiang Hotel Management College, obey only research on critical thinking The University of South Australia, legitimate powers. In that case, my original question recurs. S INCE no man has a natural authority over his fellow, and force creates no right, we must conclude that conventions form the basis of academic article writing Polimoda all legitimate authority among men. If an individual, says Grotius, can alienate his liberty and make himself the The University (Navitas) slave of a master, why could not a whole people do the same and make itself subject to a king? There are in this passage plenty of ambiguous words which would need explaining; but let us confine ourselves to the word alienate. To alienate is to give or to sell. Now, a man who becomes the conclusion House College slave of another does not give himself; he sells himself, at of South Australia (Navitas), the least for starting his subsistence: but for what does a people sell itself? A king is so far from research on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas) furnishing his subjects with their subsistence that he gets his own only from them; and, according to Rabelais, kings do not live on nothing. Do subjects then give their persons on condition that the king takes their goods also? I fail to see what they have left to preserve.

It will be said that the despot assures his subjects civil tranquillity. Granted; but what do they gain, if the wars his ambition brings down upon them, his insatiable avidity, and the vexatious conduct of his ministers press harder on them than their own dissensions would have done? What do they gain, if the very tranquillity they enjoy is one of their miseries? Tranquillity is academic article found also in dungeons; but is that enough to make them desirable places to on critical of South (Navitas), live in? The Greeks imprisoned in the cave of the Cyclops lived there very tranquilly, while they were awaiting their turn to be devoured. To say that a man gives himself gratuitously, is to say what is a critical thinker Hult School absurd and inconceivable; such an on critical The University of South, act is null and illegitimate, from the mere fact that he who does it is out of his mind. To say the same of a whole people is to suppose a people of madmen; and madness creates no right. Even if each man could alienate himself, he could not alienate his children: they are born men and free; their liberty belongs to them, and no one but they has the right to dispose of it. Before they come to essay writing, years of discretion, the father can, in their name, lay down conditions for their preservation and well-being, but he cannot give them irrevocably and without conditions: such a gift is contrary to the ends of nature, and research Australia (Navitas), exceeds the an essay rights of paternity. Of South? It would therefore be necessary, in order to review Jin Jiang Management College, legitimise an on critical of South Australia, arbitrary government, that in every generation the article Polimoda people should be in a position to accept or reject it; but, were this so, the government would be no longer arbitrary.

To renounce liberty is to renounce being a man, to surrender the rights of humanity and even its duties. For him who renounces everything no indemnity is possible. Such a renunciation is incompatible with man's nature; to remove all liberty from his will is to remove all morality from his acts. Finally, it is an empty and contradictory convention that sets up, on the one side, absolute authority, and, on the other, unlimited obedience. Is it not clear that we can be under no obligation to a person from whom we have the right to on critical thinking Australia (Navitas), exact everything? Does not this condition alone, in the absence of equivalence or exchange, in itself involve the nullity of the act? For what right can my slave have against me, when all that he has belongs to me, and, his right being mine, this right of mine against myself is a phrase devoid of meaning? Grotius and the rest find in war another origin for the so-called right of slavery. The victor having, as they hold, the right of killing the write an essay conclusion House vanquished, the thinking of South Australia (Navitas) latter can buy back his life at writing and essay, the price of research The University of South his liberty; and this convention is the article Polimoda more legitimate because it is to the advantage of research on critical The University Australia both parties.

But it is become thinker Hult International School clear that this supposed right to kill the on critical (Navitas) conquered is by no means deducible from the state of war. Men, from the mere fact that, while they are living in their primitive independence, they have no mutual relations stable enough to journal review articles Les Roches Hotel Management College, constitute either the state of peace or the research thinking The University Australia state of war, cannot be naturally enemies. War is constituted by a relation between things, and not between persons; and, as the state of war cannot arise out of and essay Sherborne International simple personal relations, but only out of real relations, private war, or war of man with man, can exist neither in the state of nature, where there is no constant property, nor in the social state, where everything is under the authority of the laws. Individual combats, duels and encounters, are acts which cannot constitute a state; while the private wars, authorised by the Establishments of Louis IX, King of France, and suspended by the Peace of God, are abuses of feudalism, in itself an absurd system if ever there was one, and contrary to the principles of natural right and to all good polity. War then is on critical thinking The University a relation, not between man and writing Sherborne, man, but between State and State, and individuals are enemies only research on critical thinking The University of South, accidentally, not as men, nor even as citizens, 3 but as soldiers; not as members of their country, but as its defenders. Finally, each State can have for enemies only other States, and not men; for between things disparate in nature there can be no real relation. Furthermore, this principle is in conformity with the established rules of all times and the constant practice of all civilised peoples.

Declarations of war are intimations less to Sidcot School, powers than to their subjects. The University Australia (Navitas)? The foreigner, whether king, individual, or people, who robs, kills or detains the subjects, without declaring war on the prince, is academic writing not an enemy, but a brigand. Even in real war, a just prince, while laying hands, in the enemy's country, on all that belongs to the public, respects the lives and goods of on critical thinking of South Australia (Navitas) individuals: he respects rights on which his own are founded. The object of the war being the destruction of the hostile State, the other side has a right to kill its defenders, while they are bearing arms; but as soon as they lay them down and surrender, they cease to be enemies or instruments of the enemy, and become once more merely men, whose life no one has any right to take. Sometimes it is possible to kill the article writing Polimoda State without killing a single one of research thinking The University Australia its members; and war gives no right which is not necessary to the gaining of its object.

These principles are not those of Grotius: they are not based on become Hult, the authority of poets, but derived from the nature of reality and based on reason. The right of conquest has no foundation other than the right of the strongest. If war does not give the research on critical conqueror the writing and essay International right to massacre the conquered peoples, the right to enslave them cannot be based upon a right which does not exist. No one has a right to kill an research The University (Navitas), enemy except when he cannot make him a slave, and the right to enslave him cannot therefore be derived from the starting a persuasive Appleby right to kill him. It is accordingly an unfair exchange to make him buy at the price of his liberty his life, over which the victor holds no right. Is it not clear that there is a vicious circle in founding the The University Australia right of a critical International Business School life and death on the right of slavery, and the right of slavery on the right of life and death? Even if we assume this terrible right to kill everybody, I maintain that a slave made in on critical of South (Navitas), war, or a conquered people, is under no obligation to Sherborne, a master, except to obey him as far as he is compelled to do so. By taking an equivalent for his life, the victor has not done him a favour; instead of killing him without profit, he has killed him usefully. So far then is he from acquiring over him any authority in addition to that of force, that the state of war continues to subsist between them: their mutual relation is the effect of it, and the usage of the right of war does not imply a treaty of peace. On Critical Thinking Of South Australia? A convention has indeed been made; but this convention, so far from destroying the great essay state of war, presupposes its continuance. So, from whatever aspect we regard the question, the research right of slavery is null and void, not only as being illegitimate, but also because it is absurd and meaningless.

The words slave and great writing Sidcot School, right contradict each other, and are mutually exclusive. It will always be equally foolish for a man to say to research on critical thinking of South (Navitas), a man or to become a critical Hult, a people: I make with you a convention wholly at your expense and wholly to my advantage; I shall keep it as long as I like, and you will keep it as long as I like. 5. THAT WE MUST ALWAYS GO BACK TO A FIRST CONVENTION. E VEN if I granted all that I have been refuting, the research (Navitas) friends of despotism would be no better off. There will always be a great difference between subduing a multitude and ruling a society. Even if scattered individuals were successively enslaved by one man, however numerous they might be, I still see no more than a master and his slaves, and certainly not a people and great writing Sidcot, its ruler; I see what may be termed an aggregation, but not an association; there is as yet neither public good nor body politic. The man in question, even if he has enslaved half the world, is still only an individual; his interest, apart from that of others, is still a purely private interest. If this same man comes to die, his empire, after him, remains scattered and without unity, as an oak falls and dissolves into a heap of ashes when the fire has consumed it. A people, says Grotius, can give itself to research thinking Australia, a king. Then, according to Grotius, a people is a people before it gives itself.

The gift is itself a civil act, and articles Hotel Management College, implies public deliberation. It would be better, before examining the of South (Navitas) act by which a people gives itself to a king, to examine that by which it has become a people; for this act, being necessarily prior to the other, is the true foundation of society. Indeed, if there were no prior convention, where, unless the election were unanimous, would be the obligation on the minority to submit to the choice of the majority? How have a hundred men who wish for a master the right to vote on behalf of ten who do not? The law of majority voting is itself something established by convention, and presupposes unanimity, on one occasion at least.

I SUPPOSE men to have reached the point at which the obstacles in the way of writing Sherborne their preservation in the state of nature show their power of resistance to be greater than the resources at the disposal of each individual for his maintenance in that state. That primitive condition can then subsist no longer; and the human race would perish unless it changed its manner of existence. But, as men cannot engender new forces, but only unite and direct existing ones, they have no other means of thinking The University of South (Navitas) preserving themselves than the formation, by Sidcot, aggregation, of a sum of forces great enough to thinking The University Australia, overcome the resistance. These they have to bring into articles Les Roches Hotel College play by means of a single motive power, and research The University, cause to act in concert. This sum of forces can arise only where several persons come together: but, as the force and liberty of each man are the chief instruments of his self-preservation, how can he pledge them without harming his own interests, and conclusion House, neglecting the care he owes to himself? This difficulty, in research The University (Navitas), its bearing on my present subject, may be stated in and essay, the following terms: The problem is to find a form of association which will defend and protect with the whole common force the research thinking person and goods of each associate, and in which each, while uniting himself with all, may still obey himself alone, and remain as free as before. This is the fundamental problem of which the Social Contract provides the solution. The clauses of this contract are so determined by the nature of the act that the slightest modification would make them vain and how to conclusion Brooke College, ineffective; so that, although they have perhaps never been formally set forth, they are everywhere the same and everywhere tacitly admitted and recognised, until, on the violation of the social compact, each regains his original rights and resumes his natural liberty, while losing the thinking The University of South (Navitas) conventional liberty in favour of which he renounced it.

These clauses, properly understood, may be reduced to how to Business, one #x2014; the total alienation of each associate, together with all his rights, to the whole community; for, in the first place, as each gives himself absolutely, the conditions are the same for all; and, this being so, no one has any interest in making them burdensome to others. Moreover, the alienation being without reserve, the union is as perfect as it can be, and no associate has anything more to demand: for, if the individuals retained certain rights, as there would be no common superior to decide between them and the public, each, being on one point his own judge, would ask to research on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas), be so on all; the state of nature would thus continue, and the association would necessarily become inoperative or tyrannical. Finally, each man, in giving himself to all, gives himself to writing, nobody; and as there is no associate over whom he does not acquire the same right as he yields others over himself, he gains an equivalent for everything he loses, and an increase of force for the preservation of what he has. If then we discard from the social compact what is not of its essence, we shall find that it reduces itself to the following terms: Each of us puts his person and all his power in common under the supreme direction of the of South Australia (Navitas) general will, and, in our corporate capacity, we receive each member as an indivisible part of the whole.

At once, in place of the individual personality of each contracting party, this act of association creates a moral and collective body, composed of as many members as the assembly contains votes, and receiving from this act its unity, its common identity, its life and its will. Become A Critical Business? This public person, so formed by the union of on critical thinking The University of South all other persons formerly took the how to become a critical thinker name of city , 4 and now takes that of Republic or body politic ; it is called by its members State when passive. Research Thinking? Sovereign when active, and Power when compared with others like itself. Those who are associated in it take collectively the name of people , and severally are called citizens , as sharing in the sovereign power, and essay College, subjects , as being under the laws of the State. But these terms are often confused and on critical thinking The University of South, taken one for journal review articles Les Roches Jin Jiang Hotel another: it is enough to know how to distinguish them when they are being used with precision. T HIS formula shows us that the act of association comprises a mutual undertaking between the public and the individuals, and that each individual, in of South (Navitas), making a contract, as we may say, with himself, is bound in a double capacity; as a member of the conclusion College Sovereign he is bound to the individuals, and as a member of the State to research on critical thinking of South (Navitas), the Sovereign.

But the maxim of writing International civil right, that no one is bound by undertakings made to himself, does not apply in this case; for on critical The University there is a great difference between incurring an obligation to yourself and incurring one to a whole of journal International Hotel which you form a part. Attention must further be called to the fact that public deliberation, while competent to research thinking The University Australia (Navitas), bind all the great essay School subjects to the Sovereign, because of the two different capacities in which each of them may be regarded, cannot, for the opposite reason, bind the Sovereign to itself; and that it is thinking of South consequently against the nature of the body politic for academic the Sovereign to impose on on critical of South Australia, itself a law which it cannot infringe. Being able to how to become Hult International, regard itself in only one capacity, it is in the position of an individual who makes a contract with himself; and this makes it clear that there neither is nor can be any kind of fundamental law binding on the body of the people #x2014; not even the social contract itself. This does not mean that the body politic cannot enter into undertakings with others, provided the contract is not infringed by them; for in relation to what is external to it, it becomes a simple being, an individual. But the research thinking The University of South body politic or the academic article writing Polimoda Sovereign, drawing its being wholly from the research The University of South Australia (Navitas) sanctity of the contract, can never bind itself, even to an outsider, to do anything derogatory to the original act, for Jin Jiang International Hotel Management instance, to thinking (Navitas), alienate any part of itself, or to submit to another Sovereign.

Violation of the act by which it exists would be self-annihilation; and that which is itself nothing can create nothing. As soon as this multitude is so united in starting College, one body, it is impossible to research thinking Australia, offend against one of the members without attacking the body, and still more to offend against the body without the members resenting it. Duty and interest therefore equally oblige the a persuasive Appleby two contracting parties to give each other help; and the same men should seek to combine, in their double capacity, all the advantages dependent upon that capacity. Again, the Sovereign, being formed wholly of the individuals who compose it, neither has nor can have any interest contrary to theirs; and consequently the sovereign power need give no guarantee to its subjects, because it is impossible for the body to wish to hurt all its members. We shall also see later on that it cannot hurt any in particular. The Sovereign, merely by virtue of what it is, is always what it should be. This, however, is not the case with the relation of the The University (Navitas) subjects to the Sovereign, which, despite the common interest, would have no security that they would fulfil their undertakings, unless it found means to Jin Jiang Management, assure itself of their fidelity. In fact, each individual, as a man, may have a particular will contrary or dissimilar to the general will which he has as a citizen. Research The University? His particular interest may speak to him quite differently from the write an essay Brooke College common interest: his absolute and naturally independent existence may make him look upon what he owes to the common cause as a gratuitous contribution, the loss of which will do less harm to others than the of South Australia (Navitas) payment of it is burdensome to himself; and, regarding the moral person which constitutes the academic article Polimoda State as a persona ficta , because not a man, he may wish to enjoy the rights of citizenship without being ready to fulfil the duties of a subject. The continuance of such an injustice could not but prove the undoing of the body politic.

In order then that the social compact may not be an empty formula, it tacitly includes the undertaking, which alone can give force to the rest, that whoever refuses to obey the general will shall be compelled to do so by the whole body. This means nothing less than that he will be forced to be free; for this is the condition which, by giving each citizen to on critical The University of South Australia, his country, secures him against all personal dependence. In this lies the become a critical International School key to the working of the political machine; this alone legitimises civil undertakings, which, without it, would be absurd, tyrannical, and liable to the most frightful abuses. T HE passage from the state of nature to on critical thinking The University (Navitas), the civil state produces a very remarkable change in man, by substituting justice for instinct in and essay Sherborne International, his conduct, and giving his actions the research on critical of South Australia morality they had formerly lacked. Then only, when the voice of duty takes the place of physical impulses and right of appetite, does man, who so far had considered only himself, find that he is forced to act on different principles, and to consult his reason before listening to his inclinations. Although, in this state, he deprives himself of some advantages which he got from nature, he gains in return others so great, his faculties are so stimulated and developed, his ideas so extended, his feelings so ennobled, and his whole soul so uplifted, that, did not the abuses of this new condition often degrade him below that which he left, he would be bound to bless continually the how to House College happy moment which took him from it for ever, and, instead of research thinking (Navitas) a stupid and unimaginative animal, made him an intelligent being and a man. Let us draw up the whole account in terms easily commensurable.

What man loses by the social contract is his natural liberty and an unlimited right to everything he tries to get and succeeds in essay College, getting; what he gains is civil liberty and research on critical The University of South (Navitas), the proprietorship of all he possesses. If we are to avoid mistake in weighing one against the other, we must clearly distinguish natural liberty, which is bounded only by how to Business School, the strength of the individual, from civil liberty, which is research on critical thinking The University of South limited by the general will; and a persuasive essay College, possession, which is merely the effect of force or the right of the first occupier, from on critical thinking The University (Navitas) property, which can be founded only on a positive title. We might, over and above all this, add, to what man acquires in the civil state, moral liberty, which alone makes him truly master of himself; for the mere impulse of appetite is Sherborne International slavery, while obedience to a law which we prescribe to ourselves is on critical thinking The University (Navitas) liberty. But I have already said too much on this head, and the philosophical meaning of the word liberty does not now concern us. E ACH member of the community gives himself to it, at the moment of an essay House its foundation, just as he is, with all the resources at his command, including the goods he possesses. This act does not make possession, in changing hands, change its nature, and become property in the hands of the of South Australia (Navitas) Sovereign; but, as the writing and essay Sherborne International forces of the city are incomparably greater than those of an individual, public possession is also, in fact, stronger and more irrevocable, without being any more legitimate, at any rate from the point of research thinking of South Australia (Navitas) view of how to thinker foreigners.

For the research on critical of South Australia State, in relation to its members, is master of all their goods by the social contract, which, within the State, is the basis of all rights; but, in relation to other powers, it is so only by the right of the first occupier, which it holds from its members. The right of the first occupier, though more real than the right of the strongest, becomes a real right only when the right of property has already been established. Every man has naturally a right to everything he needs; but the positive act which makes him proprietor of one thing excludes him from everything else. House? Having his share, he ought to research on critical thinking Australia, keep to it, and can have no further right against the community. This is why the right of the first occupier, which in starting a persuasive essay College, the state of nature is so weak, claims the respect of every man in civil society. In this right we are respecting not so much what belongs to research on critical thinking The University of South (Navitas), another as what does not belong to academic article writing Polimoda, ourselves. In general, to establish the right of the first occupier over research thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas), a plot of ground, the following conditions are necessary: first, the land must not yet be inhabited; secondly, a man must occupy only the amount he needs for his subsistence; and, in the third place, possession must be taken, not by an empty ceremony, but by labour and cultivation, the only sign of proprietorship that should be respected by others, in default of a legal title. In granting the right of first occupancy to necessity and labour, are we not really stretching it as far as it can go? Is it possible to leave such a right unlimited?

Is it to be enough to set foot on a plot of common ground, in order to be able to call yourself at once the master of it? Is it to be enough that a man has the starting a persuasive essay strength to expel others for a moment, in order to establish his right to prevent them from ever returning? How can a man or a people seize an immense territory and keep it from the research of South (Navitas) rest of the world except by a punishable usurpation, since all others are being robbed, by such an write conclusion House, act, of the place of on critical The University habitation and the means of and essay Sherborne subsistence which nature gave them in common? When Nunez Balboa, standing on the sea-shore, took possession of the South Seas and the whole of South America in on critical, the name of the crown of Castile, was that enough to dispossess all their actual inhabitants, and to shut out from article writing them all the princes of the world? On such a showing, these ceremonies are idly multiplied, and the Catholic King need only research on critical Australia, take possession all at once, from his apartment, of the whole universe, merely making a subsequent reservation about what was already in the possession of other princes. We can imagine how the lands of academic article individuals, where they were contiguous and on critical The University of South (Navitas), came to be united, became the public territory, and how the right of Sovereignty, extending from the subjects over the lands they held, became at once real and personal. The possessors were thus made more dependent, and the forces at their command used to guarantee their fidelity. The advantage of this does not seem to have been felt by ancient monarchs, who called themselves Kings of the Persians, Scythians, or Macedonians, and seemed to regard themselves more as rulers of men than as masters of a country. Those of the how to write an essay conclusion House College present day more cleverly call themselves Kings of research on critical The University Australia France, Spain, England, etc.: thus holding the land, they are quite confident of holding the inhabitants. The peculiar fact about this alienation is that, in taking over the goods of individuals, the community, so far from despoiling them, only assures them legitimate possession, and changes usurpation into a true right and enjoyment into proprietorship.

Thus the possessors, being regarded as depositaries of the public good, and journal review Les Roches International Hotel, having their rights respected by all the members of the State and maintained against foreign aggression by all its forces, have, by research thinking The University (Navitas), a cession which benefits both the public and great essay writing School, still more themselves, acquired, so to speak, all that they gave up. Research On Critical The University (Navitas)? This paradox may easily be explained by the distinction between the writing Sherborne International rights which the Sovereign and on critical The University (Navitas), the proprietor have over the same estate, as we shall see later on. It may also happen that men begin to write an essay conclusion Brooke College, unite one with another before they possess anything, and that, subsequently occupying a tract of country which is enough for all, they enjoy it in common, or share it out research on critical The University among themselves, either equally or according to a scale fixed by the Sovereign. However the acquisition be made, the right which each individual has to his own estate is always subordinate to the right which the community has over all: without this, there would be neither stability in the social tie, nor real force in the exercise of Sovereignty. I shall end this chapter and this book by remarking on a fact on which the whole social system should rest: i.e., that, instead of destroying natural inequality, the fundamental compact substitutes, for such physical inequality as nature may have set up between men, an equality that is moral and legitimate, and that men, who may be unequal in strength or intelligence, become every one equal by convention and legal right. 5. 1. Learned inquiries into public right are often only the history of past abuses; and troubling to study them too deeply is a profitless infatuation ( Essay on the Interests of France in Relation to a critical thinker International, its Neighbours, by the Marquis d'Argenson).

This is exactly what Grotius has done. 2. See a short treatise of research Australia (Navitas) Plutarch's entitled That Animals Reason. 3. The Romans, who understood and respected the right of writing and essay Sherborne International war more than any other nation on earth, carried their scruples on this head so far that a citizen was not allowed to serve as a volunteer without engaging himself expressly against the enemy, and against such and such an enemy by name. A legion in which the of South (Navitas) younger Cato was seeing his first service under Popilius having been reconstructed, the elder Cato wrote to a persuasive essay College, Popilius that, if he wished his son to continue serving under him, he must administer to him a new military oath, because, the first having been annulled, he was no longer able to bear arms against research on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas) the enemy. The same Cato wrote to his son telling him to take great care not to go into battle before taking this new oath. I know that the siege of Clusium and other isolated events can be quoted against me; but I am citing laws and customs. The Romans are the people that least often transgressed its laws; and no other people has had such good ones.

4. The real meaning of this word has been almost wholly lost in modern times; most people mistake a town for a city, and a townsman for a citizen. They do not know that houses make a town, but citizens a city. The same mistake long ago cost the how to thinker Hult Carthaginians dear. I have never read of the research of South (Navitas) title of great writing Sidcot citizens being given to the subjects of any prince, not even the ancient Macedonians or the English of to-day, though they are nearer liberty than any one else. The French alone everywhere familiarly adopt the name of citizens, because, as can be seen from their dictionaries, they have no idea of its meaning; otherwise they would be guilty in usurping it, of the crime of research thinking of South Australia (Navitas) lse-majest : among them, the name expresses a virtue, and not a right. When Bodin spoke of how to an essay our citizens and townsmen, he fell into a bad blunder in taking the one class for of South Australia the other. M. d'Alembert has avoided the error, and, in his article on Geneva, has clearly distinguished the four orders of men (or even five, counting mere foreigners) who dwell in our town, of which two only compose the Republic.

No other French writer, to my knowledge, has understood the real meaning of the word citizen. 5. Under bad governments, this equality is only apparent and illusory: it serves only to-keep the pauper in his poverty and the rich man in the position he has usurped. Write An Essay Brooke? In fact, laws are always of research thinking The University of South (Navitas) use to those who possess and harmful to those who have nothing: from which it follows that the social state is advantageous to men only when all have something and none too much.

Write my essay -
Critical Thinking and Reasoning in Health - Study at UniSA

Free Information Technology essays. Nowadays people tend to on critical The University (Navitas) read articles or news directly from gadgets such as Smartphone and tablets. Wea??re already seeing some changes, even with semantics. Academic. For example, you publish a book, but you launch an e-book. Research Of South. E-books are more similar to the Internet than to traditional books. The lengths of e-books are changing. E-books can be shorter than print books, as seen with long-form journalism and e-shorts by Byliner, Atavist, Kobo, and Kindle Singles. E-books can also be published as serials, allowing for the agile model of journal review Les Roches Hotel publishing.

Readers now have the chance to give input and help shape the content. The evolution of the E-Books make people change their reading habits. These habits lead to on critical (Navitas) reduction of people visited the starting a persuasive essay Appleby library. On Critical Thinking Australia. Library can be defined as a collection of sources of information and similar resources, made accessible to a defined community for reference or borrowing. Review Les Roches Hotel College. It provides physical or digital access to research on critical The University Australia (Navitas) material, and may be a physical building or room, or a virtual space, or both. Review Jin Jiang International College. In another words, people love to subscribe eBooks through gadgets than visit the research on critical thinking The University Australia (Navitas) library to find a books. In these situation library should play a role in increasing their information about people interest in the form of books and Journals.

It is because more people nowadays tend to journal review Jin Jiang International Hotel Management College read E-Books or E-Journals than visiting the library. Though e-readers are becoming more and more popular, theya??re not outdistancing print, and therea??s no indication that they will even in the future. In 2012, researcher found that of the adults questioned, only 5 percent of them read exclusively e-books. People of all ages prefer print books than E-books because of research of South Australia many reason. Article Polimoda. It will cover the pro and cons of research on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas) print books and E-books. There will be a justification made in these report. The purposes of this report are; i) To justify the statement a?˜..Libraries should provide more books rather than invest in new technology such as ebooks and e-journals. ii) The pros and cons of E-Book and E-Journals.

With the essay Appleby advance of phones, tablets, and ereaders, ebooks have become a popular reading standard. Still, there’s something about the feel of an old-fashioned paper book. Ebooks can be read practically anywhere on anything, it really help when we in work and have no time to open a book. On another hand, some researchers discovered that 62 percent of the respondents actually prefer printed books to e-books, even though theya??re technically the technological and digital generation. i) Paper books cannot be deleted and real experience. There are few opinion that agree, library should invest more in books because books is on critical The University of South (Navitas), more practical than ebooks. Writing Polimoda. One of them are; a??The ebook I was reading told me I was 84% finished with the book when the on critical The University (Navitas) book ended.

The remaining 16% was excerpts from the author’s other books, an author interview, and a discussion guide. Paper books are far superior when it comes to letting you know your place in a book, and that’s why I prefer booka?? In these case library should give more attention to providing a books than invest in technology. Become A Critical Hult International. Libraries should be responsible for keeping paper books as one day the internet may not exist. Australia. It is a known fact that paper books are the only reliable and safe source of information. The best way to start and write an essay Brooke House College, finish your book is reading the book itself. One day your gadget may lost all the research thinking data because of technical problem such as virus and malware. There is no guarantee that ebooks will kept forever in our phone. Starting Essay Appleby. Leta??s take an example, when A format their phone or laptop the data store in it will not exist and may deleted.

It will destruct the ebooks in their phone. On Critical Thinking Of South Australia. Lending print books couldna??t be easiera?” just grab the book and how to write conclusion House College, pass it along; no set-up or hassle involved. Research The University Of South. There is just something about print books that ebook cana??t compete with, the way the spine cracks the great essay writing Sidcot fist time ita??s open, the way the thinking pages feel in your hands, the academic writing Polimoda rich scent of paper, the way they wear over time and gain character. People will appreciate the books when they can touch, feel and read it. The best part it we can hold a pen and write down anything that we thought about research thinking The University of South (Navitas) every passage we read. While ebooks are probably going to be around for quite a while, there is journal review Les Roches College, something really special about being able to hold something in your hands that your parents, grandparents, and other family members had when they were young. Some people love to sit with their family and holding a book than holding a tablet. It is because they will more concentrate on the book their read.

Seeing a shelf full of books and on critical thinking The University, topics is inspiring and stimulates the imagination. Keeping books in handphone and bookshelf is much different. When we keep books in bookshelf we can see the books in our house or any place. If we keep the Brooke books in our gadgets, it was like the books we read are never exist. The situation is we read and delete rather than read and research on critical of South, keep it for our collection. It’s no secret that reading is good for you. Just six minutes of reading is enough to reduce stress by 68%, and numerous studies have shown that reading keeps your brain functioning effectively as you age.

One study even found that elderly individuals who read regularly are 2.5 times less likely to develop Alzheimer’s than their peers. But not all forms of reading are created equal. ii) E-books are damaging our health. Ebooks will damaging our physical and become a critical thinker Hult International, mental health than we might think. When we read through smartphone, the light from the screen may destruct our sight and lead to eyes problem.

Researchers have been examining the differences between reading regular books and on critical The University of South (Navitas), e-books for years. Many of the writing studies have shown that reading old-fashioned books has plenty of advantages over e-books, which can be gateways to research on critical thinking The University of South Australia (Navitas) other electronic distractions, all of which screw with your sleep. This is why you should ditch the screen for an essay Brooke House printed pages. Using laptops or phones late at night to read doesn’t make way for restful sleep. Reading helps you de-stress faster or just as fast as listening to music, taking a walk, or having a cup of tea or coffee, according to a 2009 study.

When researchers measured heart rate and muscle tension, they found that people relaxed just six minutes into reading. But reading on a device might cancel out this effect, and on critical thinking Australia (Navitas), may even impact your stress levels negatively. Repeated use of write conclusion mobile phones or laptops late at night has been linked to depression, higher levels of stress, and fatigue among young adults. Constant use of technology not only disrupts our sleeping patterns and throws off our circadian rhythms, but it fosters a shorter attention span and fractured focus a?” online, we jump from meme to research thinking The University of South meme and starting a persuasive essay, link to research Australia link, checking Facebook intermittently. Social media and technological distractions also always seem to foster guilt and regret, and before we know it, three hours have passed and our brains feel like mush. People nowadays love to read something with visual than directly words by words. Essay College. Thata??s why people will love to check facebook than open their books in their smartphone or tablets. Reading an old-fashioned paper book might seem out of style, wasteful, or impractical.

But dona??t underestimate the simplicity of holding a physical book in your hands, flipping through the pages, and not having anything else to shift your focus to. Commit to research thinking of South Australia (Navitas) the classic paper book and you’ll get the full, healthier experience. Reading in print helps with comprehension. A 2014 study found that readers of a short mystery story on a Kindle were significantly worse at remembering the a critical Hult Business order of events than those who read the same story in paperback. Lead researcher Anne Mangen of Norway’s Stavanger University concluded that “the haptic and tactile feedback of a Kindle does not provide the thinking The University of South Australia same support for mental reconstruction of a story as a print pocket book does.” iii) Survey about conclusion Brooke Prints books and on critical of South Australia (Navitas), E-books. Textbook makers, bookstore owners and college student surveys all say millennials still strongly prefer print for pleasure and learning, a bias that surprises reading experts given the same groupa??s proclivity to consume most other content digitally. Marlene England (Owner of a bookstores) said millennials regularly tell her they prefer print because ita??s a??easier to follow stories.a?? Pew studies show the highest print readership rates are among those ages 18 to and essay International 29, and the same age group is still using public libraries in research (Navitas), large numbers. Don Kilburn, North American president for Pearson, the largest publisher in the world and the dominant player in education, said the move to digital a??doesna??t look like a revolution right now. Journal Articles Les Roches International Management. It looks like an evolution, and on critical thinking Australia (Navitas), ita??s lumpy at best.a?? And it can be seen most prominently on college campuses, where students still lug backpacks stuffed with books, even as they increasingly take notes (or check Facebook) on laptops during class.

This is the report made by The Washington Post. This post shows that more people will choose prints book than E-books. In order to great School justify this report, there is a survey has been conducted with 20 respondent. It will ask about which the respondent prefer in research The University Australia, finding information. The question will cover their choices about prints books or E-books. Survey about Print Books Vs E-books. 1. How many Books have you read in the last year?

a??11 or more Books. 2. Have you purchased an E-book or a print book in the last 12 months? a??Ia??ve purchased only E-books. a??Ia??ve purchased only printed books. a??Ia??ve bought both e-books and how to write, printed books. a??No Ia??havena??t purchased either.

3. Do you prefer to read E-Books or Print Books? a??Print books only. 4. Do you agree with the following statement: a??Library should invest more in research on critical thinking The University of South, books publication than ebooks and academic Polimoda, e journals..a?? a??Neither agree or disagree. Result of the survey. 1. How many Books have you read in the last year? Among the 20 respondent the majority will read four to The University of South five books in a year.

2. A Critical Hult International Business. Have you purchased an E-book or a print book in on critical thinking of South (Navitas), the last 12 months? These finding shows more people prefer to purchased both e-books and printed books. Printed books are more popular among the reader. 3. Do you prefer to read E-Books or Print Books? The third questions shows that most of the writing Sherborne respondent prefer print books than E-books. Research Thinking Of South Australia. Many people wrote in their comments and had clear reasons for avoiding the academic article screen like, a??Therea??s something about curling up with a good book in onea??s hands that cana??t be beata?? and a??I spend enough time on computers at thinking (Navitas) work, need a breaka?? to a??I like the feel of the pagesa??. Academic Writing. Seems like the smell and feel of paper, curling up on a rainy afternoon with a mug of thinking tea is better than seeing on screen with brighting light that can distract our eyes.

4. Sherborne International. Do you agree with the following statement: a??Library should invest more in research Australia, books publication than ebooks and e journals..a?? The last questions is about the main topic that need to justify with the survey. More respondents strongly agree that library should vary and invest in print books to satisfied people needs in reading a print books. The result show that most of them strongly agree library should invest more on prints book than E-books. Article Polimoda. We will forget how good to hold a books in real and appreciate the writing in the print books. Library will play a main role in promoting a people to read a print books. Readers absorb less on Kindles and iPads than when they read on paper. A few years back, researcher wrote that it’s faster to read paper books than e-books, study shows.

For a conclusion, it is better if we invest more on printed books because many people cana??t forget the smell of the thinking (Navitas) books and also the sentimental value when we hold a book than smartphones. The survey will be the evidence that print books may allow for deeper reading and stronger understanding and memory than digital books. Nostalgia, comfort and great writing Sidcot, convenience seem to research on critical The University of South (Navitas) be big reasons in academic, favor for keeping the physical book alive. Another study show that sixteen to 24-year-olds are known as the super-connected generation, obsessed with snapping selfies or downloading the latest mobile apps, so it comes as a surprise to learn that 62% prefer print books to ebooks. The two big reasons for on critical The University of South (Navitas) preferring print are value for money and how to become Business School, an emotional connection to physical books. Research Thinking The University Of South (Navitas). On questions of academic Polimoda ebook pricing, 28% think that ebooks should be half their current price, while just 8% say that ebook pricing is right. On Critical Thinking The University Australia (Navitas). Sometimes books in digital form is starting a persuasive Appleby, expensive than books in printed form. People nowadays will consider much on the value of the things they buy. It is better to buy something that we can see and hold than in virtual form. Search our thousands of essays:

If this essay isn't quite what you're looking for, why not order your own custom Information Technology essay, dissertation or piece of coursework that answers your exact question? There are UK writers just like me on hand, waiting to research on critical thinking (Navitas) help you. Each of us is qualified to a high level in our area of articles Les Roches Jin Jiang Hotel expertise, and we can write you a fully researched, fully referenced complete original answer to your essay question. Just complete our simple order form and you could have your customised Information Technology work in your email box, in as little as 3 hours. This Information Technology essay was submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies.

This page has approximately words. If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows: Essay UK, Books and ebooks . Available from: [03-10-17]. If you are the research on critical of South Australia (Navitas) original author of this content and starting a persuasive Appleby College, no longer wish to have it published on our website then please click on the link below to request removal: 10-05-17 - Image processing 09-05-17 - Integration of thinking The University Cloud and Internet of Things 03-05-17 - Mobile ad-hoc network 02-05-17 - Technology used in hospitality industry 01-05-17 - The Personal Software ProcessSM (PSPSM) 21-04-17 - Software quality 20-04-17 - Data Warehouse for decision making 19-04-17 - Enhancing food security via a web based system 17-04-17 - Frame relay technology 15-04-17 - Competition and Innovation: A Comparative Study of Telecommunications and write conclusion Brooke House, Insurance (WIP)

We offer professional custom essay writing, dissertation writing and coursework writing service. Our work is high quality, plagiarism-free and The University of South Australia, delivered on time. Essay UK is starting a persuasive essay Appleby, a trading name of Student Academic Services Limited , a company registered in England and Wales under Company Number 08866484 .