Write My Paper For Me -
Eynesbury - University-of-adelaide
Australopithecus Afarensis, and Australopithecus Africanus Essay. From Proconsul heseloni, it was decided that three species evolved from it. These species included A. A. afarensis, A. africanus and Sivapithecus indicus. Sivapithecus indicus was branched off the early human evolutionary line as the characteristics from the essay The University (Navitas) dentation and skull characteristics differed from that of A. afarensis and of writing Arts Bournemouth (AUB) A. africanus (See Fig.1 Dentation of early humans, Fig.2 Skull Characteristics of essay of Adelaide, early humans). P. Boisei was placed as a direct descendent Sivapithecus indicus and not of Proconsul heseloni. Thinking Algonquin? Justification for this was the write The University of Adelaide (Navitas) data obtained through the persuasice Cardiff Sixth Form College comparison of skulls. P. Boisei has a similar brain size to body weight ratio to that of Sivapithecus indicus, indicating that whilst they were not identical, the brain to body weight ratio may have increased through evolution over millions of years. More reasoning of The University, this placement is that the characteristics of critical thinking, P. Boisei were similar to write The University of Adelaide, the modern chimpanzee, which is known to be a descendant of Sivapithecus indicus. As time progress on the phylogeny, Australopithecus africanus and Australopithecus Essay on The Environments of the Earliest Australopithecus. locomotion emerged are still unresolved.
However they are all closely dependent on environment reconstructions. This project will contribute to the scientific community's understanding of the environments of the parts an essay Arts earliest Australopithecine. Australopithecus anamensis is the write an argument The University earliest species of the genus and the first indisputably bipedal hominid. According to paleoecological analyses (isotopes, fauna, soils, etc) (2,3), these hominids were generalists who lived in mosaic environments , e.g. a mix Comparison of 3 Australopithecines Essay example. Critical Thinking Thinking Amsterdam Foundation Campus? modern-day lowland gorillas do with tough foods” ( Unger2). Many scientists today do not believe that the Australopithecus boisei is an ancestor to modern humans like the Gracile Australopithecines. Essay The University (Navitas)? The gracile Australopithecines are much smaller and not so bulky as the Australopithecines robustus. To describe any of the different species of the gracile australopithecine's compared to of writing University Bournemouth (AUB), the australopithecus boisei one would include a smaller dentition and lighter facial and dental muscles than the robust Essay on Leo Africanus Book Review. He finds a lifelong friend at school, Harun, and together they roam the streets of the city, looking for adventure.
Hasan accompanies his uncle on write an argument essay his first tactful mission, and as their caravan roam the huge Sahara, his uncle fills in the historic gaps for writing persuasive, young Hasan, teaching him the art of storytelling. ''His tone was so reassuring,'' Hasan later recalls, ''that it made me breathe once more the odors of the Granada of my birth, and his prose was so bewitching that my camel seemed to move forwards Amin Maalouf Utilizes Language and write of Adelaide (Navitas) Religion in Leo Africanus Essay example. From this book, the reader becomes aware about the political situation that had overcome Granada which determined the fate of its Muslims. Similarly today, despite the technical differences the central conflict is evident, and of critical University of California, (UCLA) this territorial necessitate can be seen today in Middle Eastern countries such as Iraq and Iran. Due to this chronological structure, one can understand that despite him not mentally being fully aware, he has an important role to play. We see how the Muhammad put a certain taught as a fact in an argument, almost every institution world wide, from all level of academics: grades school to The Regent’s School,, prestige colleges like Harvard and Oxford University. One of the many suppose “missing links” taught as evidence is “Lucy” (AL 288-1), the Australopithecus afarensis hominoid, strongly held as the best evidence for write The University of Adelaide, the evolution of ape to human (Oard, Richard). The discovery of “Lucy” was unearthed on November 30, 1974 by Donald Johanson and Maurice Taieb near Hadar, Ethiopia. It was named after the The Evolution of Humans The evolution of humans was (and is) a very important time. The first being of evolution was Australopithecus Afarensis or “Lucy”. Then we moved on to Homo erectus and Homo Neanderthal.
When the weather got hotter, we were Homo Sapiens Sapiens and finally, the modern man. This evolution did not happen overnight. It took millions of Form, years. The past is hardly forgotten, but the imminent is next. The future of essay The University of Adelaide, evolution is being studied as well as the past. Most people were Lucy, discovered by Donald C. Johanson and Tom Gray, is Our Oldest and Most Complete Human Ancestor. Lucy The discovery of how to write in college, Lucy is our oldest and most complete human ancestor. She is less than 3.8 million years old hominid of Australopithecus afarensis, which was discovered in write The University, November 24, 1974 by Donald C. Johanson and Tom Gray in the Hadar region of Ethiopia.
They named her Lucy in reference to the well-known Beatles song Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds, which played over and over as they celebrated their findings. Deakin University? This uncovering of Lucy was very fascinating and answered many questions to AMU ANTH 100: Be An Anthropologist Essay. weight thus a larger brain indicates human primates are more intelligent than that of other primates like monkeys, or apes 3. Distinguish between members of genus Australopithecus and Paranthropus in write essay of Adelaide, terms of time, location, and physical features The earliest known and accepted fossils are categorized as Australopithecus or the southern ape. A well known and famous fossil known as Lucy belongs to aspects of critical thinking University, this fossil group, fossils of Australopithecus's have been found in areas such as Ethiopia, Kenya Essay on The Importance of Human Evolution. The next major species found after the Australopithecus was the essay The University of Adelaide Homo habilis.
Around the same time period they came into Algonquin existence, two other species were present, homo rudolfensis (Alexeev 1986) and homo ergaster (Archaeology Information n.d). Of Adelaide (Navitas)? The brain size of Homo habilis was about 590-687 cc, unlike the Australopithecus they should evidence of tool usage (Tobias 1987). The homo ergaster species has a brain size of approximately 860cc (Australian museum n.d). They also showed evidence of tool Essay on parts of writing an essay (AUB) The Origins Of Our Species. It is understood that, as with the write Australopithecus, the Kenyanthropus also walked upright. The emergence of these bipedal apes was a revolutionary breakthrough in human evolution.
What forced these creatures in this direction is critical thinking thinking of Amsterdam — Campus likely to have been the climatic changes that swept through the The University (Navitas) African continent some fifteen million years ago. The transformed geography, driven by the separation of two tectonic plates, running from the Red Sea in persuasive University, the north through Mozambique in the south, saw faulting
Best Essay Writers Here -
The University of Adelaide (Navitas) - программы и…
MLA Format: The Complete MLA Citation Guide. The 8th edition of MLA format provides researchers with guidance on how to document the use of others’ work responsibly. Published in April 2016, the new handbook illustrates examples of citations made in the revised style, and explains how to create two types of citations: full citations that are placed in a works cited list, and in-text citations, which are abbreviated versions of full citations and located in The University, the body of the work. With the new and and communication Algonquin improved MLA citation format, a major change was made to how full citations are created and how MLA works cited pages are formatted. Overall, the style presents a much simpler way to write an argument The University of Adelaide (Navitas) create accurate citations for students and researchers compared to past versions. 1. One standard citation format that applies to every source type. In previous editions of the style, researchers were required to locate the citation format for the source type that they were citing. Bournemouth? For instance, they were trying to cite a scholarly journal article, they would have to reference the The University of Adelaide, rules for citing journals. This has become inefficient in modern writing, however, as we are digesting information for a wider variety of sources than ever before. With information readily available in write essays in college The Regent’s International Bangkok, tweets, Facebook posts, blogs, etc., it has become unrealistic for to create citation formats for every source type. To address this, there is essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas), now one universal format that researchers can use to essays in college The Regent’s International School, Bangkok create their citations.
To properly use this new format, the researcher is required to an argument of Adelaide (Navitas) locate the “Core Elements” of their sources. These are what make up the thinking thinking University of Amsterdam — Amsterdam Campus, information that will populate the citation. These core elements can be found in the forms in the MLA citation generator. The “Core Elements” of a citation, along with their corresponding punctuation marks, include the following (in this order): The appropriate punctuation mark must follow each core element, unless it is the final piece. Write Essay The University? In that situation, the punctuation mark should always be a period. These core elements are then placed within the citation, and generally follow this format:
Author. Title. Title of the container. Other contributors, Version, Number, Publisher’s name, Date of publication, Location. Here is an example of critical thinking College how an actual source (in this case, a book) looks when cited using the 8th edition style: Goodwin, Doris. Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln . Simon Shuster, 2012.
For more help with creating citations with these core elements, try the MLA citation maker on write (Navitas), EasyBib. 2. Inclusion of thinking and creative thinking University of Amsterdam — Foundation “containers” in citations. When the source you are referencing is actually a small part of a larger source, such as a chapter within a book, the larger source is called the “container,” as it “contains” the The University of Adelaide (Navitas), smaller source. Aspects Thinking University Los Angeles (UCLA)? Generally, the write of Adelaide (Navitas), container is italicized and is followed by a comma. For more details on this, see the examples below. You can also create citations with containers in the MLA citation machine. MLA citation format for citing a title within a container might looks as follows: Source Author(s) Last Name, First Name. “Title of Source.” Container Title , Container Contributor(s) First Name Last Name, Publisher, Date Published, page numbers. Here is an example full citation of how to cite a book chapter using the 8th edition format: Uenten, Wesley Iwao. “Rising Up from a Sea of Discontent: The 1970 Koza Uprising in U.S.
Occupied Okinawa.” Militarized Currents: Toward a Decolonized Future in Asia and aspects of critical the Pacific , edited by essay The University of Adelaide, Setsu Shigematsu and Keith L. Camacho, University of Minnesota Press, 2010, pp. 91-124. 3. The ability to persuasive University use pseudonyms for The University of Adelaide (Navitas) author names. In order to more efficiently create accurate citations for critical thinking and communication College new source types, it is now acceptable to use online handles or screen names in place of authors’ names. @TwitterHandle. “Content of Tweet.” Twitter, Date, Time, URL (omit http:// or https://). @realDonaldTrump. An Argument Essay (Navitas)? “I will be having a general news conference on JANUARY ELEVENTH in N.Y.C.
Thank you.” Twitter , 3 Jan. 2017, 6:58 p.m., twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/816433590892429312. 4. Adding the abbreviations vol. and no. to magazine and journal article citations. In previous versions of the style, there was no indication that the numbers in periodical citations referred to the volume and thinking of Amsterdam — Foundation issue numbers. This has changed in the 8 th edition to be clearer to the reader. O’Carol, John. “The Dying of the of Adelaide (Navitas), Epic.” Anthropoetics 30.2 (2011): 48-49.
Print. O’Carol, John. “The Dying of the Epic.” Anthropoetics , vol. How To Essays The Regent’s School,? 30, no. 2, 2011, pp. 48-49. Unlike previous editions, the inclusion of URLs in citations highly recommended by an argument, the 8 th edition.
Omit “http://” or “https://” from the aspects of critical Los Angeles (UCLA), URL when including it in a citation. 6. Omitting the city of publication. In previous versions of the write essay of Adelaide, citation style, researchers included the city where the publisher was located. Critical Thinking And Communication? Today, this information generally serves little purpose and the city of publication can often be omitted. Only include the city of publication if the an argument (Navitas), version of the source differs when published in a different country (Example: British editions of books versus versions printed in the United States). 7. Flexibility in citation formatting. In addition to one universal format for all source types, the 8th edition now allows for more flexibility in citation presentation than previous versions of the style. For example, there is thinking Algonquin College, technically no right or wrong way to document a source, and certain aspects of a source can be included or excluded, depending on the focus of the work. For example, if you are citing the movie, Casablanca , and your research project focuses on essay The University, the main character, Rick Blaine, it would be beneficial to your reader for you to include the name of the write essays in college, actor, Humphrey Bogart, in your citation.
Other writers who instead focus on the whole movie in their paper may elect to just include the write an argument essay, name of the director in their works cited page. To create the best and most effective citations, you always should think about which pieces of essays Deakin information will help readers easily locate the source you referenced themselves. Your teacher may want you to format your paper using the guidelines specified in the 8th edition. If you were told to create your citations in The University, this format, your paper should be formatted using the new MLA guidelines as well. Use white 8 ? x 11” paper. Make 1 inch margins on the top, bottom, and thinking of Amsterdam — Campus sides The first word in every paragraph should be indented one half inch. The University Of Adelaide (Navitas)? Indent set-off quotations one inch from the left margin Use any type of font that is easy to parts Arts Bournemouth (AUB) read, such as Times New Roman. Write The University Of Adelaide? Make sure that italics look different from the regular typeface Use 12 point size Double space the critical and communication Algonquin College, entire research paper, even the works cited page. Leave one space after periods and other punctuation marks, unless your instructor tells you to make two spaces.
You can either create a title page using EasyBib’s Title Page creator or omit the write The University, title page completely and use a header. To create a MLA header, follow these steps: Begin one inch from the top of the first page and flush with the left margin. Persuasice Essay Cardiff Sixth? Type your name, your instructor’s name, the course number, and the date on separate lines, using double spaces between each. Double space once more and center the title. Do NOT underline, bold, or type the title in all capital letters. Only italicize words that would normally be italicized in the text. Write An Argument Essay The University Of Adelaide? Example: Character Development in The Great Gatsby. Do not place a period after the title or after any heading.
Double space between the University of Amsterdam — Amsterdam, title and first lines of the text. Placed in the upper right-hand corner, one half inch from the top, flush with the right margin. Type your last name before the page number. (To make this process easier, set your word processor to automatically add the last name and page number to each page). Do not place p. Write An Argument Essay? before the page number. Many instructors do not want a page number on the first page. Persuasice Essay Form College? Ask your instructor for their specific preferences. Should be placed as close as possible to the text that they most closely refer to. Label tables with: “Table,” an arabic numeral, and create a title for it. This information should be located above the table, flush left, on The University, separate lines.
Format the title the same way as the critical thinking Algonquin, title of the paper. Underneath the table, provide the source and The University of Adelaide any notes. Notes should be labeled with a letter, rather than a numeral, so the reader is critical thinking, able to differentiate between the notes of the text and the notes of the table. An Argument (Navitas)? Use double spacing throughout. Aspects Thinking University? Label illustrations with: Fig. Essay Of Adelaide? (short for figure), assign an arabic number, and provide a caption.
The label and caption should appear underneath the illustration. **If the table or illustration’s caption gives complete information about the source and the source isn’t cited in the text, there is no need to include the citation in the works cited page. Label musical scores with: Ex. (short for Example), assign it an Arabic numeral, and and creative thinking Amsterdam provide a caption. The label and caption should appear below the musical illustration. The 8th edition recommends that numbers are spelled out if the number can be written with one or two words. An Argument Of Adelaide? For larger numbers, write the number itself. One, forty four, one hundred, 247, 2 ?, 101.
If the project calls for frequent use of numbers (such as a scientific study or statistics), use numerals that precede measurements. 247 milligrams, 5 pounds. Here are some other formatting tips to persuasive essays Deakin keep in mind: Do not start sentences with a numeral, spell out the number. Always use numerals before abbreviations or symbols, ex. 6 lbs. In divisions, use numbers, ex: In page 5 of the study. The purpose of an essay of Adelaide, MLA works cited list is to display the critical thinking University of Amsterdam — Foundation, sources that were used for a project, and to give credit to the original authors of the works that were consulted for a project. Works Cited lists are typically found at the very end of a project. Citations are what make up a works cited list.
Here are some tips on essay of Adelaide, how to create a works cited list for your citations: Citations are listed in alphabetical order by critical University Foundation, the first word in the citation, which is write an argument essay, typically the last name of the how to write essays School, Bangkok, author. Each citation should have a hanging indent. An Argument Essay Of Adelaide? When there are two or more sources with the same author, only include the author’s name in the first citation. In the second or subsequent citations, use three hyphens in place of the author’s name, followed by a period. Middlekauff, Robert. Writing Deakin University? The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution.
Oxford UP, 2007. – – -. Colonial America . Oxford UP, 1999. Connell, James. “The Battle of write an argument essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas) Yorktown: What Don’t We Know?” The American History Journal, vol. 19, no. 6, 2005, pp. 36-43. Middlekauff, Robert. Critical Thinking And Communication Algonquin? The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution. Oxford UP, 2007. – – -. Colonial America . Oxford UP, 1999. The Patriot.
Directed by Roland Emmerich, performed by Mel Gibson and Heath Ledger. Columbia Pictures, 2002. The 8th edition also has standardized rules regarding the write The University of Adelaide (Navitas), formatting of titles within citations. Thinking? Here are some of the rules pertaining to titles in write an argument of Adelaide, the new MLA format: When citing book titles, always enter the full title, in italics, followed by an essay Arts University Bournemouth, a period. See the MLA format citation below: Last Name, First Name. Italicized Title . Write Essay The University? Publisher, Publication Year. When citing periodicals, place the title of the article in quotes, with a period at the end of the title. The italicized title of the periodical follows, along with a comma. An MLA format example is below:
Last Name, First Name. Persuasice Sixth College? “Title of the Article.” Periodical Title.” Publication Year, Page Numbers. When citing a website, the title of the web page or article is placed in quotation marks, with a period before the end quotation. The title of the website is written in italics followed by a comma. If the essay (Navitas), name of the publisher differs from the name of the website, include it after the title. Immediately following the publisher is the date that the page or article was published, or posted. Finally, end with the URL.
The URL is the website’s address. The citation format is as follows: Author’s Last name, First name. “Title of the Article or Individual Page.” Title of the website, Name of the thinking University of California,, publisher, Date of write an argument essay The University (Navitas) publication, URL. Click here for parts University Bournemouth (AUB) additional information on website titles. Giving credit to the author of works that you use in your research paper is an argument of Adelaide (Navitas), not only important for citation accuracy, but will prevent plagiarism. In order to include the aspects of critical Los Angeles, author’s name in your citation, follow the guidelines listed below: Author formatting: Olsen, Gregg.
Citation example: Olsen, Gregg. Write The University? If I Can’t Have You: Susan Powell, Her Mysterious Disappearance, and University Los Angeles the Murder of Her Children . St. Martin’s True Crime, 2015, pp. 18-22. Place the authors in the order in which they appear on write an argument (Navitas), the source. Note that only the persuasice Cardiff College, lead author’s name is listed last name first; all additional authors are listed by their first name, middle initial if applicable, and then last name: Author formatting: Bernecker, Sven, and Fred Dretske. Citation example: Bernecker, Sven, and an argument The University (Navitas) Fred Dretske. Writing Persuasive? Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford: UP, 2007. List the author’s last name, first name, and then middle initial if applicable.
Follow it with a comma, and then add et al. in place of the additional authors: Author formatting: George, Michael L., et al. Citation example: George, Michael L., et al. The Lean Six Sigma Pocket Toolbook. McGraw-Hill, 2005.
In cases where the an argument The University of Adelaide (Navitas), person responsible for creating a work is someone other than the author, such as an editor, producer, performer, or artist, always include the individual’s role after the name: Kansaker, Tej Ratna, and Mark Turin, editors. When citing works of an essay Arts Bournemouth (AUB) entertainment, such as film or television, include the name and role of the person on whom you’ve focused: Byrne, Rose, performer. *Note: If you are writing about a film or television show that does not focus on an individual’s role, omit the author’s name and start the citation with the title. If a corporation is the The University, author of the text, include the full name of the of critical University, corporation: The American Heart Association.
Treat the translator as the author. You should do this only if the focus of an argument essay The University your paper is on the original translated work. Include the name of the original creator after the title, preceded by the word “By”: Author formatting: Rabassa, Gregory, translator. Citation example: Rabassa, Gregory, translator. One Hundred Years of Solitude. By Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Random House, 1995.
When no author is aspects of California, Los Angeles, given in a text, omit this section and start the citation with the title. Sources can be released in different versions, or forms. For example, a book can have various versions – such as a first edition or a second edition, even an updated edition. A movie can have an unrated or an uncut version. It is important to communicate to the reader which version was used to an argument essay (Navitas) help them locate the exact source themselves. For books, if it is a specific numbered edition, type out the thinking and creative University of Amsterdam — Campus, numeral and use the abbreviation “ed.” for edition.
If no specific version is mentioned or located, omit this information from the citation. Examples of 8th edition citations for sources with various versions: Weinberger, Norman M. “The Auditory System and Elements of Music” The Psychology of Music, edited by Diana Deutsch, 2nd ed., Academic Press, 1999, p.61. Google Books, books.google.com/books?id=A3jkobk4yMMClpg=PP1dq=psychologypg=PR6#v=onepageq=psychologyf=false. JFK. Performance by Kevin Costner, directed by Oliver Stone, director’s cut ed., Warner Home Video, 2008. When including the date of publication, there aren’t any set rules to how the date should be input into the citation. Write An Argument Essay Of Adelaide? For example, you can use May 5, 2016 or 5 May 2016. What does matter is consistency.
Whichever way the write International School, Bangkok, date is placed in one citation, the write essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas), same format should be used in the other citations in your project. Names of months that use more than four letters are written with abbreviations. Regarding new MLA in text citations, the rules are the same as in previous versions of the style. When using a direct quote or paraphrasing an author’s work, place an critical University of Amsterdam —, in-text citation after the borrowed information. Generally, the in text citation is an argument of Adelaide (Navitas), found immediately following the direct quote or paraphrase, but it is acceptable to aspects of critical insert it in a place, soon after, that allows for a natural pause while reading. (Author Last Page Number[s]).
Ready to The University of Adelaide (Navitas) start citing? See the information and examples below to critical and creative University Amsterdam Foundation Campus get started creating citations for the most popular source types. Author’s Last name, First name. Title of the work, translated by or edited by First Name Last name, vol. number, Publisher, Year the an argument essay The University, book was published, page number(s). Roth, Veronica. Divergent.
Katherine Tegen Books, 2011. Olsen, Gregg, and Rebecca Morris. If I Can’t Have You: Susan Powell, Her Mysterious Disappearance, and the Murder of Her Children. St. Essays Deakin? Martin’s True Crime, 2015, pp.
18-22. Matthews, Graham, et al. An Argument The University Of Adelaide (Navitas)? Disaster Management in Archives, Libraries, and Museums. Ashgate, 2009. Author’s Last name, First name. “Title of chapter or section.” Title of the work, translated by or edited by First Name Last name, vol. number, Publisher, Year the book was published, page number(s). Montrose, Louis. “Elizabeth Through the Looking Glass: Picturing the Queen’s Two Bodies.” The Body of the essays Deakin University (Navitas), Queen: Gender and Rule in the Courtly World, 1500-2000, edited by Regina Schulte, Berghahn, 2006, pp.
61-87. How to Cite an E-book Found Online: Author’s last name, First name. “Title of the chapter or section.” Title of the e-book, translated by essay (Navitas), or edited by First name Last name, vol. number, Publisher, Year of publication, page number(s). Title of the web site or database, URL. Austen, Jane, and Seth Grahame-Smith. Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. Quirk, 2015. Google Books, books.google.com/books?id=x5xPaPeZzmUClpg=PP1dq=zombiespg=PP1#v=onepageq=zombiesf=false. Poe, Edgar Allan. “The Gold Bug.” Short Stories for English Courses, Edited by critical thinking thinking Amsterdam Foundation, Rosa M.R. Mikels, 2004. Project Gutenberg, www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/5403/pg5403-images.html.
Author’s last name, First name. “Title of the chapter or section.” Title of the e-book, translated by or edited by First name Last name, Name of e-reader device, vol. Essay Of Adelaide (Navitas)? number, Publisher, Year of publication, page number(s). Doer, Anthony. All the thinking and creative thinking University of Amsterdam — Amsterdam Campus, Light We Cannot See. Kindle ed., Scribner, 2014. Author’s Last name, First name. “Title of the (Navitas), Article or Individual Page.” Title of the website, Name of the publisher, Date of publication, URL. White, Lori. “The Newest Fad in People Helping People: Little Free Pantries.” Upworthy, Cloud Tiger Media, 3 Aug.
2016, www.upworthy.com/the-newest-fad-in-people-helping-people-little-free-pantries?g=2c=hpstream. MLA Citation Website with no author: “Title of the writing persuasive Deakin (Navitas), Article or Individual Page.” Title of the website, Name of the essay The University (Navitas), publisher, Date of publication, URL. “Giant Panda.” Smithsonian National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institute, 2004, nationalzoo.si.edu/animals/giantpandas/pandafacts. How to Cite a Website with no webpage title: Webpage Description. Title of the website, Name of the publisher, Date of publication, URL. General Information on the New York Mets. NYCData, The Weissman Center for International Business Baruch College/CUNY, www.baruch.cuny.edu/nycdata/sports/nymets.htm. How to Cite a Journal Article found on a Database: Author’s Last name, First name. “Title of the article.” Title of the journal , First name Last name of any other contributors (if applicable), Version (if applicable), Numbers (such as a volume and issue number), Publication date, Page numbers.
Title of the database, URL or DOI. Brian, Real, et al. “Rural Public Libraries and Digital Inclusion: Issues and thinking and creative of Amsterdam — Campus Challenges.” Information and Technology Libraries , vol. 33, no. An Argument (Navitas)? 1, Mar. 2014, pp. 6-24. ProQuest, ezproxy.nypl.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.i.ezproxy.nypl.org/docview/1512388143?accountid=35635. How to Cite a Journal Article found in Print: Author’s Last name, First name ” Title of the article.” Title of Journal , Volume, Issue, Year, pages. Bagchi, Alaknanda. “Conflicting Nationalisms: The Voice of the Subaltern in Mahasweta Devi’s Bashai Tudu .” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, vol. 15, no.
1, 1996, pp. 41-50. Follow the formula for citing a book. Cite the author of the essay, the name of the essay, the how to write International, name of the collection, the editor of the write an argument essay of Adelaide, collection, the publication information, and the page number(s) of the essay. How to Cite an Image from a Website:
If there is no title available for the image, include a brief description of the image instead. Creator’s Last name, First name. “Title of the digital image.” Title of the website, First name Last name of any contributors, Version (if applicable), Number (if applicable), Publisher, Publication date, URL.
Order Essay from Experienced Writers with Ease -
Eynesbury - University-of-adelaide
9 of the Best Kids Desk Chairs for Homework, School and Play. The older kids get, the more time they have to spend doing their school work. A desk is an argument The University of Adelaide (Navitas), very useful, as it gives teenagers a quiet space to thinking and communication College work on assignments or study for exams, but even younger kids will find a desk useful. An Argument! However, you can’t have a desk without providing somewhere for your child to sit, which is why kids desk chairs are sold separately. Cardiff College! Some kids desks come with a chair as part of the write an argument The University of Adelaide package, but if yours does not, you will need to find a suitable chair for your child.
Adult desk chairs tend to be too big for critical thinking University, younger children, so it is sensible to look at kids desk chairs that are the write an argument essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas) right size. It may be helpful if your child can try a desk chair before you buy it, but if this is not possible, use your child’s height as a rough guide when purchasing a desk chair. Adjustable chairs offer extra versatility. Essays (Navitas)! Kids desk chairs have just as many features as adult desk chairs. Look for an argument essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas), support handles, adjustable height chairs, and since comfort is crucial, look for Cardiff Sixth Form College, one with ergonomic features. Lastly, do not forget to take color and the overall style into account.
It does not matter how comfortable a chair is – if it does not look “right”, your child will probably turn their nose up at an argument essay of Adelaide (Navitas), it! Here is our guide to thinking and creative Foundation nine of the best. 1. Vecelo Mid-back Mesh Office Computer Desk Chair. The Vecelo mid-back mesh kids desk chair comes in a range of essay The University (Navitas) attractive colors, including orange, pink, purple, lime green, red, yellow, and International School, Bangkok, black. This is an ergonomically designed chair with a comfortable mesh back and a 360-degree swivel base.
The chair base is The University of Adelaide (Navitas), thickly padded for extra comfort during long study sessions. The seat can be height adjusted via a one touch pneumatic lever. 2. Cardiff Sixth Form College! Flash Furniture Soccer Task Chair with Arms. Soccer mad kids aged 7-10 years will love this soccer-themed desk chair made by Flash Furniture. (Navitas)! The chair back and critical and communication Algonquin, seat are made from stitched vinyl in an argument essay of Adelaide (Navitas) a soccer ball design. The seat can be pneumatically adjusted to different heights. There are armrests, but these can be left off when the chair is assembled. 3. Boss Microfiber Deluxe Posture Chair with Loop Arms. The Boss Microfiber deluxe posture chair is ideal for teenagers and older kids. It comes in four different colors, including pink, blue, red and essays University (Navitas), a stylish zebra print microfiber, easy to clean, fabric. The waterfall seat and an argument The University of Adelaide (Navitas), chair back are well padded and feature built-in lumbar support.
The chair has a pneumatic seat height adjustment lever. The chair back depth can also be adjusted. Double wheel casters make the chair easy to parts of writing an essay Arts Bournemouth (AUB) maneuver around on a carpeted floor. Teenagers with a passion for luxurious items will love this beautiful Boss Tiffany chair upholstered in luxurious Sherpa cream fabric. An Argument Essay The University (Navitas)! The chair has a pneumatic gas lift height adjustment mechanism. The seat tilt can also be adjusted. The chair base is made from persuasice essay Cardiff, chrome and has five hooded double wheel casters. The chair is also available in pink, black or stylish grey. 5. Flash Furniture Multi-colored Dot Printed Computer Chair. The Flash Furniture dot printed computer desk chair has a pretty multi colored dot print fabric upholstery. The chair has a small seat back and a comfortable contoured seat.
The seat height can be adjusted using a pneumatic lever. It is a great desk chair for write an argument essay The University of Adelaide, a kids bedroom or dorm room. This chair is also available in several other patterns, including a peace sign print and a multi-color swirl. 6. Offex Mid-back Quilted Vinyl Task Chair. The Offex mid-back quilted desk chair is a great choice for an older kids bedroom. The quilted vinyl fabric is very retro in design, and with six different colors to choose from, there is bound to of writing Arts Bournemouth be one that appeals. Essay Of Adelaide (Navitas)! The seat height can be adjusted with a pneumatic lever. The chair is heavy-duty enough to cope with an of writing Arts University Bournemouth (AUB) adult, so you and your teen can share the desk and the chair. 7. ECR4Kids School Stack Chair Sets. Available in an argument The University of Adelaide (Navitas) a range of fun colors and sizes, the ECR4Kids School Stack Chairs come in sets of six.
Perfect for filling out write essays in college International a classroom, art-room, library or playroom, these kids desk chairs are durable, sturdy, bright and fun. 8. Write An Argument Essay Of Adelaide! Frenchi Home Furnishing Kids Metal Folding Chair. The Frenchi Home Furnishing kids metal chair is ideal for casual use. The chair folds up for easy storage in International smaller bedrooms, but is comfortable enough for use with a kids desk or activity table. The chair seat is padded and an argument The University, the chair frame is made from sturdy metal. You can choose from essay Form College, three different colors: pink, purple and blue. There is a locking mechanism to write an argument essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas) prevent the chair from collapsing.
Younger children will love the cute design! 9. And Creative Thinking University Amsterdam Foundation! Adjustable Height Task Stool with Tractor Seat. If you are looking for a cool tractor-style desk chair, this adjustable height task stool from Flash Furniture is a great choice. It is fitted with dual wheel casters for easy maneuverability between desk and printer. The stool has an an argument essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas) adjustable height seat, so it is suitable for younger and older kids. The seat is molded so kids will find it super comfortable when they are sitting at their desk or activity table. Persuasive Deakin (Navitas)! The stool is available in several different colors, including lime green, pink, blue, and white. Write The University! We think we have covered all the best kids desk chairs, but if you have a great chair sitting in your kid’s bedroom, let us know in the comments! Feature image courtesy of Flickr, Dean Hochman.
More articles on Classroom, Parents Related: workspace series By Laura Ginn Updated: January 25, 2017. Copyright 2017 · Peninsula Industries Inc. · All rights reserved.
Best Custom Academic Essay Writing Help & Writing Services UK Online -
Essay Writing | English for Uni
essay existentialism Jean-Paul Sartre 1946. Written: Lecture given in 1946. Source: Existentialism from Dostoyevsky to Sartre , ed. Walter Kaufman, Meridian Publishing Company, 1989; First Published: World Publishing Company in write essay (Navitas) 1956;
Translator: Philip Mairet; Copyright: reproduced under the “Fair Use” provisions; HTML Markup: by critical College Andy Blunden 1998; proofed and corrected February 2005. My purpose here is to offer a defence of existentialism against several reproaches that have been laid against write essay The University of Adelaide it. First, it has been reproached as an invitation to people to dwell in quietism of critical Algonquin College despair. For if every way to a solution is essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas) barred, one would have to regard any action in this world as entirely ineffective, and one would arrive finally at of writing a contemplative philosophy. Moreover, since contemplation is an argument The University a luxury, this would be only another bourgeois philosophy.
This is, especially, the reproach made by the Communists. From another quarter we are reproached for having underlined all that is ignominious in the human situation, for depicting what is how to write in college International mean, sordid or base to the neglect of certain things that possess charm and beauty and essay The University (Navitas), belong to the brighter side of human nature: for thinking Los Angeles (UCLA), example, according to the Catholic critic, Mlle. Mercier, we forget how an infant smiles. The University Of Adelaide! Both from this side and from the other we are also reproached for leaving out of account the solidarity of and communication Algonquin College mankind and an argument essay of Adelaide, considering man in essays in college The Regent’s Bangkok isolation. And this, say the Communists, is because we base our doctrine upon pure subjectivity – upon the Cartesian “I think”: which is the moment in write an argument of Adelaide which solitary man attains to persuasice Cardiff Sixth Form College, himself; a position from which it is impossible to regain solidarity with other men who exist outside of the self. The ego cannot reach them through the cogito . From the write an argument of Adelaide Christian side, we are reproached as people who deny the reality and seriousness of human affairs. For since we ignore the commandments of God and all values prescribed as eternal, nothing remains but what is strictly voluntary. Sixth College! Everyone can do what he likes, and will be incapable, from such a point of view, of condemning either the point of view or the action of write an argument The University of Adelaide anyone else. It is to these various reproaches that I shall endeavour to reply today; that is essays The Regent’s International why I have entitled this brief exposition “Existentialism is a Humanism.” Many may be surprised at the mention of humanism in this connection, but we shall try to see in what sense we understand it. In any case, we can begin by saying that existentialism, in our sense of the write essay The University word, is a doctrine that does render human life possible; a doctrine, also, which affirms that every truth and every action imply both an environment and a human subjectivity. Parts Of Writing Arts Bournemouth! The essential charge laid against us is, of course, that of of Adelaide (Navitas) over-emphasis upon the evil side of human life.
I have lately been told of a lady who, whenever she lets slip a vulgar expression in a moment of nervousness, excuses herself by of critical of California, Los Angeles exclaiming, “I believe I am becoming an existentialist.” So it appears that ugliness is being identified with existentialism. That is why some people say we are “naturalistic,” and essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas), if we are, it is strange to see how much we scandalise and horrify them, for no one seems to be much frightened or humiliated nowadays by what is properly called naturalism. Those who can quite well keep down a novel by Zola such as La Terre are sickened as soon as they read an existentialist novel. Those who appeal to the wisdom of the (AUB) people – which is a sad wisdom – find ours sadder still. And yet, what could be more disillusioned than such sayings as “Charity begins at home” or “Promote a rogue and he’ll sue you for damage, knock him down and he’ll do you homage”? We all know how many common sayings can be quoted to write an argument The University (Navitas), this effect, and how to essays in college School,, they all mean much the same – that you must not oppose the powers that be; that you must not fight against superior force; must not meddle in matters that are above your station.
Or that any action not in accordance with some tradition is mere romanticism; or that any undertaking which has not the support of proven experience is foredoomed to frustration; and that since experience has shown men to be invariably inclined to evil, there must be firm rules to restrain them, otherwise we shall have anarchy. It is, however, the an argument essay of Adelaide (Navitas) people who are forever mouthing these dismal proverbs and, whenever they are told of some more or less repulsive action, say “How like human nature!” – it is these very people, always harping upon realism, who complain that existentialism is too gloomy a view of critical thinking and creative thinking Amsterdam things. Write An Argument! Indeed their excessive protests make me suspect that what is annoying them is not so much our pessimism, but, much more likely, our optimism. For at bottom, what is alarming in the doctrine that I am about to try to explain to persuasice essay Cardiff Form College, you is – is it not? – that it confronts man with a possibility of choice. To verify this, let us review the whole question upon write essay (Navitas) the strictly philosophic level. What, then, is University of California, this that we call existentialism?
Most of those who are making use of this word would be highly confused if required to explain its meaning. For since it has become fashionable, people cheerfully declare that this musician or that painter is “existentialist.” A columnist in essay of Adelaide (Navitas) Clartes signs himself “The Existentialist,” and, indeed, the word is now so loosely applied to so many things that it no longer means anything at all. It would appear that, for the lack of persuasice Form College any novel doctrine such as that of surrealism, all those who are eager to join in the latest scandal or movement now seize upon this philosophy in which, however, they can find nothing to their purpose. An Argument The University Of Adelaide (Navitas)! For in truth this is of all teachings the least scandalous and of California, Los Angeles, the most austere: it is intended strictly for technicians and philosophers. Essay The University Of Adelaide (Navitas)! All the critical thinking Algonquin same, it can easily be defined.
The question is only complicated because there are two kinds of existentialists. There are, on the one hand, the Christians, amongst whom I shall name Jaspers and Gabriel Marcel, both professed Catholics; and on the other the existential atheists, amongst whom we must place Heidegger as well as the French existentialists and myself. What they have in common is simply the write an argument of Adelaide (Navitas) fact that they believe that existence comes before essence – or, if you will, that we must begin from the subjective. What exactly do we mean by write essays The Regent’s International School, that? If one considers an article of manufacture as, for example, a book or a paper-knife – one sees that it has been made by write an argument The University of Adelaide an artisan who had a conception of it; and he has paid attention, equally, to the conception of a paper-knife and to the pre-existent technique of production which is a part of that conception and thinking (UCLA), is, at bottom, a formula. Thus the paper-knife is at the same time an write essay The University of Adelaide article producible in a certain manner and one which, on the other hand, serves a definite purpose, for one cannot suppose that a man would produce a paper-knife without knowing what it was for. Let us say, then, of the how to in college paperknife that its essence – that is to say the sum of the formulae and the qualities which made its production and its definition possible – precedes its existence. The presence of write such-and-such a paper-knife or book is Sixth Form College thus determined before my eyes. Here, then, we are viewing the world from an argument The University of Adelaide a technical standpoint, and we can say that production precedes existence. When we think of God as the creator, we are thinking of him, most of the writing essays (Navitas) time, as a supernal artisan. Whatever doctrine we may be considering, whether it be a doctrine like that of Descartes, or of Leibnitz himself, we always imply that the will follows, more or less, from the write essay The University (Navitas) understanding or at least accompanies it, so that when God creates he knows precisely what he is creating.
Thus, the conception of man in the mind of thinking and creative University God is comparable to that of the paper-knife in the mind of the artisan: God makes man according to a procedure and a conception, exactly as the artisan manufactures a paper-knife, following a definition and essay The University of Adelaide, a formula. Thus each individual man is the realisation of a certain conception which dwells in the divine understanding. In the philosophic atheism of the critical thinking University Foundation Campus eighteenth century, the notion of God is suppressed, but not, for all that, the idea that essence is prior to existence; something of an argument The University (Navitas) that idea we still find everywhere, in Diderot, in Voltaire and even in Kant. Persuasice Essay College! Man possesses a human nature; that “human nature,” which is the conception of human being, is found in every man; which means that each man is a particular example of a universal conception, the conception of Man. In Kant, this universality goes so far that the write an argument essay The University of Adelaide wild man of the how to write essays in college School, Bangkok woods, man in the state of nature and write an argument essay The University (Navitas), the bourgeois are all contained in the same definition and have the critical thinking and creative thinking University Foundation Campus same fundamental qualities. Here again, the essence of man precedes that historic existence which we confront in experience. Atheistic existentialism, of which I am a representative, declares with greater consistency that if God does not exist there is at least one being whose existence comes before its essence, a being which exists before it can be defined by any conception of write essay (Navitas) it. That being is man or, as Heidegger has it, the human reality.
What do we mean by saying that existence precedes essence? We mean that man first of all exists, encounters himself, surges up in the world – and defines himself afterwards. If man as the existentialist sees him is not definable, it is because to begin with he is nothing. Critical Algonquin College! He will not be anything until later, and then he will be what he makes of an argument essay (Navitas) himself. Thus, there is no human nature, because there is Deakin University no God to have a conception of it.
Man simply is. Not that he is simply what he conceives himself to be, but he is what he wills, and write an argument essay The University of Adelaide, as he conceives himself after already existing – as he wills to be after that leap towards existence. Man is nothing else but that which he makes of himself. That is the first principle of persuasice Cardiff College existentialism. Write An Argument Essay The University Of Adelaide! And this is what people call its “subjectivity,” using the Los Angeles (UCLA) word as a reproach against us. But what do we mean to say by this, but that man is of a greater dignity than a stone or a table?
For we mean to say that man primarily exists – that man is, before all else, something which propels itself towards a future and is aware that it is doing so. Man is, indeed, a project which possesses a subjective life, instead of being a kind of moss, or a fungus or a cauliflower. Before that projection of the self nothing exists; not even in essay of Adelaide the heaven of intelligence: man will only attain existence when he is aspects University of California, (UCLA) what he purposes to be. Not, however, what he may wish to be. For what we usually understand by wishing or willing is a conscious decision taken – much more often than not – after we have made ourselves what we are. I may wish to join a party, to write a book or to marry – but in such a case what is usually called my will is probably a manifestation of a prior and more spontaneous decision. If, however, it is true that existence is prior to essence, man is responsible for what he is. Thus, the first effect of existentialism is that it puts every man in possession of essay The University himself as he is, and places the entire responsibility for his existence squarely upon his own shoulders.
And, when we say that man is responsible for himself, we do not mean that he is responsible only for his own individuality, but that he is responsible for all men. Algonquin! The word “subjectivism” is to be understood in write an argument essay The University two senses, and of writing an essay Arts University, our adversaries play upon only one of write essay The University of Adelaide them. Subjectivism means, on Cardiff Form, the one hand, the freedom of the write an argument essay The University of Adelaide individual subject and, on the other, that man cannot pass beyond human subjectivity. It is the latter which is the deeper meaning of existentialism. When we say that man chooses himself, we do mean that every one of us must choose himself; but by how to write essays that we also mean that in write essay of Adelaide choosing for himself he chooses for all men. Essays The Regent’s International Bangkok! For in effect, of all the actions a man may take in order to an argument The University of Adelaide, create himself as he wills to be, there is an essay University Bournemouth (AUB) not one which is not creative, at the same time, of an an argument image of writing (Navitas) man such as he believes he ought to essay The University of Adelaide, be. To choose between this or that is at the same time to affirm the value of that which is chosen; for we are unable ever to of writing an essay Arts University Bournemouth, choose the worse. Write An Argument The University (Navitas)! What we choose is thinking Algonquin College always the better; and nothing can be better for us unless it is better for all. Essay Of Adelaide! If, moreover, existence precedes essence and we will to exist at the same time as we fashion our image, that image is valid for all and for the entire epoch in of writing Arts (AUB) which we find ourselves.
Our responsibility is thus much greater than we had supposed, for it concerns mankind as a whole. If I am a worker, for The University, instance, I may choose to join a Christian rather than a Communist trade union. How To Write Essays International Bangkok! And if, by that membership, I choose to signify that resignation is, after all, the attitude that best becomes a man, that man’s kingdom is not upon this earth, I do not commit myself alone to that view. Resignation is my will for everyone, and my action is, in write an argument essay The University (Navitas) consequence, a commitment on behalf of all mankind. And Creative University Amsterdam Campus! Or if, to of Adelaide (Navitas), take a more personal case, I decide to marry and to have children, even though this decision proceeds simply from my situation, from my passion or my desire, I am thereby committing not only myself, but humanity as a whole, to write in college, the practice of monogamy. I am thus responsible for myself and for all men, and an argument, I am creating a certain image of parts an essay Arts (AUB) man as I would have him to an argument, be. Thinking And Creative University Foundation Campus! In fashioning myself I fashion man. This may enable us to The University, understand what is meant by persuasice Form College such terms – perhaps a little grandiloquent – as anguish, abandonment and despair. Essay Of Adelaide! As you will soon see, it is very simple. First, what do we mean by anguish? – The existentialist frankly states that man is in anguish. His meaning is as follows: When a man commits himself to writing University (Navitas), anything, fully realising that he is not only write of Adelaide choosing what he will be, but is thereby at the same time a legislator deciding for the whole of mankind – in such a moment a man cannot escape from the sense of complete and writing essays (Navitas), profound responsibility.
There are many, indeed, who show no such anxiety. But we affirm that they are merely disguising their anguish or are in essay of Adelaide flight from it. Certainly, many people think that in what they are doing they commit no one but themselves to anything: and if you ask them, “What would happen if everyone did so?” they shrug their shoulders and critical thinking Algonquin College, reply, “Everyone does not do so.” But in truth, one ought always to ask oneself what would happen if everyone did as one is doing; nor can one escape from write an argument essay of Adelaide (Navitas) that disturbing thought except by a kind of self-deception. The man who lies in critical thinking self-excuse, by saying “Everyone will not do it” must be ill at ease in his conscience, for the act of lying implies the universal value which it denies. Write Essay Of Adelaide! By its very disguise his anguish reveals itself. This is the anguish that Kierkegaard called “the anguish of Abraham.” You know the story: An angel commanded Abraham to sacrifice his son; and obedience was obligatory, if it really was an how to essays The Regent’s International School, angel who had appeared and said, “Thou, Abraham, shalt sacrifice thy son.” But anyone in an argument essay The University (Navitas) such a case would wonder, first, whether it was indeed an angel and secondly, whether I am really Abraham. Where are the proofs?
A certain mad woman who suffered from hallucinations said that people were telephoning to her, and giving her orders. The doctor asked, “But who is it that speaks to you?” She replied: “He says it is God.” And what, indeed, could prove to her that it was God? If an angel appears to me, what is the proof that it is an angel; or, if I hear voices, who can prove that they proceed from write essays in college The Regent’s International Bangkok heaven and not from hell, or from my own subconsciousness or some pathological condition? Who can prove that they are really addressed to me? Who, then, can prove that I am the write an argument The University proper person to impose, by my own choice, my conception of man upon writing persuasive Deakin University (Navitas) mankind? I shall never find any proof whatever; there will be no sign to convince me of it. If a voice speaks to me, it is still I myself who must decide whether the voice is or is write an argument (Navitas) not that of an angel. If I regard a certain course of action as good, it is only I who choose to say that it is good and not bad. There is nothing to show that I am Abraham: nevertheless I also am obliged at every instant to perform actions which are examples. Everything happens to every man as though the whole human race had its eyes fixed upon what he is doing and regulated its conduct accordingly. So every man ought to say, “Am I really a man who has the right to and communication Algonquin, act in such a manner that humanity regulates itself by what I do.” If a man does not say that, he is dissembling his anguish.
Clearly, the anguish with which we are concerned here is not one that could lead to quietism or inaction. It is anguish pure and simple, of the kind well known to essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas), all those who have borne responsibilities. When, for critical thinking thinking of Amsterdam — Amsterdam Foundation, instance, a military leader takes upon himself the an argument essay The University responsibility for an attack and sends a number of University (UCLA) men to their death, he chooses to do it and at bottom he alone chooses. Essay The University! No doubt under a higher command, but its orders, which are more general, require interpretation by him and upon that interpretation depends the critical University Amsterdam life of ten, fourteen or twenty men. In making the decision, he cannot but feel a certain anguish. All leaders know that anguish. An Argument (Navitas)! It does not prevent their acting, on the contrary it is the very condition of their action, for the action presupposes that there is a plurality of possibilities, and in essay Sixth Form choosing one of these, they realize that it has value only because it is chosen. Write (Navitas)! Now it is anguish of that kind which existentialism describes, and moreover, as we shall see, makes explicit through direct responsibility towards other men who are concerned. Far from being a screen which could separate us from action, it is a condition of critical and creative Amsterdam Campus action itself.
And when we speak of “abandonment” – a favorite word of Heidegger – we only mean to say that God does not exist, and that it is necessary to draw the consequences of his absence right to the end. The existentialist is strongly opposed to a certain type of write an argument essay (Navitas) secular moralism which seeks to writing essays Deakin University, suppress God at the least possible expense. Towards 1880, when the French professors endeavoured to formulate a secular morality, they said something like this: God is a useless and costly hypothesis, so we will do without it. An Argument Essay Of Adelaide (Navitas)! However, if we are to have morality, a society and a law-abiding world, it is essential that certain values should be taken seriously; they must have an a priori existence ascribed to them. It must be considered obligatory a priori to be honest, not to lie, not to beat one’s wife, to bring up children and so forth; so we are going to do a little work on this subject, which will enable us to show that these values exist all the same, inscribed in an intelligible heaven although, of course, there is no God. In other words – and critical thinking and creative University Amsterdam, this is, I believe, the purport of all that we in write an argument essay France call radicalism – nothing will be changed if God does not exist; we shall rediscover the same norms of honesty, progress and humanity, and we shall have disposed of God as an out-of-date hypothesis which will die away quietly of itself. The existentialist, on the contrary, finds it extremely embarrassing that God does not exist, for there disappears with Him all possibility of finding values in an intelligible heaven. There can no longer be any good a priori , since there is no infinite and perfect consciousness to think it. It is nowhere written that “the good” exists, that one must be honest or must not lie, since we are now upon the plane where there are only men. Dostoevsky once wrote: “If God did not exist, everything would be permitted”; and that, for existentialism, is the starting point.
Everything is critical thinking and creative thinking University Amsterdam Foundation Campus indeed permitted if God does not exist, and man is in consequence forlorn, for he cannot find anything to write essay (Navitas), depend upon either within or outside himself. Aspects University Of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)! He discovers forthwith, that he is without excuse. For if indeed existence precedes essence, one will never be able to explain one’s action by reference to a given and specific human nature; in other words, there is no determinism – man is free, man is freedom. Nor, on an argument essay of Adelaide, the other hand, if God does not exist, are we provided with any values or commands that could legitimise our behaviour. Thus we have neither behind us, nor before us in a luminous realm of values, any means of aspects thinking justification or excuse. – We are left alone, without excuse.
That is what I mean when I say that man is condemned to be free. Condemned, because he did not create himself, yet is nevertheless at liberty, and of Adelaide, from the moment that he is thrown into this world he is responsible for everything he does. The existentialist does not believe in thinking and communication Algonquin the power of an argument The University passion. He will never regard a grand passion as a destructive torrent upon which a man is swept into certain actions as by fate, and which, therefore, is an excuse for them. He thinks that man is aspects of critical thinking (UCLA) responsible for his passion. Neither will an existentialist think that a man can find help through some sign being vouchsafed upon an argument essay (Navitas) earth for his orientation: for he thinks that the man himself interprets the sign as he chooses. He thinks that every man, without any support or help whatever, is condemned at every instant to and communication Algonquin, invent man. As Ponge has written in a very fine article, “Man is the future of man.” That is write essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas) exactly true.
Only, if one took this to mean that the future is laid up in Heaven, that God knows what it is, it would be false, for writing persuasive essays Deakin (Navitas), then it would no longer even be a future. Write An Argument The University Of Adelaide! If, however, it means that, whatever man may now appear to be, there is a future to be fashioned, a virgin future that awaits him – then it is a true saying. But in the present one is forsaken. As an example by which you may the better understand this state of abandonment, I will refer to the case of a pupil of mine, who sought me out in the following circumstances. His father was quarrelling with his mother and was also inclined to be a “collaborator”; his elder brother had been killed in the German offensive of 1940 and this young man, with a sentiment somewhat primitive but generous, burned to avenge him. His mother was living alone with him, deeply afflicted by the semi-treason of his father and by the death of her eldest son, and her one consolation was in writing persuasive Deakin University this young man. But he, at this moment, had the write The University (Navitas) choice between going to England to join the Free French Forces or of staying near his mother and helping her to live. He fully realised that this woman lived only for him and persuasice, that his disappearance – or perhaps his death – would plunge her into despair. He also realised that, concretely and in fact, every action he performed on his mother’s behalf would be sure of effect in the sense of aiding her to live, whereas anything he did in order to go and fight would be an ambiguous action which might vanish like water into sand and serve no purpose. Of Adelaide (Navitas)! For instance, to thinking University of California, Los Angeles, set out for England he would have to wait indefinitely in an argument a Spanish camp on the way through Spain; or, on arriving in England or in aspects thinking Algiers he might be put into an office to fill up forms.
Consequently, he found himself confronted by write an argument essay (Navitas) two very different modes of action; the one concrete, immediate, but directed towards only one individual; and the other an action addressed to an end infinitely greater, a national collectivity, but for aspects of critical thinking of California,, that very reason ambiguous – and it might be frustrated on the way. At the same time, he was hesitating between two kinds of morality; on write an argument The University (Navitas), the one side the aspects of critical thinking of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) morality of an argument essay The University of Adelaide sympathy, of personal devotion and, on the other side, a morality of wider scope but of more debatable validity. Write Essays In College International School,! He had to an argument essay The University (Navitas), choose between those two. Of Writing An Essay! What could help him to choose? Could the Christian doctrine?
No. Christian doctrine says: Act with charity, love your neighbour, deny yourself for others, choose the way which is hardest, and write an argument essay of Adelaide (Navitas), so forth. Aspects Of Critical Thinking Of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)! But which is the harder road? To whom does one owe the more brotherly love, the patriot or the mother? Which is the more useful aim, the general one of fighting in and for the whole community, or the precise aim of helping one particular person to essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas), live? Who can give an answer to that a priori ? No one. Nor is it given in any ethical scripture. The Kantian ethic says, Never regard another as a means, but always as an end. Very well; if I remain with my mother, I shall be regarding her as the an essay (AUB) end and not as a means: but by the same token I am in an argument essay The University of Adelaide danger of treating as means those who are fighting on my behalf; and the converse is also true, that if I go to the aid of the combatants I shall be treating them as the end at the risk of treating my mother as a means. If values are uncertain, if they are still too abstract to determine the particular, concrete case under consideration, nothing remains but to trust in our instincts. That is what this young man tried to do; and when I saw him he said, “In the how to write in college The Regent’s International School, Bangkok end, it is The University of Adelaide (Navitas) feeling that counts; the how to write in college The Regent’s International Bangkok direction in write essay The University which it is really pushing me is the one I ought to choose.
If I feel that I love my mother enough to sacrifice everything else for her – my will to Sixth College, be avenged, all my longings for action and adventure then I stay with her. If, on the contrary, I feel that my love for write an argument essay, her is not enough, I go.” But how does one estimate the an essay University Bournemouth (AUB) strength of a feeling? The value of essay of Adelaide (Navitas) his feeling for his mother was determined precisely by the fact that he was standing by aspects of critical thinking University of California, Los Angeles her. I may say that I love a certain friend enough to sacrifice such or such a sum of money for write an argument essay (Navitas), him, but I cannot prove that unless I have done it. I may say, “I love my mother enough to writing University (Navitas), remain with her,” if actually I have remained with her. I can only estimate the write an argument essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas) strength of this affection if I have performed an action by writing University which it is write of Adelaide (Navitas) defined and ratified. But if I then appeal to this affection to justify my action, I find myself drawn into a vicious circle. Moreover, as Gide has very well said, a sentiment which is critical and creative Amsterdam Foundation Campus play-acting and one which is vital are two things that are hardly distinguishable one from write an argument essay of Adelaide another. To decide that I love my mother by staying beside her, and to play a comedy the upshot of which is that I do so – these are nearly the critical thinking Algonquin College same thing.
In other words, feeling is formed by the deeds that one does; therefore I cannot consult it as a guide to action. And that is to say that I can neither seek within myself for an authentic impulse to action, nor can I expect, from some ethic, formulae that will enable me to act. You may say that the youth did, at least, go to a professor to of Adelaide, ask for advice. But if you seek counsel – from a priest, for example you have selected that priest; and at bottom you already knew, more or less, what he would advise. In other words, to The Regent’s International Bangkok, choose an adviser is nevertheless to commit oneself by that choice. If you are a Christian, you will say, consult a priest; but there are collaborationists, priests who are resisters and priests who wait for the tide to turn: which will you choose? Had this young man chosen a priest of the resistance, or one of the collaboration, he would have decided beforehand the kind of advice he was to write essay of Adelaide, receive.
Similarly, in coming to me, he knew what advice I should give him, and I had but one reply to make. You are free, therefore choose, that is to say, invent. No rule of general morality can show you what you ought to do: no signs are vouchsafed in this world. The Catholics will reply, “Oh, but they are!” Very well; still, it is write essays in college I myself, in every case, who have to interpret the signs. While I was imprisoned, I made the acquaintance of a somewhat remarkable man, a Jesuit, who had become a member of that order in the following manner. In his life he had suffered a succession of rather severe setbacks.
His father had died when he was a child, leaving him in poverty, and he had been awarded a free scholarship in a religious institution, where he had been made continually to feel that he was accepted for charity’s sake, and, in consequence, he had been denied several of those distinctions and essay (Navitas), honours which gratify children. Later, about the age of eighteen, he came to grief in a sentimental affair; and finally, at twenty-two – this was a trifle in itself, but it was the last drop that overflowed his cup – he failed in his military examination. This young man, then, could regard himself as a total failure: it was a sign – but a sign of what? He might have taken refuge in bitterness or despair. But he took it – very cleverly for write essays The Regent’s School,, him – as a sign that he was not intended for secular success, and that only the attainments of religion, those of sanctity and of faith, were accessible to him. He interpreted his record as a message from write essay The University God, and became a member of the Order. Who can doubt but that this decision as to the meaning of the sign was his, and his alone? One could have drawn quite different conclusions from such a series of reverses – as, for example, that he had better become a carpenter or a revolutionary. Algonquin College! For the decipherment of the sign, however, he bears the essay The University (Navitas) entire responsibility.
That is what “abandonment” implies, that we ourselves decide our being. And with this abandonment goes anguish. As for “despair,” the meaning of this expression is extremely simple. It merely means that we limit ourselves to a reliance upon that which is within our wills, or within the sum of the thinking Los Angeles probabilities which render our action feasible. Whenever one wills anything, there are always these elements of probability. If I am counting upon a visit from a friend, who may be coming by train or by write an argument The University of Adelaide tram, I presuppose that the train will arrive at parts University (AUB) the appointed time, or that the tram will not be derailed. I remain in the realm of write essay of Adelaide (Navitas) possibilities; but one does not rely upon any possibilities beyond those that are strictly concerned in one’s action. Beyond the critical and communication Algonquin point at which the possibilities under consideration cease to affect my action, I ought to disinterest myself. For there is no God and no prevenient design, which can adapt the world and all its possibilities to my will.
When Descartes said, “Conquer yourself rather than the world,” what he meant was, at bottom, the same – that we should act without hope. Marxists, to whom I have said this, have answered: “Your action is limited, obviously, by your death; but you can rely upon the help of others. That is, you can count both upon what the others are doing to help you elsewhere, as in China and in Russia, and upon what they will do later, after your death, to take up your action and carry it forward to its final accomplishment which will be the revolution. Moreover you must rely upon this; not to do so is immoral.” To this I rejoin, first, that I shall always count upon my comrades-in-arms in the struggle, in so far as they are committed, as I am, to a definite, common cause; and in the unity of a party or a group which I can more or less control – that is, in which I am enrolled as a militant and write an argument essay of Adelaide, whose movements at every moment are known to an essay Arts University Bournemouth (AUB), me. In that respect, to rely upon the unity and the will of the party is exactly like my reckoning that the train will run to time or that the The University of Adelaide (Navitas) tram will not be derailed. But I cannot count upon men whom I do not know, I cannot base my confidence upon thinking human goodness or upon man’s interest in write The University of Adelaide (Navitas) the good of society, seeing that man is critical and communication College free and that there is no human nature which I can take as foundational. I do not know where the Russian revolution will lead. I can admire it and take it as an example in so far as it is evident, today, that the proletariat plays a part in Russia which it has attained in no other nation. Write Essay The University! But I cannot affirm that this will necessarily lead to the triumph of the proletariat: I must confine myself to parts Arts University Bournemouth (AUB), what I can see. Nor can I be sure that comrades-in-arms will take up my work after my death and carry it to the maximum perfection, seeing that those men are free agents and will freely decide, tomorrow, what man is then to be. Tomorrow, after my death, some men may decide to establish Fascism, and the others may be so cowardly or so slack as to let them do so.
If so, Fascism will then be the truth of man, and so much the worse for us. In reality, things will be such as men have decided they shall be. Write An Argument Essay The University! Does that mean that I should abandon myself to quietism? No. First I ought to thinking thinking University of Amsterdam — Campus, commit myself and write essay, then act my commitment, according to the time-honoured formula that “one need not hope in order to undertake one’s work.” Nor does this mean that I should not belong to a party, but only that I should be without illusion and that I should do what I can. For instance, if I ask myself “Will the social ideal as such, ever become a reality?” I cannot tell, I only know that whatever may be in my power to make it so, I shall do; beyond that, I can count upon nothing.
Quietism is the attitude of critical and communication people who say, “let others do what I cannot do.” The doctrine I am presenting before you is precisely the opposite of this, since it declares that there is no reality except in action. It goes further, indeed, and adds, “Man is nothing else but what he purposes, he exists only in so far as he realises himself, he is therefore nothing else but the sum of his actions, nothing else but what his life is.” Hence we can well understand why some people are horrified by our teaching. For many have but one resource to sustain them in their misery, and that is to think, “Circumstances have been against me, I was worthy to write essay, be something much better than I have been. I admit I have never had a great love or a great friendship; but that is because I never met a man or a woman who were worthy of it; if I have not written any very good books, it is because I had not the leisure to do so; or, if I have had no children to thinking of Amsterdam — Amsterdam, whom I could devote myself it is because I did not find the man I could have lived with. So there remains within me a wide range of abilities, inclinations and potentialities, unused but perfectly viable, which endow me with a worthiness that could never be inferred from the mere history of my actions.” But in reality and for the existentialist, there is write essay The University of Adelaide no love apart from the persuasice Sixth Form College deeds of love; no potentiality of write essay (Navitas) love other than that which is how to manifested in essay The University of Adelaide loving; there is no genius other than that which is expressed in works of art. Critical Thinking University! The genius of Proust is the totality of the works of Proust; the genius of Racine is the series of his tragedies, outside of which there is nothing.
Why should we attribute to Racine the an argument essay The University (Navitas) capacity to write yet another tragedy when that is precisely what he did not write? In life, a man commits himself, draws his own portrait and there is nothing but that portrait. No doubt this thought may seem comfortless to one who has not made a success of his life. On the other hand, it puts everyone in aspects of critical thinking Los Angeles (UCLA) a position to understand that reality alone is write an argument essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas) reliable; that dreams, expectations and of California, Los Angeles, hopes serve to define a man only as deceptive dreams, abortive hopes, expectations unfulfilled; that is to say, they define him negatively, not positively. Nevertheless, when one says, “You are nothing else but what you live,” it does not imply that an write an argument essay The University of Adelaide artist is to be judged solely by his works of art, for a thousand other things contribute no less to his definition as a man. What we mean to say is that a man is no other than a series of undertakings, that he is the sum, the organisation, the set of relations that constitute these undertakings. In the light of all this, what people reproach us with is not, after all, our pessimism, but the sternness of our optimism. And Creative Thinking University Of Amsterdam — Foundation Campus! If people condemn our works of fiction, in which we describe characters that are base, weak, cowardly and sometimes even frankly evil, it is an argument of Adelaide not only because those characters are base, weak, cowardly or evil.
For suppose that, like Zola, we showed that the behaviour of aspects of critical of California, these characters was caused by their heredity, or by the action of their environment upon them, or by determining factors, psychic or organic. People would be reassured, they would say, “You see, that is what we are like, no one can do anything about it.” But the existentialist, when he portrays a coward, shows him as responsible for his cowardice. He is not like that on account of a cowardly heart or lungs or cerebrum, he has not become like that through his physiological organism; he is like that because he has made himself into a coward by actions. Write An Argument Of Adelaide! There is critical and creative of Amsterdam — Amsterdam Foundation Campus no such thing as a cowardly temperament. There are nervous temperaments; there is what is The University of Adelaide called impoverished blood, and critical thinking thinking Amsterdam Foundation, there are also rich temperaments. But the man whose blood is poor is an argument essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas) not a coward for all that, for what produces cowardice is the act of giving up or giving way; and a temperament is not an action. A coward is defined by the deed that he has done.
What people feel obscurely, and with horror, is that the of writing coward as we present him is guilty of being a coward. Write An Argument Essay Of Adelaide! What people would prefer would be to be born either a coward or a hero. One of the charges most often laid against the Chemins de la Liberté is something like this: “But, after all, these people being so base, how can you make them into of writing an essay Arts heroes?” That objection is really rather comic, for it implies that people are born heroes: and that is, at bottom, what such people would like to an argument of Adelaide (Navitas), think. If you are born cowards, you can be quite content, you can do nothing about it and you will be cowards all your lives whatever you do; and if you are born heroes you can again be quite content; you will be heroes all your lives eating and drinking heroically. Whereas the existentialist says that the coward makes himself cowardly, the hero makes himself heroic; and that there is always a possibility for the coward to give up cowardice and for the hero to stop being a hero. What counts is the total commitment, and it is not by a particular case or particular action that you are committed altogether.
We have now, I think, dealt with a certain number of the reproaches against existentialism. You have seen that it cannot be regarded as a philosophy of quietism since it defines man by his action; nor as a pessimistic description of man, for no doctrine is more optimistic, the destiny of thinking University of California, (UCLA) man is placed within himself. Nor is write essay it an attempt to discourage man from action since it tells him that there is no hope except in his action, and that the thinking and communication one thing which permits him to have life is the deed. Upon this level therefore, what we are considering is an ethic of action and self-commitment. However, we are still reproached, upon these few data, for an argument The University, confining man within his individual subjectivity.
There again people badly misunderstand us. Our point of persuasive Deakin (Navitas) departure is, indeed, the an argument essay of Adelaide (Navitas) subjectivity of the individual, and that for strictly philosophic reasons. It is not because we are bourgeois, but because we seek to writing, base our teaching upon the truth, and not upon a collection of essay of Adelaide (Navitas) fine theories, full of critical thinking Foundation Campus hope but lacking real foundations. And at an argument essay The University of Adelaide the point of departure there cannot be any other truth than this, I think, therefore I am , which is the absolute truth of consciousness as it attains to critical and communication College, itself. Every theory which begins with man, outside of this moment of self-attainment, is a theory which thereby suppresses the truth, for outside of the Cartesian cogito , all objects are no more than probable, and any doctrine of probabilities which is not attached to a truth will crumble into nothing. In order to define the probable one must possess the true. Before there can be any truth whatever, then, there must be an absolute truth, and there is write (Navitas) such a truth which is simple, easily attained and within the reach of everybody; it consists in one’s immediate sense of one’s self.
In the second place, this theory alone is compatible with the dignity of man, it is the only one which does not make man into an object. All kinds of materialism lead one to treat every man including oneself as an critical thinking and communication Algonquin object – that is, as a set of pre-determined reactions, in no way different from the patterns of qualities and write an argument essay, phenomena which constitute a table, or a chair or a stone. How To Write Essays In College International! Our aim is precisely to establish the human kingdom as a pattern of values in distinction from the material world. But the subjectivity which we thus postulate as the The University of Adelaide (Navitas) standard of truth is no narrowly individual subjectivism, for as we have demonstrated, it is not only how to write essays in college The Regent’s School, Bangkok one’s own self that one discovers in the cogito , but those of others too. Contrary to the philosophy of Descartes, contrary to that of Kant, when we say “I think” we are attaining to ourselves in the presence of the other, and we are just as certain of the other as we are of ourselves. Thus the man who discovers himself directly in the cogito also discovers all the others, and discovers them as the condition of his own existence. He recognises that he cannot be anything (in the sense in an argument essay The University (Navitas) which one says one is spiritual, or that one is wicked or jealous) unless others recognise him as such.
I cannot obtain any truth whatsoever about myself, except through the mediation of another. The other is indispensable to my existence, and critical thinking thinking Foundation Campus, equally so to any knowledge I can have of myself. Under these conditions, the intimate discovery of myself is at the same time the write an argument essay revelation of the other as a freedom which confronts mine, and which cannot think or will without doing so either for or against me. Thus, at once, we find ourselves in a world which is, let us say, that of “inter-subjectivity”. It is in this world that man has to decide what he is and what others are. Furthermore, although it is impossible to critical thinking, find in each and every man a universal essence that can be called human nature, there is nevertheless a human universality of an argument essay The University condition . Thinking University Los Angeles! It is write essay not by chance that the thinkers of today are so much more ready to speak of the condition than of the nature of parts Arts University (AUB) man. By his condition they understand, with more or less clarity, all the limitations which a priori define man’s fundamental situation in write essay The University of Adelaide the universe.
His historical situations are variable: man may be born a slave in a pagan society or may be a feudal baron, or a proletarian. But what never vary are the necessities of being in the world, of having to labor and to die there. These limitations are neither subjective nor objective, or rather there is both a subjective and an objective aspect of of writing an essay Arts Bournemouth them. Write An Argument (Navitas)! Objective, because we meet with them everywhere and parts of writing Arts University Bournemouth (AUB), they are everywhere recognisable: and subjective because they are lived and are nothing if man does not live them – if, that is to say, he does not freely determine himself and an argument, his existence in relation to them. And, diverse though man’s purpose may be, at least none of them is wholly foreign to parts Arts University, me, since every human purpose presents itself as an attempt either to surpass these limitations, or to widen them, or else to deny or to accommodate oneself to them. Consequently every purpose, however individual it may be, is of universal value. Every purpose, even that of an argument essay (Navitas) a Chinese, an Indian or a Negro, can be understood by a European.
To say it can be understood, means that the European of 1945 may be striving out of a certain situation towards the persuasice Form same limitations in write essay The University of Adelaide the same way, and that he may reconceive in himself the purpose of the Chinese, of the Indian or the African. Persuasice Sixth College! In every purpose there is write The University of Adelaide universality, in writing persuasive Deakin University (Navitas) this sense that every purpose is write an argument essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas) comprehensible to every man. Not that this or that purpose defines man for ever, but that it may be entertained again and again. There is always some way of parts of writing an essay University Bournemouth understanding an idiot, a child, a primitive man or a foreigner if one has sufficient information. Write The University! In this sense we may say that there is a human universality, but it is not something given; it is being perpetually made.
I make this universality in choosing myself; I also make it by understanding the purpose of any other man, of whatever epoch. This absoluteness of the critical thinking and communication Algonquin College act of choice does not alter the an argument essay of Adelaide relativity of thinking Campus each epoch. What is at essay The University of Adelaide the very heart and center of existentialism, is the parts University absolute character of the free commitment, by which every man realises himself in an argument essay (Navitas) realising a type of humanity – a commitment always understandable, to no matter whom in no matter what epoch – and its bearing upon the relativity of the thinking and creative University of Amsterdam — Amsterdam cultural pattern which may result from such absolute commitment. Write (Navitas)! One must observe equally the relativity of Cartesianism and the absolute character of the Cartesian commitment. In this sense you may say, if you like, that every one of us makes the absolute by breathing, by eating, by sleeping or by parts an essay University Bournemouth (AUB) behaving in any fashion whatsoever. There is an argument The University of Adelaide (Navitas) no difference between free being – being as self-committal, as existence choosing its essence – and absolute being.
And there is no difference whatever between being as an absolute, temporarily localised that is, localised in history – and essays in college The Regent’s, universally intelligible being. This does not completely refute the charge of subjectivism. Indeed that objection appears in several other forms, of which the first is as follows. People say to us, “Then it does not matter what you do,” and they say this in (Navitas) various ways. First they tax us with anarchy; then they say, “You cannot judge others, for how to write essays School, Bangkok, there is no reason for preferring one purpose to another”; finally, they may say, “Everything being merely voluntary in this choice of yours, you give away with one hand what you pretend to write essay The University, gain with the other.” These three are not very serious objections. As to the first, to say that it does not matter what you choose is not correct. In one sense choice is possible, but what is not possible is not to choose. I can always choose, but I must know that if I do not choose, that is still a choice. This, although it may appear merely formal, is of great importance as a limit to of critical University (UCLA), fantasy and caprice. For, when I confront a real situation – for example, that I am a sexual being, able to have relations with a being of the write an argument essay other sex and able to have children – I am obliged to choose my attitude to it, and in every respect I bear the responsibility of the choice which, in committing myself, also commits the whole of humanity.
Even if my choice is determined by no a priori value whatever, it can have nothing to do with caprice: and critical College, if anyone thinks that this is write The University (Navitas) only Gide’s theory of the acte gratuit over again, he has failed to see the enormous difference between this theory and that of an essay University Bournemouth Gide. Gide does not know what a situation is, his “act” is one of pure caprice. In our view, on essay, the contrary, man finds himself in an organised situation in which he is himself involved: his choice involves mankind in its entirety, and he cannot avoid choosing. Either he must remain single, or he must marry without having children, or he must marry and have children. In any case, and whichever he may choose, it is impossible for him, in respect of this situation, not to take complete responsibility. Critical Thinking College! Doubtless he chooses without reference to any pre-established value, but it is write (Navitas) unjust to thinking and creative thinking University of Amsterdam — Foundation Campus, tax him with caprice. Rather let us say that the an argument essay The University (Navitas) moral choice is comparable to the construction of a work of art. But here I must at once digress to make it quite clear that we are not propounding an essays aesthetic morality, for write The University of Adelaide (Navitas), our adversaries are disingenuous enough to reproach us even with that.
I mention the work of art only by way of College comparison. That being understood, does anyone reproach an artist, when he paints a picture, for not following rules established a priori . Does one ever ask what is the picture that he ought to paint? As everyone knows, there is no pre-defined picture for him to make; the artist applies himself to an argument (Navitas), the composition of a picture, and the picture that ought to be made is precisely that which he will have made. And Communication Algonquin! As everyone knows, there are no aesthetic values a priori , but there are values which will appear in due course in the coherence of the picture, in the relation between the will to create and the finished work. No one can tell what the painting of tomorrow will be like; one cannot judge a painting until it is done. What has that to do with morality? We are in the same creative situation.
We never speak of a work of art as irresponsible; when we are discussing a canvas by Picasso, we understand very well that the composition became what it is at write an argument (Navitas) the time when he was painting it, and that his works are part and parcel of his entire life. It is the write essays in college International same upon the plane of morality. There is this in an argument essay The University (Navitas) common between art and morality, that in both we have to persuasice essay Form College, do with creation and invention. We cannot decide a priori what it is that should be done. I think it was made sufficiently clear to write an argument essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas), you in the case of that student who came to Deakin University (Navitas), see me, that to whatever ethical system he might appeal, the Kantian or any other, he could find no sort of guidance whatever; he was obliged to invent the law for himself. Certainly we cannot say that this man, in choosing to remain with his mother – that is, in taking sentiment, personal devotion and concrete charity as his moral foundations – would be making an irresponsible choice, nor could we do so if he preferred the sacrifice of going away to write (Navitas), England. Aspects Los Angeles! Man makes himself; he is essay (Navitas) not found ready-made; he makes himself by the choice of his morality, and he cannot but choose a morality, such is the thinking University of Amsterdam — Amsterdam Foundation Campus pressure of circumstances upon him. We define man only in an argument relation to his commitments; it is therefore absurd to reproach us for irresponsibility in our choice. In the second place, people say to of writing Arts University, us, “You are unable to judge others.” This is essay (Navitas) true in one sense and false in another. It is essays in college true in this sense, that whenever a man chooses his purpose and his commitment in write an argument essay (Navitas) all clearness and in all sincerity, whatever that purpose may be, it is impossible for him to prefer another.
It is essays International Bangkok true in essay The University the sense that we do not believe in progress. Progress implies amelioration; but man is always the parts of writing Arts (AUB) same, facing a situation which is always changing, and choice remains always a choice in the situation. The moral problem has not changed since the time when it was a choice between slavery and anti-slavery – from the time of the war of an argument The University of Adelaide Secession, for Arts Bournemouth, example, until the present moment when one chooses between the M.R.P. [ Mouvement Republicain Poputaire ] and the Communists. We can judge, nevertheless, for, as I have said, one chooses in an argument view of others, and in view of others one chooses himself. One can judge, first – and University of Amsterdam — Amsterdam Campus, perhaps this is write essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas) not a judgment of value, but it is a logical judgment – that in certain cases choice is thinking Los Angeles (UCLA) founded upon an error, and in others upon the truth. One can judge a man by saying that he deceives himself. Since we have defined the situation of essay (Navitas) man as one of free choice, without excuse and without help, any man who takes refuge behind the excuse of his passions, or by inventing some deterministic doctrine, is a self-deceiver. One may object: “But why should he not choose to deceive himself?” I reply that it is not for me to judge him morally, but I define his self-deception as an error. Here one cannot avoid pronouncing a judgment of truth.
The self-deception is and communication evidently a falsehood, because it is a dissimulation of man’s complete liberty of commitment. Upon this same level, I say that it is also a self-deception if I choose to declare that certain values are incumbent upon an argument me; I am in essays Deakin University contradiction with myself if I will these values and at the same time say that they impose themselves upon me. Write An Argument Essay Of Adelaide! If anyone says to me, “And what if I wish to deceive myself?” I answer, “There is no reason why you should not, but I declare that you are doing so, and that the attitude of thinking and creative thinking University Foundation Campus strict consistency alone is that of write The University of Adelaide (Navitas) good faith.” Furthermore, I can pronounce a moral judgment. For I declare that freedom, in respect of critical and creative University of Amsterdam — concrete circumstances, can have no other end and aim but itself; and when once a man has seen that values depend upon himself, in an argument essay of Adelaide that state of forsakenness he can will only one thing, and that is freedom as the foundation of all values. That does not mean that he wills it in the abstract: it simply means that the actions of men of good faith have, as their ultimate significance, the quest of parts of writing Arts (AUB) freedom itself as such. A man who belongs to some communist or revolutionary society wills certain concrete ends, which imply the will to an argument essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas), freedom, but that freedom is parts an essay Arts Bournemouth willed in community. We will freedom for freedom’s sake, in an argument The University and through particular circumstances. And in thus willing freedom, we discover that it depends entirely upon the freedom of others and that the freedom of others depends upon our own. Obviously, freedom as the definition of a man does not depend upon others, but as soon as there is a commitment, I am obliged to will the liberty of others at the same time as my own.
I cannot make liberty my aim unless I make that of others equally my aim. Consequently, when I recognise, as entirely authentic, that man is a being whose existence precedes his essence, and that he is a free being who cannot, in any circumstances, but will his freedom, at the same time I realize that I cannot not will the freedom of Deakin University others. Thus, in the name of that will to freedom which is implied in an argument The University of Adelaide (Navitas) freedom itself, I can form judgments upon those who seek to hide from themselves the wholly voluntary nature of their existence and essays The Regent’s International Bangkok, its complete freedom. An Argument Essay Of Adelaide! Those who hide from this total freedom, in a guise of solemnity or with deterministic excuses, I shall call cowards. Thinking And Communication! Others, who try to write an argument essay The University, show that their existence is necessary, when it is (AUB) merely an write The University accident of the appearance of the human race on earth – I shall call scum. But neither cowards nor scum can be identified except upon the plane of strict authenticity.
Thus, although the content of morality is variable, a certain form of writing persuasive essays University (Navitas) this morality is universal. Kant declared that freedom is a will both to an argument The University (Navitas), itself and to the freedom of how to write in college The Regent’s International others. An Argument Essay The University Of Adelaide (Navitas)! Agreed: but he thinks that the formal and the universal suffice for the constitution of persuasive essays a morality. We think, on the contrary, that principles that are too abstract break down when we come to defining action. To take once again the case of that student; by what authority, in the name of what golden rule of essay morality, do you think he could have decided, in perfect peace of mind, either to writing persuasive essays University (Navitas), abandon his mother or to write an argument The University of Adelaide (Navitas), remain with her? There are no means of how to write essays in college International judging. The content is always concrete, and therefore unpredictable; it has always to be invented. The one thing that counts, is to know whether the invention is made in the name of freedom. Let us, for example, examine the two following cases, and you will see how far they are similar in write essay (Navitas) spite of their difference.
Let us take The Mill on the Floss . We find here a certain young woman, Maggie Tulliver, who is an incarnation of the value of critical thinking College passion and is aware of it. She is in love with a young man, Stephen, who is engaged to another, an insignificant young woman. This Maggie Tulliver, instead of heedlessly seeking her own happiness, chooses in the name of an argument essay (Navitas) human solidarity to sacrifice herself and to give up the man she loves. On the other hand, La Sanseverina in Stendhal’s Chartreuse de Parme , believing that it is passion which endows man with his real value, would have declared that a grand passion justifies its sacrifices, and must be preferred to how to write in college, the banality of write an argument essay (Navitas) such conjugal love as would unite Stephen to the little goose he was engaged to marry. It is the latter that she would have chosen to sacrifice in realising her own happiness, and, as Stendhal shows, she would also sacrifice herself upon the plane of passion if life made that demand upon her. Here we are facing two clearly opposed moralities; but I claim that they are equivalent, seeing that in both cases the overruling aim is freedom. You can imagine two attitudes exactly similar in effect, in that one girl might prefer, in resignation, to give up her lover while the other preferred, in fulfilment of sexual desire, to critical thinking and communication Algonquin, ignore the prior engagement of the man she loved; and, externally, these two cases might appear the write The University (Navitas) same as the two we have just cited, while being in critical thinking University of Amsterdam — Campus fact entirely different.
The attitude of La Sanseverina is much nearer to that of write an argument of Adelaide (Navitas) Maggie Tulliver than to one of careless greed. Thus, you see, the essays Deakin (Navitas) second objection is at an argument The University (Navitas) once true and false. One can choose anything, but only if it is upon the plane of free commitment. The third objection, stated by saying, “You take with one hand what you give with the other,” means, at bottom, “your values are not serious, since you choose them yourselves.” To that I can only say that I am very sorry that it should be so; but if I have excluded God the Father, there must be somebody to invent values. We have to take things as they are. And moreover, to say that we invent values means neither more nor less than this; that there is no sense in life a priori . How To Write Essays The Regent’s School,! Life is nothing until it is lived; but it is yours to make sense of, and the value of it is nothing else but the sense that you choose.
Therefore, you can see that there is a possibility of creating a human community. I have been reproached for an argument essay, suggesting that existentialism is a form of humanism: people have said to me, “But you have written in your Nausée that the an essay University (AUB) humanists are wrong, you have even ridiculed a certain type of humanism, why do you now go back upon that?” In reality, the word humanism has two very different meanings. One may understand by humanism a theory which upholds man as the an argument The University of Adelaide (Navitas) end-in-itself and as the supreme value. Persuasive Essays Deakin University (Navitas)! Humanism in this sense appears, for instance, in Cocteau’s story Round the World in 80 Hours , in which one of the characters declares, because he is flying over mountains in an argument The University of Adelaide (Navitas) an airplane, “Man is magnificent!” This signifies that although I personally have not built aeroplanes, I have the benefit of those particular inventions and that I personally, being a man, can consider myself responsible for, and and creative of Amsterdam — Foundation Campus, honoured by, achievements that are peculiar to some men. It is to assume that we can ascribe value to man according to the most distinguished deeds of certain men. That kind of humanism is an argument of Adelaide absurd, for only the dog or the horse would be in a position to writing Deakin, pronounce a general judgment upon man and declare that he is magnificent, which they have never been such fools as to do – at least, not as far as I know. But neither is it admissible that a man should pronounce judgment upon Man. Existentialism dispenses with any judgment of essay this sort: an existentialist will never take man as the end, since man is thinking University of Amsterdam — Campus still to be determined. And we have no right to write essay The University (Navitas), believe that humanity is something to persuasive essays Deakin (Navitas), which we could set up a cult, after the write manner of Auguste Comte. The cult of humanity ends in Comtian humanism, shut-in upon itself, and – this must be said – in critical and communication College Fascism.
We do not want a humanism like that. But there is write The University (Navitas) another sense of the word, of which the fundamental meaning is this: Man is all the critical University of Amsterdam — time outside of essay The University (Navitas) himself: it is in projecting and losing himself beyond himself that he makes man to exist; and, on the other hand, it is by pursuing transcendent aims that he himself is of writing University (AUB) able to exist. Since man is thus self-surpassing, and can grasp objects only in an argument essay The University of Adelaide (Navitas) relation to his self-surpassing, he is himself the heart and center of his transcendence. There is how to International School, no other universe except the human universe, the universe of human subjectivity. Write Essay The University Of Adelaide (Navitas)! This relation of transcendence as constitutive of man (not in essays in college the sense that God is transcendent, but in the sense of self-surpassing) with subjectivity (in such a sense that man is not shut up in himself but forever present in a human universe) – it is this that we call existential humanism. This is humanism, because we remind man that there is no legislator but himself; that he himself, thus abandoned, must decide for himself; also because we show that it is not by turning back upon himself, but always by seeking, beyond himself, an aim which is one of liberation or of some particular realisation, that man can realize himself as truly human. You can see from these few reflections that nothing could be more unjust than the objections people raise against us. Existentialism is nothing else but an attempt to an argument The University (Navitas), draw the full conclusions from a consistently atheistic position.
Its intention is not in the least that of plunging men into despair. And if by despair one means as the persuasice essay Sixth College Christians do – any attitude of an argument essay (Navitas) unbelief, the despair of the existentialists is something different. Existentialism is not atheist in the sense that it would exhaust itself in demonstrations of the non-existence of God. It declares, rather, that even if God existed that would make no difference from its point of critical and creative view. Not that we believe God does exist, but we think that the real problem is not that of His existence; what man needs is to find himself again and to understand that nothing can save him from himself, not even a valid proof of the existence of God.
In this sense existentialism is optimistic. It is a doctrine of action, and it is only by self-deception, by confining their own despair with ours that Christians can describe us as without hope.