Date: 13.3.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 662
Seyirzevki.com #Uc art requirement College du Leman

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Uc art requirement College du Leman

Uc art requirement College du Leman

May/Tue/2018 | Uncategorized





[XLS]Alphabetical - US Organizations - ielts

Buy Essays Online from Successful Essay -
School Profile for University Admissions 2016-2017 - Nord Anglia

bill moyers essay True, the bill contains more money for the hungry, but this windfall proves two things: one, before you can help the poor in this country, you have to buy off the rich, and second, so many vested interests have a stake in our government's dysfunction, they don't want to fix it. Just another reason for the candidates - and all of us - to read a new book by one of America's top students of government - Paul Light. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! He calls it a government ill executed - a phrase from founding father Alexander Hamilton, who warned his fellow architects of our Constitution that a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in College practice, a bad government. Just look at the past six months, says Paul Light. We've seen the federal government at its worst, thoroughly unable to guarantee the faithful execution of all the laws or look out for your interests as citizens. Where were the watchdogs who should have barked when lenders and borrowers went crazy and sub-prime mortgages began to melt down? Where were the inspectors before those risky mining practices in du Leman Utah led to the deaths of nine men?

If you were sitting on one of those grounded airplanes this spring, it's because the FAA had been treating the airlines - not the public - as their customers. When this FAA inspector blew the whistle on writing for scholarships School, his agency - for allowing Southwest Airlines to fly for months without mandatory safety checks, putting lives at uc art College, stake - his own management threatened him. DOUGLAS PETERS: On his way out the essay writing Shawnigan Lake, door he made the following statement: You have a good job here and your wife has a good job over at the Dallas FSDO. I'd hate to uc art requirement College du Leman, see you jeopardize yours and hers career trying to take down a couple of losers. BILL MOYERS: It was one more reminder that whistleblowers are often our first line of defense against corruption and College, incompetence. VOICE: The question is on passage of the bill… BILL MOYERS: Congress recognized the importance of whistleblowers last year with bills to strengthen protections for those who speak up about uc art requirement College du Leman wrongdoing in website writes essays for you (INTO) the workplace. This man, Scott Bloch, is supposed to uc art College, be their guardian. SCOTT BLOCH: Wrongdoers and those who retaliate against them - against whistleblowers should receive real discipline to punish behavior, set the example and reassure the public they are protected by writing global warming State University (INTO), effective oversight. Requirement Du Leman! BILL MOYERS: Bloch talks a good game. He was President Bush's choice to essay Oregon State (INTO), run the independent Office of the requirement College, Special Counsel.He's supposed to make sure whistleblowers aren't punished while their allegations are vetted. He's also supposed to uphold the Hatch Act that forbids partisan political activities in federal agencies.

But this month the essay writing paper Sevenoaks, FBI seized Bloch's computer and boxes full of documents after someone blew the whistle on uc art requirement College, him, for allegedly closing hundreds of whistleblower complaints without investigating them, for retaliating against issues about essay of Birmingham whistleblowers on his own staff, for uc art requirement, discriminating against gay employees, and for possibly erasing evidence from his hard drive. So much for essay paper, this independent watch dog, the administration's own chief enforcer of honesty in government. That's just the beginning. One federal agency after another has been compromised for partisan reasons. In a recent survey of more than 1,500 scientists at the environmental protection agency, 60 percent of College them - that's 889 scientists - said they had experienced political interference with their work. And their work, remember, is the protection of environmental and human health. To Write About! SEN. SHELDON WHITEHOUSE (D-RI): Setting aside the statistics or percentages or any conclusions you might draw, just the du Leman, raw data point of studies 889 scientists who work for your organization who say that their work has been interfered with politically - DR. GEORGE M. GRAY: I will say that 889 is a number that is unacceptable to uc art College, me as the essay for scholarships Lake, head of the College du Leman, Agency's science and technology office and as the Agency's science adviser. Writes For You Washington! BILL MOYERS: There have been so many scandals in government it's hard to keep track. Which is why you probably missed the uc art College, story of Lurita Doan.

REP. HENRY WAXMAN (D-CA): And I'm very pleased to welcome the Honorable Lurita A. Issues To Write In A College The University! Doan. BILL MOYERS: Doan headed one of the most important but little known agencies of government, the General Services Administration. It's supposed to be non-partisan, charged with overseeing nearly $500 billion dollars of uc art College du Leman goods and writes essays (INTO), services for the government… But Doan, a big contributor to uc art du Leman, Republican campaigns, allowed Karl Rove's White House deputy, Scott Jennings, to detail a partisan strategy right there in her offices - a violation of the Hatch Act. Essay School! REP. BRUCE BRALEY (D-IA): The Committee has been informed by multiple sources that after Mr. Jennings finished his presentation, you stated, How can we use GSA to help our candidates in the next election? Now, reminding you that you are under oath, can you tell the committee whether in fact you did make that statement? LURITA DOAN: I do know that I am under oath, and I will tell you that honestly and absolutely I do not have a recollection of actually saying that. BILL MOYERS: As evidence against Doan mounted, it was too much for House Oversight Committee Chair, Henry Waxman. REP.

HENRY WAXMAN (D-CA): It's unusual for me to ever call for the resignation of a federal official. But in your case, I don't see any other course of action. I would urge you to resign. BILL MOYERS: That was almost a year ago and Doan didn't resign until last month when the du Leman, White House finally asked her to. Not for College, violating the Hatch Act but because her ongoing and public feud with her agency's own watchdog had become what her bosses at the White House called a distraction.

ALPHONSO JACKSON: Madam Chair, I am here to present FY 2009 HUD Budget. BILL MOYERS: Speaking of distractions, there's Alphonso Jackson, a Bush fundraiser as well as friend and former neighbor. The President rewarded him with a cabinet post running HUD, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, a 35 billion dollar agency whose mission, among others, is to help Americans become homeowners. Du Leman! SEN. PATTY MURRAY (D-WA): This subcommittee has a tremendously important oversight… BILL MOYERS: But Jackson, it seems, was also helping friends and cronies get lucrative housing contracts. For half his tenure he's been under investigation and ducking questions. SEN.

PATTY MURRAY (D-WA): You have an opportunity to issues essay The University of Birmingham, set the College, record straight here and I'm asking you a direct question. Writing School! ALPHONSO JACKSON: Therefore I'm going to let the requirement, investigators complete their work before I make any public comment. BILL MOYERS: And, in Philadephia, the city's housing director Carl Greene, says Jackson threatened his agency's funding after he refused to hand over city property worth two million dollars to essay writing Sevenoaks School, one of Jackson's friends. Philadelphia's lawsuit against HUD uncovered this incriminating exchange of email between Jackson's top assistants. Would you like me to make his life less happy? If so, how? Take away all of his federal dollars? Let me look into that possibility. SEN.

ARLEN SPECTER (R-PA): When you have this exchange of email about making his life unhappy and taking away the funding, and I'll look into that and requirement College, then the same day they take action to withhold what is now amounting to 50 million dollars that's just too much of a coincidence. ALPHONSO JACKSON: As I stated in a memorandum to you. I saw this for the first time on Tuesday. And I am making every effort to get to essay for scholarships School, the bottom of it. BILL MOYERS: But weeks later, Jackson decided he was needed at home. ALPHONSO JACKSON: There comes a time when one must attend diligently to personal and requirement du Leman, family matters. BILL MOYERS: Even as the president nominated Jackson's replacement, he still had some good words for his good friend Alphonso. Critical Thinking! GEORGE W. BUSH: He's worked tirelessly at uc art requirement College du Leman, HUD to help America's homeowners. About College Essay! He has transformed a lot of lives.

And America is a better place because of your service. BILL MOYERS: We've heard that before. GEORGE W. BUSH: And Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job. College Du Leman! BILL MOYERS: You remember Brownie - Michael Brown - the President's man at to write about in a college essay of Birmingham, FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency.When Katrina struck the Gulf Coast, Brownie became the personification of high level appointees chosen for loyalty over experience. Scores of others have won their own brownie points - and lost their bearings - tripped up by conflicts of uc art du Leman interest, corruption, or incompetence - they resigned. If these were simply unconnected anecdotes, it would be one thing. But there's a pattern to writes essays University, them, one our new President is uc art requirement College du Leman, going to have to deal with from day one. Right away that new President will have to writes Washington State University (INTO), appoint almost 3,000 political executives to oversee the 15 million people who make up the federal workforce. Paul Light's book pulls no punches, but he also points to changes that could invigorate our government.

So, not only the uc art requirement, presidential candidates, but everyone running for Congress should read this book. Issues To Write About In A College Essay! If our political leaders do not confront this pattern of desperate concern, says this sober scholar, they are likely to preside over a string of meltdowns that will make the federal response to Hurricane Katrina look like a minor mistake. BILL MOYERS JOURNAL examines the reality of waste and abuse of power in Washington with a look at the investigations being conducted by Congress's Committee on Oversight and requirement College, Government Reform, including into writes for you Washington State, Lurita Doan. A Bill Moyers Essay on uc art requirement College, the justifications and consequences of a presidential pardon of I. Lewis Scooter Libby. To Write College Essay Of Birmingham! Who is keeping track of the uc art requirement du Leman, billions we're spending in Iraq? Bill Moyers looks at some underreported news, including the allegations against Howard Cookie Krongard. Monica Goodling's alma mater, Regent University is working to ensure that Biblical principles are reflected in the law of the land. Last April, Bill Moyers interviewed Josh Marshall about the writing Sevenoaks, story his Web site, talkingpointsmemo.com, broke about politicized firings of US Attorneys. The story would lead to a Pulitzer for Josh Marshall and the resignation of requirement College Alberto Gonzales. How did the mainstream media get it so wrong? (Watch the full 90-minute show online) By the Associated Press, April 22, 2007. By Paul Kiel, TALKING POINTS MEMO, December 31, 2007.

Has links to original stories. Paul Mirengoff defends the Bush Administration's record. There may be a potentially dangerous chemical leaching into our food from the containers that we use every day. THE JOURNAL and EXPOSÉ examine why, even though studies show that the chemical Bisphenol A can cause cancer and writes essays for you Washington, other health problems in lab animals, the manufacturers, their lobbyists, and U.S. regulators say it's safe. A Bill Moyers essay on du Leman, the administration's record of resignations. Jeffrey Toobin, one of the most recognized legal journalists in the country, discusses what the Supreme Court might look after the 2008 election. Website Writes For You State (INTO)! Plus, online tools to help you become a court-watcher.

Bill Moyers on honoring our veterans this Memorial Day. Plus, resources for veterans and families and how to do an oral history of College du Leman a veteran in your life #151; to join the collection in essay writing for scholarships Lake School the National Archives.

Custom Essay Writing Service -
European Union - The World Factbook — Central Intelligence Agency

Mortgage Branch Ops Manager 2 - Portland, OR. PORTLAND , OR 97240. Manages mortgage loan processing and branch operations, including overseeing the loan pipeline to ensure timely and quality processing of all loan applications. Coordinates workflow both within the branch and with other departments. Maintains compliance with all applicable laws and regulations to achieve satisfactory procedural and compliance audits or examinations of branch operations.

Effectively communicates new policies, procedures, and products to staff. Maintains high level of uc art customer service both internally and externally. Provides ongoing training, motivation, and team-building of support staff. Supervises and trains all processing and support staff including interviewing and making recommendations for writing global warming Oregon hiring, and performance management. Qualifications: Basic Qualifications. Bachelor's degree, or equivalent work experience. Five or more years of uc art requirement College du Leman experience in mortgage banking with an emphasis on mortgage lending procedures and regulations.

Five or more years of essays for you Washington State University (INTO) Loan Prospector experience. Five or more years of supervisory experience Preferred Skills/Experience. Thorough knowledge of loan processing, closing policies and requirement College du Leman, procedures and credit policy to include automated underwriting system approver authority. Advanced problem-solving and decision-making skills. Excellent verbal and written communication skills. Proficient computer skills, especially Microsoft Office applications. Ability to manage multiple tasks/projects and deadlines simultaneously.

Primary Location: Oregon-OR-Portland. Average Hours Per Week: 40. Requisition ID: 170004805 U.S. Bank is an Equal Opportunity Employer committed to creating a diverse workforce. Create a job alert for Mortgage Branch Ops Manager 2 - Portland, OR at PORTLAND, OR. Great! You'll now receive job alerts for critical Bishopstrow Mortgage Branch Ops Manager 2 - Portland, OR at College, PORTLAND, OR. Create a job alert for Mortgage Branch Ops Manager 2 - Portland, OR at PORTLAND, OR. Branch Manager Portland Portland OR. Caliber Home Loans.

Posted 1 days ago. VIEW JOBS 10/4/2017 12:00:00 AM 2018-01-02T00:00 Caliber Home Loans, Inc. is a full-service national mortgage lender and agency direct seller/servicer. Caliber originates loans through various channels and transaction types, including a network of retail branches, wholesale lending, correspondent and emerging banker lending, and a consumer-direct centralized operation specializing in a variety of loan programs for purchase and refinance such as conforming, jumbo, and government products. Caliber also offers innovative servicing solutions for essay writing paper both conforming and non-conforming loans. Caliber is led by uc art requirement du Leman a veteran senior management team that consists of mortgage banking professionals with a history of building successful national mortgage operations. Caliber is owned by Lone Star Funds, a global private equity fund. POSITION SUMMARY The Producing Branch Manager (PBM) is responsible for issues to write college essay The University of Birmingham maintaining personal loan production at or above minimum loan volume and quality targets. They are responsible for structuring loan application and loan terms, making certain the loan program and pricing structure meets the goals of the client as well as the company.

In addition to developing their own production pipeline, the PBM is also responsible for carrying out strategic initiatives, sales development, leadership/management of uc art retail branch production, in essay global Oregon (INTO) alignment with corporate targets. The PBM is directly responsible for overseeing production goals based on recruiting activities and development of producing Loan Consultants. RESPONSIBILITIES * Identifies market opportunities and hires/develops retail Loan Consultants * Identifies new business opportunities for their existing Loan Consultants in order to meet office goals * Develops/executes overall market strategy to uc art du Leman, increase retail volume, market share and profitability * Supports production office(s) 1 year business plans, consistently monitoring progress versus plan * Collaborates with operations support to ensure customer service, loan quality and pull through targets are achieved and/or exceeded * Responsible for communication and implementation of company policy and procedures * Holds regular performance discussions for all Loan Consultants and performance issues in a timely manner * Provides regular reporting on retail performance within the assigned market * Presentation of Caliber Funding Value Proposition to potential business sources * Responsible for website writes University producing personal loan volume at or above target expectations * Maintain active recruiting database * Promotes Caliber Brand in assigned geography; support efforts that enhance the Brand * Manages the PL for the branch QUALIFICATIONS: * Experience as a Producing Loan Consultant required; Management experience with Producing Loan Consultant's preferred * Management experience working with Retail Loan Consultants preferred * 2+ years' experience in mortgage (production), including LOS system experience * High School Diploma or equivalent Caliber Home Loans, Inc. is focused on uc art College du Leman, being the best mortgage company in the United States and winning through talent. Caliber is for scholarships Shawnigan Lake School committed to diversity and is an requirement, Equal Employment Opportunity employer. Visit us at www.CaliberHomeLoans.com to essay writing global Oregon University, learn more. Uc Art? Caliber Home Loans Portland OR. Mortgage Sales Manager West Portland Metro. Posted 1 days ago. VIEW JOBS 10/4/2017 12:00:00 AM 2018-01-02T00:00 **Job Description:** **ABOUT THE JOB (JOB BRIEF):** Reporting to issues about in a essay of Birmingham, the KeyBank Mortgage (KBM) National Sales Manager, the KBM Sales Manager is accountable for managing and coordinating all prime mortgage origination sales and service activities, expense management, growth and retention of the sales force within one of the 9 regions within the Community Bank franchise.

This position supports the strategic direction of the region while ensuring the region plans are aligned with the business strategy. The KBM Sales Manager is accountable for the delivery of exceptional sales results, the execution of a disciplined sales culture, and uc art requirement College du Leman, the coaching and development of a high performing sales team. This position partners with other lines of business leaders primarily the retail partners to increase the essays Washington State University mortgage and other retail banking opportunities. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman? The KBM Sales Manager will be responsible for managing client referral and about college, cross sell processes ensuring all new customers are introduced to a local Key Bank Branch. Uc Art Requirement College? This individual ensures sales/originator systems and essay writing Sevenoaks School, work flows are efficiently controlled and will partner effectively with our internal fulfillment area in properly managing the loan process from point of requirement College registration to closing. Writing Paper Sevenoaks School? This individual will also develop and coach a team of uc art du Leman Loan Officers (could include all channels: Retail field, CDB Private Banking) to ensure they have a thorough knowledge and understanding of the issues to write about college of Birmingham bank origination process in order to du Leman, meet or exceed financial objectives/ profitability. **ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTIONS:** The role of the KBM Sales Manager is to staff, build, coach, develop, lead and writing Sevenoaks School, motivate a team that is capable of analyzing clients’ needs while efficiently stepping the client through the requirement College loan origination process.

The KBM Sales Manager is reflective Windermere responsible for College knowing and ensuring the loan officers are familiar with all Federal Regulations and website for you Washington University, bank policies/procedures. The KBM Sales Manager is to uc art requirement, keep informed of writing trends and requirement du Leman, developments in global Oregon State University the real estate market and mortgage industry. Uc Art Du Leman? In addition, the KBM Sales Manager is to develop and maintain in-depth knowledge of essay global warming Oregon State University (INTO) products and services as well as knowledge of competitors and competitive products. Requirement College? Other responsibilities include: + Sales Leadership Business Delivery + Drive an aggressive sales culture in the region by ensuring accountability for writing warming Oregon State (INTO) results through execution of the uc art College sales and sales management process and writing Windermere, effective coaching practices which include coaching to superior quality customer service and uc art requirement du Leman, sharing best practices. + Develop loan officers through observational coaching, joint sales calls and using the coaching model and thinking studies Bishopstrow College, developing/utilizing individual professional growth plans. Uc Art Du Leman? + Staffing of critical studies loan officers within the markets within the region including recruiting/identifying talent and interviewing and selecting and training new loan officers with involvement from the National Sales Manager. Uc Art College? + Establishes and tracks performance objectives for loan officers; manages and evaluates staff performance to thinking studies College, established objectives, differentiates performance and strives to ensure each loan officer achieves their respective goals. + Manage employee hours worked in requirement du Leman accordance to and compliant with KeyBank’s time tracking policies + Collaborate and ensures loan officers are partnering effectively with third party fulfillment partner to meet the needs of customers from the point of registration to closing. + Ensure loan officers adhere to the KBM lending policies, including government regulations, ensure information is properly disclosed to clients. Responsible for essay writing paper Sevenoaks School overall compliance and quality control within the department - ensuring documentation is appropriate; application packages are timely, quality is acceptable, and timely completion of disclosures. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman? + Effectively assist loan officers with resolving customer complaints within a timely fashion. Critical Thinking Studies College? + Effectively monitor and manage loan officers in uc art requirement College their pipeline management while at the same time effectively managing pricing issues. Website Writes University? **Weekly Activities:** 1. Conduct Team Meeting: Conduct a weekly team call with Loan Officers.

At least quarterly, the manager should meet in person with their team as a group. 2. Market/Region Leadership Engagement: Effective weekly interaction with market/region leadership including RSL ARLs and regular interaction with other Line of Business leaders. **Monthly Activities:** **1.** Conduct One on Ones with each LO: Topics of discussion should include, but not be limited to: + Review and discuss individual mortgage production, cross sell and requirement du Leman, home equity results compared to LO’s individual goals. + Review LO Playbook and LO’s Individual Sales Action Plan to essay writing Sevenoaks, ensure LO is effectively executing on all activities discuss future tactics and strategies (30 day look back review/30 day look forward plan). Identify best practice activities leading to results with internal partners and COI’s + Review of time management and hours worked + Review registered pipeline; focus on loan status, aged loans, expired loans and upcoming expiratio 2. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman? Production to Goal Review: Meet with RSL and Private Bank Sales Leader(s) to essay writing School, review monthly mortgage results against goal and discuss future tactics and uc art requirement, strategies. **Quarterly Activities:** 1. Observational Coaching: Conduct at least one observational coaching session with each LO and one of their clients, internal referral partners or COI’s. Opportunities for observation include: + LO conducting a mortgage presentation during an essay Sevenoaks, in-person branch huddle, Key at Work call or COI call + LO conducting a quarterly planning meeting with a Branch Manager, per the LO Playbook + LO conducting a planning session with a PB, RM or Line of Business partner + LO conducting a telephone sales call with a borrower or COI referral source + LO “In Action” during a Mortgage Day Execute a post observation meeting to de-brief with the LO 2. Sales Manager inspection of each Loan Officer’s commitment their branch schedule and effectiveness of uc art requirement du Leman their internal COI business development. 3 Sales Manager to invite their CDB Market Compliance partner to a at least one Team Meeting to discuss CDB initiatives and studies Bishopstrow, share best practices for supporting the LMI Community with their mortgage needs. **Annual Activity:** **1.** Annual Goal Setting and Individual Sales Action Planning: Provide LOs with a Goal Setting/Sales Action Planning Toolkit for use in completing their individual Sales Action Plans which should include activities not addressed in the LO Playbook. Conduct one on one meetings to review and finalize each LO’s individual annual production goals and Sales Action Plan This document, along with the uc art College du Leman LO Playbook and writing Windermere, Performance Scorecard will be used to regularly measure activities and requirement, performance. Website For You Washington University (INTO)? **REQUIRED QUALIFICATIONS** • Bachelor’s degree (business or finance preferred) or equivalent experience. • Minimum of three years mortgage experience **ABOUT KEY:** KeyCorp's roots trace back 190 years to Albany, New York. Headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, Key is one of the nation's largest bank-based financial services companies, with assets of approximately $134.5 billion at March 31, 2017.

Key provides deposit, lending, cash management, insurance, and investment services to uc art College, individuals and reflective Windermere, businesses in uc art 15 states under the essay School name KeyBank National Association through a network of more than 1,200 branches and more than 1,500 ATMs. Requirement College? Key also provides a broad range of essay writing sophisticated corporate and investment banking products, such as merger and du Leman, acquisition advice, public and private debt and equity, syndications, and derivatives to middle market companies in selected industries throughout the United States under the KeyBanc Capital Markets trade name. KeyBank is Member FDIC. Writing For Scholarships Shawnigan? **ABOUT THE BUSINESS:** Key Community Bank serves individuals and small to midsized businesses from Maine to requirement College du Leman, Alaska through our 15-state network of over 1,200 branches, 1,500 ATMs, telephone banking and robust online and mobile platforms. KeyBank’s Consumer/Business Banking segment provides consumers and small business owners with straightforward banking solutions and personal finance expertise that helps them make confident financial decisions today and plan for reflective School tomorrow. Uc Art? Key Private Bank offers wealth planning that follows a consistent, disciplined approach guided by objective advice based on each unique situation.

KeyBank Commercial Bank offers midsize business financial services that drive growth and profitability and to write in a college The University of Birmingham, help business owners identify new opportunities with products and uc art requirement du Leman, services including deposit, cash management, investment services, commercial lending, equipment leasing, and asset-based lending. About Of Birmingham? **FLSA STATUS:** Exempt KeyCorp is an Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action Employer committed to engaging a diverse workforce and sustaining an uc art du Leman, inclusive culture. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to writes Washington University, race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability, or veteran status. **Employee Type:** Full-Time **Location:** Portland, OR **Experience:** Not Specified **Date Posted:** 9/27/2017 Keybank Portland OR. Mortgage Consultant Assistant Vice President Lake Oswego. Mufg Union Bank. Posted 1 days ago. VIEW JOBS 10/4/2017 12:00:00 AM 2018-01-02T00:00 Discover your opportunity with Union Bank® and become a part of one of the world’s leading financial groups. Union Bank is a member of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG), the 5th largest financial group in the world with total assets of over $2.4 trillion (as ranked by SNL Financial, April 2016) and 140,000 colleagues in requirement du Leman nearly 50 countries.

In the critical College U.S., we’re 13,000 strong, working together to positively impact every customer, organization, and requirement, community we serve. Writing State? At Union Bank, we aim to be the premier and most trusted West Coast bank, serving customers with high-touch, local delivery and global capabilities as we leverage our rich, 150-year history. This is all part of our inclusive, high-performing culture supported by competitive Total Rewards, including our cash balance pension plan. Join a team that’s working to fulfill its vision to be the world’s most trusted financial group. # Job Summary: Responsible for originating conventional residential real estate loans for the Bank. Participate in uc art requirement College du Leman related business development activities. # Major Responsibilities: + Solicit residential first mortgages through contacts with realtors, builders and essay writing global Oregon State, developers. + Make sales calls to assigned Community Banking branches. Provide service to customers and prospects seeking residential mortgage loans. + Interview applicants to develop information concerning their needs, desires and earnings to assist in determining whether the loan will be an College du Leman, acceptable risk; obtain and analyze pertinent financial and about in a of Birmingham, credit data. + Follow up current loans to requirement College, ensure conformity with terms. Negotiate terms and conditions of global Oregon loans with mortgagors. + Keep abreast of trends and developments in the local real estate market, as well as the uc art College du Leman changing rules and regulations pertaining to private insured mortgages. Writing Paper Sevenoaks? + Call on potential or existing customers as assigned to develop new business or retain existing business. + Cross sell bank products. Answer inquiries regarding loan programs and rates. + Provide sales and product training to Community Banking branches as needed. + Develop and implement a marketing territory to educate the community regarding the Bank's CRA programs. Typically requires a high school diploma or G.E.D. and must have excellent sales and customer service skills.

This position may be subject to SAFE Act Registration Requirements. Pursuant to the SAFE Act requirements, all applicants for requirement College employment who will be engaged in residential loan mortgage originations (as defined by the SAFE Act) must register with the federal registry system and maintain a status in good standing under the SAFE Act requirements. If at any time the Bank determines that your position requires SAFE Act registration, you will be required to register and submit to the required SAFE Act background check and registration process. Failure to register successfully or to maintain a status in good standing under the SAFE Act will affect your eligibility for issues in a The University of Birmingham continued employment and uc art College, may result in your immediate termination. _The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed. They are not intended to be construed as an exhaustive list of all responsibilities, duties, and skills required of personnel so classified._ _We are proud to issues about essay of Birmingham, be an Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer and committed to leveraging the requirement College du Leman diverse backgrounds, perspectives, and experience of our workforce to create opportunities for writing our colleagues and our business. We do not discriminate in uc art requirement employment decisions on the basis of any protected category._ # Job: _Sales_ # Title: _Mortgage Consultant, Assistant Vice President - Lake Oswego and Portland_ # Location: _OREGON-Portland_ # Requisition ID: _10016178-WD_ Mufg Union Bank Portland OR. Mortgage Branch Ops Manager 2 - Portland, OR. 1. Resume Copy paste or upload your resume. 2. Cover Letter (Optional) 2. Cover Letter (Optional)

Attached Cover Letter. 2. Cover Letter (Optional) Copy paste or upload your cover letter. Don’t have a cover letter? Build one now! We will save your jobs while you are here, but once you leave, they will be discarded. To save your jobs for when you return, please sign in.

Mighty Recruiter Mighty Recruiter. Customer Service Customer Service. 800-652-8430 Mon- Fri 8am - 8pm CST. Sat 8am - 5pm CST, Sun 10am - 6pm CST Stay in touch with us.

Custom Essay Order -
Boarding Brochure English Version Pages 1 - 44 - Text Version

50 Inspiring Resume Designs: And What You Can Learn From Them. Your resume or CV may be one of the most important projects you ever design. It can make or break job applications, open doors to new careers, make a great (or dismal) first impression. When you send out your resume, you’re really sending out a piece of yourself. Uc Art College. So make sure it’s representing you to your best advantage. Just like how you dress your best for an interview, it’s important to give your resume the same treatment — to writing for scholarships Shawnigan Lake School make sure it’s polished and uc art requirement presentable. The 50 resume designs below span a wide range of styles, from reflective essay writing School strictly businesslike to ultra creative — browse through them to get some ideas for updating your own resume.

Designing your own is easy with our wide collection of beautiful resume templates. Click the image to see more resume templates. Starting off your resume strong with a bold header, like in this design by Shed Labs for Loft Resumes, draws attention to your name and uc art requirement College makes it more memorable. You can also include a few keywords or descriptors under your name that sum up who you are as a candidate. This chessboard-style layout is certainly striking, giving each category its own distinct space. But Mikha Makhoul’s resume is reflective writing Windermere School still somewhat subdued thanks to the simple black-and-white color scheme; it doesn’t sacrifice professionalism for visual interest. Uc Art Requirement. Some well-placed shadows can make your resume pop, literally — giving it a 3D appearance and writing for scholarships Shawnigan creating the illusion of depth. College Du Leman. Errol Veloso explains how he chose the colors of his design purposefully: blue to symbolize his creative side and red to symbolize his analytic side.

Try using shapes and frames for writes essays emphasis. Uc Art. You can experiment with geometric shapes (circles, squares, rectangles), ribbons, or solid or dashed lines. Here, Michael Long frames his name and his role to help them stand out. A cohesive color scheme of cool blues and minty hues gives this information-packed, infographic-style resume by Joseph Acena a visual theme and an orderly, coordinated look. Using a horizontal orientation (instead of the traditional vertical format) immediately gives your resume an edge in terms of attracting attention. Other strong points of this design by critical thinking Bishopstrow College, Justin Schueler include a balanced, un-crowded layout and plenty of requirement College, negative space. Essay Oregon (INTO). There seems to be a trend, at least in industries where you can take some risks with your resume, to forget the stuffy business lingo and show that there’s a human behind the piece of paper. Using a more conversational tone, as David Elgena has done with his “Hello, nice to meet you.

Here’s a little about me” header at requirement College the top of essay writing School, this resume, may help you create rapport with the uc art person who’s reviewing your application before you even meet them. This resume by Kyle Robertson features a custom crest with Kyle’s name and a catchy tagline. Creating a distinctive personal brand or style for yourself (such as a personal logo, a color scheme, a nice selection of essay Windermere, fonts, etc.) gives your work an extra sheen of professionalism (and an opportunity to show off your abilities). Plus, once you put the work in, this “brand” is something you can use over uc art requirement College du Leman and over again — on essay writing warming State (INTO), letterhead, business cards, social media profiles, you name it. For a unique take on requirement, traditional resume colors, try light text on a dark background, as Abdullah Al Mamun has done here. Just make sure that your font is weighty enough to be easily readable and not get lost against critical thinking Bishopstrow College the background. This clean resume by Patrick Rogan uses a bright splash of color and whittles down the information to only the uc art du Leman basics (skills and writing for scholarships Lake past positions).

Icons in the skills section provide a visual reference that still complements the simplistic style. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman. Printing your resume on textured paper can give an impression of about college essay, quality, craftsmanship, or luxury. If a color other than white seems inappropriate for your industry, try a white or cream-colored paper with a slight texture for an ultra-professional, upscale look. This example by S.N. Carter, printed on uc art, a recycled or kraft-style paper, gives the resume a custom, hand-printed feel.

When applying for a position where a more creative approach isn’t appropriate, it’s always a safe bet to opt for writing Lake School a simple, text-based resume with clean fonts. Here, Frank Schamhart has embellished his resume slightly with minimal use of an accent color and a small personal portrait. If you’re after a job in the arts or some other highly visual industry, make your resume a mini portfolio like illustrator Rianti Hidayat has done here. Du Leman. Bradley Brooks keeps his resume businesslike with a classic black-and-white color scheme, but livens things up with a modular layout and a personal logo. Infographic-style resumes have become popular, and they can be effective when done well. But they should be more than a collection of pretty pictures; the images should, at a glance, tell something about you and writing Oregon State (INTO) complement or enhance the text, like in this resume design by College, Rachel Winter. If you’re seeking work in reflective writing Windermere School an industry where appearance is important, or the job has asked you to include a portrait, try integrating it into College your resume.

It doesn’t have to be the issues to write about college essay of Birmingham center of attention, though — you can make it a bit more subtle by du Leman, using a small picture or placing it behind a colored screen, like in Egotype’s resume template. Mailing out some resumes? Make opening yours up a memorable experience, like Amber Van Mieghem has done with this clever folding resume. Wishing you could infuse a little creativity into writes essays Washington State University your plain, corporate resume? Try a monogram with your initials, like Bill Mawhinney has done for this resume template. It adds a little style while still keeping the overall presentation very businesslike. You can use the same graphic on College, your cover letter to give your application a polished, pulled-together look. If you have some creative leeway in creating your resume, using a non-rectangular shape will be sure to attract attention, like John Mujica’s round resume does here. Writing Windermere. If you do format your resume in any unusual shape, just make sure all the text is uc art requirement readable. You’ve only reflective essay writing School got one name. Make it memorable.

If it’s unique, highlight it. Make it big and uc art bold, like Fredrik Andresen did on his resume. Give the hiring manager something to zero in on. Your font choices can change the whole character of your resume. Essay Writing Global Warming Oregon State University (INTO). For instance, the rounded fonts with soft edges that Louis Omari has used for his resume have a more casual, friendly feel than sharper, serif fonts might have. Need to show your qualifications on the run? Post your resume online and uc art College du Leman make it mobile-friendly, like Julien Renvoye has done. Essay Writing For Scholarships Shawnigan Lake. You can include your resume on your personal website or even post it to networking platforms like LinkedIn.

Use blocks of requirement College, color and/or lines to separate different sections of your resume, give it structure, and make it easy to thinking College navigate visually. This template from Beautiful Resumes features vibrant colors, but you could just as easily get the same effect with a more subtle color scheme. If you’re going the infographic route, think of uc art, effective ways that you can use different types of graphs to issues about in a essay The University of Birmingham represent your skills, experience, or background, like Martin Suster did here. Requirement College. Organizing your resume with columns, like this three-column layout Anton Yermolov used, keeps the essay paper Sevenoaks School information tidy, creates clear divisions between sections, and helps you keep everything sharply aligned. Use a sidebar in your resume to call attention to extra (or extra important) information that you want to highlight. Here, Ola Hamdy used a colored sidebar to uc art requirement separate her personal and contact information from critical Bishopstrow College her educational and uc art College du Leman professional details. Although this resume design is text-heavy, Gershom Charig mixes things up with a two-color scheme and a word cloud to creatively represent the breadth of his skills and experience. Similar in function to the word cloud above, various sizes of issues about The University of Birmingham, circles represent Silviu Schiau’s proficiency in various areas, such as management and design. The size of the circles corresponds with his amount of experience — a fresh way to illustrate core competencies.

Give the person looking at your resume an excuse to find out more about you. Including a link to your website or portfolio (or even a QR code, as Krysten Newby has done here) acts as a good prompt. If your job history includes working for big companies with recognizable logos, feature them on your resume. Tamas Leb has included space to do so on this resume template, and it makes an impressive statement, even at a glance. For creative resumes, a theme can give you a starting point to build a one-of-a-kind design and College think about innovative ways to present your information. Bishopstrow. Here, Peter Kisteman’s laboratory theme makes a strong visual statement and gives his artistic background a scientific, experimental dimension.

Putting your resume in College a folder or other kind of holder gives you more space to showcase your experience and accomplishments, plus the to write about in a college The University extra tactile feature makes it memorable, as with this design from uc art requirement College S1M. The vertical timeline on the outside offers an writing Sevenoaks immediate visual representation of the uc art requirement du Leman candidate’s career history. This traditional black, white, and essay writing global (INTO) gray design by Brice Seraphin brightens up quite nicely with some turquoise as an accent. This can be done with any color (and you may want to tone it down depending on your industry), but vibrant hues have particular impact. Du Leman. Besides being another nice example of using an accent color, this design by writing Sevenoaks, Adam Rozmus keeps things clean and simple, showing that resumes don’t have to be fancy to make a good impression. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman. If competition is stiff, try standing out thinking Bishopstrow College with a resume package that gives you some space to uc art requirement College du Leman demonstrate your abilities, develop a personal brand, and include more information than the limited area of a one-page resume allows for. Here, Sabrae Precure uses a distinct color scheme and critical thinking studies Bishopstrow custom illustrations to stand out from the crowd. Uc Art Du Leman. This resume by writing global warming Oregon, Gabriel Valdivia combines a traditional format (the typical positions, dates, and short descriptions) with pictorial elements that provide a more personal touch.

As if to say that a normal paper resume just won’t cut it, Alison Root got clever with her resume presentation, which demonstrates that she thinks outside the College du Leman box. This sample resume from website essays for you Washington Rahul Chakraborty features bold typography and uc art bright colors for issues to write about of Birmingham a high-impact look that will make people take notice. There may be times when it’s ok to let your sense of humor shine through in requirement your resume; it makes you more relatable, more likable. For instance, check out the pronunciation guide Nick Iannuccilli provided for his difficult last name. Using a border is essay State a good way to add a little bit of color to your resume, as Evelien Callens has done here, without worrying about looking unprofessional. Stylistically, this design is a good compromise between customary and more creative resumes. The two-color, mostly traditional layout uses graphic elements sparingly but purposefully. As a nice touch, Dan Hernandez has branded his cover letter with the same style, which is a smart idea if your job application involves submitting multiple documents. Sometimes you have to uc art do what you can to get noticed. Critical. For an illustrator like Lucia Paul, hand-drawing her resume is uc art College du Leman both appropriate for her industry and gives her a standout way to display her skills. Big, bold typography, a high-contrast color scheme, and a well-organized presentation all combine to make sure Joao Andrade’s resume gets looked at.

No long-winded explanations of job roles here. Just the essentials — enough to get someone interested in wanting to know more about Gianina Santiago and her background. Clean, sans-serif fonts, relatively little text, and lots of essay writing global warming Oregon State, white space give Maxat Malbekov’s resume a sleek look that’s easy to uc art College achieve if you condense your resume down to only the most relevant information. If you have a lot of information you need to fit on one page, take a tip from this design by Halle Rasco and use easy-to-read fonts and clear headings for each section. Need to keep your resume fairly conservative? A two-column layout with a businesslike blue-gray accent color gives this otherwise traditional resume from ResumeBaker some extra interest. Reflective Windermere School. Syril Bobadilla’s illustrations are whimsical and kid-friendly, and her resume reflects that style. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman. Notice how she also created matching business cards for a cohesive personal brand. Even if your industry doesn’t allow as much creative expression as someone in the arts, you can express your personality in more subtle ways, like through font choices or an accent color. Website Writes Essays University. Resumes don’t always have to read from College left to paper right, top to uc art College bottom.

You can play with the layout of your resume to make the best and most visually interesting use of the essay University (INTO) space you have available, like Milena Filipova has done here. You can use a grid structure to uc art College organize your resume and make it easier to navigate, similarly to how Orlando Silva designed this template. If applicable, you might also try including some pieces from your portfolio right on essay School, the resume (so your abilities are on display at first glance). As you can see from the examples above, there are many approaches you can take to designing your resume. But no matter what style or format you choose, there are a few things you want to make sure to get right: Readable text Industry-appropriate style (if unsure, play it safe with a conservative design.) Updated and accurate information No spelling/grammar errors. Uc Art Requirement. Now it#8217;s your turn. Put these skills into action! Bring great design to for scholarships Shawnigan your entire workplace. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman. Janie is essay writing global Oregon State University (INTO) a freelance writer and graphic designer and the owner of requirement College, Design Artistree Creative Studio. After college, she built on her background in website essays Washington State University art to explore design. and loved it.

Now, she enjoys finding ways to combine the craftsmanship of traditional fine arts with the digital possibilities of uc art requirement College du Leman, graphic design. Design The Perfect Google+ Banner Image With Tips And E. 50 Unique and Engaging About Us Pages to Inspire You. These Are Some of The Most Beautiful Album Covers We#8. Graphic Design From Around the World: Spanish Design. 60 Free Outline Icon Sets Perfect for Contemporary Desi. 60 Free Fonts for Minimalist Designs. 50 Free Headline Fonts Built For Impact And Audience En. 50 Beautiful Free Wallpapers For Creatives [2015 Editio. 50 Design Terms Explained Simply For Non-Designers. The 30 Best Free Social Media Icon Sets of 2015.

100 Brilliant Color Combinations and How to Apply Them . Free Icons: 49 Best Sites To Find Beautiful And Useful . 60 Awesome Free Tools To Create A Visual Marketing Camp. Free Stock Photos: 73 Best Sites To Find Awesome Free I. Essay Writing. You're almost there! You’ll receive an uc art College du Leman email soon to confirm your subscription. Empowering the world to design. Get your dream job!

Design a resume to impress using Canva#8217;s amazingly simple drag-and-drop design tool.

Buy Essays Online from Successful Essay -
Collge du Lman International School Geneva | Nord Anglia

compliance resume SUBJECT: EEOC COMPLIANCE MANUAL. PURPOSE: This transmittal covers the uc art requirement College du Leman issuance of Section 12 of the new Compliance Manual on “Religious Discrimination.” The section provides guidance and instructions for investigating and analyzing charges alleging discrimination based on religion. EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon receipt. DISTRIBUTION: EEOC Compliance Manual holders.

OBSOLETE DATA: This Section of the Compliance Manual replaces Section 628: Religious Accommodation , EEOC Compliance Manual, Volume II and its Appendices: Appendix A, Policy Statement on essay writing Shawnigan Lake School, Ansonia Board of Education v. Philbrook and Religious Accommodation ; Appendix B, Policy Guidance On ‘New Age’ Training Programs Which Conflict With Employees’ Religious Beliefs ; and Appendix C, Religious Objections to uc art, Unionism . Writes For You! It also replaces the following policy documents: Religious Organizations that Pay Women Less than Men in uc art College Accordance with Religious Beliefs ; Religious Organization Exemption Under Title VII of the essay for scholarships Lake Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended ; and Policy Statement on Goldman v. Weinberger (Accommodation of the Wearing of Religious Dress) . The Commission’s Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Religion, 29 C.F.R. Part 1605, remain in effect. SECTION 12: RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION. SECTION 12: RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION. This Section of the Compliance Manual focuses on uc art requirement College du Leman, religious discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). Critical Thinking! [2] Title VII protects workers from employment discrimination based on their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or protected activity. Solely with respect to religion, Title VII also requires reasonable accommodation of uc art College employees’ [3] sincerely held religious beliefs, observances, and practices when requested, unless accommodation would impose an undue hardship on business operations. [4] Undue hardship under Title VII is defined as “more than de minimis ” cost or burden -- a substantially lower standard for employers to satisfy than the “undue hardship” defense under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is defined instead as “significant difficulty or expense.” [5] The prohibition on discrimination and Washington State University, the requirement of reasonable accommodation apply whether the uc art College religious views in question are mainstream or non-traditional, and even if not recognized by any organized religion. These protections also extend to those who profess no religious beliefs. [6] Questions about religion in the workplace have increased as religious pluralism has increased.

In a 2001 survey of human resource professionals conducted by the Society for Human Resource Management and writing Oregon State, the Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding, 36% of human resource professionals who responded reported an increase in the religious diversity of their employees in the preceding five years. [7] Further, the number of religious discrimination charges filed with EEOC has more than doubled from uc art du Leman 1992 to 2007, although the total number of such charges remains relatively small compared to paper, charges filed on other bases. [8] Many employers seek legal guidance in managing the issues that arise as religious diversity in uc art requirement College du Leman the American workplace continues to essay writing, increase. [9] This Section of the uc art requirement College Compliance Manual is designed to be a practical resource for employers, employees, practitioners, and EEOC enforcement staff on Title VII’s prohibition against religious discrimination. Thinking Bishopstrow! The Section defines religious discrimination, discusses typical scenarios in which religious discrimination may arise, and provides guidance to employers on how to balance the needs of individuals in a diverse religious climate. [10] The Section is organized by legal topic, as follows: I - Coverage issues , including the definition of “religion” and “sincerely held,” the religious organization exception, and the ministerial exception. II - Disparate treatment analysis of employment decisions based on religion, including recruitment, hiring, promotion, discipline, and compensation, as well as differential treatment with respect to religious expression; customer preference; security requirements; and bona fide occupational qualifications. III - Harassment analysis , including religious belief or practice as a condition of employment or advancement, hostile work environment, and employer liability issues.

IV - Reasonable accommodation analysis , including notice of the requirement conflict between religion and work, scope of the accommodation requirement and undue hardship defense, and common methods of accommodation. V - Related forms of discrimination , including discrimination based on national origin, race, or color, as well as retaliation. Some charges of essay writing religious discrimination may raise multiple claims, for example requiring analysis under disparate treatment, harassment, and denial of reasonable accommodation theories of liability. In addition, there are some instances where Title VII religious discrimination cases implicate federal constitutional provisions. [11] For example, a government employer may contend that granting a requested religious accommodation would pose an undue hardship because it would constitute government endorsement of religion in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. College! [12] A private sector employer may contend that its own First Amendment rights under the Free Exercise or Free Speech Clauses would be violated if it is compelled by essay writing warming University (INTO) Title VII to grant a particular accommodation. [13] In addition, government employees often raise claims under the requirement du Leman First Amendment parallel to writing for scholarships Lake, their Title VII accommodation claims. [14] Defining the exact parameters of the First Amendment is uc art requirement College du Leman, beyond the scope of this document. However, these First Amendment issues are referenced throughout this document in order to illustrate how they often arise in Title VII cases. [15] Title VII prohibits covered employers, employment agencies, and unions [16] from: (1) treating applicants or employees differently (disparate treatment) based on their religious beliefs or practices or lack thereof in any aspect of employment, including recruitment, hiring, assignments, discipline, promotion, and writing paper Sevenoaks School, benefits; (2) subjecting employees to uc art du Leman, harassment because of their religious beliefs or practices or lack thereof or because of the religious practices or beliefs of people with whom they associate ( e.g. , relatives, friends, etc.); (3) denying a requested reasonable accommodation of an applicant’s or employee’s sincerely held religious beliefs or practices or lack thereof if an accommodation will not impose an undue hardship on the conduct of the business; [17] and, (4) retaliating against an applicant or employee who has engaged in protected activity, including participation ( e.g. , filing an EEO charge or testifying as a witness in someone else’s EEO matter), or opposition relating to alleged religious discrimination ( e.g. , complaining to human resources department about alleged religious discrimination). Although more than one of to write in a of Birmingham these theories of liability may apply in uc art College a particular case, they are discussed in separate parts of this manual for ease of use.

Charges involving religion may give rise to claims for disparate treatment, harassment, denial of reasonable accommodation, and/or retaliation. Therefore, these charges should be investigated and issues essay of Birmingham, analyzed under all four theories of liability to the extent applicable, even if the charging party only uc art College, raises one claim. Overview: Religion is very broadly defined under Title VII. Religious beliefs, practices, and observances include those that are theistic [18] in issues to write in a The University of Birmingham nature, as well as non-theistic “moral or ethical beliefs as to du Leman, what is right and wrong which are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views.” Religious beliefs can include unique views held by a few or even one individual; however, mere personal preferences are not religious beliefs. Sevenoaks School! Title VII requires employers to uc art, accommodate religious beliefs, practices, and observances if the issues The University of Birmingham beliefs are “sincerely held” and the reasonable accommodation poses no undue hardship on uc art du Leman, the employer. Title VII defines “religion” to global warming Oregon (INTO), include “all aspects of uc art requirement College du Leman religious observance and essay writing paper Sevenoaks, practice as well as belief.” [19] Religion includes not only traditional, organized religions such as Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism, but also religious beliefs that are new, uncommon, not part of a formal church or sect, only subscribed to by a small number of people, or that seem illogical or unreasonable to others. [20] Further, a person’s religious beliefs “need not be confined in either source or content to traditional or parochial concepts of religion.” [21] A belief is “religious” for Title VII purposes if it is “‘religious’ in the person’s own scheme of things,” [22] i.e. , it is “a sincere and meaningful belief that occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by God.” [23] An employee’s belief or practice can be “religious” under Title VII even if the employee is affiliated with a religious group that does not espouse or recognize that individual’s belief or practice, or if few or no other people adhere to it. [24]

Religious beliefs include theistic beliefs as well as non-theistic “moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right and wrong which are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views.” [25] Although courts generally resolve doubts about particular beliefs in favor of finding that they are religious, [26] beliefs are not protected merely because they are strongly held. Rather, religion typically concerns “ultimate ideas” about “life, purpose, and death.” [27] Social, political, or economic philosophies, as well as mere personal preferences, are not “religious” beliefs protected by Title VII. Uc Art Du Leman! [28] Religious observances or practices include, for example, attending worship services, praying, wearing religious garb or symbols, displaying religious objects, adhering to certain dietary rules, proselytizing or other forms of writing global warming State (INTO) religious expression, or refraining from certain activities. Determining whether a practice is religious turns not on the nature of the activity, but on requirement du Leman, the employee’s motivation. The same practice might be engaged in Lake School by one person for religious reasons and by another person for purely secular reasons.

Whether or not the practice is “religious” is uc art requirement College, therefore a situational, case-by-case inquiry. [29] For example, one employee might observe certain dietary restrictions for religious reasons while another employee adheres to the very same dietary restrictions but for secular ( e.g. , health or environmental) reasons. [30] In that instance, the same practice might in essay paper Sevenoaks one case be subject to reasonable accommodation under Title VII because an requirement College du Leman employee engages in the practice for religious reasons, and in another case might not be subject to reasonable accommodation because the practice is engaged in for secular reasons. The following examples illustrate these concepts: Employment Decisions Based on “Religion” An otherwise qualified applicant is not hired because he is a self-described evangelical Christian. A qualified non-Jewish employee is denied promotion because the supervisor wishes to give a preference based on religion to a fellow Jewish employee. An employer terminates an employee based on his disclosure to the employer that he has recently converted to the Baha’i Faith. Each of these is an example of an employment decision based on the religious affiliation of the applicant or employee, and therefore is based on “religion” within the meaning of Title VII.

Religious Practice versus Secular Practice. A Seventh-day Adventist employee follows a vegetarian diet because she believes it is religiously prescribed by the scriptural passage “[b]ut flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat,” (Genesis 9:4). Essay Windermere School! Her vegetarianism is requirement College du Leman, a religious practice, even though not all Seventh-day Adventists share this belief or follow this practice, and essay writing for scholarships Lake School, even though many individuals adhere to a vegetarian diet for purely secular reasons. Types of Religious Practice or Observance. A Catholic employee requests a schedule change so that he can attend church services on Good Friday. A Muslim employee requests an exception to the company’s dress and grooming code allowing her to wear her headscarf, or a Hindu employee requests an exception allowing her to wear her bindi (religious forehead marking). Uc Art! An atheist asks to be excused from the essay writing Lake religious invocation offered at the beginning of staff meetings. An adherent to Native American spiritual beliefs seeks unpaid leave to attend a ritual ceremony. Requirement College! An employee who identifies as Christian but is to write about essay of Birmingham, not affiliated with a particular sect or denomination requests accommodation of his religious belief that working on his Sabbath is prohibited.

Each of these accommodation requests relates to uc art requirement College, a “religious” belief or practice within the meaning of writing for scholarships Lake School Title VII. By contrast, a request for a schedule change to requirement, help set up decorations or prepare food for a church event, for instance, typically does not involve a “religious” belief or practice within the meaning of Title VII. Writing Sevenoaks School! [31] Supervisor Considers Belief Illogical. Morgana asks for time off on October 31 to uc art du Leman, attend the “Samhain Sabbat,” the New Year observance of Wicca, her religion. Her supervisor refuses, saying that Wicca is not a “real” religion but an “illogical conglomeration” of writing Shawnigan Lake “various aspects of the occult, such as faith healing, self?hypnosis, tarot card reading, and spell casting, which are not religious practices.” The supervisor’s refusal to accommodate her on requirement College, the ground that he believes her religion is illogical violates Title VII unless the writing for scholarships Shawnigan employer can show her request would impose an undue hardship.

The law applies to religious beliefs even though others may find them “incorrect” or “incomprehensible.” [32] Unique Belief Can Be Religious. Edward practices the Kemetic religion, based on ancient Egyptian faith, and affiliates himself with a tribe numbering fewer than ten members.He states that he believes in various deities, and requirement du Leman, follows the faith’s concept of Ma’at, a guiding principle regarding truth and paper Sevenoaks, order that represents physical and moral balance in the universe. During a religious ceremony he received small tattoos encircling his wrist, written in the Coptic language, which express his servitude to Ra, the uc art requirement Egyptian god of the sun. When his employer asks him to cover the tattoos, he explains that it is a sin to cover them intentionally because doing so would signify a rejection of Ra. These can be religious beliefs and practices even if no one else or few other people subscribe to them. [33] Personal Preference That is Not a Religious Belief. Sylvia wears several tattoos and has recently had her nose and eyebrows pierced. A newly hired manager implements a dress code that requires that employees have no visible piercings or tattoos. Writing Paper Sevenoaks! Sylvia says that her tattoos and piercings are religious because they reflect her belief in body art as self-expression and should be accommodated.

However, the evidence demonstrates that her tattoos and piercings are not related to any religious belief system. For example, they do not function as a symbol of any religious belief, and do not relate to any “ultimate concerns” such as life, purpose, death, humanity’s place in the universe, or right and wrong, and they are not part of a moral or ethical belief system. Therefore, her belief is a personal preference that is not religious in nature. [34] Title VII requires employers to requirement College, accommodate only writing, those religious beliefs that are “sincerely held.” [35] Therefore, whether or not a religious belief is “sincerely held” by an applicant or employee is only relevant to religious accommodation, not to claims of disparate treatment or harassment because of religion. In those claims, it is the motivation of the discriminating official, not the actual beliefs of the individual alleging discrimination, that are typically relevant in uc art du Leman determining if the discrimination that occurred was because of essays for you State University religion. A detailed discussion of College du Leman reasonable accommodation of sincerely held religious beliefs appears in § IV, but the meaning of “sincerely held” is addressed here. Like the “religious” nature of a belief or practice, the “sincerity” of an employee’s stated religious belief is usually not in reflective essay writing dispute. Nevertheless, there are some circumstances in which an employer may assert as a defense that it was not required to provide accommodation because the employee’s asserted religious belief was not sincerely held.

Factors that either alone or in combination might undermine an employee’s assertion that he sincerely holds the religious belief at requirement issue include: whether the employee has behaved in a manner markedly inconsistent with the essay writing professed belief; [36] whether the uc art requirement College du Leman accommodation sought is a particularly desirable benefit that is likely to be sought for secular reasons; whether the timing of the critical thinking request renders it suspect ( e.g. , it follows an requirement earlier request by the employee for for scholarships Shawnigan the same benefit for secular reasons); and whether the employer otherwise has reason to believe the accommodation is not sought for uc art du Leman religious reasons. However, none of these factors is website writes for you Washington State (INTO), dispositive. For example, although prior inconsistent conduct is uc art requirement, relevant to the question of sincerity, an individual’s beliefs or degree of adherence may change over time, and essay writing, therefore an uc art employee’s newly adopted or inconsistently observed religious practice may nevertheless be sincerely held. [37] An employer also should not assume that an employee is insincere simply because some of his or her practices deviate from the commonly followed tenets of his or her religion. [38] 3. Employer Inquiries into Religious Nature or Sincerity of Belief. Because the definition of religion is broad and issues to write about essay The University, protects beliefs and practices with which the employer may be unfamiliar, the employer should ordinarily assume that an requirement College du Leman employee’s request for religious accommodation is about in a college essay The University, based on a sincerely-held religious belief. If, however, an employee requests religious accommodation, and an employer has an objective basis for questioning either the uc art requirement religious nature or the sincerity of a particular belief or practice, the employer would be justified in seeking additional supporting information. See infra § IV-A-2. If the Respondent (R) disputes that the essay global warming State University Charging Party’s (“CP’s”) belief is “religious,” consider the following: Begin with the CP’s statements. What religious belief or practice does the uc art College du Leman CP claim to have? In some cases, the website writes for you Washington University CP’s credible testimony regarding his belief or practice will be sufficient to demonstrate that it is religious.

In other cases, however, the investigator may need to ask follow-up questions about the uc art College du Leman nature and tenets of the essay writing Shawnigan asserted religious beliefs, and/or any associated practices, rituals, clergy, observances, etc., in uc art requirement College order to identify a specific religious belief or practice or determine if one is at issue. Since religious beliefs can be unique to an individual, evidence from others is not always necessary. To Write Essay Of Birmingham! However, if the uc art du Leman CP believes such evidence will support his or her claim, the investigator should seek evidence such as oral statements, affidavits, or other documents from CP’s religious leader(s) if applicable, or others whom CP identifies as knowledgeable regarding the religious belief or practice in reflective writing Windermere question. Remember, where an alleged religious practice or belief is at issue, a case-by-case analysis is required. Investigators should not make assumptions about a religious practice or belief. In some cases, to determine whether CP’s asserted practice or belief is “religious” as defined under Title VII, the investigator’s general knowledge will be insufficient, and additional objective information will have to be obtained, while nevertheless recognizing the intensely personal characteristics of uc art adherence to a religious belief. If the essay paper School Respondent disputes that CP’s belief is “sincerely held,” the following evidence may be relevant:

Oral statements, an affidavit, or other documents from CP describing his or her beliefs and uc art, practices, including information regarding when CP embraced the belief or practice, as well as when, where, and how CP has adhered to the belief or practice; and/or, Oral statements, affidavits, or other documents from potential witnesses identified by CP or R as having knowledge of whether CP adheres or does not adhere to thinking Bishopstrow, the belief or practice at issue ( e.g ., CP’s religious leader (if applicable), fellow adherents (if applicable), family, friends, neighbors, managers, or co-workers who may have observed his past adherence or lack thereof, or discussed it with him). Overview: Title VII jurisdictional rules apply to all religious discrimination claims under the statute. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! However, specially-defined “religious organizations” and writing paper Sevenoaks, “religious educational institutions” are exempt from certain religious discrimination provisions, and a “ministerial exception” bars Title VII claims by employees who serve in clergy roles. Title VII’s prohibitions apply to requirement College, employers, employment agencies, and unions, [39] subject to for you University (INTO), the statute’s jurisdictional requirements.

See EEOC Compliance Manual, “Threshold Issues,” https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/threshold.html. Those covered entities must carry out their activities in requirement du Leman a nondiscriminatory manner and provide reasonable accommodation unless doing so would impose an undue hardship. [40] Unions also can be liable if they knowingly acquiesce in employment discrimination against essays for you Washington State (INTO), their members, join or tolerate employers’ discriminatory practices, or discriminatorily refuse to requirement College du Leman, represent employees’ interests. [41] Under Title VII, religious organizations are permitted to give employment preference to about The University, members of their own religion. [42] The exception applies only to those institutions whose “purpose and character are primarily religious.” [43] That determination is to College, be based on “[a]ll significant religious and essay writing School, secular characteristics.” [44] Although no one factor is dispositive, significant factors to consider that would indicate whether an entity is religious include: Do its articles of incorporation state a religious purpose? Are its day-to-day operations religious ( e.g. , are the services the entity performs, the uc art du Leman product it produces, or the studies College educational curriculum it provides directed toward propagation of the religion)? Is it not-for-profit? Is it affiliated with or supported by a church or other religious organization? [45] This exception is not limited to religious activities of the organization. College Du Leman! [46] However, it only allows religious organizations to prefer to employ individuals who share their religion. [47] The exception does not allow religious organizations otherwise to discriminate in employment on protected bases other than religion, such as race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. [48] Thus, a religious organization is not permitted to engage in racially discriminatory hiring by asserting that a tenet of writing Sevenoaks School its religious beliefs is not associating with people of other races. Uc Art College! Similarly, a religious organization is not permitted to deny fringe benefits to married women but not to married men by asserting a religiously based view that only men can be the head of a household. Sex Discrimination Not Excused.

Justina works at Tots Day Care Center. Tots is essay global warming State, run by a religious organization that believes that, while women may work outside of the College du Leman home if they are single or have their husband’s permission, men should be the heads of their households and reflective, the primary providers for their families. Believing that men shoulder a greater financial responsibility than women, the organization pays female teachers less than male teachers. The organization’s practice of uc art requirement du Leman unequal pay based on essay writing Sevenoaks, sex constitutes unlawful discrimination. College! [49] Courts have held, based on First Amendment constitutional considerations, that clergy members cannot bring claims under the federal employment discrimination laws, including Title VII, the Age Discrimination in essay paper Sevenoaks School Employment Act, the Equal Pay Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, because “[t]he relationship between an organized church and its ministers is its lifeblood.” [50] This “ministerial exception” comes not from the text of the statutes, but from the First Amendment principle that governmental regulation of church administration, including the appointment of clergy, impedes the free exercise of requirement religion and constitutes impermissible government entanglement with church authority. [51] Thus, courts will not ordinarily consider whether a church’s employment decision concerning one of its ministers was based on essay writing global State University (INTO), discriminatory grounds, although some courts have allowed ministers to bring sexual harassment claims. [52] The ministerial exception applies only to those employees who perform essentially religious functions, namely those whose primary duties consist of engaging in church governance, supervising a religious order, or conducting religious ritual, worship, or instruction. [53] The exception is not limited to ordained clergy, [54] and has been applied by courts to others involved in clergy-like roles who conduct services or provide pastoral counseling. College! However, the exception does not necessarily apply to everyone with a title typically conferred upon for you Washington State University, clergy ( e.g. Uc Art College Du Leman! , minister). [55] In short, in each case it is necessary to make a factual determination of whether the function of the issues to write about in a essay The University of Birmingham position is one to which the exception applies. Title VII’s prohibition against disparate treatment based on religion generally functions like its prohibition against disparate treatment based on race, color, sex, or national origin.

Disparate treatment violates the uc art requirement College statute whether motivated by bias against essay writing Sevenoaks School, or preference toward an applicant or employee due to his religious beliefs, practices, or observances or lack thereof. Thus, for uc art example, except to the extent permitted by the religious organization and ministerial exceptions, an employer may not refuse to recruit, hire, or promote individuals of a certain religion, may not impose stricter promotion requirements for persons of a certain religion, and issues to write in a essay The University of Birmingham, may not impose more or different work requirements on an employee because of that employee’s religious beliefs or practices. [56] The following sub-sections address work scenarios that may lead to claims of religious discrimination. 1. Recruitment, Hiring, and Promotion. Employers that are not religious organizations may neither recruit individuals of uc art a particular religion nor adopt recruitment practices, such as word-of-mouth recruitment, that have the purpose or effect of discriminating based on religion. Title VII permits employers that are not religious organizations to hire and employ employees on essays for you Washington State University, the basis of religion only if religion is College du Leman, “a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise.” [57]

For example, an studies Bishopstrow College employer may not refuse to hire an applicant simply because he does not share the du Leman employer’s religious beliefs, and conversely may not select one applicant over essay writing warming Oregon University another based on a preference for employees of a particular religion. [58] Similarly, employment agencies may not comply with requests from employers to engage in discriminatory recruitment or referral practices, for example by screening out applicants who have names often associated with a particular religion ( e.g., Mohammed). Requirement College! Moreover, an employer may not exclude an applicant from hire merely because he or she may need a reasonable accommodation that could be provided absent undue hardship. [59] Charles, the president of a company that owns several gas stations, needs managers for the new convenience stores he has decided to add to the stations. He posts a job announcement at the Hindu Temple he attends and website writes essays State University (INTO), asks other members of the temple to refer only uc art requirement du Leman, Hindu friends or family members who may be interested in the position. He does no other recruitment. By limiting his recruitment to Hindus, Charles is engaging in essay Windermere School unlawful discrimination. Mary is a human resources officer who is filling a vacant administrative position at her company. During the application process, she performs an Internet search on the candidates and learns that one applicant, Jonathan, has written an article for the local chapter of the Ethical Society setting forth his view that religion has been historically divisive and explaining why he subscribes to no religious beliefs or practices.

Although Mary believes he is the requirement du Leman most qualified candidate, she does not hire him because she knows that many current company employees are observant Christians like her, and she believes they would be more comfortable working with someone like-minded. By not hiring Jonathan because of writing paper Sevenoaks his lack of religious identification, the company violated Title VII. Darpak, who practices Buddhism, holds a Ph.D. degree in engineering and applied for uc art College a managerial position at the research firm where he has worked for essay writing ten years. He was rejected in favor of a non-Buddhist candidate who was less qualified. The company vice president who made the promotion decision advised Darpak that he was not selected because “we decided to go in requirement a different direction.” However, the vice president confided to co-workers at a social function that he did not select Darpak because he thought a Christian manager could make better personal connections with the firm’s clients, many of whom are Christian. Issues Essay The University! The vice president’s statement, combined with the lack of requirement any legitimate non-discriminatory reason for selecting the less qualified candidate, as well as the evidence that Darpak was the best qualified candidate for the position, suggests that the proffered reason was a pretext for issues The University discrimination against Darpak because of du Leman his religious views. [60] Title VII also prohibits employers from Washington State University (INTO) disciplining or discharging employees because of their religion. Requirement College Du Leman! [61] Joanne, a retail store clerk, is frequently 10-15 minutes late for her shift on several days per week when she attends Mass at a Catholic Church across town. Her manager, Donald, has never disciplined her for this tardiness, and instead filled in for her at the cash register until she arrived, stating that he understood her situation. On the other hand, Yusef, a newly hired clerk who is Muslim, is disciplined by essay global warming (INTO) Donald for arriving 10 minutes late for his shift even though Donald knows it is due to his attendance at services at the local Mosque.

While Donald can require all similarly situated employees to uc art College, be punctual, he is engaging in disparate treatment based on religion by disciplining only Yusef and not Joanne absent a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for treating them differently. A charge alleging the above facts might also present a claim for denial of reasonable accommodation. While the employer may require employees to issues about essay The University of Birmingham, be punctual, it may have to accommodate an employee who seeks leave or a schedule change to resolve the conflict between religious services and a work schedule, unless the accommodation would pose an requirement College undue hardship. [62] 3. Compensation and Other Terms, Conditions, or Privileges of critical thinking studies Bishopstrow College Employment. Title VII prohibits discrimination on a protected basis “with respect to uc art, . . Essay Writing For Scholarships Lake School! . compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment,” for example, setting or adjusting wages, granting benefits, and/or providing leave in a discriminatory fashion. [63] Wages and Benefits. Janet, who practices Native American spirituality, is uc art, a newly hired social worker for an agency. As a benefit to its employees, the agency provides tuition reimbursement for professional continuing education courses offered by essay writing selected providers. Janet applied for tuition reimbursement for an approved course that was within permitted cost limit. Janet’s supervisor denied her request for uc art requirement College du Leman tuition reimbursement, stating that since Janet believes in “voodoo” she “won’t make a very good caseworker.” By refusing, because of Janet’s religious beliefs, to provide the tuition reimbursement to which Janet was otherwise entitled as a benefit of her employment, Janet’s supervisor has discriminated against critical studies, Janet on the basis of College du Leman religion. Title VII’s prohibition on disparate treatment based on religious beliefs also can apply to State, disparate treatment of religious expression in College the workplace. [64]

Eve is a secretary who displays a Bible on her desk at work. Reflective Writing Windermere School! Xavier, a secretary in the same workplace, begins displaying a Quran on his desk at work. Their supervisor allows Eve to retain the Bible but directs Xavier to put the Quran out of view because, he states, co-workers “will think you are making a political statement, and with everything going on uc art requirement, in the world right now we don’t need that around here.” This differential treatment of similarly situated employees with respect to the display of a religious item at work constitutes disparate treatment based on religion in violation of essay warming Oregon Title VII. Uc Art College! [65] Charges involving religious expression may present claims not only of disparate treatment, but also of harassment and/or denial of reasonable accommodation. Investigation of thinking College claims of harassment and denial of reasonable accommodation are addressed respectively in du Leman §§ III and IV of this document. As discussed in greater detail in essay for scholarships Shawnigan Lake School those sections, Title VII requires employers to accommodate expression that is based on a sincerely held religious practice or belief, unless it threatens to constitute harassment or otherwise poses an undue hardship on uc art requirement College du Leman, the conduct of the business. Thus, for example, an employer can restrict religious expression where it would cause customers or co-workers reasonably to perceive the materials to express the employer’s own message, or where the item or message in question is critical thinking College, harassing or otherwise disruptive. Uc Art Requirement College! [66] For further discussion of how to website essays for you University (INTO), analyze when accommodation of College du Leman religious expression would pose an writing Sevenoaks undue hardship, refer to uc art, the sections on Harassment at to write college The University of Birmingham § III-C and Accommodation at § IV-C-6. If an employer takes an action based on the discriminatory preferences of others, including co-workers or clients, the uc art requirement College du Leman employer is unlawfully discriminating. Employment Decision Based on Customer Preference. Harinder, who wears a turban as part of writing paper Sevenoaks School his Sikh religion, is hired to work at the counter in a coffee shop. Requirement Du Leman! A few weeks after Harinder begins working, the manager notices that the work crew from the construction site near the essay Sevenoaks shop no longer comes in for requirement du Leman coffee in the mornings.

When he inquires, the crew complains that Harinder, whom they mistakenly believe is Muslim, makes them uncomfortable in Windermere light of the September 11 th attacks. The manager tells Harinder that he has to let him go because the customers’ discomfort is understandable. The manager has subjected Harinder to unlawful religious discrimination by uc art requirement du Leman taking an adverse action based on essay writing for scholarships Shawnigan Lake, customers’ preference not to have a cashier of requirement du Leman Harinder’s perceived religion. Harinder’s termination based on customer preference would violate Title VII regardless of whether he was Muslim, Sikh, or any other religion. In general, an employer may adopt security requirements for its employees or applicants, provided they are adopted for nondiscriminatory reasons and are applied in a nondiscriminatory manner. For example, an employer may not require Muslim applicants to undergo a background investigation or more extensive security procedures because of their religion while not imposing the same requirements on similarly situated applicants who are non-Muslim, unless such job requirements are imposed by federal statute or Executive Order in the interest of national security. [67]

D. Bona Fide Occupational Qualification. Title VII permits employers to hire and employ employees on the basis of essay writing paper Sevenoaks religion if religion is uc art requirement, “a bona fide occupational qualification [“BFOQ”] reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise.” [68] Religious organizations do not typically need to rely on this BFOQ defense, however, because the “religious organization” exception in Title VII permits them to State (INTO), prefer their co-religionists. See supra § I-C. It is well settled that for employers that are not religious organizations and therefore seek to rely on the BFOQ defense to justify a religious preference, the defense is a narrow one and requirement du Leman, can rarely be successfully invoked. [69] Employers can reduce the risk of issues about in a essay The University of Birmingham discriminatory employment decisions by establishing written objective criteria for evaluating candidates for hire or promotion and applying those criteria consistently to all candidates. In conducting job interviews, employers can ensure nondiscriminatory treatment by uc art College du Leman asking the same questions of all applicants for a particular job or category of job and inquiring about matters directly related to the position in essay paper question. Employers can reduce the risk of du Leman religious discrimination claims by carefully and timely recording the accurate business reasons for disciplinary or performance?related actions and sharing these reasons with the essay global Oregon affected employees. Uc Art! When management decisions require the exercise of subjective judgment, employers can reduce the risk of discriminatory decisions by providing training to inexperienced managers and encouraging them to consult with more experienced managers or human resources personnel when addressing difficult issues.

If an employer is confronted with customer biases, e.g., an adverse reaction to essay global State University (INTO), being served by requirement College du Leman an employee due to religious garb, the employer should consider engaging with and educating the customers regarding any misperceptions they may have and/or the writes for you Washington State University equal employment opportunity laws. Overview: Religious harassment is analyzed and proved in the same manner as harassment on uc art requirement du Leman, other Title VII bases, e.g., race, color, sex, or national origin. [70] However, the facts of religious harassment cases may present unique considerations, especially where the alleged harassment is based on another employee’s religious practices a situation that may require an writing Sevenoaks employer to reconcile its dual obligations to take prompt remedial action in response to uc art du Leman, alleged harassment and to accommodate certain employee religious expression. Religious harassment in violation of Title VII occurs when employees are: (1) required or coerced to abandon, alter, or adopt a religious practice as a condition of thinking Bishopstrow employment (this type of “quid pro quo” harassment may also give rise to a disparate treatment or denial of accommodation claim in some circumstances), [71] or (2) subjected to unwelcome statements or conduct that is based on religion and is so severe or pervasive that the individual being harassed reasonably finds the work environment to be hostile or abusive, and there is a basis for holding the uc art employer liable. [72] 1. Religious Coercion That Constitutes a Tangible Employment Action. Title VII is violated when an employer or supervisor explicitly or implicitly coerces an employee to abandon, alter, or adopt a religious practice as a condition of receiving a job benefit or avoiding an adverse action. [73] Religious Conformance Required for Promotion. Wamiq was raised as a Muslim but no longer practices Islam. Critical Bishopstrow! His supervisor, Arif, is a very devout Muslim who tries to persuade Wamiq not to abandon Islam and advises him to follow the teachings of the uc art College Quran. Arif also says that if Wamiq expects to advance in essay warming Oregon State the company, he should join Arif and uc art requirement College, other Muslims for essay for scholarships Shawnigan Lake School weekly prayer sessions in Arif’s office. Notwithstanding this pressure to requirement College, conform his religious practices in for you (INTO) order to College, be promoted, Wamiq refused to attend the weekly prayer sessions, and was subsequently denied the promotion for which he applies even though he was the most qualified. Arif’s conduct indicates that the essay warming University promotion would have been granted if Wamiq had participated in the prayer sessions and requirement, had become an observant Muslim.

Absent contrary evidence, the employer will be liable for harassment for conditioning Wamiq’s promotion on his adherence to Arif’s views of appropriate religious practice. [74] This would also be actionable as disparate treatment based on religion. In addition, if the prayer sessions were made mandatory and Wamiq had asked to be excused on religious grounds, Arif would have been required to Windermere School, excuse him from the prayer sessions as a reasonable accommodation. A claim of harassment based on coerced religious participation or non-participation, however, only arises where it was intended to College du Leman, make the employee conform to essay Sevenoaks School, or abandon a religious belief or practice. By contrast, an employer would not be engaging in coercion if it required an employee to participate in requirement du Leman a workplace activity that conflicts with the employee’s sincerely held religious belief, so long as the employer demonstrates that it would impose an website for you (INTO) undue hardship to accommodate the employee’s request to be excused. However, the same fact pattern may give rise to uc art, claims of disparate treatment, harassment, and/or denial of accommodation. For example, terminating rather than accommodating an website writes essays for you Washington State University (INTO) employee may give rise to both denial of accommodation and discriminatory discharge claims. [75] For discussion of the accommodation issue, see § IV, infra .[76] Title VII’s prohibition against religious discrimination can also be violated if the employee is subjected to a hostile work environment because of religion. Uc Art Du Leman! [77] An unlawful hostile environment based on religion might take the form of critical Bishopstrow either verbal or physical harassment or unwelcome imposition of religious views or practices on an employee. A hostile work environment is requirement College du Leman, created when the “workplace is permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult that is sufficiently severe or pervasive to writing, alter the conditions of the uc art requirement College victim’s employment and create an abusive working environment.” [78] To establish a case of religious harassment, an employee must show that the harassment was: (1) based on essay writing global Oregon (INTO), his religion; (2) unwelcome; (3) sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the uc art conditions of employment by creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment; and, (4) that there is a basis for employer liability. Paper School! [79] To support a religious harassment claim, the adverse treatment must be based on religion. [80] This standard can be satisfied regardless of whether the harassment is motivated by the religious belief or observance or lack thereof of either the harasser or the targeted employee.

Moreover, while verbally harassing conduct clearly is based on uc art du Leman, religion if it has religious content, harassment can also be based on studies, religion even if religion is not explicitly mentioned. [81] Harassing Conduct Based on du Leman, Religion Religion Mentioned. Mohammed is an Indian-born Muslim employed at a car dealership. Because he takes scheduled prayer breaks during the work day and observes Muslim dietary restrictions, his co-workers are aware of to write about in a college essay The University of Birmingham his religious beliefs. Upset about the 9/11 terrorist attacks, his co-workers and managers began making mocking comments about his religious dietary restrictions and need to requirement, pray during the workday. They repeatedly referred to him as “Taliban” or “Arab” and essay Oregon, asked him “why don’t you just go back where you came from since you believe what you believe?” When Mohammed questioned why it was mandatory for requirement College du Leman all employees to attend a United Way meeting, his supervisor said: “This is America.

That’s the way things work over here. This is not the Islamic country where you come from.” After this confrontation, the supervisor issued Mohammed a written warning stating that he “was acting like a Muslim extremist” and that the supervisor could not work with him because of his “militant stance.” This harassment is “based on” religion and national origin. [82] Harassing Conduct Based on essay writing paper Sevenoaks School, Religion Religion Not Mentioned. Shoshanna is a Seventh-day Adventist whose work schedule was adjusted to accommodate her Sabbath observance, which begins at uc art du Leman sundown each Friday. When Nicholas , the new head of Shoshanna’s department, was informed that he must accommodate her, he told a colleague that “anybody who cannot work regular hours should work elsewhere.” Nicholas then moved the essay writing Lake School regular Monday morning staff meetings to late Friday afternoon, repeatedly scheduled staff and client meetings on Friday afternoons, and often marked Shoshanna AWOL when she was not scheduled to work.

In addition, Nicholas treated her differently than her colleagues by, for example, denying her training opportunities and loudly berating her with little or no provocation. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! Although Nicholas did not mention Shoshanna’s religion, the evidence shows that his conduct was because of Shoshanna’s need for writes essays State University (INTO) religious accommodation, and therefore was “based on” religion. [83] To be unlawful, harassing conduct must be unwelcome. Conduct is “unwelcome” when the employee did not solicit or incite it and regards it as undesirable or offensive. [84] It is necessary to evaluate all of the surrounding circumstances to determine whether or not particular conduct or remarks are unwelcome. [85] For example, where an employee is upset by repeated mocking use of derogatory terms or comments [86] about his religious beliefs or observance by a colleague, it may be evident that the conduct is unwelcome. Uc Art Requirement! This would stand in website Washington State stark contrast to a situation where the same two employees were engaged in a consensual conversation that involves a spirited debate of religious views, and neither employee indicates that he was upset by it. The distinction between welcome and uc art requirement, unwelcome conduct is especially important in in a essay The University of Birmingham the religious context in situations involving proselytizing of employees who have not invited such conduct. [87] Where a religious employee attempts to persuade a non-religious employee of the correctness of his belief, or vice versa, the conduct may or may not be welcome. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! When an employee objects to particular religious expression, unwelcomeness is evident. [88] Beth’s colleague, Bill, repeatedly talked to her at work about critical thinking studies Bishopstrow College her prospects for du Leman salvation. For several months, she did not object and discussed the matter with him. When he persisted even after she told him that he had “crossed the line” and should stop having non-work related conversations with her, the conduct was clearly unwelcome. [89] Even unwelcome religiously motivated conduct is not unlawful unless “the victim . Studies! . . subjectively perceive[s] the environment to be abusive” and du Leman, the conduct is “severe or pervasive enough to writing for scholarships Shawnigan Lake School, create an objectively hostile or abusive work environment -- an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive.” [90] Whether a reasonable person would perceive the conduct as abusive turns on common sense and context, looking at the totality of the circumstances. [91] Relevant factors include whether the conduct was abusive, derogatory, or offensive; [92] whether the conduct was frequent; [93] and whether the conduct was humiliating or physically threatening. [94]

Reasonable Person Perceives Conduct To Be Hostile. Although he hired employees of uc art requirement College all religions, the studies Bishopstrow College Director of “Get Drug Free Today” required employees to sign a statement that they would support the values of the Church of Scientology. He regularly chastised those whose conduct did not conform to those values. A reasonable person would perceive this to be a religiously hostile work environment. [95] To “alter the College du Leman conditions of employment,” conduct need not cause economic or psychological harm. [96] It need not impair work performance, discourage employees from remaining on the job, or impede their advancement. [97] The presence of one or more of those factors would buttress the reflective essay claim, but is uc art requirement College du Leman, not required. Essay Sevenoaks! [98] However, Title VII is not a general civility code, and does not render all insensitive or offensive comments, petty slights, and requirement College, annoyances illegal. [99] Offhand or isolated incidents (unless extremely serious) will not rise to paper School, the level of illegality. [100] Insensitive Comments Not Enough To Constitute Hostile Environment. Marvin is an Orthodox Jew who was hired as a radio show host. When he started work, a co-worker, Stacy, pointed to his yarmulke and asked, “Will your headset fit over that?” On a few occasions, Stacy, made other remarks about the yarmulke, such as: “Nice hat. Is that a beanie?” and “Do they come in uc art requirement College du Leman different colors?” Although the essay writing co-worker’s comments about his yarmulke were insensitive, they were not sufficiently severe or pervasive to create a hostile work environment for Marvin. [101] Isolated Comments Not Enough to Constitute Hostile Environment.

Bob, a supervisor, occasionally allowed spontaneous and requirement College, voluntary prayers by employees during office meetings. Essay Oregon State! During one meeting, he referenced Bible passages related to “slothfulness” and “work ethics.” Amy complained that Bob’s comments and the few instances of allowing voluntary prayers during office meetings created a hostile environment. The comments do not create an actionable harassment claim. They were not severe, and because they occurred infrequently, they were not sufficiently pervasive to state a claim. [102] The severity and du Leman, pervasiveness factors operate inversely. The more severe the harassment, the less frequently the incidents need to recur. At the same time, incidents that may not, individually, be severe may become unlawful if they occur frequently or in close proximity. [103] Although a single incident will seldom create an unlawfully hostile environment, it may do so if it is issues about in a college of Birmingham, unusually severe, particularly if it involves physical threat. [104] One Instance of Physically Threatening Conduct Is Enough to Constitute Hostile Environment. Ihsaan is a Muslim.

Shortly after the terrorist attacks on College du Leman, September 11, 2001, Ihsaan came to work and found the words “You terrorists go back where you came from! We will avenge the victims!! Your life is writing School, next!” scrawled in red marker on his office door. Because of the timing of the statement and the direct physical threat, this incident, alone, is sufficiently severe to constitute hostile environment harassment based on religion and national origin. [105] Persistent Offensive Remarks Constitute Hostile Environment. Betty is a Mormon. During a disagreement regarding a joint project, a co-worker, Julian, tells Betty that she doesn’t know what she is talking about and that she should “go back to Salt Lake City.” When Betty subsequently proposes a different approach to the project, Julian tells her that her suggestions are as “flaky” as he would expect from “her kind.” When Betty tries to resolve the conflict, Julian tells her that if she is uncomfortable working with him, she can either ask to be transferred, or she can “just pray about it.” Over the next six months, Julian regularly makes similar negative references to Betty’s religion. His persistent offensive remarks create a hostile environment. Religious expression that is repeatedly directed at an employee can become severe or pervasive, whether or not the content is intended to College du Leman, be insulting or abusive. Thus, for example, persistently reiterating atheist views to a religious employee who has asked that it stop can create a hostile environment. However, the essays extent to which the expression is uc art College, directed at a particular employee is relevant to determining whether or when it could reasonably be perceived to be severe or pervasive by paper School that employee. [106] For example, although it is conceivable that one employee may allege that he is offended by a colleague’s wearing of religious garb, expressing one’s religion by wearing religious garb is not religious harassment.

It merely expresses an uc art requirement College du Leman individual’s religious affiliation and does not demean other religious views. As such, it is not objectively hostile. Nor is it directed at any particular individual. Issues Essay Of Birmingham! Similarly, workplace displays of religious artifacts or posters that do not demean other religious views generally would not constitute religious harassment. No Hostile Environment from Comments That Are Not Abusive and Not Directed at Complaining Employee. While eating lunch in requirement College the company cafeteria, Clarence often overhears conversations between his co-workers Dharma and Khema. Dharma, a Buddhist, is discussing meditation techniques with Khema, who is interested in Buddhism. Essay Shawnigan School! Clarence strongly believes that meditation is an occult practice that leads to requirement College, devil worship and complains to their supervisor that Dharma and Khema are creating a hostile environment for him.

Such conversations do not constitute severe or pervasive religious harassment of essays (INTO) Clarence because they do not insult other religions and uc art requirement College, they were not directed at him. Overview: An employer is always liable for a supervisor’s harassment if it results in a tangible employment action. However, if it does not, the employer may be able to avoid liability or limit damages by establishing an reflective essay writing Windermere affirmative defense that includes two necessary elements: (a) the employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any harassing behavior, and (b) the College employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of about in a essay any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the employer or to avoid harm otherwise. In cases of harassment by a co-worker or a third party over whom the requirement employer had some control, an employer is liable if it knew or should have known about the harassment and failed to take immediate and appropriate corrective action. 1. Harassment by Supervisors or Managers. Employers are automatically liable for supervisory harassment that results in writing for scholarships Lake a tangible employment action such as a denial of promotion, demotion, discharge, or constructive discharge. If the harassment does not result in uc art College a tangible employment action, the website writes essays for you Washington State University (INTO) employer can attempt to uc art requirement, prove, as an affirmative defense to liability, that: (1) the employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and promptly correct any harassing behavior, and (2) the employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the employer or to otherwise avoid harm. Essay Paper Sevenoaks! [107] Supervisory Harassment with Tangible Employment Action. George, a high level official in a state agency, is an atheist who has frequently been heard to say that he thinks anyone who is deeply religious is uc art requirement, a zealot with his own agenda and cannot be trusted to act in the best interests of the to write about essay public.

George particularly ridicules Debra, a devoutly observant Jehovah’s Witness, and consistently withholds the most desirable assignments from her. He denies her request for a promotion to a more prestigious job in another division, saying that he can’t let her “spread that religious poppycock any further.” Debra files a religious harassment charge. Respondent asserts in its position statement that it is not liable because Debra never made a complaint under its internal anti-harassment policy and complaint procedures. Because the harassment culminated in a tangible employment action (failure to promote), the employer is liable for the harassment even if it has an effective anti-harassment policy, and even if Debra never complained. Uc Art Requirement College! Additionally, the denial of to write in a college essay The University of Birmingham promotion would be actionable as disparate treatment based on requirement College du Leman, religion. Supervisory Harassment Without Tangible Employment Action. Jennifer’s employer, XYZ, had an anti-harassment policy and complaint procedure that covered religious harassment.

All employees were aware of it, because XYZ widely and regularly publicized it. Despite his knowledge of the policy, Jennifer’s supervisor frequently mocked her religious beliefs. When Jennifer told him that his comments bothered her, he told her that he was just kidding and essay writing Lake, she should not take everything so seriously. Jennifer never reported the problem. When one of Jennifer’s co-workers eventually reported the supervisor’s harassing conduct, the employer promptly investigated, and acted effectively to stop the uc art requirement supervisor’s conduct. Jennifer then filed a religious harassment charge. Because the harassment of Jennifer did not culminate in a tangible employment action, XYZ may assert as an affirmative defense that it is essay paper Sevenoaks, not liable because Jennifer failed to make a complaint under its internal anti-harassment policy and uc art College du Leman, complaint procedures. On these facts, XYZ will not be liable for website writes State University (INTO) the harassment because Jennifer unreasonably failed to utilize XYZ’s available, effective complaint mechanisms, and because XYZ took prompt and reasonable corrective measures once it did learn of the harassment. An employer is liable for harassment by co-workers where it: knew or should have known about the harassment, and failed to take prompt and appropriate corrective action. [108] Harassment by requirement du Leman Co-Workers.

John, who is a Christian Scientist, shares an website writes essays (INTO) office with Rick, a Mormon. Rick repeatedly tells John that he is uc art requirement College, practicing a false religion, and that he should study Mormon literature. Despite John’s protestations that he is very happy with his religion and has no desire to convert, Rick regularly leaves religious pamphlets on John’s desk and tries to talk to him about religion. After vainly asking Rick to stop the reflective essay Windermere School behavior, John complains to their immediate supervisor, who dismisses John’s complaint on the ground that Rick is a nice person who believes that he is just being helpful. If the harassment continues, the employer is College, liable because it knew, through the supervisor, about Rick’s harassing conduct but failed to essays Washington State (INTO), take immediate and appropriate corrective action. [109] An employer is liable for harassment by non-employees where it: knew or should have known about the harassment, could control the harasser’s conduct or otherwise protect the employee, and uc art College du Leman, failed to take prompt and appropriate corrective action. [110] Harassment by a Contractor. Tristan works for XYZ, a contractor that manages Crossroads Corporation’s mail room. Essay Writing Sevenoaks School! When Tristan delivers the mail to Julia, the Crossroads receptionist, he gives her religious tracts, attempts to convert her to his religion, and persists even after she tells him to stop. Requirement Du Leman! Julia reports Tristan’s conduct to her supervisor, who tells her that he cannot do anything because Tristan does not work for Crossroads. If the harassment continues, the supervisor’s failure to act will subject Crossroads to essay writing global warming State University, liability because Tristan’s conduct is pervasive and uc art du Leman, Crossroads refused to take preventive action within its control.

Options available to essay paper Sevenoaks, Julia’s supervisor or the appropriate individual in the supervisor’s chain of command might include initiating a meeting with Tristan and XYZ management regarding the harassment and demanding that it cease, that appropriate disciplinary action be taken if it continues, and/or that a different mail carrier be assigned to Julia’s route. C. Special Considerations for Employers When Balancing Anti-Harassment and Accommodation Obligations With Respect to Religious Expression. While some employees believe that religion is intensely personal and private, others are open about requirement College du Leman their religion. [111] There are employees who may believe that they have a religious obligation to writing global warming Oregon State University (INTO), share their views and to requirement College, try to persuade co-workers of the truth of their religious beliefs, i.e. , to proselytize. Some employers, too, may wish to writing global warming State (INTO), express their religious views and uc art College, share their religion with their employees. [112] As noted above, however, some employees may perceive proselytizing or other religious expression as unwelcome harassment based on their own religious beliefs and observances, or lack thereof. This mix of to write college essay of Birmingham divergent beliefs and practices can give rise to conflicts requiring employers to balance the rights of employees who wish to express their religious beliefs with the rights of uc art requirement College other employees to essay writing warming Oregon State University (INTO), be free from religious harassment under the foregoing Title VII harassment standards. [113] As discussed in more detail in § IV-C-6 of this document, an employer never has to accommodate expression of a religious belief in uc art requirement du Leman the workplace where such an accommodation could potentially constitute harassment of co-workers, because that would pose an undue hardship for the employer. Essay Paper Sevenoaks! Therefore, while Title VII requires employers to uc art College du Leman, accommodate an employee’s sincerely held religious belief in engaging in essay warming (INTO) religious expression ( e.g. , proselytizing) in the workplace, an employer does not have to allow such expression if it imposes an undue hardship on the operation of the business. For example, it would be an undue hardship for an employer to accommodate proselytizing by an employee if it constituted potentially unlawful religious harassment of a co-worker who found it unwelcome, or if it otherwise interfered with the operation of the business. [114] Because employers are responsible for maintaining a nondiscriminatory work environment, they are liable for perpetrating or tolerating religious harassment of their employees. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! An employer can reduce the chance that employees will engage in conduct that rises to Oregon State University (INTO), the level of unlawful harassment by implementing an requirement College anti-harassment policy and essay Oregon State, an effective procedure for reporting, investigating, and College, correcting harassing conduct. For Scholarships Shawnigan Lake School! [115] Even if the policy does not prevent all such conduct, it will likely limit the employer’s liability where the affected employee allows the conduct to rise to requirement College, the level of essay writing illegality by uc art requirement College failing to report it. However, Title VII violations may result if an employer tries to issues in a college essay The University of Birmingham, avoid potential co-worker objections to employee religious expression by uc art requirement preemptively banning all religious communications in the workplace, since Title VII requires that employees’ sincerely held religious practices and thinking College, beliefs be accommodated as long as no undue hardship is posed.

Employers should have a well-publicized and consistently applied anti-harassment policy that: (1) covers religious harassment; (2) clearly explains what is prohibited; (3) describes procedures for bringing harassment to College du Leman, management’s attention; and, (4) contains an assurance that complainants will be protected against retaliation. The procedures should include a complaint mechanism that includes multiple avenues for complaint; prompt, thorough, and essay School, impartial investigations; and prompt and appropriate corrective action. Employers should allow religious expression among employees to the same extent that they allow other types of requirement du Leman personal expression that are not harassing or disruptive. Once an employer is on notice that an employee objects to religious conduct that is directed at writing paper him or her, the employer should take steps to end the conduct because even conduct that the employer does not regard as abusive can become sufficiently severe or pervasive to uc art, affect the issues about in a college essay of Birmingham conditions of employment if allowed to uc art requirement du Leman, persist in the face of the employee’s objection. Writing Warming State University (INTO)! If harassment is perpetrated by a non-employee assigned by a contractor, the supervisor or other appropriate individual in the chain of command should initiate a meeting with the contractor regarding the requirement harassment and demand that it cease, that appropriate disciplinary action be taken if it continues, and/or that a different individual be assigned by the contractor.

To prevent conflicts from escalating to the level of a Title VII violation, employers should immediately intervene when they become aware of objectively abusive or insulting conduct, even absent a complaint. Employers should encourage managers to essay writing paper, intervene proactively and College, discuss with subordinates whether particular religious expression is welcome if the manager believes the expression might be construed as harassing to a reasonable person. Critical Thinking Bishopstrow! While supervisors are permitted to engage in certain religious expression, they should avoid expression that might due to their supervisory authority reasonably be perceived by uc art du Leman subordinates as coercive, even when not so intended. Employees who are the recipients of unwelcome religious conduct should inform the individual engaging in the conduct that they wish it to stop. If the conduct does not stop, employees should report it to their supervisor or other appropriate company official in critical College accordance with the procedures established in the company’s anti-harassment policy. Employees who do not wish to personally confront an individual who is directing unwelcome religious or anti-religious conduct towards them should report the conduct to requirement, their supervisor or other appropriate company official in thinking studies Bishopstrow accordance with the company’s anti-harassment policy. Overview: Title VII requires an employer, once on notice, to uc art requirement College du Leman, reasonably accommodate an employee whose sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance conflicts with a work requirement, unless providing the accommodation would create an undue hardship. [116] However, the Title VII “undue hardship” defense is defined very differently than the “undue hardship” defense for website writes essays for you Washington disability accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Under Title VII, the undue hardship defense to providing religious accommodation requires a showing that the proposed accommodation in a particular case poses a “more than de minimis” cost or burden, which is a far lower standard for an employer to meet than undue hardship under the ADA, which is defined in that statute as “significant difficulty or expense.” [117] A religious accommodation claim is uc art requirement, distinct from a disparate treatment claim, in which the writing School question is whether employees are treated equally. An individual alleging denial of religious accommodation is seeking an adjustment to a neutral work rule that infringes on the employee’s ability to College, practice his religion. The accommodation requirement is Shawnigan Lake School, “plainly intended to relieve individuals of the burden of choosing between their jobs and uc art du Leman, their religious convictions, where such relief will not unduly burden others.” [118]

A reasonable religious accommodation is essay writing for scholarships Shawnigan, any adjustment to the work environment that will allow the employee to comply with his or her religious beliefs. However, it is subject to the limit of uc art requirement College more than de minimis cost or burden. The need for religious accommodation most frequently arises where an individual’s religious beliefs, observances, or practices conflict with a specific task or requirement of the job or the application process. The employer’s duty to accommodate will usually entail making a special exception from, or adjustment to, the particular requirement so that the employee or applicant will be able to practice his or her religion. Accommodation requests often relate to work schedules, dress and grooming, or religious expression or practice while at work. 1. Notice of the Conflict Between Religion and Work.

An applicant or employee who seeks religious accommodation must make the to write about college The University employer aware both of the uc art requirement College need for accommodation and that it is being requested due to writing for scholarships Lake School, a conflict between religion and work. The employee is obligated to explain the religious nature of the belief or practice at College issue, and cannot assume that the employer will already know or understand it. [119] Similarly, the employer should not assume that a request is invalid simply because it is based on religious beliefs or practices with which the employer is writing School, unfamiliar, but should ask the employee to requirement du Leman, explain the religious nature of the reflective essay School practice and the way in which it conflicts with a work requirement. No “magic words” are required to place an employer on notice of an requirement applicant’s or employee’s conflict between religious needs and a work requirement. Sevenoaks! To request an accommodation, an individual may use plain language and need not mention any particular terms such as “Title VII” or “religious accommodation.” However, the applicant or employee must provide enough information to uc art College, make the employer aware that there exists a conflict between the individual’s religious practice or belief and about essay The University of Birmingham, a requirement for applying for or performing the job. [120] Failure to Advise Employer That Request Is Due to requirement College, Religious Practice or Belief. Jim agreed to take his employer’s drug test but was terminated because he refused to sign the reflective essay writing Windermere School accompanying consent form.

After his termination, Jim filed a charge alleging that the College employer failed to accommodate his religious objection to swearing an oath. Until it received notice of the charge, the essay paper School employer did not know that Jim’s refusal to sign the form was based on his religious beliefs. Because the uc art College du Leman employer was not notified of the conflict at critical thinking studies the time Jim refused to sign the form, or at any time prior to Jim’s termination, it did not have an opportunity to uc art requirement College du Leman, offer to accommodate him. Reflective Essay Writing! The employer has not violated Title VII. [121] While an uc art requirement College employer is not required by Title VII to conduct a discussion with an critical thinking studies Bishopstrow College employee before denying the employee’s accommodation request, as a practical matter it can be important to do so. Both the employer and the employee have roles to play in uc art resolving an accommodation request. In addition to placing the employer on notice of the need for accommodation, the College employee should cooperate with the employer’s efforts to determine whether a reasonable accommodation can be granted.

Once the employer becomes aware of the du Leman employee’s religious conflict, the employer should obtain promptly whatever additional information is needed to determine whether an accommodation is available that would eliminate the religious conflict without posing an undue hardship on the operation of the employer’s business. Writing Global Warming Oregon University! [122] This typically involves the employer and employee mutually sharing information necessary to process the accommodation request. Employer?employee cooperation and flexibility are key to the search for a reasonable accommodation. Uc Art College Du Leman! If the accommodation solution is not immediately apparent, the employer should discuss the request with the employee to website writes, determine what accommodations might be effective. If the employer requests additional information reasonably needed to evaluate the requirement du Leman request, the employee should provide it. Failure to confer with the reflective essay Windermere employee is not an independent violation of Title VII but, as a practical matter, such failure can have adverse legal consequences for both an employee and an employer. For example, in some cases where an employer has made no effort to act on an accommodation request, courts have found that the employer lacked the requirement evidence needed to writing Sevenoaks, meet its burden of proof to establish that the plaintiff’s proposed accommodation would actually have posed an undue hardship. [123] Likewise, courts have ruled against employees who refused to cooperate with an employer’s requests for reasonable information when, as a result, the uc art du Leman employer was deprived of the writing for scholarships Shawnigan Lake School information necessary to resolve the accommodation request. For example, if an employee requested a schedule change to College du Leman, accommodate daily prayers, the issues to write essay of Birmingham employer might need to uc art College, ask for information about the religious observance, such as time and duration of the daily prayers, in order to website writes for you Washington University, determine if accommodation can be granted without posing an undue hardship on the operation of the uc art requirement College du Leman employer’s business. Issues To Write About In A College Essay The University! [124] Moreover, even if the employer does not grant the employee’s preferred accommodation but instead provides an alternative accommodation, the employee must cooperate by attempting to meet his religious needs through the employer’s proposed accommodation if possible. [125] Where the accommodation request itself does not provide enough information to uc art College, enable the employer to make a determination, and the employer has a bona fide doubt as to the basis for the accommodation request, it is entitled to make a limited inquiry into the facts and circumstances of the employee’s claim that the belief or practice at issue is essay writing School, religious and sincerely held, and requirement, that the belief or practice gives rise to the need for the accommodation. See “Sincerely Held” and “Employer Inquiries into Religious Nature or Sincerity of Belief,” supra §§ I-A-2 and I-A-3. Writing State University (INTO)! [126] Whether an employer has a reasonable basis for requirement du Leman seeking to verify the employee’s stated beliefs will depend on writing Sevenoaks, the facts of a particular case.

Sincerity of Religious Belief Questioned. Bob, who had been a dues-paying member of the CDF union for fourteen years, had a work-related dispute with a union official and one week later asserted that union activities were contrary to his religion and that he could no longer pay union dues. The union doubted whether Bob’s request was based on a sincerely held religious belief, given that it appeared to uc art College du Leman, be precipitated by an unrelated dispute with the union, and he had not sought this accommodation in issues in a The University of Birmingham his prior fourteen years of employment. In this situation, the union can require him to provide additional information to requirement College, support his assertion that he sincerely holds a religious conviction that precludes him from writing global (INTO) belonging to or financially supporting a union. [127] When an employer requests additional information, employees should provide information that addresses the employer’s reasonable doubts. That information need not, however, take any specific form. For example, written materials or the employee’s own first-hand explanation may be sufficient to alleviate the employer’s doubts about the sincerity or religious nature of the uc art employee’s professed belief such that third-party verification is unnecessary. Further, since idiosyncratic beliefs can be sincerely held and religious, even when third-party verification is for you State (INTO), needed, it does not have to come from a church official or member, but rather could be provided by others who are aware of the employee’s religious practice or belief. [128] An employee who fails to cooperate with an requirement College du Leman employer’s reasonable request for verification of the Lake School sincerity or religious nature of a professed belief risks losing any subsequent claim that the employer improperly denied an accommodation. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! By the same token, employers who unreasonably request unnecessary or excessive corroborating evidence risk being held liable for critical studies College denying a reasonable accommodation request, and uc art College, having their actions challenged as retaliatory or as part of a pattern of harassment.

It also is important to remember that even if an employer concludes that an global University individual’s professed belief is uc art College, sincerely held and religious, it is only required to grant those requests for accommodation that do not pose an undue hardship on the conduct of its business. Clarifying a Request. Diane requests that her employer schedule her for “fewer hours” so that she can “attend church more frequently.” The employer denies the request because it is not clear what schedule Diane is requesting or whether the change is sought due to a religious belief or practice. Website Essays Washington University (INTO)! While Diane’s request lacked sufficient detail for the employer to make a final decision, it was sufficient to constitute a religious accommodation request. Rather than denying the request outright, the employer should have obtained the information from Diane that it needed to make a decision. Uc Art College Du Leman! The employer could have inquired of to write about essay The University of Birmingham Diane precisely what schedule change was sought and for what purpose, and how her current schedule conflicted with her religious practices or beliefs. Uc Art College Du Leman! Diane would then have had an obligation to provide sufficient information to essays University (INTO), permit her employer to make a reasonable assessment of whether her request was based on a sincerely held religious belief, the precise conflict that existed between her work schedule and church schedule, and whether granting the uc art du Leman accommodation would pose more than a de minimis burden on the employer’s business. 3. Essay Writing Oregon State University (INTO)! What is a “Reasonable” Accommodation?

Although an employer never has to provide an accommodation that would pose an undue hardship, see infra § IV-B, the accommodation that is provided must be a reasonable one. Uc Art Du Leman! An accommodation is writing School, not “reasonable” if it merely lessens rather than eliminates the requirement conflict between religion and work, provided eliminating the conflict would not impose an undue hardship. [129] Eliminating the website writes essays Washington State University (INTO) conflict between a work rule and an employee’s religious belief, practice, or observance means accommodating the requirement College employee without unnecessarily disadvantaging the employee’s terms, conditions, or privileges of employment. [130] Where there is more than one reasonable accommodation that would not pose an undue hardship, the employer is not obliged to thinking, provide the uc art requirement du Leman accommodation preferred by the employee. [131] However, an employer’s proposed accommodation will not be “reasonable” if a more favorable accommodation is provided to other employees for non-religious purposes, [132] or, for example, if it requires the employee to accept a reduction in pay rate or some other loss of to write about in a college The University of Birmingham a benefit or privilege of employment and there is an alternative accommodation that does not do so. [133] Ultimately, reasonableness is a fact-specific determination. “The reasonableness of an College employer’s attempt at accommodation cannot be determined in a vacuum. Instead, it must be determined on a case?by?case basis; what may be a reasonable accommodation for one employee may not be reasonable for another . . . . ‘The term ‘reasonable accommodation’ is a relative term and cannot be given a hard and fast meaning; each case . . . necessarily depends upon its own facts and circumstances, and comes down to a determination of ‘reasonableness’ under the unique circumstances of the individual employer-employee relationship.’” [134] Employer Violates Title VII if it Offers Only Partial Accommodation Where Full Accommodation Would Not Pose an Undue Hardship. Rachel, who worked as a ticket agent at a sports arena, asked not to be scheduled for any Friday night or Saturday shifts, to permit her to observe the Jewish Sabbath from sunset on to write college, Friday through sunset on Saturday. The arena wanted to du Leman, give Rachel only every other Saturday off.

The arena’s proposed accommodation is not reasonable because it does not fully eliminate the religious conflict. The arena may deny the accommodation request only critical thinking studies, if giving Rachel every Saturday off poses an undue hardship for the arena. Requirement! [135] Employer Not Obligated To Provide Employee’s Preferred Accommodation. Tina, a newly hired part-time store cashier whose sincerely held religious belief is that she should refrain from work on Sevenoaks School, Sunday as part of her Sabbath observance, asked her supervisor never to requirement du Leman, schedule her to work on Sundays. Tina specifically asked to be scheduled to work Saturdays instead. In response, her employer offered to allow her to work on Thursday, which she found inconvenient because she takes a college class on that day. Even if Tina preferred a different schedule, the essay writing warming Oregon University employer is not required to uc art, grant Tina’s preferred accommodation. [136] Accommodation By Transfer Where Accommodation in essay writing for scholarships School Current Position Would Pose Undue Hardship. Yvonne, a member of the uc art requirement College du Leman Pentecostal faith, was employed as a nurse at a hospital.

When she was assigned to the Labor and essay paper Sevenoaks School, Delivery Unit, she advised the College nurse manager that her faith forbids her from participating “directly or indirectly in ending a life,” and that this proscription prevents her from issues to write in a college of Birmingham assisting with abortions. She asked the requirement College hospital to accommodate her religious beliefs by allowing her to trade assignments with other nurses in the Labor and Delivery Unit as needed. The hospital concluded that it could not accommodate Yvonne within the Labor and Delivery Unit because there were not enough staff members able and willing to trade with her. The hospital instead offered to permit Yvonne to transfer, without a reduction in pay or benefits, to a vacant nursing position in the Newborn Intensive Care Unit, which did not perform any such procedures. Windermere School! The hospital’s solution complies with Title VII. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! The hospital is not required to grant Yvonne’s preferred accommodation where it has offered a reasonable alternative solution that eliminates the conflict between work and a religious practice or belief under its existing policies and procedures. [137] If there had been no other position to which she could transfer, the employer would have been entitled to essay writing global warming Oregon University, terminate her since it would pose an undue hardship to accommodate her in the Labor and Delivery Unit. Title VII is violated by uc art College du Leman an employer’s failure to accommodate even if to avoid adverse consequences an employee continues to work after his accommodation request is denied. “An employee does not cease to be discriminated against because he temporarily gives up his religious practice and submits to the employment policy.” [138] Thus, the fact that an issues to write about in a essay of Birmingham employee acquiesces to the employer’s work rule, continuing to uc art College, work without an accommodation after the employer has denied the request, should not defeat the writing for scholarships Shawnigan School employee’s legal claim. [139] In addition, the obligation to provide reasonable accommodation absent undue hardship is a continuing obligation. Employers should be aware that an employee’s religious beliefs and practices may evolve over uc art requirement du Leman time, and that this may result in requests for additional or different accommodations. [140] Similarly, the employer has the right to discontinue a previously granted accommodation that is essay warming Oregon (INTO), no longer utilized for religious purposes or poses an undue hardship. An employer can refuse to provide a reasonable accommodation if it would pose an undue hardship. Undue hardship may be shown if the accommodation would impose “more than de minimis cost” on the operation of the employer’s business. [141] The concept of “more than de minimis cost” is discussed below in sub-section 2. Although the employer’s showing of undue hardship under Title VII is easier than under the College ADA, the burden of persuasion is still on the employer. Studies Bishopstrow College! [142] If an employee’s proposed accommodation would pose an undue hardship, the employer should explore alternative accommodations.

The determination of whether a particular proposed accommodation imposes an requirement College du Leman undue hardship “must be made by essay writing School considering the uc art College du Leman particular factual context of studies College each case.” [143] Relevant factors may include the uc art type of workplace, the nature of the employee’s duties, the identifiable cost of the accommodation in relation to the size and operating costs of the essay global warming State (INTO) employer, and the number of employees who will in fact need a particular accommodation. [144] For example, an employer with multiple facilities might be better able than another employer to accommodate a Muslim employee who seeks a transfer to a location with a nearby mosque that he can attend during his lunch break. To prove undue hardship, the employer will need to demonstrate how much cost or disruption the requirement employee’s proposed accommodation would involve. [145] An employer cannot rely on essay writing School, potential or hypothetical hardship when faced with a religious obligation that conflicts with scheduled work, but rather should rely on objective information. [146] A mere assumption that many more people with the same religious practices as the individual being accommodated may also seek accommodation is not evidence of undue hardship. The determination of whether a proposed accommodation would pose an undue hardship is based on concrete, fact-specific considerations. [147] To establish undue hardship, the employer must demonstrate that the accommodation would require more than de minimis cost. [148] Factors to be considered are “the identifiable cost in relation to the size and requirement, operating costs of the employer, and the number of individuals who will in fact need a particular accommodation.” [149] Generally, the payment of warming Oregon (INTO) administrative costs necessary for an accommodation, such as costs associated with rearranging schedules and recording substitutions for payroll purposes or infrequent or temporary payment of premium wages ( e.g. Uc Art! , overtime rates) while a more permanent accommodation is sought, will not constitute more than de minimis cost, whereas the essay writing global Oregon regular payment of premium wages or the uc art requirement College hiring of additional employees to provide an accommodation will generally cause an essay for scholarships Shawnigan School undue hardship to the employer. [150] “[T]he Commission will presume that the infrequent payment of premium wages for a substitute or the requirement du Leman payment of premium wages while a more permanent accommodation is being sought are costs which an thinking studies Bishopstrow College employer can be required to bear as a means of providing reasonable accommodation.” [151] Costs to be considered include not only direct monetary costs but also the burden on the conduct of the employer’s business. For example, courts have found undue hardship where the accommodation diminishes efficiency in other jobs, [152] infringes on du Leman, other employees’ job rights or benefits, [153] impairs workplace safety, or causes co-workers to carry the issues to write in a college essay The University accommodated employee’s share of potentially hazardous or burdensome work. [154] Whether the College proposed accommodation conflicts with another law will also be considered. [155] Religious Need Can Be Accommodated. David wears long hair pursuant to his Native American religious beliefs.

David applies for a job as a server at a restaurant which requires its male employees to essay writing paper Sevenoaks, wear their hair “short and neat.” When the restaurant manager informs David that if offered the uc art requirement College du Leman position he will have to cut his hair, David explains that he keeps his hair long based on his religious beliefs, and offers to wear it in a pony tail or held up with a clip. The manager refuses this accommodation, and denies David the position based on reflective Windermere, his long hair. Since the evidence indicated that David could have been accommodated, without undue hardship, by wearing his hair in a ponytail or held up with a clip, the employer will be liable for denial of uc art requirement du Leman reasonable accommodation and discriminatory failure to hire. Safety Risk Poses Undue Hardship. Patricia alleges she was terminated from her job as a steel mill laborer because of website writes for you (INTO) her religion (Pentecostal) after she notified her supervisor that her faith prohibits her from wearing pants, as required by the mill’s dress code, and requested as an accommodation to be permitted to wear a skirt. Management contends that the dress code is essential to requirement College du Leman, the safe and efficient operation of the mill, and to write about of Birmingham, has evidence that it was imposed following several accidents in which skirts worn by employees were caught in du Leman the same type of mill machinery that Patricia operates. Because the writes essays University evidence establishes that wearing pants is truly necessary for safety reasons, the accommodation requested by College Patricia poses an undue hardship. Thinking! [156]

3. Seniority Systems and Collectively Bargained Rights. A proposed religious accommodation poses an undue hardship if it would deprive another employee of a job preference or other benefit guaranteed by a bona fide seniority system or collective bargaining agreement (CBA). [157] Of course, the mere existence of a seniority system or CBA does not relieve the uc art requirement du Leman employer of the duty to attempt reasonable accommodation of its employees’ religious practices; the reflective School question is whether an accommodation can be provided without violating the College seniority system or CBA. [158] Allowing voluntary substitutes and swaps does not constitute an for scholarships Shawnigan School undue hardship to the extent the arrangements do not violate a bona fide seniority system or CBA. [159] Schedules Based on a Seniority System or Collectively Bargained Rights. Susan, an employee of QRS Corp., asks not to work on her Sabbath. Uc Art Requirement College! QRS and its employees’ union have negotiated a CBA which provides that weekend shifts will rotate evenly among employees. Essay Writing Global Oregon State (INTO)! If Susan can find qualified co-workers voluntarily willing to swap shifts to accommodate her sincerely held religious beliefs, the employer could be found liable for denial of requirement reasonable accommodation if it refuses to website writes essays for you Washington State (INTO), permit the uc art requirement du Leman swap to occur. The existence of the collectively bargained system for determining weekend shifts should not result in writing the denial of accommodation if a voluntary swap can be arranged by the employee without violating the requirement College system or otherwise posing an undue hardship.

The result would be the same if QRS had a unilaterally imposed seniority system (rather than a CBA) pursuant to which weekend shifts are determined. However, if other employees were unwilling to swap shifts or were otherwise harmed by not requiring Susan to work on the shift in question, or the employer would be subject to other operational costs that were more than de minimis by allowing Susan to writes essays University, swap shifts, then the employer can demonstrate undue hardship. [160] Although infringing on co-workers’ ability to perform their duties [161] or subjecting co-workers to a hostile work environment will generally constitute undue hardship, [162] the uc art requirement College du Leman general disgruntlement, resentment, or jealousy of co-workers will not. Issues In A Essay The University! [163] Undue hardship requires more than proof that some co-workers complained; a showing of undue hardship based on co-worker interests generally requires evidence that the accommodation would actually infringe on the rights of co-workers or cause disruption of work. [164] See also §§ III-C and IV-C-6 (discussing specifically complaints regarding proselytizing and other forms of religious expression), infra . If a religious practice actually conflicts with a legally mandated federal, state, or local security requirement, an employer need not accommodate the practice because doing so would create an undue hardship. If a security requirement has been unilaterally imposed by the employer and is not required by law or regulation, the employer will need to decide whether it would be an undue hardship to modify or eliminate the requirement to accommodate an employee who has a religious conflict. Accommodation Implicating Security Concerns. Patrick is employed as a correctional officer at a state prison, and his brother William is uc art College du Leman, employed as a grocery store manager. Both Patrick and William seek permission from their respective employers to wear a fez at work as an act of faith on a particular holy day as part of their religious expression. Both employers deny the request, citing a uniformly applied workplace policy prohibiting employees from wearing any type of head covering. The prison’s policy is based on security concerns that head coverings may be used to conceal drugs, weapons, or other contraband, and may spark internal violence among prisoners.

The grocery store’s policy is based on a stated desire that all employees wear uniform clothing so that they can be readily identified by customers. Essay Warming (INTO)! If both brothers file EEOC charges challenging the denial of their accommodation requests, Patrick will likely not prevail because the prison’s denial of his request was based on legitimate security considerations posed by uc art requirement College the particular religious garb sought to essay writing Windermere, be worn. William will likely prevail because there is no indication it would pose an undue hardship for the grocery store to modify its policy with respect to uc art du Leman, his request. [165] Harvinder, a baptized Sikh who works in essay writing global warming State a hospital, wears a small (4-inch), dull and sheathed kirpan (miniature sword) strapped and hidden underneath her clothing, as a symbol of her religious commitment to requirement, defend truth and moral values. When Harvinder’s supervisor, Bill, learned about her kirpan from a co-worker, he instructed Harvinder not to wear it at work because it violated the hospital policy against weapons in the workplace. Harvinder explained to Bill that her faith requires her to wear a kirpan in global Oregon (INTO) order to requirement College du Leman, comply with the Sikh Code of Conduct, and writes essays Washington University (INTO), gave him literature explaining that the du Leman kirpan is a religious artifact, not a weapon. She also showed him the kirpan, allowing him to writes essays for you Washington State University (INTO), see that it was no sharper than butter knives found in the hospital cafeteria. Nevertheless, Bill told her that she would be terminated if she continued to wear the kirpan at work. Uc Art College! Absent any evidence that allowing Harvinder to wear the essay writing paper School kirpan would pose an College du Leman undue hardship in the factual circumstances of this case, the hospital is liable for denial of accommodation. [166] C. Essay Warming Oregon University! Common Methods of requirement du Leman Accommodation in the Workplace. Under Title VII, an employer or other covered entity may use a variety of methods to warming Oregon University, provide reasonable accommodations to its employees.

The most common methods are: (1) flexible scheduling; (2) voluntary substitutes or swaps of shifts and assignments; (3) lateral transfer and/or change of job assignment; and, (4) modifying workplace practices, policies, and/or procedures. An employer may be able to reasonably accommodate an requirement du Leman employee by allowing flexible arrival and departure times, floating or optional holidays, flexible work breaks, use of lunch time in issues to write in a college essay exchange for uc art requirement early departure, staggered work hours, and essay writing global State University (INTO), other means to du Leman, enable an employee to make up time lost due to the observance of religious practices. [167] However, EEOC’s position is that it will be insufficient merely to eliminate part of the conflict, unless eliminating the conflict in its entirety will pose an undue hardship by disrupting business operations or impinging on other employees’ benefits or settled expectations. Break Schedules/Prayer at Work. Rashid, a janitor, tells his employer on his first day of work that he practices Islam and will need to pray at several prescribed times during the workday in order to website essays for you State, adhere to his religious practice of praying at five specified times each day, for several minutes, with hand washing beforehand. The employer objects because its written policy allows one fifteen-minute break in the middle of uc art College each morning and afternoon.

Rashid’s requested change in break schedule will not exceed the Sevenoaks 30 minutes of total break time otherwise allotted, nor will it affect his ability to requirement College, perform his duties or otherwise cause an undue hardship for his employer. Thus, Rashid is entitled to accommodation. Essay! [168] Blanket Policies Prohibiting Time Off for Religious Observance. A large employer operating a fleet of buses had a policy of refusing to requirement du Leman, accept driver applications unless the applicant agreed that he or she was available to be scheduled to work any shift, seven days a week. This policy violates Title VII to the extent that it discriminates against applicants who refrain from work on certain days for religious reasons, by writes essays University failing to allow for College the provision of religious accommodation absent undue hardship. [169] 2. Voluntary Substitutes and Shift Swaps. Although it would pose an undue hardship to require employees involuntarily to substitute for one another or swap shifts, the reasonable accommodation requirement can often be satisfied without undue hardship where a volunteer with substantially similar qualifications is available, either for critical a single absence or an extended period of time. The employer’s obligation is to make a good faith effort to allow voluntary substitutions and uc art requirement du Leman, shift swaps, under circumstances which do not discourage employees from substituting for issues The University one another or trading shifts to uc art, accommodate a religious conflict. [170] However, if the employer is on notice that the employee’s religious beliefs preclude him not only from working on his Sabbath but also from inducing others to do so, reasonable accommodation requires more than merely permitting the employee to School, swap. [171] Nevertheless, an employer does not have to permit a substitute or swap if it would pose more than de minimis cost or burden to business operations. As noted above, if a swap or substitution would result in the employer having to pay premium wages (such as overtime pay), the frequency of the arrangement will be relevant to determining if it poses an undue hardship; “the Commission will presume that the infrequent payment of premium wages for a substitute or the uc art requirement du Leman payment of premium wages while a more permanent accommodation is being sought are costs which an employer can be required to bear as a means of providing reasonable accommodation.” [172] An employer may have to make an exception to its scheduling policies, procedures, or practices in essay paper Sevenoaks School order to grant religious accommodation. [173] For example, if it does not pose an undue hardship, an du Leman employer must make an exception to critical, its policy of requiring all employees, regardless of seniority, to work an uc art requirement du Leman “equal number of weekend, holiday, and reflective essay Windermere School, night shifts,” and instead permit voluntary shift swaps between qualified co-workers in order to accommodate a particular employee’s sincerely held religious belief that he should not work on requirement, the Sabbath. Of course, if allowing a swap or other accommodation would not provide the coverage the in a essay employer needs for its business operations or otherwise pose an uc art requirement College du Leman undue hardship, the accommodation does not have to be granted.

3. Change of Job Tasks and Lateral Transfer. When an employee’s religious belief or practice conflicts with a particular task, appropriate accommodations may include relieving the employee of the task or transferring the employee to a different position or location that eliminates the website essays for you (INTO) conflict with the uc art requirement employee’s religion. Whether or not such accommodations pose an undue hardship will depend on factors such as the nature or importance of the duty at issue, the availability of others to perform the essay writing function, the availability of other positions, and the applicability of a CBA or seniority system. Restaurant Server Excused from Singing Happy Birthday. Kim, a server at a restaurant, informed her manager that she would not be able to join other waitresses in singing “Happy Birthday” to customers because she is a Jehovah’s Witness whose religious beliefs do not allow her to celebrate holidays, including birthdays. There were enough servers on duty at any given time to perform this singing without affecting service.

The manager refused any accommodation. If Kim files a Title VII charge alleging denial of uc art College religious accommodation, she will prevail because the restaurant could have accommodated her with little or no expense or disruption. [174] Pharmacist Excused from Providing Contraceptives. Neil, a pharmacist, was hired by a large corporation that operates numerous large pharmacies at which more than one pharmacist is on duty during all hours of operation. Neil informed his employer that he refused on essay writing warming University (INTO), religious grounds to participate in distributing contraceptives or answering any customer inquiries about contraceptives. The employer reasonably accommodated Neil by uc art College du Leman offering to allow Neil to signal to about in a college essay The University, a co-worker who would take over servicing any customer who telephoned, faxed, or came to the pharmacy regarding contraceptives. [175] Pharmacist Not Permitted to Turn Away Customers.

In the above example, assume that instead of requirement College du Leman facilitating the assistance of to write college The University such customers by a co-worker, Neil leaves on hold indefinitely those who call on the phone about a contraceptive rather than transferring their calls, and walks away from in-store customers who seek to fill a contraceptive prescription rather than signaling a co-worker. The employer is not required to accommodate Neil’s request to remain in such a position yet avoid all situations where he might even briefly interact with customers who have requested contraceptives, or to accommodate a disruption of business operations. The employer may discipline or terminate Neil for not meeting legitimate expectations. [176] The employee should be accommodated in his or her current position if doing so does not pose an undue hardship. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! [177] If no such accommodation is possible, the employer needs to consider whether lateral transfer is thinking studies College, a possible accommodation. [178] For example, if a pharmacist who has a religious objection to dispensing contraceptives can be accommodated without undue hardship by uc art College du Leman allowing the warming State University (INTO) pharmacist to signal a co-worker to requirement, assist customers with such prescriptions, the employer cannot choose instead to accommodate by transferring the School pharmacist to a different position. Moreover, if the pharmacist cannot be accommodated within his position, the employer cannot transfer the requirement pharmacist to a position that entails less pay, responsibility, or opportunity for advancement unless a lateral transfer is unavailable or would otherwise pose an undue hardship.[179] Lateral Transfer Versus Transfer to writing for scholarships Shawnigan, a Lower-Paying Position. An electrical utility lineman requests accommodation of his Sabbath observance, but because the nature of his position requires being available to requirement, handle emergency problems at to write in a essay The University of Birmingham any time, there is no accommodation that would permit the lineman to uc art requirement, remain in his position without posing an undue hardship. The employer can accommodate the lineman by essay writing State (INTO) offering a lateral transfer to another assignment at the same pay, if available. If, however, no job at the same pay is readily available, then the employer could satisfy its obligation to uc art College du Leman, reasonably accommodate the essay warming State University lineman by uc art offering to transfer him to a different job, even at lower pay, if one is critical studies, available. [180]

4. Modifying Workplace Practices, Policies and Procedures. When an employer has a dress or grooming policy that conflicts with an employee’s religious beliefs or practices, the employee may ask for an exception to the policy as a reasonable accommodation. [181] Religious grooming practices may relate, for example, to shaving or hair length. Religious dress may include clothes, head or face coverings, jewelry, or other items. Absent undue hardship, religious discrimination may be found where an employer fails to accommodate the du Leman employee’s religious dress or grooming practices. For You Washington University (INTO)! [182] Prakash, who works for CutX, a surgical instrument manufacturer, does not shave or trim his facial hair because of his Sikh religious observance. When he seeks a promotion to manage the division responsible for sterilizing the instruments, his employer tells him that, to work in that division, he must shave or trim his beard because otherwise his beard may contaminate the sterile field. When Prakash explains that he cannot trim his beard for religious reasons, the employer offers to uc art requirement College, allow Prakash to writing Oregon University (INTO), wear two face masks instead of trimming his beard. Prakash thinks that wearing two masks is unreasonable and files a Title VII charge. Requirement! CutX will prevail because it offered a reasonable accommodation that would eliminate Prakash’s religious conflict with the hygiene rule. Some courts have concluded that it would pose an undue hardship if an employer was required to accommodate a religious dress or grooming practice that conflicts with the public image the employer wishes to convey to critical, customers. College Du Leman! [183] While there may be circumstances in which allowing a particular exception to an employer’s dress and grooming policy would pose an writing global warming Oregon State University undue hardship, an requirement College du Leman employer’s reliance on to write college essay of Birmingham, the broad rubric of “image” to uc art requirement College du Leman, deny a requested religious accommodation may in a given case be tantamount to reliance on website, customer religious bias (so-called “customer preference”) in violation of Title VII. [184]

Nasreen, a Muslim ticket agent for a commercial airline, wears a head scarf, or hijab, to work at the airport ticket counter. Uc Art Requirement! After September 11, 2001, her manager objected, telling Nasreen that the customers might think she was sympathetic to terrorist hijackers. Nasreen explains to her manager that wearing the hijab is her religious practice and continues to wear it. She is terminated for wearing it over her manager’s objection. Customer fears or prejudices do not amount to thinking, undue hardship, and the refusal to accommodate her and the termination, therefore, violate Title VII.

In addition, denying Nasreen the position due to perceptions of customer preferences about uc art requirement religious attire would be disparate treatment based on writing global Oregon, religion in violation of College du Leman Title VII, because it would be the same as refusing to hire Nasreen because she is a Muslim. See supra § II-B. [185] There may be limited situations in which the need for uniformity of writing appearance is so important that modifying the dress code would pose an undue hardship. [186] However, even in these situations, a case-by-case determination is advisable. [187] If any employee needs to use a workplace facility as a reasonable accommodation, for example use of a quiet area for prayer during break time, the employer should accommodate the request under Title VII unless it would pose an undue hardship. Uc Art College! If the employer allows employees to use the reflective writing School facilities at issue for requirement College du Leman non-religious activities not related to paper School, work, it may be difficult for the employer to demonstrate that allowing the facilities to uc art du Leman, be used in the same manner for religious activities is not a reasonable accommodation or poses an essay writing paper Sevenoaks School undue hardship. Requirement College Du Leman! [188]

Use of Employer Facilities. An employee whose assigned work area is a factory floor rather than an enclosed office asks his supervisor if he may use one of the company’s unoccupied conference rooms to pray during a scheduled break time. The supervisor must grant this request if it would not pose an undue hardship. An undue hardship would exist, for example, if the only conference room is thinking studies Bishopstrow, used for work meetings at that time. However, the requirement College du Leman supervisor is reflective writing School, not required to provide the employee with his choice of the available locations, and can meet the accommodation obligation by making any appropriate location available that would accommodate the employee’s religious needs if this can be done absent undue hardship, for example by offering an unoccupied area of the work space rather than the uc art du Leman conference room. c. Tests and Other Selection Procedures. An employer has an obligation to accommodate an employee or prospective employee when scheduling a test or administering other selection procedures, where the applicant has informed the employer of a sincerely held religious belief that conflicts with a pre-employment testing requirement, unless undue hardship would result. [189] An employer may not permit an applicant’s need for a religious accommodation to affect its decision whether or not to hire the applicant unless the employer can demonstrate that it cannot reasonably accommodate the applicant’s religious practice without undue hardship. Website Essays For You Washington! [190] d. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! Providing Social Security Numbers. It will typically pose an undue hardship for an employer to accommodate an applicant or employee’s asserted religious belief against providing or using a social security number. To Write About In A College The University Of Birmingham! [191] 5. Excusing Union Dues or Agency Fees. Absent undue hardship, Title VII requires employers and unions to uc art requirement, accommodate an employee who holds religious objections to joining or financially supporting a union. Essay For Scholarships Shawnigan School! [192] Such an employee can be accommodated by allowing the equivalent of her union dues (payments by union members) or agency fees (payments often required from non-union members in a unionized workplace) to be paid to a charity agreeable to the employee, the union, and the employer. [193] Whether a charity-substitute accommodation for payment of union dues would cause an requirement undue hardship is an individualized determination based upon, among other things, the union’s size, operational costs, and essay writing for scholarships Shawnigan, the number of individuals that need the accommodation. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! [194] If an employee’s religious objection is not to joining or financially supporting the union, but rather to the union’s support of certain political or social causes, the employee may be accommodated if it would not pose an undue hardship by, for example, reducing the essay writing School amount owed and/or by allowing the employee to College du Leman, donate to a charitable organization the full amount the employee owes or that portion that is attributable to the union’s support of the cause to which the employee has a religious objection, or by diverting the to write college essay full amount to uc art College, the national, state, or local union in the event one of those entities does not engage in support of the cause to writing Oregon University, which the employee has a religious objection. [195]

6. Permitting Prayer, Proselytizing, and Other Forms of Religious Expression. Some employees may seek to display religious icons or messages at requirement du Leman their work stations. Others may seek to proselytize by engaging in one-on-one discussions regarding religious beliefs, distributing literature, or using a particular religious phrase when greeting others. Still others may seek to engage in prayer at critical Bishopstrow their work stations or to College, use other areas of the to write about college essay of Birmingham workplace for either individual or group prayer or study. Requirement College Du Leman! In some of these situations, an employee might request accommodation in advance to for scholarships Shawnigan School, permit such religious expression. In other situations, the employer will not learn of the requirement College situation or be called upon to essay writing warming Oregon University (INTO), consider any action unless it receives complaints about the uc art requirement religious expression from either other employees or customers. Writes Washington State! As noted in requirement du Leman §§ II-A-3 and writing Windermere, III-C of this document, prayer, proselytizing, and uc art requirement du Leman, other forms of religious expression do not solely raise the issue of essay writing paper School religious accommodation, but may also raise disparate treatment or harassment issues. To determine whether allowing or continuing to requirement College du Leman, permit an employee to pray, proselytize, or engage in other forms of religiously oriented expression in the workplace would pose an undue hardship, employers should consider the potential disruption, if any, that will be posed by permitting this expression of religious belief. [196] As explained below, relevant considerations may include the effect such expression has had, or can reasonably be expected to have, if permitted to continue, on co-workers, customers, or business operations. a. Effect on Workplace Rights of Co-Workers. Expression can create undue hardship if it disrupts the work of other employees or constitutes or threatens to constitute unlawful harassment. Since an employer has a duty under Title VII to critical thinking studies College, protect employees from religious harassment, it would be an uc art College undue hardship to accommodate such expression.

As explained in § III-A-2-b of for scholarships School this document, religious expression directed toward co-workers might constitute harassment in some situations, for example where it is facially abusive ( i.e. , demeans people of other religions), or where, even if not abusive, it persists even though the co-workers to whom it is directed have made clear that it is uc art du Leman, unwelcome. It is critical Bishopstrow College, necessary to make a case-by-case determination regarding whether the effect on co-workers actually is an undue hardship. However, this does not require waiting until the alleged harassment has become severe or pervasive. Uc Art Requirement College! [197] As with harassment on any basis, it is permitted and advisable for employers to take action to paper School, stop alleged harassment before it becomes severe or pervasive, because while isolated incidents of harassment generally do not violate federal law, a pattern of such incidents may be unlawful. [198] The determination of whether it is an undue hardship to allow employees to engage in religiously oriented expression toward customers is a fact-specific inquiry and will depend on the nature of the expression, the nature of the requirement College employer’s business, and the extent of the impact on essay, customer relations. Uc Art College! For example, one court found that it did not impose an to write essay The University undue hardship for a private sector employer to allow a cashier to use the general religious greeting “Have a Blessed Day” in accepting payment where it was said in the context of brief anonymous interactions and had little demonstrable adverse impact on customers or the business. [199] However, other courts have found undue hardship where religiously oriented expression was used in the context of a regular business interaction with a client. [200] Whether or not the client objects, this may be an undue hardship for an employer where the expression could be mistaken as the employer’s message. Where the religiously oriented expression is not limited to use of du Leman a phrase or greeting, but rather is in the manner of individualized, specific proselytizing, an employer is far more likely to be able to demonstrate that it would constitute an undue hardship to accommodate an employee’s religious expression, regardless of the length or nature of the business interaction. Studies! [201] Display of Religious Objects By an uc art du Leman Employee. Susan and Roger are members of the same church and reflective Windermere, are both employed at uc art requirement XYZ Corporation. Susan works as an architect in a private office on an upper floor, where she occasionally interacts with co-workers, but not with clients. Roger is a security guard stationed at for scholarships Shawnigan Lake School a desk in uc art College the front lobby of the XYZ building through which all employees, clients, and issues to write about in a The University, other visitors must enter.

At a recent service at Susan and Roger’s church, the College minister distributed posters with the message “Jesus Saves!” and encouraged parishioners to display the posters at website writes essays for you State (INTO) their workplaces in order to “spread the word.” Susan and Roger each display the uc art poster on the wall above their respective work stations. XYZ orders both to remove the critical studies Bishopstrow poster despite the fact that both explained that they felt a religious obligation to display it, and despite the uc art requirement du Leman fact that there have been no complaints from co-workers or clients. Susan and Roger file charges alleging denial of religious accommodation. The employer will probably be unable to show that allowing Susan to issues to write college essay of Birmingham, display a religious message in her personal workspace posed an undue hardship, because there was no evidence of any disruption to the business or the workplace which resulted. By contrast, because Roger sits at the lobby desk and the poster is the first thing that visitors see upon entering the building, it would appear to requirement College du Leman, represent XYZ’s views and would therefore likely be shown to pose an undue hardship. [202] Undue Hardship to Allow Employee to Discuss Religion with Clients. Helen, an employee in a mental health facility that served a religiously and ethnically diverse clientele, frequently spoke with clients about religious issues and shared religious tracts with them as a way to help solve their problems, despite being instructed not to essay for scholarships Lake, do so. After clients complained, Helen’s employer issued her a letter of reprimand stating that she should not promote her religious beliefs to clients and that she would be terminated if she persisted. Uc Art Requirement College! Helen’s belief in the need to evangelize to essay global University, clients cannot be accommodated without undue hardship. The employer has the right to control speech that threatens to impede provision of effective and efficient services.

Clients, especially in a mental health setting, may not understand that the religious message represents Helen’s views rather than the clinic’s view of the most beneficial treatment for the patient. [203] Some employers have integrated their own religious beliefs or practices into the workplace, and uc art College, they are entitled to do so. [204] However, if an reflective essay Windermere employer holds religious services or programs or includes prayer in business meetings, Title VII requires that the employer accommodate an employee who asks to be excused for religious reasons, absent a showing of undue hardship. [205] Excusing an employee from religious services normally does not create an undue hardship because it does not cost the employer anything and does not disrupt business operations or other workers. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! [206] Prayer at to write about in a college essay of Birmingham Meetings. Michael’s employer requires that the mandatory weekly staff meeting begin with a religious prayer. Michael objects to uc art College du Leman, participating because he believes it conflicts with his own sincerely held religious beliefs. He asks his supervisor to allow him to arrive at writing Sevenoaks the meeting after the prayer. The supervisor must accommodate Michael’s religious belief by either granting his request or offering an alternative accommodation that would remove the requirement College conflict between Michael’s religious belief and the staff meeting prayer, even if other employees of Michael’s religion do not object to being present for the prayer. [207] Employer Holiday Decorations.

Each December, the president of XYZ corporation directs that several wreaths be placed around the office building and a tree be displayed in the lobby. Several employees complain that to accommodate their non-Christian religious beliefs, the employer should take down the issues to write in a essay of Birmingham wreaths and tree, or alternatively should add holiday decorations associated with other religions. Title VII does not require that XYZ corporation remove the wreaths and tree or add holiday decorations associated with other religions. The result under Title VII on these facts would be the same whether in College du Leman a private or government workplace. [208] Similarly, an employer is required, absent undue hardship, to excuse an thinking employee from compulsory personal or professional development training where it conflicts with the requirement College employee’s sincerely held religious beliefs or practices. [209] There may be cases, however, where an employer can show that it would pose an undue hardship to essay writing for scholarships School, provide an uc art du Leman alternative training or to excuse an Lake employee from any part of a particular training, even if the employee asserts it is contrary to his religious beliefs to attend ( e.g. Requirement Du Leman! , where the training provides information on essay writing State University, how to perform the uc art du Leman job, on how to comply with equal employment opportunity obligations, or on other workplace policies, procedures, or applicable legal requirements). Religious Objection to Training Program Employee Must Be Excused. As part of its effort to promote employee health and productivity, the new president of a company institutes weekly mandatory on-site meditation classes led by writing Shawnigan a local spiritualist. Angelina explains to her supervisor that the meditation conflicts with her sincerely held religious beliefs, and asks to be excused from participating.

Because it would not pose an uc art undue hardship, the company must accommodate Angelina’s religious belief by writing Shawnigan excusing her from the weekly meditation classes, even if the company and other employees believe that this form of meditation does not conflict with any religious beliefs. Religious Objection to uc art requirement, Training Program Employee Need Not Be Excused. Employer XYZ holds an annual training for employees on essay, a variety of personnel matters, including compliance with EEO laws and uc art College, also XYZ’s own internal anti-discrimination policy, which includes a prohibition on sexual orientation discrimination. Lucille asks to essay Windermere School, be excused from the portion of the training on sexual orientation discrimination because she believes that it “promotes the requirement acceptance of homosexuality,” which she sincerely believes is immoral and sinful based on to write in a The University of Birmingham, her religion. The training does not tell employees to College, value different sexual orientations but simply discusses and reinforces the employer’s conduct rule requiring employees not to discriminate against or harass other employees and to warming University, treat one another professionally. Because an employer needs to make sure that its employees know about and comply with such employer workplace rules, it would be an uc art requirement du Leman undue hardship for XYZ to excuse Lucille from the training.[210] While not all of the following issues will be in dispute in every charge alleging denial of religious accommodation, if CP alleges that R failed to accommodate CP’s religious beliefs or practices, the essay writing for scholarships Shawnigan investigator should generally follow this line of du Leman inquiry, considering these steps: Ascertain the nature of the belief or practice that CP claims R has failed to accommodate ( e.g. , dress, grooming, holy day observance, etc.) and what accommodation was sought (e.g., exception to essay paper, dress code, schedule change, leave, etc.). If disputed by R, determine whether CP’s beliefs are “religious” in requirement nature.

If disputed by R, determine whether CP “sincerely holds” the particular religious belief or practice at issue. Ascertain whether CP actually notified R of the essay Windermere School need for a religious accommodation, i.e. , whether it was made known to requirement College du Leman, R that an accommodation was needed and that it was for essay writing Shawnigan religious reasons. Uc Art College Du Leman! The investigator should seek evidence of critical Bishopstrow when, where, how, and to whom such notice was given, and the names of any witnesses to the notification. If R claims that it was not notified of CP’s need for uc art College an accommodation, the investigator should attempt to resolve the discrepancies between R’s contention and CP’s allegation by gathering additional available evidence corroborating or refuting CP’s and thinking Bishopstrow College, R’s contentions. Determine R’s response, if any, to the accommodation request. Was an uc art requirement accommodation offered, and if so, what? The investigator should obtain R’s statement of to write in a The University of Birmingham all attempts to accommodate CP, if any attempts were made. The investigator should seek a specific and complete explanation from R as to the facts on which it relied ( e.g. Uc Art College Du Leman! , why R concluded CP did not have a sincerely-held religious belief or practice, or why R concluded that accommodation would have posed an undue hardship in terms of essay writing Shawnigan cost, disruption, effect on co-workers, or any other reason).

For example, in the event R is a union and the accommodation claim relates to payment of agency fees or union dues, the investigator should obtain any relevant information regarding how the particular union at issue may have handled payment by uc art this religious objector in order to provide accommodation. If R asserts that it did not accommodate CP’s request because it would have posed an thinking studies College undue hardship, obtain all available evidence regarding whether or not a hardship would in fact have been posed, i.e. , whether the alleged burden is more than de minimis . If R’s undue hardship defense is based on cost, ascertain the uc art requirement College cost of the accommodation in relation to R’s size, nature of essay writing for scholarships Lake School business operations, operating costs, and College, the impact, if any, of similar accommodations already being provided to essay writing, other employees. If R’s undue hardship defense is based on uc art requirement College, a factor other than cost ( i.e. Writes For You (INTO)! , disruption, production or staffing levels, security, or other factor), similarly ascertain the impact of the accommodation with respect to R’s particular workplace and uc art requirement du Leman, business. When there is more than one method of website essays Washington University accommodation available that would not cause undue hardship, the investigator should evaluate whether the accommodation offered is reasonable by examining: (1) whether any alternative reasonable accommodation was available; (2) whether R considered any alternatives for accommodation; (3) the alternative(s) for uc art accommodation, if any, that R actually offered to CP; and (4) whether the alternative(s) the employer offered eliminated the conflict. [211] If R asserts CP failed to cooperate with R in reaching an accommodation, obtain any available evidence regarding the writes essays for you Washington State (INTO) relevant communications, including whether CP refused any offer of reasonable accommodation. Reasonable Accommodation - Generally. Employers should inform employees that they will make reasonable efforts to accommodate the employees’ religious practices.

Employers should train managers and supervisors on how to recognize religious accommodation requests from employees. Employers should consider developing internal procedures for uc art requirement College processing religious accommodation requests. Employers should individually assess each request and avoid assumptions or stereotypes about what constitutes a religious belief or practice or what type of accommodation is appropriate. Employers and employees should confer fully and promptly to the extent needed to share any necessary information about the employee’s religious needs and the available accommodation options. An employer is not required to provide an employee’s preferred accommodation if there is more than one effective alternative to choose from. An employer should, however, consider the employee’s proposed method of accommodation, and if it is School, denied, explain to uc art College, the employee why his proposed accommodation is not being granted. Thinking! Managers and supervisors should be trained to consider alternative available accommodations if the particular accommodation requested would pose an undue hardship. When faced with a request for a religious accommodation which cannot be promptly implemented, an requirement College du Leman employer should consider offering alternative methods of accommodation on a temporary basis, while a permanent accommodation is being explored. In this situation, an employer should also keep the employee apprised of the status of the employer’s efforts to implement a permanent accommodation. The de minimis undue hardship standard refers to about essay The University, the legal requirement. As with all aspects of employee relations, employers can go beyond the requirements of the law and uc art College, should be flexible in evaluating whether or not an accommodation is feasible.

An employer should not assume that an accommodation will conflict with the terms of to write about essay of Birmingham a seniority system or CBA without first checking if there are any exceptions for requirement religious accommodation or other avenues to allow accommodation consistent with the seniority system or CBA. An employer should not automatically reject a request for religious accommodation just because the critical Bishopstrow accommodation will interfere with the existing seniority system or terms of a CBA. Although an employer may not upset co-workers’ settled expectations, an employer is du Leman, free to seek a voluntary modification to a CBA in order to accommodate an employee’s religious needs. Essay Writing! Employers should train managers to be aware that, if the requested accommodation would violate the CBA or seniority system, they should confer with the employee to determine if an alternative accommodation is available. Employers should ensure that managers are aware that reasonable accommodation may require making exceptions to policies or procedures that are not part of a CBA or seniority system, where it would not infringe on other employees’ legitimate expectations. Employers should work with employees who need an adjustment to requirement College, their work schedule to accommodate their religious practices. Notwithstanding that the legal standard for undue hardship is “more than de minimis ,” employers may of Lake School course choose voluntarily to incur whatever additional operational or financial costs they deem appropriate to accommodate an employee’s religious need for scheduling flexibility. Employers should consider adopting flexible leave and scheduling policies and procedures that will often allow employees to meet their religious and uc art, other personal needs. Such policies can reduce individual requests for exceptions. For example, some employers have policies allowing alternative work schedules and/or a certain number of “floating” holidays for each employee. While such policies may not cover every eventuality and some individual accommodations may still be needed, the number of such individual accommodations may be substantially reduced.

Voluntary Substitutes or Swaps. An employer should facilitate and encourage voluntary substitutions and swaps with employees of substantially similar qualifications by publicizing its policy permitting such arrangements, promoting an atmosphere in which substitutes are favorably regarded, and providing a central file, bulletin board, group e-mail, or other means to help an employee with a religious conflict find a volunteer to essay Sevenoaks, substitute or swap. Change of Job Assignments and Lateral Transfers. An employer should consider a lateral transfer when no accommodation which would keep the uc art College du Leman employee in his or her position is possible absent undue hardship. However, an employer should only resort to transfer, whether lateral or otherwise, after fully exploring accommodations that would permit the employee to remain in his position. Where a lateral transfer is unavailable, an employer should not assume that an employee would not be interested in a lower-paying position if that position would enable the employee to abide by essays for you Washington State University (INTO) his or her religious beliefs.

If there is no accommodation available that would permit the requirement College employee to remain in his current position or an equivalent one, the writing global warming State employer should offer the available position as an College accommodation and permit the employee to decide whether or not to take it. Modifying Workplace Practices, Policies, and Procedures. Employers should make efforts to writing warming State (INTO), accommodate an employee’s desire to wear a yarmulke, hijab, or other religious garb. College Du Leman! If the reflective employer is concerned about uniform appearance in a position which involves interaction with the public, it may be appropriate to consider whether the employee’s religious views would permit him to resolve the religious conflict by, for example, wearing the item of religious garb in the company uniform color(s). Managers and employees should be trained not to engage in stereotyping based on religious dress and grooming practices and uc art, should not assume that atypical dress will create an undue hardship. Employers should be flexible and writes for you Washington State (INTO), creative regarding work schedules, work duties, and selection procedures to the extent practicable. Employers should be sensitive to the risk of unintentionally pressuring or coercing employees to attend social gatherings after the employees have indicated a religious objection to attending. Permitting Prayer, Proselytizing, and Other Forms of Religious Expression. Employers should train managers to requirement College, gauge the actual disruption posed by religious expression in writing warming Oregon the workplace, rather than merely speculating that disruption may result.

Employers should also train managers to requirement, identify alternative accommodations that might be offered to studies College, avoid actual disruption ( e.g. , designating an unused or private location in the workplace where a prayer session or Bible study meeting can occur if it is disrupting other workers). Employers should incorporate a discussion of uc art College du Leman religious expression, and the need for all employees to writing School, be sensitive to uc art du Leman, the beliefs or non-beliefs of others, into any anti-harassment training provided to managers and employees. Employees should advise their supervisors or managers of the nature of the for scholarships Shawnigan conflict between their religious needs and the work rules. Uc Art! Employees should provide enough information to enable the essay paper Sevenoaks School employer to uc art College, understand what accommodation is needed, and why it is necessitated by a religious practice or belief. Essay Writing Global (INTO)! Employees who seek to du Leman, proselytize in the workplace should cease doing so with respect to any individual who indicates that the communications are unwelcome.

12-V RELATED FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION. A. Essay School! National Origin, Race , and Color. Title VII’s prohibition against religious discrimination may overlap with Title VII’s prohibitions against discrimination based on national origin, race, and color. Where a given religion is strongly associated or perceived to uc art requirement, be associated with a certain national origin, the same facts may state a claim of Shawnigan Lake both religious and national origin discrimination. [212] All four bases might be implicated where, for example, co-workers target a dark-skinned Muslim employee from Saudi Arabia for harassment because of his religion, national origin, race, and/or color. Requirement College Du Leman! [213] Title VII prohibits retaliation by an employer, employment agency, or labor organization because an individual has engaged in protected activity. [214] Protected activity consists of opposing a practice the employee reasonably believes is made unlawful by one of the critical thinking studies College employment discrimination statutes or of uc art requirement College du Leman filing a charge, testifying, assisting, or participating in any manner in Sevenoaks an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under the statute. EEOC has taken the position that requesting religious accommodation is protected activity. [215] Retaliation for uc art requirement College Requesting Accommodation. Jenny requests that she be excused from daily employer-sponsored Christian prayer meetings because she is an atheist.

Her supervisor insists that she attend, but she persists in her request that she should be excused, and essay writing paper School, explains that requiring her to attend is offensive to her religious beliefs. She takes her request to College, human resources, and informs them that requiring her to attend these prayer meetings is offensive to her religious beliefs. Despite her supervisor’s objections, the writing warming Oregon State human resources department instructs the College supervisor that in the circumstances no undue hardship is reflective essay, posed and he must grant the request. Motivated by reprisal, her supervisor shortly thereafter gives her an unjustified poor performance rating, and uc art requirement College, denies her requests to attend training that is approved for similarly situated employees. This violates Title VII. Employers can reduce the risk of retaliation claims by training managers and supervisors to for scholarships, be aware of their anti-retaliation obligations under Title VII, including specific actions that may constitute retaliation. Employers can help reduce the uc art requirement risk of retaliation claims by carefully and timely recording the accurate business reasons for disciplinary or performance related actions and sharing these reasons with the employee. HOW APPLICANTS OR EMPLOYEES CAN FILE A CHARGE. If you believe you have been discriminated against by a private sector or state or local government employer, labor union, or employment agency when applying for a job or while on the job because of your race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age (40 or over), or disability, or believe that you have been discriminated against Windermere School, because you opposed unlawful discrimination or participated in an equal employment opportunity (EEO) proceeding, you may file a charge of discrimination with the U.S.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Charges against private sector and local and state government employers may be filed in person, by uc art mail, or by telephone by contacting the thinking studies College nearest EEOC office. If there is no EEOC office in uc art requirement College the immediate area, call toll free 1-800?669?4000 or 1?800?669?6820 (TTY) for more information. Issues In A Of Birmingham! To avoid delay, call or write beforehand if you need special assistance, such as an uc art requirement College du Leman interpreter, to file a charge. Federal sector employees and essay warming State, applicants should contact the EEO office of the uc art agency responsible for the alleged discrimination to initiate EEO counseling. There are strict time frames in which charges of employment discrimination must be filed or your agency’s EEO office must be contacted. When charges or complaints are filed beyond these time frames, you may not be able to obtain any remedy. Charges against thinking studies Bishopstrow College, private sector or state or local governments must be filed with EEOC within 180 days of the alleged discriminatory act.

The time frame is extended to 300 days if the uc art du Leman alleged discrimination arose in a state or locality that has a fair employment practices agency (FEPA) with the authority to Windermere School, grant or seek relief for the alleged discrimination. Federal sector employees and applicants must initiate EEO counseling at requirement du Leman the agency responsible for the alleged discrimination within 45 days of the alleged discriminatory event. Allegations of harassment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin are timely if at least one incident of essay writing for scholarships School harassment that is part of the larger pattern of harassment occurred within the filing period. If you wish to requirement, remain anonymous during the period when an EEOC charge is paper School, being processed involving a private sector or state or local government employer, another individual or an organization may file a charge on your behalf. Uc Art College Du Leman! In some circumstances, an EEOC Commissioner may file a charge against writing School, a private sector or state or local government employer. Federal sector employees and applicants may remain anonymous during EEO counseling, but lose the right to anonymity after filing a formal complaint. WHEN A CHARGE IS FILED AGAINST A PRIVATE SECTOR OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYER. This appendix provides general information regarding the processing of a charge alleging discrimination by a private sector or state or local government employer under the EEO statutes. The information presented in this appendix applies to private sector and state and local government employers only. Du Leman! For information on the processing of complaints against college essay of Birmingham, federal agencies, visit the EEOC’s “Federal Sector Information” page on the Internet at College http://eeoc.gov/federal/fed_employees/index.cfm. Anyone who believes that a private sector or state or local government employer has violated his or her employment rights based on race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age (40 or over), disability, opposition to unlawful discrimination, or participation in an EEO proceeding, may file a charge of discrimination with the EEOC.

A charge does not constitute a finding that your company did, in fact, discriminate. The EEOC has a responsibility to reflective Windermere, investigate and determine whether there is reasonable cause to uc art requirement du Leman, believe discrimination occurred. That process begins with the EEOC sending your company a copy of the charge, which will briefly identify the website for you Washington State (INTO) charging party, the basis ( e.g. , race, religion, etc.) and issues (hiring, promotion, etc.), and the date(s) of the alleged discrimination. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! You also may be asked to provide a response to the charge and supporting documentation. The EEOC also may ask to visit your work site or to interview some employees. It is important that your company retain records relating to issues under investigation as a result of the charge until the charge or any lawsuit based on the charge is resolved. In some cases, the EEOC notice may offer mediation as a method of critical College resolving the charge before an investigation. EEOC’s mediation program is a free service, and requirement College du Leman, participation is voluntary. The process is confidential, and there is thinking studies Bishopstrow College, a firewall ( i.e. , total separation) between the mediation program and requirement, EEOC’s enforcement activities. Essay Paper Sevenoaks! Mediation provides employers and charging parties the opportunity to reach mutually agreeable solutions early in the process.

The EEOC will notify your company if a charge is eligible for mediation. Uc Art! In the Sevenoaks event that mediation does not succeed, the charge is College du Leman, referred for investigation. If the EEOC finds reasonable cause to issues to write in a college The University, believe that your company discriminated against uc art College du Leman, a charging party, it will invite you to conciliate the charge ( i.e. , the EEOC will offer you a chance to writing Shawnigan Lake School, resolve the matter informally). In some cases, where conciliation fails, the EEOC will file a civil court action. Requirement! If the EEOC does not find discrimination, or if conciliation fails and the EEOC chooses not to file suit, it will issue a notice of a right to sue, which gives the charging party 90 days to file a civil court action. The EEOC also must issue a notice of right to sue to the charging party on request if its handling of the charge is still pending after 180 days, or earlier if the EEOC knows it will take more than 180 days to complete action on critical thinking, the charge. In all cases, your company should remember that it is unlawful to retaliate against du Leman, the charging party for filing the to write college essay The University charge, even if you believe the charge is without merit. You should submit a response to the EEOC and provide the uc art information requested, even if you believe the charge is frivolous.

If the essay writing for scholarships Lake charge was not dismissed by the EEOC when it was received, that means there was some basis for proceeding with further investigation. Requirement College Du Leman! There are many cases where it is unclear whether discrimination may have occurred and an investigation is necessary. In A Essay! You are encouraged to present any facts that you believe show the allegations are incorrect or do not amount to uc art College, a violation of the law. [1] This document uses examples that refer to the practices and beliefs of various religions. These examples are intended to website writes essays Washington (INTO), clarify the legal principles for which they are used and do not purport to represent the religious beliefs or practices to which they refer.

In some instances, links to non-EEOC Internet sites are also provided for the reader’s convenience in obtaining additional information. Requirement College! EEOC assumes no responsibility for their content and does not endorse their organizations or guarantee the accuracy of critical studies College these sites. [2] This Section of the Compliance Manual replaces Section 628: Religious Accommodation , EEOC Compliance Manual, Volume II and College du Leman, its Appendices: Appendix A, Policy Statement on Ansonia Board of Education v. Philbrook and Religious Accommodation ; Appendix B, Policy Guidance On ‘New Age’ Training Programs Which Conflict With Employees’ Religious Beliefs ; and Appendix C, Religious Objections to Unionism . School! It also replaces the following policy documents: Religious Organizations that Pay Women Less than Men in Accordance with Religious Beliefs ; Religious Organization Exemption Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended ; and Policy Statement on Goldman v. Weinberger (Accommodation of the Wearing of Religious Dress ). Uc Art Requirement College! The Commission’s Guidelines on Discrimination Because of writing warming Religion (hereafter Commission Guidelines ) are not affected by this Section. See Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. Part 1605. [3] Use of the term “employee” in this document should be presumed to include an applicant and, as appropriate, a former employee. [4] 42 U.S.C. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! § 2000e-2(a) provides that it is an issues in a unlawful employment practice for uc art requirement College du Leman an employer: (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to paper Sevenoaks School, discriminate against uc art College, any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or.

(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to critical thinking, deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an requirement du Leman employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j) provides that: The term “religion” includes all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless an employer demonstrates that he is unable to reasonably accommodate an employee’s or prospective employee’s religious observance or practice without undue hardship on critical studies Bishopstrow, the conduct of the employer’s business. [5] Federal legislation known as the uc art College du Leman Workplace Religious Freedom Act (“WRFA”), that has been proposed since the thinking College 1990s, would amend Title VII to change the current “ de minimis ” standard for establishing undue hardship to uc art requirement du Leman, require employers to show that the accommodation would cause significant difficulty or expense. See H.R. Writing Shawnigan Lake School! 1431, 110th Cong. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! (2007). This compliance manual chapter interprets and applies the issues to write about in a college essay The University of Birmingham current federal law, and takes no position on WRFA. Note: Various state and local laws extend beyond Title VII in terms of the protected bases covered, the discrimination prohibited or accommodation required, and the legal standards and defenses that apply. [6] See, e.g., Torcaso v. Watkins , 367 U.S. 488, 495 n.11 (1961) (First Amendment does not permit government to distinguish between theistic and non-theistic religions such as Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, and Secular Humanism); Young v. Southwestern Sav. Loan Ass’n, 509 F.2d 140 (5th Cir.

1975) (Title VII violated by requiring atheist employee to attend prayer portion of business meeting). [7] Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) and the Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding, Religion in the Workplace Survey, at 6 (Society for Human Resource Management, 2001) (executive summary and information on uc art College, obtaining report available at http://www.tanenbaum.org/research.html (last visited July 2, 2008); Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, U.S. Religious Landscape Survey (2008), available at website writes essays for you Washington State (INTO) http://religions.pewforum.org/reports (last visited July 2, 2008). [8] In fiscal year 2007, EEOC received 2,880 religious discrimination charges, accounting for 3.5% of du Leman all charges filed with the Commission that year. In fiscal year 1992, EEOC received 1,388 religious discrimination charges, accounting for 1.9% of all charges filed with the Commission that year. Statistics regarding the number of thinking studies College religious discrimination charges filed with the Commission can be found at uc art College du Leman http://eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/charges.cfm. [9] “Religion in the Workplace is a Diversity Issue for U.S. Companies,” U.S. Department of in a college State’s Bureau of International Information Programs (Nov. 28, 2007), available at uc art requirement http://www.america.gov/st/ washfile-english/2007/November/20071128173019xlrennef0.1781427.html (last visited July 2, 2008). [10] The principles discussed in this Section apply to about The University, Title VII claims against private employers as well as to requirement College, federal, state, and local public sector employers, unless otherwise noted.

See 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e(a) - (b), 2000e-16(a), et seq. , and 2000e-16a. See, e.g. , infra nn.11-15, 66 (directing attention to situations where the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) may apply), and 201-203. As explained in writing Lake n.5, supra , claims under various state or local laws may be analyzed under different standards. [11] The First Amendment religion and speech clauses (“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech”) protect individuals against restrictions imposed by the government, not by private entities, and therefore do not apply to requirement du Leman, rules imposed on private sector employees by their employers. The First Amendment, however, does protect private sector employers from government interference with their free exercise and essay global Oregon (INTO), speech rights. Moreover, government employees’ religious expression is protected by both the First Amendment and Title VII. Requirement College! See infra nn.12-15, 66, and accompanying text; Brown v. Polk County , 61 F.3d 650 (8th Cir. 1995); Guidelines on Religious Exercise and Religious Expression in the Federal Workplace (Aug. 14, 1997) (hereafter Federal Workplace Guidelines ), 158 Daily Labor Report (BNA) 1522-5968 (Aug. 15, 1997) (available at http://clinton2.nara.gov/WH/New/html/19970819-3275.html (last visited July 2, 2008)).

Although the Federal Workplace Guidelines are directed at to write about in a college The University of Birmingham federal employers, they provide useful guidance for uc art requirement College private employers as well. In addition, the thinking Bishopstrow College U.S. Department of Justice maintains a website, www.firstfreedom.gov, which provides information on a variety of constitutional and statutory religious discrimination issues, including a section on Title VII employment protections based on religion. [12] See Daniels v. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! City of Arlington , 246 F.3d 500 (5th Cir.) (as a government entity, police department may be able to demonstrate that providing the requested accommodation would have posed an undue hardship because allowing the officer to wear a cross on his uniform would give the appearance of reflective essay writing Windermere School public agency endorsement of the officer’s religious views, in violation of the department’s constitutional obligations), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 951 (2001); Helland v. South Bend Cmty. Sch. Uc Art Requirement College! Corp. , 93 F.3d 327 (7th Cir. 1996) (public school did not violate either plaintiff’s Title VII religious accommodation right or his First Amendment free exercise right by removing plaintiff from website writes essays Washington University (INTO) substitute teacher list due to requirement du Leman, his proselytizing in class); Brown v. Writing Windermere School! Polk County , 61 F.3d at 656-59 (where there was no evidence that subordinates objected on religious grounds , it would not have posed an undue hardship under Title VII, or violated the requirement du Leman First Amendment Establishment Clause, to accommodate supervisor’s occasional affirmations of Christianity and spontaneous voluntary prayers during meetings). [13] See, e.g., EEOC v. Townley Eng’g Mfg.

Co. Issues About College Of Birmingham! , 859 F.2d 610, 621 (9th Cir. 1988) (court must balance the application of Title VII to the employment policy against private employers’ right under First Amendment Free Exercise clause to practice their religion; private secular employer’s free exercise right to hold mandatory religious services for employees did not outweigh its Title VII obligation to accommodate atheist employee’s request to be exempt from attending the requirement College du Leman services on about in a The University of Birmingham, religious grounds; excusing plaintiff’s attendance would not pose an undue hardship on uc art requirement, operation of employer’s business). [14] See, e.g., Knight v. Connecticut Dep’t of about college Pub. Health , 275 F.3d 156, 164-65 (2d Cir. 2001) (state agency did not violate either Title VII or First Amendment Free Exercise Clause by refusing to allow employee to uc art requirement College du Leman, evangelize clients of essay state agency while performing job duties; in College du Leman addition, employer would have risked First Amendment Establishment Clause violation by permitting the accommodation); Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Newark , 170 F.3d 359 (3d Cir. Website Writes Essays For You State University! 1999) (police department violated Sunni Muslim officer’s First Amendment free exercise rights by refusing to make a religious exception to its “no beard” policy to accommodate his beliefs, while exempting other officers for medical reasons); Draper v. Logan County Pub. Requirement Du Leman! Library , 403 F. Supp. 2d 608 (W.D.

Ky. 2005) (public library employee’s First Amendment free speech and free exercise rights were violated when she was prohibited from wearing a necklace with a cross ornament). [15] Guidance for essay paper government workplaces on the First Amendment religious free exercise issues, much of which is also useful for the private sector, is College, available in issues to write about in a of Birmingham the Federal Workplace Guidelines , supra n.11 ; see also Brown , 61 F.3d at 658 (applying First Amendment test governing free speech of public employees to College, First Amendment free exercise claims, court balanced an employee’s right to free exercise with the employer’s interest in providing effective and efficient public services; public employee’s termination constituted both denial of writing Windermere religious accommodation under Title VII and violation of First Amendment Free Exercise Clause). [16] 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2. To determine whether an entity is College du Leman, covered by Title VII, see EEOC Compliance Manual, “Threshold Issues,” https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/threshold.html. Although this document concerns Title VII, employers and employees should note that there may be state and local laws in their jurisdiction prohibiting religious discrimination in employment, some of which may be parallel to Title VII and some of which may afford narrower or broader coverage.

[18] “Theistic” is defined as “believing in a god or gods.” The American Heritage Dictionary of the studies Bishopstrow College English Language , Fourth Ed , Houghton Mifflin Co. (2004), available at http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/theistic (last visited July 2, 2008). [19] 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j). Redmond v. GAF Corp. , 574 F.2d 897, 900 (7th Cir. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! 1978) (the statutory language “all aspects of essay writing School religious practice and belief” is interpreted broadly; “to restrict the act to those practices which are mandated or prohibited by uc art requirement du Leman a tenet of the writing global warming State University religion, would involve the court in determining not only what are the tenets of a particular religion, which by College itself perhaps would not be beyond the province of the court, but would frequently require the thinking Bishopstrow College courts to uc art requirement College, decide whether a particular practice is or is not required by essay Shawnigan School the tenets of the religion”); s ee also Employment Div., Dep’t of uc art requirement Human Res. of Oregon v. Essay Writing School! Smith , 494 U.S. 872, 887 (1990) (in holding that the Free Exercise Clause did not prohibit application of Oregon drug laws to ceremonial ingestion of College peyote, Court noted that “[r]epeatedly and in many different contexts, we have warned that courts must not presume to determine the place of a particular belief in a religion or the plausibility of a religious claim”). [20] Thomas v. Issues About College! Review Bd. of the Indiana Employment Sec. Div. , 450 U.S. 707, 714 (1981) (“religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in uc art requirement College order to merit First Amendment protection”); see also Church of to write about in a college Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Requirement College! City of Hialeah , 508 U.S. 520, 531 (1993) (although animal sacrifice may seem “abhorrent” to some, Santerian belief is religious in nature and for scholarships Lake, is protected by the First Amendment); U.S. v. Meyers , 906 F. Supp. Uc Art Requirement! 1494, 1499 (D. Wyo.

1995) (“one man’s religion will always be another man’s heresy”). [21] Thomas , 450 U.S. at 716 (“[I]t is not within the judicial function and judicial competence to inquire whether the petitioner or [another practitioner] . . State (INTO)! . more correctly perceived the commands of their common faith. Courts are not arbiters of scriptural interpretation.”). [22] Redmond , 574 F.2d at 901 n.12 (Title VII case citing United States v. Seeger , 380 U.S. 163 (1969), and Welsh v. United States , 398 U.S. 333 (1970), which defined protected “religion” for requirement purposes of the Universal Military Training and paper School, Service Act). Uc Art Requirement! Unless otherwise noted, cases are cited in this document for their Title VII holdings.

[23] Seeger , 380 U.S. at 176. “This standard was developed in [ Seeger ] and [ Welsh ]. The Commission has consistently applied this standard in essay writing global warming State (INTO) its decisions.” 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1. [24] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1 (“The fact that no religious group espouses such beliefs or the fact that the religious group to which the uc art requirement du Leman individual professes to belong may not accept such belief will not determine whether the reflective essay Windermere School belief is a religious belief of the employee or prospective employee.”); Welsh, 398 U.S. at 343 (petitioner’s beliefs were religious in nature although the church to which he belonged did not teach those beliefs); accord Africa v. Commonwealth of uc art College Pa ., 662 F.2d 1025, 1032-33 (3d Cir.1981); Bushouse v. Local Union 2209, United Auto., Aerospace Agric. Implement Workers of Am. , 164 F. Supp. 2d 1066, 1076 n.15 (N.D. Ind. 2001) (“Title VII’s intention is to provide protection and accommodation for issues essay of Birmingham a broad spectrum of religious practices and belief not merely those beliefs based upon organized or recognized teachings of a particular sect”). [25] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. Uc Art! § 1605.1; Torcaso , 367 U.S. at 489-90 (government may not favor theism over pantheism or atheism); Welsh , 398 U.S.

333 (to be religion protected by writing Oregon State University (INTO) the First Amendment, a belief system need not have a concept of a god, supreme being, or afterlife; plaintiff’s belief was deemed to be religious because it was held with strength of traditional religious beliefs); Townley , 859 F.2d 610 (Title VII prohibits an employer from compelling its atheist employees to attend religious services); Young , 509 F.2d 140 (same). [26] United States v. Meyers, 906 F. Supp. Requirement! 1494, 1499 (D. Wyo. Writes For You State (INTO)! 1995) (the threshold for establishing the uc art requirement religious nature of for scholarships Shawnigan Lake School beliefs is low; under the First Amendment, “if there is any doubt about whether a particular set of beliefs constitutes a religion, the Court will err on the side of freedom and find that the beliefs are a religion. . . . [because the country’s] founders were animated in large part by a desire for religious liberty”), aff’d , 95 F.3d 1475, 1482-83 (10th Cir. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! 1996); see also Smith , 494 U.S. at 887 (in holding that the Free Exercise Clause did not prohibit application of Oregon drug laws to Shawnigan, ceremonial ingestion of peyote, Court noted that “[r]epeatedly and in many different contexts, we have warned that courts must not presume to determine the place of du Leman a particular belief in a religion or the warming Oregon University plausibility of uc art requirement a religious claim”). [27] Meyers, 906 F. Supp. at 1502 (religions address “ultimate ideas,” i.e. , “fundamental questions about life, purpose, and death”; holding that single-faceted worship of marijuana was not a religion for First Amendment purposes), aff’d , 95 F.3d at 1483; accord Africa, 662 F.2d at essay Sevenoaks School 1032 (“a religion [protected by the First Amendment] addresses fundamental and ultimate questions having to do with deep and imponderable matters [and] . College Du Leman! . Reflective Essay! . is comprehensive in nature; it consists of a belief-system as opposed to an isolated teaching”); Dettmer v. Landon , 617 F. Supp. 592, 595-96 (E.D. Va.

1985) (under the First Amendment, Wiccans’ belief is religious in nature because, among other things, the belief structure relates to “ultimate” concerns and reflects a broad concern for improving the quality of life for others), aff’d in relevant part and uc art College du Leman, rev’d on other grounds , 799 F.2d 929 (4th Cir. 1986); Church of the Chosen People (No. Am. Panarchate) v. United States , 548 F. Supp. 1247 (D. Minn. Writing Paper Sevenoaks School! 1982) (a church whose single-faceted doctrine concerned sexual preference and not ultimate questions was not a religion entitled to tax exemption); Brown v. Pena , 441 F. Supp. 1382, 1385 (S.D.

Fla. 1977) (“religious” belief under Title VII “is based on du Leman, a theory of ‘man’s nature or his place in writing paper the Universe,’ [and is] not merely a personal preference”), aff’d, 589 F.2d 1113 (5th Cir. 1979). Requirement Du Leman! Although “religion” is often marked by external manifestations such as ceremonies, rituals or clergy, such manifestations are not required for a belief to be “religious.” E.g., Malnak v. Yogi, 592 F.2d 197, 209-10 (3d Cir. 1979). [28] For example, EEOC and courts have found that the Ku Klux Klan is not a religion within the meaning of Title VII because its philosophy has a narrow, temporal, and writing paper, political character. Commission Decision No. 79-06, CCH EEOC Decisions ¶ 6737 (1983); Bellamy v. Mason’s Stores, Inc., 368 F. Supp. 1025, 1026 (E.D.

Va. Requirement Du Leman! 1973), aff’d , 508 F.2d 504 (4th Cir. 1974); Slater v. King Soopers , 809 F. Supp. 809, 810 (D. Colo. 1992) (dismissing religious discrimination claim by a member of the Ku Klux Klan who allegedly was fired for participating in a Hitler rally because the Ku Klux Klan is “political and social in about of Birmingham nature” and is not a religion for requirement Title VII purposes); s ee also Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp.

1382 (plaintiff’s belief that eating cat food contributes to his well-being is writing paper, a personal preference and not a religion). In an analogous case, Peterson v. Uc Art College! Wilmur Communications, Inc ., 205 F. Supp. Critical Thinking Studies College! 2d 1014, 1022 (E.D. Wis. 2002), the court held that an employee’s membership in the World Church of the requirement College Creator was a “religious” belief, even though the organization’s central tenet is white supremacy, because “it functions as religion in writing [plaintiff’s] life” as evidenced by the fact that he has been a minister in it for more than three years, worked to uc art requirement College, put the church’s teachings into practice, and actively proselytizes. However, the Peterson court might have reached a different conclusion had it considered whether the Washington State (INTO) belief was merely one-dimensional and thus not religious, i.e. , not part of a moral or ethical belief system concerning “ultimate ideas” about “life, purpose, and requirement College, death.” [29] Compare Tiano v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc ., 139 F.3d 679 (9th Cir. 1998) (employer not liable for denying employee’s request to be absent from work on particular dates to attend a religious pilgrimage where the evidence showed that her religious needs could be met by going on the pilgrimage at another time and that the issues about college of Birmingham particular dates she requested were simply a personal preference), with Heller v. EBB Auto Co. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! , 8 F.3d 1433 (9th Cir. 1993) (employer liable for failing to accommodate Jewish employee’s attendance of spouse’s conversion ceremony); see also Wessling v. Kroger Co. , 554 F. Supp. Essay Writing Lake School! 548 (E.D.

Mich. 1982) (employer not liable for denial of uc art du Leman accommodation where employee requested leave to help children get into writes for you Washington State (INTO) their costumes and practice before performance of church play; employee’s own testimony revealed her participation in uc art College du Leman this instance was more in the nature of a parental and essay writing Windermere, social obligation); Redmond , 574 F.2d at 901 (employer liable for failing to accommodate employee’s participation in uc art Saturday Bible classes; the court found his attendance to be pursuant to a sincerely held religious belief given that he was appointed to be lifetime leader of his church Bible study class many years earlier, time of meeting was scheduled by church elders, and employee felt that his participation was at dictate of his elders and constituted a “religious obligation”); Weitkenaut v. Goodyear Tire Rubber Co. , 381 F. Supp. 1284, 1288?89 (D. Vt. 1974) (employer liable for global State University (INTO) failing to protect minister’s attendance at monthly church organizational meetings where it was considered necessary to uc art du Leman, preparing for essays University his pastoral duties and thus essential to his ability to lead his congregation). [30] Cf. Uc Art Du Leman! LaFevers v. Saffle , 936 F.2d 1117 (10th Cir. 1991) (although not all Seventh-day Adventists are vegetarian, an individual adherent’s genuine religious belief in such a dietary practice warrants constitutional protection under the First Amendment). [31] See, e.g., Wessling v. Kroger Co. , 554 F. Supp. 548 (E.D.

Mich. 1982) (court held that plaintiff, who had volunteered to arrive at Church early to set up, decorate, and receive children prior to studies, their performance of a play during Christmas Mass, was engaging in a social and family obligation rather than a religious belief, practice, or observance). [32] See Dettmer v. Landon, 799 F.2d 929, 932 (4th Cir. 1986) (in First Amendment case, rejecting argument that witchcraft was a “conglomeration” of “various aspects of the occult” rather than a religion; religious beliefs need not be “acceptable, logical, consistent or comprehensible to others” to be protected); Washington Ethical Soc’y v. District of Columbia , 249 F.2d 127, 128 (D.C. Cir. 1957) (Ethical Society qualifies as a “religious corporation or society” and its building is uc art College, entitled to in a college of Birmingham, tax exemption; belief in a Supreme Being or supernatural power is not essential to qualify for College tax exemption accorded to “religious corporations,” “churches” or “religious societies”); Fellowship of Humanity v. County of issues to write about in a college The University of Birmingham Alameda , 315 P.2d 394 (Cal. App. 1957) (same holding with respect to Secular Humanists). [33] EEOC v. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. , 2005 WL 2090677 (W.D. Wash.

Aug. 29, 2005) (denying employer’s motion for summary judgment on accommodation claim arising from employee’s refusal to cover his Kemetic religious tattoos in order to comply with employer’s dress code). [34] These facts are similar to those in Cloutier v. Costco Wholesale Corp. , 390 F.3d 126 (1st Cir. 2004). Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! However, the court in Cloutier did not resolve the issue of whether or not the studies College plaintiff’s facial piercing, which she alleged was displayed pursuant to her adherence to the beliefs of the Church of Body Modification, was part of uc art College du Leman a “religious” belief, practice, or observance, instead finding that the essay Sevenoaks School proposed accommodation of allowing display of the piercing would have posed an College du Leman undue hardship. [35] Seeger , 380 U.S. at 185 (“[w]hile the ‘truth’ of critical studies Bishopstrow a belief is College, not open to question, there remains the significant question of whether it is ‘truly held’”). [36] EEOC v. Union Independiente De La Autoridad De Acueductos, 279 F.3d 49, 56 (1st Cir. To Write In A College Essay The University! 2002) (evidence that Seventh-day Adventist employee had acted in ways inconsistent with the tenets of his religion, for example that he worked five days a week rather than the required six, had lied on an employment application, and took an oath before a notary upon becoming a public employee, can be relevant to the evaluation of sincerity but is not dispositive); Hansard v. Johns-Manville Prods. Corp ., 1973 WL 129 (E.D.

Tex. Requirement! Feb. 16, 1973) (employee’s contention that he objected to Sunday work for religious reasons was undermined by his very recent history of Sunday work); see also Hussein v. Waldorf-Astoria , 134 F. Issues To Write In A The University! Supp. 2d 591 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (employer had a good faith basis to doubt sincerity of requirement employee’s professed religious need to wear a beard because he had not worn a beard at in a college essay The University of Birmingham any time in his fourteen years of employment, had never mentioned his religious beliefs to anyone at the hotel, and simply showed up for uc art College work one night and asked for an on-the-spot exception to the no?beard policy), aff’d , 2002 WL 390437 (2d Cir. School! Mar. 13, 2002) (unpublished). [37] EEOC v. Ilona of Hungary, Inc ., 108 F.3d 1569 (7th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (Jewish employee proved her request for requirement du Leman leave to observe Yom Kippur was based on a sincerely held religious belief even though she had never in her prior eight-year tenure sought leave from work for a religious observance, and conceded that she generally was not a very religious person; the evidence showed that certain events in her life, including the birth of her son and the death of her father, had strengthened her religious beliefs over the years); Cooper v. Oak Rubber Co ., 15 F.3d 1375 (6th Cir.

1994) (that employee had worked the Friday night shift at website essays for you State University plant for approximately seven months after her baptism did not establish that she did not hold sincere religious belief against working on Saturdays, considering that 17 months intervened before employee was next required to work on Saturday, and employee’s undisputed testimony was that her faith and commitment to her religion grew during this time); EEOC v. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! IBP, Inc., 824 F. Supp. 147 (C.D. Ill. 1993) (Seventh-day Adventist employee’s previous absence of writes faith and subsequent loss of faith did not prove that his religious beliefs were insincere at the time that he refused to work on the Sabbath); s ee also Union Independiente, 279 F.3d at 57 n.8 (the fact that the alleged conflict between plaintiff’s beliefs and union membership kept changing might call into question the sincerity of the beliefs or “might simply reflect an uc art requirement College evolution in plaintiff’s religious views toward a more steadfast opposition to Bishopstrow, union membership”). [38] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1; Anderson v. U.S.F. Requirement Du Leman! Logistics (IMC), Inc. , 274 F.3d 470, 475 (7th Cir.

2001) (employee’s belief that she needed to use the phrase “Have a Blessed Day” was a religious practice covered by Title VII even though using the phrase was not a requirement of her religion); Rivera v. Choice Courier , 2004 WL 1444852 (S.D.N.Y. June 25, 2004) (the statutory language providing that Title VII encompasses “all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief,” means that Title VII “protects more than . . . practices specifically mandated by an employee’s religion”). [39] For the text of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a), which applies to employers, see supra n.4. Essay Paper School! Under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(b), it is unlawful for employment agencies to “fail or refuse to refer for employment, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of his . . . Requirement College! religion . Essay Global University (INTO)! . Requirement College! . or to to write essay The University of Birmingham, classify or refer for requirement employment any individual on the basis of his . Issues About College Essay Of Birmingham! . . Uc Art College! religion . . . Website Writes For You State (INTO)! .” Under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(c), it is unlawful for unions to “(1) to exclude or expel from membership, or otherwise to du Leman, discriminate against, any individual because of his . . Writing Global Oregon! . religion . . . ; (2) to limit, segregate or classify its membership or applicants . . Uc Art Requirement! . Writing! or to refuse to refer for employment any individual . Requirement! . . because of essay Oregon State University such individual’s . College Du Leman! . To Write College Essay Of Birmingham! . religion . College! . . Essay For Scholarships Lake School! ; or (3) to cause or attempt to uc art College du Leman, cause an employer to discriminate . . . in violation of this section.” [40] See, e.g., Union Independiente, 279 F.3d 49; Bushouse , 164 F. Essays For You Washington State University (INTO)! Supp. 2d 1066. See infra §§ II, III, and IV; see also § IV-C-5. [41] Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co . College Du Leman! 482 U.S.

656, 668-69 (1987) (unions violated “§ 703(c)(1) [of Title VII, which] makes it an unlawful practice for a Union to writing for scholarships School, ‘exclude or to expel from College its membership, or otherwise to issues in a The University of Birmingham, discriminate against, any individual’” when they “ignored [racial] discrimination claims . . Uc Art Du Leman! . , knowing that the writes for you Washington employer was discriminating in violation of the contract”). See, e.g., Perugini v. Safeway Stores, 935 F. 2d 1083 (9th Cir. Uc Art Du Leman! 1991) (remand to determine whether union discriminatorily failed to challenge employer’s refusal to give pregnant worker light duty); Rainey v. Town of essay Lake School Warren , 80 F. Supp. Uc Art College Du Leman! 2d 5, 17 (D.R.I. 2000) (“[i]t is axiomatic that a union’s failure to Shawnigan, adequately represent union members in the face of uc art requirement du Leman employer discrimination may subject the union to liability under either Title VII or its duty of fair representation”). To the extent it has been held that a union cannot be held liable where it knowingly acquiesces in discrimination, the EEOC disagrees.

See EEOC v. Pipefitters Ass’n Local Union 597 , 334 F.3d 656 (7th Cir. 2003). [42] Section 702(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-1(a), provides: This subchapter shall not apply to . . . a religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society with respect to the employment of paper School individuals of uc art College du Leman a particular religion to perform work connected with the carrying on by such corporation, association, educational institution, or society of college essay The University its activities. Section 703(e)(2) of uc art requirement du Leman Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(e)(2) provides: it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for Shawnigan a school, college, university, or educational institution or institution of learning to hire and uc art requirement College, employ employees of critical thinking Bishopstrow College a particular religion if such school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning is, in College du Leman whole or in substantial part, owned, supported, controlled, or managed by essay Sevenoaks School a particular religion or by uc art requirement College du Leman a particular religious corporation, association, or society, or if the writing for scholarships Shawnigan curriculum of such school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning is directed toward the propagation of a particular religion.

While Congress did not include a definition of the § 702(a) term “religious corporation” in Title VII, at least one judge has argued that the legislative history indicates that Congress intended “the § 703(e)(2) exemption to require a lesser degree of association between an entity and a religious sect than what would be required under § 702(a).” See LeBoon v. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! Lancaster Jewish Cmty. Ctr. , 503 F.3d 217, 237 (3d Cir. 2007) (Rendell, J., dissenting). Executive Order 13279, Equal Protection of the Laws for Faith-Based and Community Organizations , issued on December 12, 2002, provides that certain faith-based organizations that provide social programs can deliver those services and essay writing warming State, make hiring decisions on the basis of their religious beliefs even if they receive federal funding. See 67 Fed. Requirement! Reg.

77,141 (12/16/02). The Guidance to Faith-Based and Community Organizations on Partnering with the Federal Government , http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/fbci/guidance_document_01-06.pdf (last visited July 2, 2008), issued by the White House Office of thinking Faith Based and Community Initiatives, explains that while religious organizations that receive federal funds to provide social services may choose to hire persons of the uc art College du Leman same religion, they are also subject to federal, state, and essay writing Shawnigan Lake School, local employment and anti-discrimination laws, such as Title VII. [43] Townley , 859 F.2d at 618; accord Hall v. Baptist Mem. Health Care Corp. , 215 F.3d 618, 624-25 (6th Cir. 2000) (college of health sciences qualified as a religious institution under Title VII because it was an affiliated institution of a church-affiliated hospital, had direct relationship with the Baptist church, and the college atmosphere was permeated with religious overtones). [44] Townley, 859 F.2d at 618; see also Killinger v. Requirement College Du Leman! Samford Univ. , 113 F.3d 196 (11th Cir. 1997) (Baptist university was “religious educational institution” where largest single source of essay paper Sevenoaks funding was state Baptist Convention, all university trustees were Baptists, university reported financially to Convention and to du Leman, Baptist State Board of Missions, university was member of Association of essay global warming Oregon (INTO) Baptist Colleges and uc art du Leman, Schools, university charter designated its chief purpose as “the promotion of the critical thinking Bishopstrow College Christian Religion throughout the uc art College du Leman world by maintaining and operating institutions dedicated to the development of Christian character in high scholastic standing,” and both Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Department of Education recognized university as religious educational institution).

[45] Townley , 859 F.2d at issues to write about in a college 619 (manufacturer of mining equipment, whose owners asserted that they made a covenant with God that their business “would be a Christian, faith?operated business,” is not a religious organization because it is for profit; it produces mining equipment, a secular product; it is not affiliated with or supported by a church; and its articles of incorporation do not mention any religious purpose) . Cf. EEOC v. Kamehameha Sch./Bishop Estate , 990 F.2d 458, 461 (9th Cir. 1993) (non-profit school not “religious” for du Leman Title VII purposes where ownership and about in a essay, affiliation, purpose, faculty, student body, student activities, and curriculum of the schools are either essentially secular, or neutral as far as religion is concerned). [46] See Corp. of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of uc art College Latter-Day Saints v. Essay Writing! Amos , 483 U.S. 327 (1987) (a nonprofit church-run business does not violate Title VII if it refuses to hire anyone other than members of du Leman its own religion, even for enterprises or jobs that are not religious in nature). [47] Killinger , 113 F.3d at 200 (School of Divinity need not employ professor who did not adhere to the theology advanced by its leadership); Tirpanlis v. Unification Theological Seminary , 2001 WL 64739 (S.D.N.Y.

Jan. 24, 2001) (seminary operated by Unification Church cannot be sued for religious discrimination by Greek Orthodox employee who was allegedly terminated for refusing to accept the teachings of the Unification Church). [48] Ziv v. Valley Beth Shalom , 156 F.3d 1242 (Table), 1998 WL 482832 (9th Cir. Aug. Website For You University! 11, 1998) (unpublished) (religious organization can be held liable for retaliation and national origin discrimination); DeMarco v. Holy Cross High Sch. , 4 F.3d 166 (2d Cir. 1993) (religious institutions may not engage in age discrimination). [49] EEOC v. Fremont Christian Sch. , 781 F.2d 1362 (9th Cir. 1986) (religious school violated Title VII and uc art, the Equal Pay Act when it provided “head of household” health insurance benefits only to single persons and married men). [50] McClure v. Salvation Army , 460 F.2d 553, 558-60 (5th Cir. 1972); s ee also Hollins v. Methodist Healthcare, Inc. Essay! , 474 F.3d 223 (6th Cir.

2007) (applying ministerial exception to bar claim by resident in hospital’s pastoral care program who alleged disability discrimination); Tomic v. Catholic Diocese of Peoria , 442 F.3d 1036 (7th Cir. 2006) (applying ministerial exception to uc art, bar age discrimination claim brought by Catholic Diocese music director who was terminated following a dispute with the website writes essays for you bishop’s assistant regarding what to College du Leman, play during the Easter Mass); Hankins v. Lyght , 441 F.3d 96 (2d Cir. 2006) (applying ministerial exception to bar age discrimination claim); Combs v. Central Texas Annual Conf. of United Methodist Church, 173 F.3d 343 (5th Cir. 1999) (barring claim because court could not determine whether an employment decision concerning a minister was based on essay writing for scholarships Lake School, legitimate or illegitimate grounds without entering the constitutionally impermissible realm of internal church management); EEOC v. Du Leman! Catholic Univ. of America , 83 F.3d 455 (D.C. Essay Writing Global Warming (INTO)! Cir. 1996) (ministerial exception barred Title VII sex discrimination claim brought by tenured member of Catholic University’s department of religious canon law); DeMarco v. Holy Cross High School , 4 F.3d 166 (2d Cir. 1993) (ministerial exception inapplicable to parochial school teacher’s age discrimination claim because employer’s contention that teacher was terminated specifically for failing to attend Mass and to lead his students in prayers could be evaluated without risk of excessive entanglement between government and religious institution); Guianan v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Indianapolis, 42 F. Supp. 2d 849 (S.D.

Ind. Requirement Du Leman! 1998) (ministerial exception inapplicable to parochial school teacher’s age discrimination claim, even though teacher taught at least one class in issues to write about in a essay of Birmingham religion per term, and organized one worship service per month, since vast majority of teacher’s duties involved teaching math, science, and other secular courses). [51] Rayburn v. Gen. Conference of Seventh?Day Adventists , 772 F.2d 1164, 1169 (4th Cir. 1985). [52] Rweyemamu v. Cote , 520 F.3d 198 (2d Cir. 2008) (Title VII race discrimination claim by African-American Catholic priest challenging denial of promotion and uc art requirement du Leman, subsequent termination was barred by Windermere School the ministerial exception); Petruska v. Gannon Univ. , 462 F.3d 294 (3d Cir. 2006) (ministerial exception bars Title VII sex discrimination claim by female Catholic chaplain against school, alleging that she was forced out as chaplain after she advocated on behalf of alleged victims of sexual harassment and spoke out against uc art, the school’s president regarding alleged sexual harassment and discrimination against female employees); Werft v. Desert Southwest Annual Conf. of the United Methodist Church , 377 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. Critical Studies Bishopstrow College! 2004) (ministerial exception barred minister’s claim against church for failure to accommodate his disabilities). College! However, some courts have ruled that the critical Bishopstrow ministerial exception does not bar harassment claims by ministers, but rather only du Leman, applies to claims involving matters such as hiring, promotion, and termination. Global State (INTO)! See Elvig v. Calvin Presbyterian Church , 375 F.3d 951 (9th Cir.

2004) (ministerial exception does not bar sexual harassment claim by minister), reh’g denied , 397 F.3d 790 (9th Cir. 2005) (two concurring and three dissenting opinions); Bollard v. California Province of the Soc’y of Jesus , 196 F.3d 940 (9th Cir. 1999) (novice’s sexual harassment claim could be maintained without excessive entanglement between church and state because religious order did not offer a religious justification for the alleged harassment, and uc art College du Leman, plaintiff did not seek reinstatement or other equitable relief); Dolquist v. Heartland Presbytery, 342 F. Essay Shawnigan Lake! Supp. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! 2d 996 (D. Essay Writing! Kan. 2004) (First Amendment Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses did not preclude minister from pursuing Title VII sexual harassment claim against requirement, her church, because claims did not involve choice of clergy); see also Bryce v. Bishopstrow! Episcopal Church in College du Leman the Diocese of Colorado, 289 F.3d 648, 657-59 (10th Cir. Essay School! 2002) (although “employment decisions may be subject to Title VII scrutiny, where the decision does not involve the church’s spiritual functions,” minister’s Title VII harassment claim was subject to dismissal because it was based on requirement College du Leman, communications protected by writing Oregon State University (INTO) the First Amendment under the uc art du Leman “church autonomy” doctrine; the doctrine is broader than the ministerial exception and bars civil court review of internal church disputes involving matters of writing Windermere doctrine and church governance). [53] Geary v. Visitation of Blessed Virgin Mary Parish Sch. , 7 F.3d 324 (3d Cir.

1993) (lay teacher at College du Leman church?operated elementary school not a minister); Dole v. Shenandoah Baptist Church , 899 F.2d 1389 (4th Cir. 1990) (lay teachers of private religious schools who “perform no sacerdotal functions [nor] serve as church governors [and] belong to about college essay The University of Birmingham, no clearly delineated religious order” are not ministers despite their sincere belief that theirs is a ministry); but see EEOC v. Catholic Univ. of America , 83 F.3d 455 (D.C. College! Cir. 1996) (ministerial exception barred Title VII sex discrimination claim brought by tenured member of Catholic university’s department of religious canon law). [54] Alicea?Hernandez v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, 320 F.3d 698 (7th Cir.

2003) (ministerial exception applied to Communications Director who was responsible for crafting the Church’s message to the Hispanic community); EEOC v. Essay Shawnigan Lake! Roman Catholic Diocese of Raleigh, 213 F.3d 795 (4th Cir. Uc Art College Du Leman! 2000) (ministerial exception applies to cathedral’s director of music ministry and part-time music teacher); Rayburn , 772 F.2d at website writes Washington (INTO) 1168 (ministerial exception applies to associate pastor who had completed seminary training but was not ordained); Starkman v. Evans , 198 F.3d 173 (5th Cir. 1999) (ministerial exception barred Americans with Disabilities Act claim by church choir director). [55] EEOC v. Requirement! Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary , 651 F.2d 277, 283 (5th Cir. 1981) (“[w]hile religious organizations may designate persons as ministers for their religious purposes free from any governmental interference, bestowal of such a designation does not control their extra?religious legal status”). [56] Abramson v. William Paterson Coll. of School N.J. , 260 F.3d 265, 281 (3d Cir. 2001) (prima facie case and evidentiary burdens of an employee alleging religious discrimination mirror those of an employee alleging race or sex discrimination).

A disparate impact analysis could also apply in College the religion context, particularly in essay global warming State University the area of recruitment and hiring. See, e.g., Barrow v. Greenville Indep. Sch. Dist. , 480 F.3d 377 (5th Cir. 2007) (affirming summary judgment, citing lack of statistical evidence, for employer on Title VII claim brought by teacher who asserted policy favoring teachers whose children attended the public schools had a disparate impact on those whose children attended private school for religious rather than secular reasons). However, because the reasonable accommodation/undue hardship analysis usually applies when a neutral work rule adversely affects religious practices, s ee infra § IV, disparate impact analysis is seldom if ever used in religion cases. [57] 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(e)(1); see also §§ I-C and II-D of this document. [58] See, e.g., EEOC v. Requirement College! Preferred Mgmt .Corp., 216 F. Supp. Essay Oregon University! 2d 763, 813 (S.D. Ind. 2002) (telling applicant that “[y]ou damned humanists are ruining the world” and will “burn in hell forever” raises reasonable inference that the failure to hire her was unlawfully based on religion).

[60] In Noyes v. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! Kelly Servs. Thinking Bishopstrow College! Inc ., 488 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2007), the plaintiff alleged “reverse religious discrimination” when she was not promoted because she did not follow the religious beliefs of her supervisor and management, who were members of a small religious group and favored and promoted other members of the religious group. The court ruled that while the employee did not adhere to a particular religion, the fact that she did not share the employer’s religious beliefs was the basis for the alleged discrimination against her, and the evidence was sufficient to create an issue for trial on whether the requirement employer’s decision to promote another employee was a pretext for religious discrimination. [61] Tincher v. Wal-Mart Stores , 118 F.3d 1125, 1131 (7th Cir. 1997) (reasonable jury could conclude that employer’s articulated reason for the discharge of a Seventh-day Adventist was pretextual and that the real reason was religious discrimination because of the inconvenience caused by employee’s inability to work on Saturdays); s ee also Campos v. City of Blue Springs, 289 F.3d 546 (8th Cir. 2002) (evidence supported religiously motivated constructive discharge based on plaintiff’s Native American spiritual beliefs); EEOC v. Essay Writing Oregon State University (INTO)! University of College Chicago Hospitals , 276 F.3d 326 (7th Cir. 2002) (evidence sufficient to writing Shawnigan School, proceed to trial in case brought on behalf of recruiter alleging constructive discharge based on her evangelical religious beliefs); Dachman v. Shalala , 2001 WL 533760 (4th Cir.

May 18, 2001) (unpublished) (Orthodox Jewish employee who was treated in the same manner as non-Jewish employees with similar performance and disciplinary records failed to show that she was terminated because of her religion); Altman v. Minn. Dep’t of Corr. , 251 F.3d 1199, 1203 (8th Cir. 2001) (in case raising both Title VII and uc art College, First Amendment claims, holding that employer may not discipline employees for religiously based conduct because it is religious in nature if it permits such conduct by other employees when not motivated by religious beliefs). However, not all employer decisions affect a term, condition, or privilege of employment as required to be actionable as disparate treatment. See, e.g. , Goldmeier v. Allstate Ins. Co. , 337 F.3d 629 (6th Cir.

2003) (resignation 53 days prior to effective date of employer’s policy that would have posed conflict with employees’ religious beliefs did not constitute constructive discharge); Shabat v. Blue Cross Blue Shield , 925 F. Supp. 977 (W.D.N.Y. 1996) (plaintiff’s contention that he received a promotion only by pressuring management did not allege an issues to write in a essay The University of Birmingham “adverse” employment action). [62] See infra § IV, Reasonable Accommodation. [63] 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) (discriminating in hiring, discharge, or otherwise with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of uc art requirement du Leman employment); see also 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(2) (discriminating by limiting, segregating, or classifying employees or applicants in reflective essay writing Windermere a way which would deprive or tend to deprive employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect employment status); cf. Uc Art Requirement College! Ansonia Bd. of Educ. v. Philbrook , 479 U.S. 60, 71 (1986) (a benefit “that is issues to write in a essay The University of Birmingham, part and parcel of the uc art requirement employment relationship may not be doled out in a discriminatory fashion, even if the employer would be free . . Essays Washington (INTO)! . not to provide the benefit at all”) (quoting Hishon v. King Spalding , 467 U.S. 69, 75 (1984)). However, at least one court has held that a private employer providing company resources to recognized employee “affinity groups” does not violate Title VII by denying this privilege to any group promoting or advocating any religious or political position, where the company excluded not only groups advocating a particular religious position but also those espousing religious indifference or opposition.

See Moranski v. General Motors Corp. , 433 F.3d 537 (7th Cir. 2005). [64] Delelegne v. Kinney Sys., Inc., 2004 WL 1281071 (D. College Du Leman! Mass. June 10, 2004) (Ethiopian Christian parking garage cashier could proceed to trial on to write about college The University, claims of religious harassment and discriminatory termination where he was not allowed to bring a Bible to College, work, pray, or display religious pictures in State University (INTO) his booth, while Somali Muslim employees were permitted to take prayer breaks and to display religious materials in their booths). [65] This fact pattern may also give rise to requirement, a denial of accommodation claim. See infra § IV-C-6.

[66] Determining whether religious expression disrupts co-workers or customers is discussed in §§ III-C and IV-C-6, infra . Additionally, in a government workplace, the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause and Establishment Clause may affect the employer’s or employee’s ability to restrict or engage in religious expression. Website Essays Washington State! See supra nn.11-15 infra nn.201-203 ; see also Federal Workplace Guidelines , supra n.11, at uc art requirement du Leman sections 2-B and 2-E, noting implications of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) for neutral rules that burden religion in the federal workplace. [67] 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(g) (permitting covered entities to discharge or refuse to “hire and employ” or refer an essay paper individual who does not meet federal security requirements). However, the requirement du Leman Commission is thinking studies Bishopstrow, aware of no statute or order that requires or permits distinctions based on uc art requirement College du Leman, religion. See infra § IV-B-5 (discussion of security requirements and Title VII’s accommodation obligation). [69] Compare Abrams v. Baylor Coll. of Med. , 805 F.2d 528 (5th Cir. Studies College! 1986) (being non-Jewish was not a BFOQ for a university which had a contract to supply physicians on rotation at a Saudi Arabian hospital when the requirement hospital presented no evidence to support its contention that Saudi Arabia would actually have refused an entry visa to of Birmingham, a Jewish faculty member), and Rasul v. District of College du Leman Columbia , 680 F. Supp.

436 (D.D.C. 1988) (Department of Corrections failed to demonstrate that Protestant religious affiliation was a BFOQ for position as prison chaplain because chaplains were recruited and hired on a facility-wide basis and were entrusted with the job of planning, directing, and Windermere School, maintaining a total religious program for all inmates, whatever their respective denominations), with Kern v. Dynalectron Corp ., 577 F. College Du Leman! Supp. 1196 (N.D. Critical! Tex. 1983) (requirement that pilot convert to Islam was a BFOQ which warranted employer’s refusal to hire him, inasmuch as requirement was not based on a preference of contractor performing work in Saudi Arabia, but on the fact that non?Muslim employees caught flying into Mecca would, under Saudi Arabian law, be beheaded), aff’d , 746 F.2d 810 (5th Cir. 1984), and Pime v. Loyola Univ. of Chicago , 803 F.2d 351 (7th Cir. 1986) (although university was not a religious organization under Title VII, the uc art requirement College court held that having some Jesuit presence in philosophy department was a BFOQ since university was founded by Jesuits, continues to writing paper Sevenoaks School, have Jesuit tradition, and College du Leman, requires all of its undergraduates to take philosophy).

[70] Faragher v. Boca Raton , 524 U.S. 775, 788 (1998) (harassment claims are actionable on any of Title VII’s protected bases); Meritor Sav. Bank, FSB v. Thinking Bishopstrow College! Vinson , 477 U.S. 57, 66 (1986) (the same Title VII harassment principle applies whether the College du Leman harassment is based on race, national origin, religion, or sex); see also Abramson, 260 F.3d at critical thinking Bishopstrow College 276; Hafford v. Du Leman! Seidner , 183 F.3d 506, 512 (6th Cir. 1999); Tillery v. ATSI, Inc. , 242 F. Supp. Writing Paper Sevenoaks School! 2d 1051, 1063 (N.D. Ala. 2003), aff’d , 97 Fed.

Appx. 906 (11th Cir. Du Leman! 2004) (Table). [71] See Venters v. City of reflective writing Windermere School Delphi , 123 F.3d 956 (7th Cir. 1997) (employee who was terminated after she disagreed with supervisor’s religious beliefs raised a triable Title VII harassment claim based on two separate theories of harassment liability: that a “tangible employment benefit” was conditioned upon acquiescing to her supervisor’s religious beliefs, and also that a hostile work environment was created). [72] Meritor Sav. Bank, 477 U.S. at 66 (1986) (prohibition on discrimination “in the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment” requires employers to maintain a workplace free from harassment based upon protected status).

[73] See, e.g., Venters , 123 F.3d at 964 (employee established that she was discharged on the basis of her religion after supervisor, among other things, repeatedly called her “evil” and stated that she had to share his Christian beliefs in order to be a good employee). [74] Many of the example’s facts are taken from uc art du Leman Sattar v. Paper School! Motorola, Inc ., 138 F.3d 1164 (7th Cir. 1998). Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! However, in Sattar the plaintiff did not prevail because the plaintiff failed to prove that his discharge was linked to the harassment by critical studies College his former supervisor. [75] Pederson v. Uc Art Requirement! Casey’s Gen. Stores, Inc. , 978 F. Supp.

926 (D. Bishopstrow College! Neb. 1997) (employer’s refusal to accommodate employee’s need to have Easter day off, while knowing that she could not compromise her religious needs and uc art requirement, where it would not have posed an Washington (INTO) undue hardship, amounted to requirement, constructive discharge in violation of Title VII). [76] Venters , 123 F.3d at 972 (“the accommodation framework . . . has no application when the employee alleges that he was fired because he did not share or follow his employer’s religious beliefs”). [77] Faragher , 524 U.S. at 788 (environmental harassment claims are actionable on critical College, any of Title VII’s protected bases); Meritor Sav. Bank, 477 U.S. at 67 (same); see also EEOC Enforcement Guidance: Vicarious Employer Liability for Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors (1999), available at https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harassment.html. [78] Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc. , 510 U.S. 17, 21 (1993). [79] Meritor Sav. Bank, 477 U.S. at 67. [80] Marcus v. West , 2002 WL 1263999, *11 (N.D.

Ill. June 3, 2002) (mistreatment of Sanctified Pentecostal Christian employee was not because of religion; supervisor mistreated all of her employees and had poor management and interpersonal skills). [81] Turner v. Barr , 811 F. Uc Art! Supp. 1, 2 (D.D.C. 1993) (hostile environment created where Jewish employee was subjected to a “joke” about the website essays for you Washington State Holocaust, denied opportunity to work overtime, and ridiculed as a “turnkey”; although the latter two incidents did not refer to uc art, religion, the facts showed that he was singled out for such treatment because of his religion). [82] See EEOC v. Essay Paper! Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. , 521 F.3d 306 (4th Cir. 2008) (reversing summary judgment for the employer and remanding the case for uc art College trial, the court ruled that a reasonable fact finder could conclude that a Muslim employee who wore a kufi as part of his religious observance was subjected to hostile work environment religious harassment when fellow employees repeatedly called him “Taliban” and “towel head,” made fun of his appearance, questioned his allegiance to the United States, suggested he was a terrorist, and essay Lake School, made comments associating all Muslims with senseless violence); EEOC v. WCM Enter., Inc. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! , 496 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. 2007) (reversing summary judgment for the employer and remanding the case for trial, the court ruled that a reasonable fact finder could conclude that harassment initiated after September 11, 2001, against a car salesman who was born in India and is a practicing Muslim was severe or pervasive and motivated by his national origin and religion). In Sunbelt , the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held: “we cannot regard as ‘merely offensive,’ and thus ‘beyond Title VII's purview,’ Harris , 510 U.S. at 21, constant and issues to write in a of Birmingham, repetitive abuse founded upon misperceptions that all Muslims possess hostile designs against the United States, that all Muslims support jihad, that all Muslims were sympathetic to uc art College, the 9/11 attack, and that all Muslims are proponents of website writes essays for you radical Islam.” 521 F.3d at 318. [83] See Abramson, 260 F.3d at 279 (supervisor’s criticism of professor’s refusal to work on uc art du Leman, her Sabbath, scheduling meetings on Jewish holidays, and issues to write about in a college The University, charging her for leave on those holidays could be found to have “infected [professor’s] work experience” because of her religion). [84] Henson v. City of Dundee , 682 F.2d 897, 903 (11th Cir.

1982). [86] See WCM Enter. , 496 F.3d at 400-01 (plaintiff’s religious and national origin harassment claim was based on having been referred to College, as a “Muslim extremist,” and constantly called “Taliban” among other terms); Khan v. United Recovery Sys., Inc., 2005 WL 469603 (S.D. Tex. 2005) (plaintiff’s religious harassment claim was based on alleged comments by co-worker that court characterized as “malicious and vitriolic,” including that all Muslims are terrorists who should be killed, that he wished “all these Muslims were wiped off the issues about college face of the earth,” that plaintiff might get shot for wearing an uc art College “Allah” pendant, and questioning plaintiff about essay Oregon State what was being taught at her mosque and whether it was “connected with terrorists”; in addition, plaintiff alleged that her supervisor placed newspaper articles on her desk about mosques in Afghanistan that taught terrorism, along with a note telling her to come into his office and justify such activity). [87] Human resources professionals who responded to requirement du Leman, a survey by Bishopstrow the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) and the Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding reported that 19% of the employees in their organizations engaged in proselytizing to co-workers. While 32% of the employees perceived increased cooperation and communication within their organizations due to acceptance of du Leman religious diversity, 9% of the issues college The University employees felt harassed by uc art co-workers who expressed their religious beliefs.

Religion in the Workplace Survey, at 24 (Society for Human Resource Management, 2001) (executive summary and information on obtaining report available at http://www.tanenbaum.org/research.html (last visited July 2, 2008)). [88] Venters , 123 F.3d at 976 (because the employee made clear her objection to the comments by telling her supervisor he had “crossed the line,” she established that the comments were unwelcome). [89] Id. (“whatever questions there might have been as to whether Venters welcomed these discussions were answered as of th[e] date [that she told him he had crossed the essay paper line]”). [90] Harris , 510 U.S. at 21-22; Faragher , 524 U.S. at 788 (“We have made it clear that conduct must be extreme to amount to a change in uc art College the terms and conditions of employment.”). [91] Faragher , 524 U.S. at School 787-88; Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs. , 523 U.S. 75, 82-83 (1998) (“[t]he real social impact of workplace behavior often depends on a constellation of surrounding circumstances, expectations, and relationships which are not fully captured by a simple recitation of the requirement words used or the physical acts performed”); Harris , 510 U.S. at 23.

[92] Bains LLC v. Arco Prods. Co ., 405 F.3d 74 (9th Cir. 2005) (upholding finding of liability for harassment in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 where Sikh employees were regularly called “rag-heads” and “towel-heads,” and were asked to clean up fuel spills with their turbans). [93] Williams v. Gen. Motors Corp ., 187 F.3d 553, 564 (6th Cir. 1999) (“a work environment viewed as a whole may satisfy the University (INTO) legal definition of an abusive work environment, for purposes of a hostile environment claim, even though no single episode crosses the uc art requirement Title VII threshold”). [94] Jones v. United Space Alliance , 2006 WL 250761 (11th Cir. Essay Shawnigan! Feb. 3, 2006) (unpublished) (plaintiff, a member of the Apostolic/Pentecostal faith, alleged that he was subjected to a hostile work environment based on religion when his manager made derogatory remarks to him based on his religion, a co-worker removed from the uc art du Leman community bulletin board a flyer describing events at thinking studies College the plaintiff’s church, the plaintiff’s manager told him to remove the lanyard for his identification badge because it had “Jesus” on it, his manager told him not to leave his Bible on uc art du Leman, his desk, he was asked to turn down the religious music that he played at work, and he was accused of having a conflict of interest with the space program because he was a pastor; in finding there was insufficient evidence of a hostile work environment, court ruled that the essay paper alleged incidents were not objectively severe or pervasive because none occurred on uc art College, a repeated basis, none were physically threatening or humiliating, and none interfered with the plaintiff’s job performance).

[95] EEOC v. AKZ Mgmt., Inc. , Civil Action No. 07-8356 (S.D.N.Y. consent decree filed Sept. 26, 2007) (settlement of religious harassment and disparate treatment claims on behalf of reflective essay writing School employees who were pressured by management to practice or conform to Scientology). See Johnson v. Spencer Press of Maine, Inc ., 364 F.3d 368 (1st Cir. 2004) (jury properly found harassment was severe and requirement College du Leman, pervasive where supervisor repeatedly insulted plaintiff and reflective writing, mocked his religious beliefs, and threatened him with violence); Sattar , 138 F.3d at requirement College 1167 (employee harassed with a barrage of essay writing University e-mails with dire warnings of the divine punishments that awaited those who refuse to follow Islam) ; Preferred Mgmt. Corp ., 216 F. Supp. 2d 763 (Christian employer violated Title VII by requiring employees to conform to College du Leman, her views). [96] Harris , 510 U.S. at 21; Meritor , 477 U.S. at 64.

[97] Harris , 510 U.S. at 22 (“even without regard to writing Oregon State University (INTO), these tangible effects, the very fact that the discriminatory conduct was so severe or pervasive that it created a work environment abusive to employees because of their race, gender, religion, or national origin offends Title VII’s broad rule of workplace equality . . . . Certainly Title VII bars conduct that would seriously affect a reasonable person’s psychological well?being, but the statute is not limited to such conduct”); s ee Dey v. Colt Const. Dev. Co ., 28 F.3d 1446, 1454-55 (7th Cir. 1994) (“The mention in Harris of an unreasonable interference with work performance was not intended to penalize the employee who possesses the uc art requirement College du Leman dedication and fortitude to complete her assigned tasks even in the face of global State University offensive and abusive [conduct] . . . . Uc Art Du Leman! As Justice Scalia separately explained in Harris , the test under Title VII ‘is not whether work has been impaired, but whether working conditions have been discriminatorily altered.’”) (citation omitted). [98] See Harris , 510 U.S. at 23 (“whether an environment is ‘hostile’ or ‘abusive’ can be determined only by thinking Bishopstrow College looking at all the circumstances . . . ; no single factor is required”). [99] Faragher , 524 U.S. at College 788 (citing Oncale , 523 U.S. at critical studies Bishopstrow 80); Sheikh v. Indep.

Sch. Dist. 535 , 2001 WL 1636504 (D. Minn. Oct. Requirement Du Leman! 18, 2001) (a Muslim employee who was ostracized by colleagues because he refused to shake hands with female colleagues did not suffer a materially adverse change in the terms and conditions of issues about college essay The University employment). [100] See Marcus , 2002 WL 1263999 at uc art requirement du Leman *11 (asking very religious employee to swear on a Bible to resolve differences with a colleague and telling her that people did not like her “church lady act” are isolated incidents that were not severe or pervasive enough to create a hostile work environment); Sublett v. Edgewood Universal Cabling Sys., Inc. , 194 F. Supp. Writing Paper School! 2d 692, 703 (S.D. Ohio 2002) (supervisor’s single comment to Rastafarian employee that “those dread things” made him look too “radical” was not sufficiently severe to create a hostile environment). [101] Cf.

Tessler v. KHOW Radio, Inc. , 1997 WL 458489 at *8 (D. Uc Art Du Leman! Colo. Apr. 21, 1997). [102] Cf. Brown v. Polk County , 61 F.3d at 656-57 (it did not pose an undue hardship for employer to accommodate supervisor’s sporadic and for scholarships Shawnigan, voluntary prayers during workplace meetings). [103] Williams , 187 F.3d at 563 (in determining whether the alleged conduct rises to requirement College, the level of severe or pervasive, a court should consider the factual “totality of the essay writing Oregon (INTO) circumstances”; using a “holistic perspective is necessary, keeping in College du Leman mind that each successive episode has its predecessors, that the impact of the separate incidents may accumulate, and that the website writes for you University (INTO) work environment created thereby may exceed the sum of the individual episodes”). [104] Cf . Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! Johnson v. Spencer Press of Maine, Inc. , 364 F.3d 368 (1st Cir.

2004) (affirming jury verdict for plaintiff on religious harassment claim, court noted that plaintiff testified supervisor who made ongoing derogatory remarks about plaintiff’s religion also once put the point of essay a knife under plaintiff’s chin, in addition to threatening to kill him with a hand grenade, run him over with a car, and shoot him with a bow and College, arrow). [105] As with any harassment claim, employer liability will depend on writing Oregon State (INTO), whether the uc art requirement College du Leman employee can show, in a case of co-worker harassment, that the employer knew or should have known of the essay paper misconduct and failed to take prompt and appropriate corrective action. Additionally, in the case of harassment by non-employees, employer liability will depend on whether the employer had control over such individuals’ misconduct. Uc Art! For standards regarding liability for harassment by essays for you State supervisors, see EEOC Enforcement Guidance: Vicarious Employer Liability for Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors (1999), available at https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harassment.html. [106] See Peters v. Renaissance Hotel Operating Co. , 307 F.3d 535 (7th Cir. 2002) (the impact of uc art College actions not directed at writes essays for you Washington State (INTO) a complaining employee is not as great as the impact of harassment directed at him and the combined impact of all the comments was not severe or pervasive enough to uc art College du Leman, create an essay paper Sevenoaks unlawful hostile environment). [107] Burlington Indus., Inc. v. Ellerth , 524 U.S. 742, 762 (1998); Faragher , 524 U.S. at uc art requirement College 788; Preferred Mgmt. Corp. , 216 F. Supp. 2d at essay writing global Oregon State 839 n.25 (employer’s anti-harassment policy was inadequate because it did not include a prohibition on religious harassment, employer did not provide training on religious harassment, and managers responded to complaints of religious harassment by uc art requirement College du Leman requiring employees to essay Shawnigan Lake School, participate in a training program based on religious principles). Requirement Du Leman! However, under agency principles an employer is issues to write, automatically liable for uc art requirement College hostile work environment harassment even if it does not result in a tangible employment action if “the agent’s high rank in the company makes him or her the employer’s alter ego.” Ellerth , 524 U.S. at 758.

If the essay global harasser is of a sufficiently high rank to fall “within that class of an employer organization’s officials who may be treated as the organization’s proxy,” which would include officials such as a company president, owner, partner, or corporate officer, the harassment is automatically imputed to the employer and no affirmative defense can be raised. Faragher , 524 U.S. at 789 see also EEOC Enforcement Guidance: Vicarious Employer Liability for uc art requirement College du Leman Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors (1999), https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harassment.html. [108] Sheikh , 2001 WL 1636504 at *5 (employer not liable because it took steps to stop alleged harassment of Muslim employee by issues to write in a college essay The University of Birmingham his co-workers); see Guidelines on Discrimination Because of National Origin , 29 C.F.R. Uc Art Requirement! § 1606.8(d) (employer liable for co-worker harassment about studies College which it knew or should have known and failed to act). [109] Cf. Powell v. Uc Art Requirement College! Yellow Book USA, Inc. , 445 F.3d 1074 (8th Cir. 2006) (employer not liable for religious harassment of to write about in a college of Birmingham plaintiff because upon learning of her complaints about uc art requirement College a co-worker’s proselytizing, the employer promptly held a meeting and told the co-worker to stop discussing religion matters with plaintiff, and there was evidence that the company continued to monitor the essay writing Lake situation to ensure that the co-worker did not resume her proselytizing). [110] 29 C.F.R. Requirement! § 1606.8(e). Berry v. Delta Airlines, Inc. , 260 F.3d 803 (7th Cir.

2001) (employer not liable for alleged sexual harassment of essays for you State University (INTO) its female employee by a male contractor because it promptly investigated the allegations, requested a change in the contractor’s shift so that he would not have contact with the College du Leman employee, and asked that all contractors be required to view sexual harassment training video). [111] When asked whether they had discussed religion in essay writing for scholarships Shawnigan the workplace in the past twenty-four hours, 48% of Americans answered yes. See George Gallup, Jr. Timothy Jones, The Next American Spirituality: Finding God in the Twenty-First Century , at 72 (Cook Communication Ministries 2000). [112] Employers are permitted to exercise their religion to the extent that such exercise does not infringe on their employees’ religious beliefs. Townley , 859 F.2d at 621 (“Where the du Leman religious practices of employers . . . and employees conflict, Title VII does not, and issues to write about The University of Birmingham, could not, require individual employers to requirement, abandon their religion. Rather, Title VII attempts to reach a mutual accommodation of the conflicting religious practices.”). [113] In a survey conducted by essay writing School the Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding, 66% of employees surveyed reported that they had witnessed religious discrimination in the workplace. Religious Bias in requirement College du Leman the Workplace: The Employee’s View (Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding, 1999) (executive summary available at for scholarships School http://www.tanenbaum.org/research_1999.html ) (last visited July 2, 2008).

[114] See Examples 15, 18-19, 27-28, 49-50. For a further discussion of the circumstances under which reasonable accommodation of religious expression in uc art requirement the workplace, including proselytizing, may be denied because it poses an undue hardship on website essays for you Washington State University (INTO), the conduct of the employer’s business, see infra § IV-C-6. [115] Cf. Bodett v. CoxCom, Inc. , 366 F.3d 736 (9th Cir. Requirement College! 2004) (employer prevailed on claim brought by terminated employee for critical Bishopstrow disparate treatment based on religion; employee’s violation of requirement College du Leman employer’s anti-harassment policy was a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for termination, even if the violations were motivated by critical studies Bishopstrow College the employee’s religious beliefs). [116] 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j); Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(b). [117] Compare Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Uc Art! Hardison, 432 U.S. 63, 84 (1977) (interpreting Title VII “undue hardship” standard, with 42 U.S.C. Essay Writing! § 12111(10)(A) (defining ADA “undue hardship” standard); see infra n.139. [118] Protos v. Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 797 F.2d 129, 136 (3d Cir.

1986) (“[t]his is . . . part of our ‘happy tradition’ of College avoiding unnecessary clashes with the dictates of conscience”) (citation omitted). [119] See Seshadri v. Kasraian , 130 F.3d 798, 800 (7th Cir. 1997) (employee who seeks accommodation need not belong to essay State University (INTO), an established church but cannot preclude inquiry into uc art du Leman whether he has a religion); Chrysler Corp. v. Mann , 561 F.2d 1282, 1285 (8th Cir. 1977) (observing that the plaintiff “did little to acquaint Chrysler with his religion and its potential impact upon his ability to perform his job”); s ee also Redmond , 574 F.2d at 902 (relying on Mann , concluding that “an employee who is disinterested in informing his employer of his religious needs ‘may forego the right to have his beliefs accommodated by his employer’”). [120] See Heller , 8 F.3d at 1439 (employee’s request for about in a college essay leave to participate in religious conversion ceremony of his wife and children was sufficient to place employer on notice that this was pursuant to a religious practice or belief; an employer need have “only enough information about an uc art du Leman employee's religious needs to issues to write in a college essay, permit the employer to uc art requirement College, understand the existence of a conflict between the employee's religious practices and the employer's job requirements”); Brown v. Polk County , 61 F.3d at 654 (even though employee did not explicitly ask for a religious accommodation, court held employer was on notice of the need for accommodation given that it reprimanded employee for engaging in known religious activities); Hellinger v. Eckerd Corp., 67 F. To Write Of Birmingham! Supp. 2d 1359 (S.D. Uc Art! Fla. 1999) (although applicant did not himself inform employer about his religious conflict on his job application, employer had learned when he contacted applicant’s former supervisor for essay writing warming State a reference that the uc art requirement College du Leman applicant had refused to sell condoms at prior job due to a religious objection, and issues to write about in a of Birmingham, was therefore on notice); cf. Wessling , 554 F. Supp. at 552 (employee’s request to leave work early in order to arrive early for a Christmas play at her church in order to decorate and receive children was insufficient to place her employer on notice of requirement College du Leman a religious practice; it was more in essay writing Windermere School the nature of uc art du Leman a social activity or family obligation that happened to essay warming Oregon State University, be associated with the church). [121] Cary v. Requirement Du Leman! Carmichael, 908 F. Supp.

1334 (E.D. Essay Writing Paper School! Va. 1995), aff’d , 116 F.3d 472 (4th Cir. 1997); see also Elmenayer v. Uc Art! ABF Freight Sys. , 2001 WL 1152815 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 20, 2001) (employer not liable for disciplining employee for tardiness where employee failed until after his discharge to explain that tardiness was because he attended a prayer service), aff’d on other grounds , 318 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2003). [122] Notwithstanding the different legal standards for determining when a failure to website writes Washington University (INTO), accommodate poses an undue hardship under Title VII and the ADA, see supra n.117, courts have endorsed a cooperative information-sharing process between employer and employee, similar to the “interactive process” used for disability accommodation requests under the uc art requirement ADA. To Write In A Essay Of Birmingham! See, e.g., Thomas v. Requirement! Nat’l Ass’n of Letter Carriers , 225 F.3d 1149, 1155 n.5 (10th Cir. Writing Global Oregon State (INTO)! 2000) (“the [ADA] ‘interactive process’ rationale is equally applicable to uc art requirement College du Leman, the obligation to offer a reasonable accommodation to School, an individual whose religious beliefs conflict with an employment requirement”); Elmenayer , 2001 WL 1152815, at *5 (same), aff’d on other grounds , 318 F.3d 130 ; Kenner v. Domtar Indus., Inc ., 2006 WL 662466 (W.D.

Ark. Mar. Requirement College! 13, 2006) (“Title VII’s reasonable accommodation provisions contemplate an interactive process, with cooperation between the employer and the employee, but which must be initiated by issues to write about in a college The University the employer”); Cosme v. Henderson , 2000 WL 1682755, *6 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2000) (“[t]he process of finding a reasonable [religious] accommodation is uc art requirement du Leman, intended to be an interactive process in which both the employer and employee participate”), aff’d , 287 F.3d 152 (3d Cir. 2002); cf. Writing! Ansonia Bd. of Educ. , 479 U.S. at 69 (“courts have noted that ‘bilateral cooperation is appropriate in the search for an acceptable reconciliation of the needs of the employee’s religion and the exigencies of the College du Leman employer’s business’”) (quoting Brener v. Diagnostic Ctr. Essay Windermere School! Hosp. Requirement College! , 671 F.2d 141, 145-46 (5th Cir. 1982)). [123] EEOC v. Arlington Transit Mix, Inc ., 957 F.2d 219, 222 (6th Cir.

1991) (“[a]fter failing to pursue [a voluntary waiver of seniority rights] or any other reasonable accommodation, the company is in no position to argue that it was unable to critical thinking Bishopstrow College, accommodate reasonably [plaintiff’s] religious needs without undue hardship on the conduct of its business”); EEOC v. Uc Art College Du Leman! Ithaca Indus., Inc. , 849 F.2d 116 (4th Cir. 1988) (employer’s failure to essay School, attempt to accommodate violated Title VII). [124] Shelton v. Univ. of College du Leman Med. Essay Writing For Scholarships Shawnigan School! Dentistry of uc art requirement N.J. Essays Washington! , 223 F.3d 220, 227 (3d Cir. 2000) (by refusing to uc art College du Leman, meet with employer’s human resources department, employee failed to issues to write about, satisfy her duty to cooperate in finding a reasonable accommodation). [125] Ansonia Bd. of Educ. , 479 U.S. at 69 (employer could satisfy its obligation by offering an alternative reasonable accommodation to the particular one proposed by the employee); Brener , 671 F.2d at 146 (“employee has a correlative duty to make a good faith attempt to satisfy his needs through means offered by the employer”); EEOC v. AutoNation USA Corp ., 2002 WL 31650749 (9th Cir.

Nov. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! 22, 2002) (unpublished) (employer satisfied its initial burden by showing that it suggested possible accommodations but that the employee short-circuited the process by resigning without first giving the proposed accommodations the opportunity to be implemented or tested); Chrysler Corp. Bishopstrow! v. Mann , 561 F.2d 1282, 1286 (8th Cir. 1977) (where employee “will not attempt to accommodate his own beliefs through the uc art du Leman means already available to him or cooperate with his employer in its conciliatory efforts, he may forego the right to have his beliefs accommodated”), cert. denied , 434 U.S. 1039 (1978). [126] See also Bushouse , 164 F. Supp. 2d 1066. [127] Id. at 1078 n.18 (court held that union’s refusal to essay writing paper, provide accommodation unless employee produced independent corroboration that his accommodation request was motivated by a sincerely held religious belief did not violate Title VII’s religious accommodation provision, but cautioned that the holding was limited to “the facts and circumstances of the uc art requirement present case” and that “the inquiry [into sincerity] and scope of that inquiry will necessarily vary based upon the individual requesting corroboration and the facts and circumstances of the request”).

[128] EEOC v. Tyson Foods, Inc ., Civil Action No. Website For You University! 99-5126 (W.D. Ark. Uc Art College! consent decree entered Aug. 14, 2000) (settlement of Title VII challenge to employer’s policy of requiring a letter from a church in support of writing all accommodation requests). [129] See EEOC v. Requirement! Ilona of Hungary, Inc. , 108 F.3d 1569 (7th Cir. 1997) (employer did not satisfy reasonable accommodation requirement by offering to let Jewish employees take off a day other than Yom Kippur, because that would not eliminate the conflict between religion and work); Shelton , 223 F.3d at 225 (citing Ansonia Bd. of Educ ., 479 U.S. at website for you Washington University 68-69) (employer’s accommodation of requirement College du Leman granting unpaid leave for issues in a college essay religious observance instead of allowing use of paid personal days provided for in collective bargaining agreement (CBA), was a reasonable accommodation as long as use of the paid days was not allowed for requirement all purposes other than religious ones); cf. Bruff v. N. Global Oregon University! Mississippi Health Serv., Inc., 244 F.3d 495 (5th Cir.

2001) (hospital offered reasonable accommodation as a matter of law where it offered plaintiff who could not be accommodated in her current position thirty days and the assistance of its in-house employment counselor to find another position where the conflict between the duties and religious beliefs could be eliminated or reduced); EEOC v. Universal Mfg. Corp ., 914 F.2d 71 (5th Cir. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! 1990) (employer’s offer of five working days off or alternatively seven days off if employee worked one shift within that seven days, did not satisfy obligation to offer reasonable accommodation of her religious practice of refraining from work during seven-day religious festival, where employer did not show undue hardship). [130] See infra nn.131-133. Under the Commission’s approach, a reasonable accommodation must eliminate the conflict between work and religion unless such accommodation would impose an undue hardship, i.e. , more than de minimis cost or disruption on the employer’s business. Thinking Studies College! Some courts have approached the issue of requirement du Leman what is a reasonable accommodation in a manner that conflicts with longstanding Commission and judicial precedent. See, e.g., EEOC v. Firestone Fibers Textiles Co. , 515 F.3d 307 (4th Cir. 2008) (analyzing reasonableness of proposed accommodation based on facts typically considered as part of undue hardship analysis); Sturgill v. United Parcel Service, Inc. , 512 F.3d 1024 (8th Cir. 2008) (noting that terminology which describes a reasonable accommodation as one that eliminates any work-religion conflict is imprecise, because it may incorrectly imply that reasonableness is determined as a matter of law without regard to the facts of an individual case, or that an employer is not permitted to choose among alternative accommodations, or that even accommodations which conflict with a CBA or otherwise pose an undue hardship must be granted). The Commission’s approach is more straightforward and issues to write college essay The University of Birmingham, more in keeping with the purpose of Title VII’s accommodation requirement. Concerns about uc art College issues such as conflicts with a union contract or burdens on other employees’ settled expectations can and should be addressed in the context of whether or not it would impose an undue hardship.

Moreover, the employer need not grant an reflective essay writing Windermere employee’s requested reasonable accommodation if the employer wishes instead to offer an alternative accommodation of its own choosing that also would eliminate the uc art College du Leman work-religion conflict and does not adversely affect the employee’s terms, conditions, or privileges of employment. [131] In Ansonia Bd. of Educ., 479 U.S. at writing warming University 68-69, the Court held that an employer has met its obligation under § 701(j) of Title VII when it demonstrates that it has offered a reasonable accommodation to the employee; “where the employer has already reasonably accommodated the employee’s religious needs, the statutory inquiry is at an end. The employer need not further show that each of the employee’s alternative accommodations would result in requirement undue hardship.” Cf. Essay Shawnigan Lake! Opuku?Boateng v. California, 95 F.3d 1461 (9th Cir. 1996) (where employer offered no accommodation and employee offered several possibilities, such as scheduling him instead for other equally undesirable shifts and College du Leman, adopting a system of voluntary or mandatory shift trades, the employer had to accept one of the essay writing School employee’s proposals unless doing so would create an undue hardship). This section addresses only whether the accommodation was reasonable. An employer that does not provide a reasonable accommodation may nevertheless avoid liability if it shows that providing the accommodation would pose an undue hardship. Undue hardship is addressed below in College du Leman § IV.B. [132] Ansonia Bd. of Educ. , 479 U.S. at 70-71 (“requiring [an employee] to take unpaid leave for holy day observance rather than use personal paid leave days provided for critical Bishopstrow College under CBA would generally be a reasonable accommodation” because it has “no direct effect upon either employment opportunities or job status,” but “unpaid leave is not a reasonable accommodation when paid leave is provided for requirement College all purposes except religious ones . . . [s]uch an arrangement would display a discrimination against to write in a college The University, religious practices that is the antithesis of reasonableness”).

In cases involving requests for schedule changes or leave as an accommodation, an employer does not have to provide paid leave as an accommodation beyond that otherwise available to the employee, but may have to provide unpaid leave as an uc art du Leman accommodation if it would not pose an undue hardship. [133] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(c)(2)(ii) (“when there is more than one means of accommodation that would not cause undue hardship, the employer or labor organization must offer the alternative which least disadvantages the website Washington individual’s employment opportunities”). The Commission’s guidelines do not require an requirement College employer to accept any alternative favored by the employee, and, thus, are not inconsistent with Ansonia . In fact, the Court in Ansonia recognized that the limitation in essay for scholarships Shawnigan Lake School the Commission’s guidelines that alternatives must be considered if they will not “disadvantage an individual’s employment opportunities” distinguished the Commission’s position from the position of the Second Circuit that was rejected in Ansonia . 470 U.S. at 69 n.6. Uc Art Requirement College! Appellate courts in the wake of essay writing global Oregon State University Ansonia have, as the Commission’s guidelines instruct, evaluated whether employer accommodations had a negative impact on the individual’s employment opportunities. See Cosme v. Henderson , 287 F.3d 152, 160 (2d Cir. 2002) (an accommodation might be unreasonable if it imposes a “significant work-related burden on the employee without justification”); Wright v. Runyon , 2 F.3d 214, 217 (7th Cir. 1993) (whether an College accommodation is reasonable requires a more searching inquiry if an employee, “in order to essay writing Sevenoaks School, accommodate his religious practices, had to uc art, accept a reduction in pay or some other loss of in a college benefits”). [134] Smith v. Pyro Mining Co. , 827 F.2d 1081, 1085 (6th Cir. 1987) (quoting Redmond , 574 F.2d at uc art College du Leman 902-03). [135] Baker v. Home Depot , 445 F.3d 541 (2d Cir.

2006) (employer’s offer to schedule employee to work in the afternoon or evenings on Sundays, rather than the mornings, was not a “reasonable” accommodation under Title VII where employee’s religious views required not only attending Sunday church services but also refraining from work on Sundays). [136] Wilshin v. Allstate Ins. Co., 212 F. Supp. 2d 1360 (M.D. Ga. 2002) (employer satisfied obligation to accommodate employee’s Saturday Sabbath observance by offering Sunday work hours instead, notwithstanding that employee would have preferred weekday hours). [137] Shelton , 223 F.3d at 226 (state hospital’s offer to transfer nurse to newborn intensive care unit was reasonable accommodation for her religious beliefs which prevented her from assisting in emergency procedures to terminate pregnancies, where nurse presented no evidence that transfer would affect her salary or benefits); see also Rodriguez v. City of Chicago, 156 F.3d 771 (7th Cir.

1998) (city’s offer to allow police officer to essay for scholarships Shawnigan Lake, exercise his right under CBA to transfer to a district with no abortion clinics resolved his religious objection to being assigned to guard such facilities; Title VII did not compel employer to College, instead grant his preferred accommodation of remaining in essay paper Sevenoaks School his district but being relieved of such assignments); Wright , 2 F.3d at 217 (7th Cir. Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! 1993) (employer reasonably accommodated employee by suggesting he exercise his rights under CBA to Windermere School, bid on jobs that would have eliminated the conflict between work and religion). [138] Townley , 859 F.2d at 614 n.5 (citing Am. Postal Workers Union v. Postmaster , 781 F.2d 772, 774?75 (9th Cir. 1986)); see also Rodriguez v. City of Chicago, 1996 WL 22964, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 12, 1996) (rejecting employer’s argument that a threat of adverse action is not enough to state a claim; “it is uc art du Leman, nonsensical to suggest that an employee who, when forced by his employer to reflective essay Windermere School, choose between his job and his faith, elects to avoid potential financial and/or professional damage by acceding to requirement, his employer’s religiously objectionable demands has not been the victim of religious discrimination”).

Moreover, a denial of reflective Windermere accommodation claim can be brought if the employer could have provided an accommodation absent undue hardship that did not disadvantage a term, condition, or privilege of employment, but did not do so. For example, if a Muslim employee is transferred to non-customer service position because she refuses to stop wearing a religiously mandated headscarf, she states a claim for uc art denial of accommodation under Title VII. Draper v. U.S. Global Warming Oregon State (INTO)! Pipe Foundry Co. , 527 F.2d 515 (6th Cir. 1975) (resorting to requirement, transfer where accommodation was possible in issues to write about The University of Birmingham employee’s current position is uc art du Leman, actionable as denial of reasonable accommodation). However, an employer need not accommodate an essay warming State University (INTO) employee who chooses to resign before notifying the employer of the need for accommodation or fails to cooperate with the employer in the accommodation process. See, e.g., Goldmeier v. Allstate Ins. Co. , 337 F.3d 629 (6th Cir. 2003) (resignation 53 days prior to effective date of employer’s policy that would have posed conflict with employees’ religious beliefs did not constitute constructive discharge); Lawson v. Washington , 296 F.3d 799 (9th Cir. 2002) (Jehovah’s Witness who quit state patrol rather than salute the flag or take an uc art requirement College du Leman oath in violation of his religious beliefs was not constructively discharged and thus was not subject to an adverse employment action where, rather than request accommodation, he informed employer that he was resigning due to essay writing School, his religious conflict); Shelton v. Univ. of Med.

Dentistry of N.J. , 223 F.3d 220, 227 (3d Cir. 2000) (employee who refused to meet with employer’s human resources department to College du Leman, pursue alternative accommodations could not argue that accommodation employer offered was not reasonable). [139] Townley , 859 F.2d at writing for scholarships Shawnigan School 614 n.5 ; Rodriguez, 1996 WL 22964. [140] Cooper , 15 F.3d at 1379 (Seventh-day Adventist employee’s need for accommodation to observe Sabbath had changed in du Leman the 17 months since employer had last scheduled her to work on a Friday night or Saturday; her “undisputed testimony was that her faith and commitment to her religion grew during this time”). [141] See, e.g., Hardison, 432 U.S. at 84. This “more than de minimis ” Title VII undue hardship standard is thinking Bishopstrow College, substantially lower than the ADA undue hardship standard, which requires employers to uc art College du Leman, show that the accommodation would cause “significant difficulty or expense.” [142] Both the statute, at 42 U.S.C. To Write College Essay The University Of Birmingham! § 2000e(j), and the Commission Guidelines , at uc art College du Leman 29 C.F.R. Reflective Essay! § 1605.2(b), require an employer to uc art requirement College, reasonably accommodate an employee’s or applicant’s religious beliefs and practices “unless the employer demonstrates” that doing so would pose an undue hardship. Even under the Fourth Circuit’s decision in EEOC v. Firestone , and the Eighth Circuit’s decision in Sturgill v. United Parcel Service , where courts focused on essay writing State, reasonableness before looking at undue hardship, the employer still has the burden of persuasion. Firestone , 515 F.3d at 315; Sturgill , 512 F.3d at 1033 n.4. [143] Tooley v. Martin Marietta Corp. , 648 F.2d 1239, 1243 (9th Cir. 1981).

[144] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e). [145] Compare Cooper , 15 F.3d at 1380(employee’s request not to be scheduled for Saturday work due to Sabbath observance posed undue hardship for employer because it would have required hiring an additional worker), and Beadle v. Tampa , 42 F.3d 633 (11th Cir. 1995) (requiring police department to alter training program schedule involving more than 900 employees to accommodate one employee’s religious needs amounts to more than de minimis cost and thus undue hardship), with Protos , 797 F.2d 129 (employee’s request not to be scheduled for Saturday work due to uc art requirement, Sabbath observance did not pose undue hardship where employer made no showing that efficiency, production, or quality would be affected and entire assembly line remained intact notwithstanding employee’s Saturday absences). [146] See Brown v. Gen. Motors Corp., 601 F.2d 956, 960 (8th Cir. 1979) (“projected ‘theoretical’ future effects cannot outweigh the undisputed fact that no monetary costs and de minimis efficiency problems were actually incurred during the three month period in which [employee] was accommodated”); EEOC v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, LLC , 432 F. Supp. 2d 1006 (D. Ariz. 2006) (employer incorrectly believed that if it allowed plaintiff to wear her religious headscarf it could not enforce its uniform policy with respect to other employees, and failed to show undue hardship based on its fear that allowing the essay School accommodation would open “the floodgates to others violating the uniform policy”).

[147] Tooley , 648 F.2d at requirement 1243 (“undue hardship cannot be supported by merely conceivable or hypothetical hardships . . Writing For Scholarships Shawnigan! . Uc Art College! . The magnitude as well as the fact of to write hardship must be determined by du Leman ‘actual imposition on co-workers or disruption of the work routine’”) (quoting Anderson v. Reflective Essay School! Gen. Dynamics Convair Aerospace Div. , 589 F.2d 397, 406-07 (9th Cir. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! 1978)); EEOC v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, LLC , 432 F. Writing School! Supp. College Du Leman! 2d at 1016 (“‘hypothetical hardships’” based on assumptions or “pure speculation” about accommodations which have never been put into practice are insufficient to show undue hardship”). [149] Id. Compare EEOC and Electrolux Reach Voluntary Resolution in essay State University Class Religious Accommodation Case (press release available at requirement College du Leman https://www.eeoc.gov/press/9-24-03.html, Sept. 24, 2003) (settlement whereby employer agreed to accommodate the reflective essay Windermere School religious request of 165 Somali workers who, pursuant to the tenets of the Islamic faith, must offer at least five daily prayers, two of which must be observed within a restricted time period of between one and two hours) with Farah v. Whirlpool Corp ., 3:02cv424 (M.D.

Tenn. Oct. 16, 2004) (jury verdict entered in favor of employer, which argued that allowing 40 Muslim factory workers to take a break from the line for uc art College their sunset prayers at the same time would result in an undue hardship because as a result of their absence, the line would have to be shut down). [150] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e)(1). Under Title VII, for example, in Hardison , the website for you (INTO) payment of overtime (or premium pay) to another employee so that plaintiff could be off for requirement du Leman weekly religious observance was an undue hardship. Id . By contrast, infrequent pay of essay School premium wages for uc art du Leman an occasional religious observance is not “more than de minimis .” See, e.g., EEOC v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Issues To Write In A College! LP , 2007 WL 2891379 (E.D. Ark. Oct. 3, 2007) (summary judgment for uc art requirement employer denied on claim by two employees that they were improperly denied leave for an annual religious observance that would have required company to pay two other workers overtime wages of approximately $220 each to fill in, where the facility routinely paid technicians overtime, the employer failed to contact the union about reflective writing School possible accommodation, the uc art requirement College du Leman policy providing for only one technician on writing Shawnigan School, leave per day was not always observed, and there was no evidence that customer service needs actually went unmet on the day at issue) (jury verdict for plaintiffs subsequently entered), appeal docketed , Case No.

08-1096 (8th Cir. Du Leman! filed Jan. Writing Sevenoaks! 10, 2008); Brown v. Gen. Uc Art College! Motors Corp. , 601 F.2d at of Birmingham 959-60 (no more than de minimis cost imposed by allowing employee to leave work at Sundown on Friday where he did not receive any pay for the time missed, a replacement worker was readily available to fill in for him on the shift during the hours he missed because the company maintained “extra board men” who were at all times available to replace unscheduled absences of uc art requirement du Leman regular employees); Burns v. Essay Warming Oregon (INTO)! S. Uc Art Requirement College! Pac. Transp. Essay Writing Paper Sevenoaks School! Co. , 589 F.2d 403, 407 (9th Cir. Uc Art Du Leman! 1978) (excusing employee from paying his monthly $19 union dues due to religious objection did not pose an undue hardship, where one union officer testified that the loss “wouldn’t affect us at all”; the loss was also de minimis because “even if so necessary to its fiscal well?being that its equivalent would be collected from the Local’s 300 members at a rate of 2 cents each per month; an accommodation that would only result in an increase of other union members dues in amount of 24 cents per year was de minimis ; unions asserted fear that many more religious objectors would request similar accommodation, resulting in greater cost, was based on mere speculation); EEOC v. IBP, Inc. , 824 F. Essay Warming State! Supp. 147 (C.D. Ill. 1993) (adopting EEOC’s interpretation in the Commission Guidelines that undue hardship means, with respect to costs for a substitute, “costs similar to the regular payment of premium wages,” and holding that “[i]nfrequent payment of premium wages made on a temporary basis and administrative costs associated with implementing an accommodation are considered de minimis , although the ultimate determination is made with ‘due regard given to uc art College du Leman, the identifiable cost in relation to the size and operating cost of the writing paper Sevenoaks employer.’ 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e)(1)).” [151] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e)(1); Redmond , 574 F.2d at 904 (employer could not demonstrate that paying replacement worker premium wages would cause undue hardship because plaintiff would have been paid premium wages for the hours at issue). [152] Protos , 797 F.2d at 134-35; Brown v. Polk County , 61 F.3d at College du Leman 655 (allowing employee to assign secretary to type his Bible study notes posed more than de minimis cost because secretary would otherwise have been performing employer’s work during that time). [153] “[A]n employer need not accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs if doing so would result in discrimination against reflective essay writing Windermere, his co-workers or deprive them of uc art College du Leman contractual or other statutory rights.” Peterson v. Hewlett-Packard Co. , 358 F.3d 599 (9th Cir.

2004) (also holding that employee’s proposed accommodation of global warming (INTO) either allowing him to post religiously motivated messages intended to College, demean and harass co-workers, or the company deleting sexual orientation from its voluntarily adopted diversity and website writes for you Washington State University, non-discrimination policy, would have posed an undue hardship on the employer); EEOC v. BJ Servs. Co. , 921 F. Uc Art Requirement College! Supp. 1509 (N.D. Tex. Writing Shawnigan School! 1995) (employer was unable to accommodate employee’s religious request for certain day off because no other employees were available to work, there were safety concerns regarding untrained substitute personnel, there were significant costs in bringing employees from other locations, and this accommodation would deny other employees their day off); Virts v. Consol. Requirement! Freightways Corp. of Delaware , 285 F.3d 508 (6th Cir. 2002) (trucking firm had no obligation under Title VII to accommodate a driver’s religious request for only male driving partners, where making assignments in this manner would have violated collective bargaining agreement). [154] BJ Servs. Co., 921 F. Bishopstrow! Supp. at 1509; Balint v. Carson City, Nevada , 180 F.3d 1047, 1054 (9th Cir. Uc Art Du Leman! 1999) (citing Bhatia v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. , 734 F.2d 1382, 1384 (9th Cir.1984) (cost of plaintiff’s requested accommodation was more than de minimis when it required co-workers to assume plaintiff’s share of the hazardous work)); Bruff 244 F.3d at 501 (requiring co-workers of plaintiff mental health counselor to assume disproportionate workload to thinking studies College, accommodate plaintiff’s request not to counsel certain clients on religious grounds would constitute undue hardship). [155] See, e.g., Sutton v. Providence St.

Joseph Med. Ctr. , 192 F.3d 826 (9th Cir. 1999) (employer not required to accommodate job applicant’s religiously based refusal to provide his social security number where employer sought it to comply with Internal Revenue Service and uc art, Immigration and essay writing Windermere, Naturalization Service requirements). However, an employer should not assume that it would pose an College du Leman undue hardship to accommodate a religious practice that appears to conflict with a generally applicable safety requirement, but rather should assess whether an undue hardship is actually posed. For example, there are existing religious exemptions to the government enforcement procedures of writes essays for you University some safety requirements.

See, e.g. , U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration STD 1-6.5 (“Exemption for Religious Reason from Wearing Hard Hats”) (June 20, 1994) (exempting employers from citations for certain violations based on religious objection of employee, but providing for various reporting requirements). [156] See EEOC v. Oak-Rite Mfg. Corp. , 2001 WL 1168156 (S.D. Ind. Aug. 21, 2001) (manufacturing employee’s proposed accommodation of wearing close-fitting denim or canvas dress or skirt that extends to within two or three inches above the ankle would impose an undue hardship on employer by requiring it to experiment with employee safety, given the absence of evidence demonstrating safety of proposed accommodation in uc art College du Leman a comparable work setting); EEOC v. Website Washington! Brink’s Inc., No. Uc Art College! 1:02-CV-0111 (C.D. Ill.) (consent decree filed Dec. Critical College! 27, 2002) (settlement of case alleging that employee was denied reasonable accommodation when she sought to wear culottes made out of messenger uniform material, rather than the required trousers, because her Pentecostal Christian beliefs precluded her from wearing pants); c f. Webb v. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! City of Philadelphia, 2007 WL 1866763 (E.D.

Pa. June 27, 2007) (undue hardship to accommodate the wearing of a traditional religious headpiece called a khimar by a Muslim police officer while in critical studies uniform, where evidence showed dress code in para-military organization promotes cooperation, fosters esprit de corps, emphasizes the hierarchical nature of the police force, and portrays a sense of authority as well as public and religious neutrality to the public). [157] Hardison, 432 U.S. at 80; Stolley v. Uc Art Requirement College! Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co. , 2007 WL 1010418 (5th Cir. Paper Sevenoaks School! March 28, 2007) (unpublished) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the uc art requirement employer, the court ruled that a newly-hired aircraft assembly line worker was not entitled to have the employer reassign him to reflective essay writing School, a different shift as an accommodation for his Sabbath observance, because the employer’s union contract dictated that shift swapping and transfers would be based on seniority and the union was unwilling to waive the contract in this case); see also Balint , 180 F.3d at 1054. [158] Balint, 180 F.3d at 1054; Killebrew v. Local Union 1683 of Am. Uc Art Du Leman! Fed’n of State, County, Mun. Employees, AFL-CIO, 651 F. Paper! Supp. 95 (W.D. Ky. 1986) (union not required to negotiate a change in the CBA to allow an employee to bump another employee to obtain an accommodation because bumping would have been detrimental to requirement du Leman, those bumped); see also Virts v. Consol. Freightways Corp. of Delaware , 285 F.3d 508 (6th Cir.

2002) (trucking firm had no obligation under Title VII to accommodate a driver’s religious request for only male driving partners, where making assignments in this manner would have violated CBA); Weber v. Roadway Express, Inc. , 199 F.3d 270 (5th Cir. 2000) (same); Thomas , 225 F.3d 1149 (because seniority system in CBA gave more senior employees first choice for job assignments, it would be an undue hardship for employer to essay writing Windermere, grant employee’s accommodation request not to uc art requirement College, be scheduled to essay for scholarships Lake, work on Saturdays); Mann v. Frank , 7 F.3d 1365 (8th Cir.1993) (no violation of the uc art duty to accommodate where the union refused the Postal Service’s request to assign another worker to take plaintiff’s Saturday shift, which would have violated CBA’s provisions governing overtime). [159] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e)(2); Stolley , 2007 WL 1010418. [160] Lee v. ABF Freight Sys., Inc., 22 F.3d 1019 (10th Cir. 1994) (employer satisfied Title VII obligation when it suggested method by which driver would usually be able to work the number of trips each week required under the union contract prior to about, the Sabbath, and uc art College du Leman, could use vacation time on other occasions; employer was not required to grant driver’s request to skip assignments, which would then have to be worked by other drivers, or his request to work less than other full-time drivers and reimburse employer for to write essay The University of Birmingham additional costs; or his request to transfer with no loss of seniority, which would violate its CBA, where the employer had sought but could not obtain a waiver from the union). [162] See Wilson v. College! U.S. West Communications, 58 F.3d 1337 (8th Cir. 1995) (employer reasonably accommodated an employee by asking her when she was outside her cubicle to cover up an anti-abortion button she wore containing a graphic photograph of issues college of Birmingham a fetus because the button so distracted other employees that it had caused a 40% reduction in productivity and some employees threatened to du Leman, walk off their jobs). [163] Opuku-Boateng , 95 F.3d at 1473 (mere complaints by studies Bishopstrow other employees did not constitute undue hardship; employer failed to establish undue hardship in accommodating employee’s religious holidays because it did not show hardship on plaintiff’s co-workers or that accommodation required more than de minimis cost).

[164] Burns, 589 F.2d at requirement du Leman 407 (“Undue hardship requires more than proof of issues about in a essay The University some fellow-workers’ grumbling or unhappiness with a particular accommodation to a religious belief. An employer or union would have to show . . . actual imposition on uc art College, co-workers or disruption of the essay Shawnigan School work routine.”); accord Brown v. Polk County , 61 F.3d at 655; Peterson v. Uc Art College! Hewlett-Packard Co. , 358 F.3d 599 (9th Cir. 2004) (it would have posed an undue hardship for employer to accommodate employee’s religiously motivated posting of large signs in his cubicle which he “intended to be hurtful” and to demean and harass his co-workers; it also would have posed an undue hardship for employer to eliminate a portion of its diversity program to which plaintiff had religious objections). [165] See nn.182-184, infra. However, a different result may obtain depending on the setting and the religious garb at issue. See United States v. Website Writes For You University! New York State Dep’t of Corr. Servs. , Civil Action No. 07-2243 (S.D.N.Y. settlement approved Jan. 18, 2008) (providing for individualized review of correctional officers’ accommodation requests with respect to uniform and grooming requirements, and allowing employees to wear religious skullcaps such as kufis or yarmulkes if close fitting and solid dark blue or black in color, provided no undue hardship was posed).

[166] For example, Title 18 U.S.C. College Du Leman! Section 930 generally prohibits the possession of knives, including kirpans, with blades longer than 2.5 inches, in federal facilities, unless otherwise authorized. [167] The Commission’s regulations, Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(d), set forth suggested methods of accommodating scheduling conflicts, but those methods are not intended to reflective, comprise an exhaustive list. Different factual circumstances will require different solutions. State wage and hour laws may provide certain limitations that impact an requirement College du Leman employer’s potential flexibility. [168] See “Electronics Manufacturer and Islamic Group Settle Muslim Prayer Issue in Georgia Factory,” Daily Labor Report (BNA), No. 230 (Dec. 1, 1999) (ISSN 1522-5968); see also supra n.149; George v. Home Depot , 2002 WL 31319124 (5th Cir. Sept. 22, 2002) (unpublished) (excusing employee who served as department “greeter” from working any Sundays would have posed an undue hardship, because she was the only greeter in the department; the store would have had to do without a Sunday greeter or hire another employee in reflective essay writing School order to grant the accommodation, both of which would have posed an undue hardship based on the evidence the employer provided regarding the requirement College du Leman need for the position); Brener , 671 F.2d 141 (requiring hospital to hire a substitute pharmacist for days employee sought not to work due to religious observance involved more than a de minimis cost, and operating without him or having the pharmacy director substitute for him would have had an unacceptable adverse impact on functions of the pharmacy). [169] See U.S. Writes Washington State! v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority , Case No.

CV 04-07699 JFW (JTLx) (C.D. Cal. consent decree filed Oct. Requirement College! 2005) (lawsuit filed by Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and resolved by consent decree prior to ruling by writes for you University (INTO) court on merits; the uc art College du Leman settlement provided that the employer would accept the applications of Sabbath-observant applicants; provide applicants with information about their accommodation rights; permit drivers to swap assignments with other drivers, and reflective School, when no acceptable assignment is possible either through use of seniority rights or swaps, permit drivers to take temporary leaves of absence; and uc art requirement, provide information about religious accommodation in marketing literature and in its training programs for supervisors). [170] EEOC v. Robert Bosch Corp. , 2006 WL 406296 (6th Cir.

Feb. 21, 2006) (unpublished) (in case involving request for writing for scholarships Shawnigan Lake shift swap and relief from mandatory overtime to accommodate Sabbath observance, summary judgment for employer reversed where reasonable factfinder could conclude that employer failed to provide reasonable accommodation based on evidence that plaintiff was told a shift swap would not be permitted and du Leman, the employer’s policy was only designed to essay, identify employees willing to work additional shifts, not to swap shifts); Beadle v. Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Dep’t , 29 F.3d 589 (11th Cir. 1994) (employer satisfied its accommodation obligation by allowing employee to make announcement on bulletin board and at employee meeting to seek out co-workers willing to swap); McGuire v. Gen. Motors Corp ., 956 F.2d 607 (6th Cir. 1992) (summary judgment for employer reversed where genuine issue of material fact existed regarding whether employer’s accommodation of uc art College allowing voluntary shift swaps was a reasonable accommodation where there was evidence employer may have intentionally or unintentionally inhibited volunteers from swapping shifts by issuing a survey to reflective essay writing Windermere, employees regarding whether they would be willing to swap shifts in order to accommodate plaintiff); see also Beadle v. Tampa, 42 F.3d at 636-37 (excusing police recruit from rotating training schedule would have posed undue hardship because it would undermine intended educational benefit of working with different training officers); Morrissette-Brown v. Mobile Infirmary Med. Ctr. , 2006 WL 1999133 (S.D. Ala. July 14, 2006) (in case brought by Seventh-day Adventist who requested not to work on her Sabbath, employer satisfied its accommodation obligation by maintaining a neutral shift rotation schedule, allowing plaintiff to arrange a shift swap with co-workers, and College, making available the schedules of other employees). [171] See, e.g., Pyro Mining Co. Reflective Writing Windermere! , 827 F.2d at 1088-89 (it would be a reasonable accommodation for uc art requirement du Leman employer simply to be amenable to a shift swap; employer not required itself actively to solicit other employees to make such a swap unless plaintiff had religious constraints against arranging his own schedule swap with other employees; a CBA’s provision permitting religious observers to trade days off with other employees did not provide reasonable accommodation in essay global State the case of an uc art employee who had a religious objection to reflective writing, seeking such a trade); EEOC v. Texas Hydraulics, Inc. , Case No. 2:06-cv-161 (E.D. Uc Art! Tenn.

April 16, 2008) (employer's proposal that employee find another qualified candidate to take his Saturday shift was not a reasonable accommodation because the employer was on notice that the employee considers it a sin for essay writing Oregon (INTO) anyone to work on Saturday, not just himself); EEOC v. Aldi , 2008 WL 859249 (W.D. Pa. Uc Art College Du Leman! March 28, 2008) (where an employee sincerely believes that working on [his Sabbath] is morally wrong and that it is a sin to writing for scholarships Shawnigan School, try to induce another to work in his stead, then an employer's attempt at accommodation that requires the employee to seek his own replacement is uc art requirement, not reasonable ”) (emphasis in original) (citing Pyro Mining Co. , 827 F.2d at 1088). [172] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e)(1); Redmond. , 574 F.2d at studies Bishopstrow College 904 (employer could not demonstrate that paying replacement worker premium wages would cause undue hardship because plaintiff would have been paid premium wages for requirement the hours at issue); EEOC v. Southwestern Bell Tel. LP, 2007 WL 2891379 (E.D. Ark. Oct. 3, 2007) (payment of premium wages for one day to allow two employees to attend a yearly Jehovah’s Witness convention as part of their religious practice, at an alleged cost of issues college The University of Birmingham $220.72 per person in requirement College a facility that routinely paid overtime was not an undue hardship as a matter of law, where there was no evidence that customer service needs actually went unmet on the day at issue), appeal docketed , Case No.

08-1096 (8th Cir. filed Jan. 10, 2008). [173] U.S.F. Logistics (IMC), Inc. , 274 F.3d at college essay The University 477 (“[i]n many cases, a company must modify its stated policies in practice to reasonably accommodate a religious practice”) (citing Minkus v. Metro. Requirement College Du Leman! Sanitary Dist. , 600 F.2d 80 (7th Cir.1979) (municipal employer failed to accommodate a Jewish applicant when it followed its stated policy and scheduled civil service examinations only on Saturdays). [174] EEOC v. Razzoo’s , Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-1781-L (N.D. Tex. consent decree filed June 18, 2007) (settlement of case alleging that restaurant unlawfully failed to essays for you Washington State, accommodate server’s religious beliefs by excusing her from requirement du Leman participating in issues to write in a college essay The University singing “Happy Birthday” to celebrating customers). [175] Noesen v. Med. Staffing Network, Inc. , 2007 WL 1302118 (7th Cir. May 2, 2007) (unpublished) (pharmacy reasonably accommodated employee by allowing him to transfer to co-worker any customer service involving contraceptives; employee’s proposed further accommodation of uc art College du Leman assigning responsibility for essay writing all initial customer contact to lower-paid technicians, even if it could be done, would impose an undue hardship because it would divert technicians from their assigned data input and insurance verification duties, resulting in uncompleted data work).

The reasonable accommodation that the employer was able to provide in Noesen might pose an undue hardship in a different case where there was no qualified co-worker on duty to whom such customer service duties could be transferred, or where it would otherwise pose more than a de minimis burden on uc art, the operation of the employer’s business. [177] Draper , 527 F.2d at 519-20 (transfer that involved substantial reduction in pay and reflective essay writing, would have “wasted [plaintiff’s] skills” would not be reasonable accommodation where plaintiff could have been accommodated in his original position without undue hardship). [178] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(d)(iii) (“When an employee cannot be accommodated either as to his or her entire job or an assignment within the job, employers and labor organizations should consider whether or not it is possible to change the requirement College du Leman job assignment or give the employee a lateral transfer.”); Rivera v. Choice Courier , 2004 WL 1444852 (S.D.N.Y. June 25, 2004) (employer’s failure to consider transferring employee to position with less stringent dress code so that he could continue his religious practice of proselytizing by wearing patch stating “Jesus is Lord” may have violated Title VII). [179] See supra n.138; Rodriguez , 156 F.3d at 775-77 (permitting employee to exercise transfer rights under CBA to obtain equivalent position that eliminated religious conflict with duty assignment was a reasonable accommodation); see also Cook v. Lindsay Olive Growers , 911 F.2d 233, 241 (9th Cir. 1990) (under state law parallel to Title VII, transfer of employee to a lower-level position was reasonable where no equivalent position was available); Bruff , 244 F.3d at 501 (accommodation by transfer to lower-paying non-counselor job could satisfy Title VII if plaintiff could not be accommodated in her current position or an essay writing for scholarships School equivalent position). [180] Shelton , 223 F.3d at 227 (offering transfer to nurse who had religious objection to abortion procedure sometimes performed in her department was a reasonable accommodation); EEOC v. Requirement College Du Leman! Dresser-Rand Co. , 2006 WL 1994792 (W.D.N.Y. July 14, 2006) (summary judgment for employer denied in case on behalf of a Jehovah’s Witness who allegedly was denied transfer to different assignment as an accommodation of essay writing Sevenoaks his religious objection to working on military projects). Uc Art College Du Leman! But cf. Website Writes Washington University (INTO)! supra n.138 (discussing when a lateral transfer might be an adverse employment action). At least one court has ruled that it is requirement du Leman, unreasonable for essay warming (INTO) public protectors such as police officers or fire fighters to requirement du Leman, seek to be relieved from certain assignments as a religious accommodation.

See Endres v. Indiana State Police , 349 F.3d 922, 927 (7th Cir. 2003) (state police officer’s religious accommodation request not to be assigned to full-time, permanent work at a casino was unreasonable; police and fire departments “need the cooperation of all members” and need them to Oregon, perform their duties “without favoritism”), cert. denied , 541 U.S. 989 (2004). Uc Art Requirement! Because public protectors, such as police officers and firefighters, are obliged to serve and protect all under their care, and their public responsibilities must take precedence over essay writing for scholarships Shawnigan Lake School their religious and other personal scruples, in some cases conflicts between the requirements of their job and their religious beliefs may not be able to requirement College, be resolved. However, it is not per se unreasonable for public protectors to reflective essay writing Windermere School, obtain changes in College job assignments, schedule changes, or transfers in writes essays for you Washington State situations where a conflict between their job duties and their religious beliefs could be eliminated or reduced.

Therefore, the better approach is to uc art College, determine on a case-by-case basis whether granting the request would pose an undue hardship. [181] See, e.g., EEOC v. United Parcel Serv. To Write About College! , 94 F.3d 314 (7th Cir. 1996) (genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the employer reasonably accommodated the employee’s religious practice of wearing a beard precluded summary judgment for the employer); EEOC v. Comair, Inc. , Civil Action No. Uc Art Requirement College! 1:05-cv-0601 (W.D. Mich. consent decree filed Nov. 22, 2006) (settlement prior to ruling on merits of case on essay writing global Oregon University (INTO), behalf of Rastafarian airline applicant alleging he was not hired because he refused to cut his hair to conform with the company’s grooming standards); EEOC v. Du Leman! Pilot Travel Ctrs .LLC , Civil Action No. 2:03-0106 (M.D. Tenn. consent decree filed April 9, 2004) (settlement prior to ruling on merits of claim on behalf of Messianic Christian maintenance worker, who wore beard as part of critical Bishopstrow his religious practice, and was terminated for refusing to shave in compliance with employer’s no-beard policy). [182] United Parcel Serv ., 94 F.3d at 318-20; c ompare Daniels , 246 F.3d 500 (police department may be able to uc art, demonstrate that allowing an critical studies Bishopstrow College officer to requirement, wear a cross on global Oregon (INTO), his uniform would give the appearance of public agency endorsement of the officer’s religious views, in violation of the department’s constitutional obligations, and therefore would pose an undue hardship under Title VII), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 951 (2001), with Draper v. Logan County Pub.

Library , 403 F. Supp. 2d 608 (W.D. Ky. 2005) (public library employee’s First Amendment free speech and uc art College, free exercise rights were violated when she was prohibited from wearing a necklace with a cross ornament). [183] See, e.g., Cloutier v. Costco Wholesale Corp. Writing Warming (INTO)! , 390 F.3d 126 (1st Cir.

2004) (holding that it would pose “an undue hardship to require Costco to uc art requirement du Leman, grant an exemption because it would adversely affect the employer’s public image,” given Costco’s determination that facial piercings detract from the “neat, clean and professional image” that it aims to cultivate). [184] Denying the employer’s motion for summary judgment in EEOC v. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. , 2005 WL 2090677 (W.D. Writing Global Warming State University! Wash. Aug. 29, 2005), the uc art requirement College du Leman court ruled that notwithstanding the employer’s purported reliance on a company profile and customer study suggesting that it seeks to present a family-oriented and reflective essay writing School, kid-friendly image, the uc art requirement College du Leman company failed to demonstrate that allowing an employee to have visible religious tattoos was inconsistent with these goals. “Hypothetical hardships based on unproven assumptions typically fail to constitute undue hardship . . . . Oregon State! Red Robin must provide evidence of ‘actual imposition on requirement College du Leman, co-workers or disruption of the work routine’ to demonstrate undue hardship.” S ee also Brown v. F.L. Roberts , 419 F. Supp. Essay Warming State University (INTO)! 2d 7, 17 (D. Mass. 2006) (district court held no Title VII violation occurred when employer transferred lube technician whose Rastafarian religious beliefs prohibited him from shaving or cutting his hair to a location with limited customer contact because he could not comply with a new grooming policy; stating it was bound to follow Cloutier as the uc art requirement College du Leman law of the circuit, the essay writing global warming Oregon State court nevertheless observed in dicta: “If Cloutier’s language approving employer prerogatives regarding ‘public image’ is read broadly, the implications for persons asserting claims for religious discrimination in uc art requirement du Leman the workplace may be grave. One has to wonder how often an employer will be inclined to cite this expansive language to terminate or restrict from customer contact, on image grounds, an writing Shawnigan employee wearing a yarmulke, a veil, or the mark on the forehead that denotes Ash Wednesday for many Catholics. More likely, and more ominously, considerations of ‘public image’ might persuade an employer to tolerate the religious practices of predominant groups, while arguing ‘undue hardship’ and ‘image’ in forbidding practices that are less widespread or well known.”); EEOC v. Chriskoll, Inc. , d/b/a Brookhaven Burger King, Civil Action No.

06-cv-1197 (E.D. Pa. Uc Art College Du Leman! consent decree filed December 3, 2007) (settlement of claim on behalf of Muslim employee who was terminated pursuant to restaurant appearance code requiring male employees to be clean-shaven notwithstanding that employer’s written policy had exception permitting beards required for religious reasons). [185] See generally EEOC v. American Airlines , Civil Action No. 02-C-6172 (N.D. Essay Writing Global Warming Oregon (INTO)! Ill.) (Order of Resolution filed September 3, 2002) (resolving claim on requirement, behalf of essay writing Sevenoaks School employee who was not hired as passenger service agent because she wore a hijab for religious reasons in violation of the uc art requirement airline’s since-changed uniform policy; the airline’s current uniform policy specifically contemplates exceptions for religious accommodation of employees). [186] Webb v. City of Philadelphia, 2007 WL 1866763 (E.D.

Pa. June 27, 2007) (granting summary judgment to the employer, the court ruled that the City of Philadelphia established as a matter of writes Washington University (INTO) law that it would pose an requirement undue hardship to essay Windermere, accommodate the wearing of a traditional religious headpiece called a khimar by a Muslim police officer while in uniform, in contravention of the department’s dress code directive). [187] See U.S. v. College! New York State Dep’t of Corr. Servs. , Civil Action No. 07-2243 (S.D.N.Y. settlement approved Jan. 18, 2008) (settlement of case brought on behalf of Muslim correctional officers by U.S. Department of Justice providing that employee requests for religious exemptions from uniform and grooming requirements of state prison system would be determined on writes University (INTO), a case-by-case basis, and allowing employees to wear religious skullcaps such as kufis or yarmulkes if close fitting and solid dark blue or black in color, provided no undue hardship was posed). [188] See also Federal Workplace Guidelines , supra n.11, at § 1.c (“Accommodation of Religious Exercise”), example (d) (under the requirement du Leman First Amendment, government workplaces that allow employees to use facilities for non-work related secular activities generally are required to reflective Windermere, allow the privilege on equal terms for employee religious activities). [189] See, e.g., Minkus , 600 F.2d 80; Cary , 908 F. Supp. at 1343-44 (employee failed to uc art requirement College du Leman, give employer proper notice so that it could attempt an accommodation of reflective essay writing Windermere his religious objection to signing consent form for a drug test). [190] Minkus , 600 F.2d 80 (employer must demonstrate it would pose undue hardship to allow applicant to take exam at uc art requirement different time than others as a religious accommodation). [191] Sutton v. Providence St.

Joseph Med. Ctr. , 192 F.3d 826 (9th Cir. 1999) (hospital not liable for refusing to critical, hire applicant who declined to provide social security number on religious grounds; because federal tax law required the hospital to obtain all employees’ social security numbers, accommodation of applicant’s religious belief would pose undue hardship); Hover v. Florida Power Light Co., 1995 WL 91531 (S.D. Fla. Feb.

6, 1995) (employee’s proposed accommodation that employer “make up” a social security number rather than obtain employee’s actual social security number posed an undue hardship), aff’d , 101 F.3d 708 (11th Cir. 1996) (Table) (unpublished). [192] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(d)(2); Tooley , 648 F.2d at requirement du Leman 1242-44 (union cannot force an employer, under a contractual union security clause, to terminate three Seventh-day Adventists who offered to pay an amount equivalent to dues to critical studies Bishopstrow, a nonreligious charity because the union failed to show that such an accommodation would deprive it of funds needed for its maintenance and operation); EEOC v. Univ. of uc art requirement Detroit , 904 F.2d 331 (6th Cir. 1990) (because employee’s religious objection was to union itself, reasonable accommodation required allowing him to make charitable donation equivalent to amount of union dues instead of paying dues); Int’l Assoc. of to write essay The University Machinists v. Boeing , 833 F.2d 165, 169 (9th Cir. Uc Art Requirement College! 1987) (an employer may be required to accommodate an issues to write in a of Birmingham employee who has a sincerely held religious opposition to unionism by allowing an equivalent contribution to uc art College du Leman, a mutually agreeable charity in lieu of college The University dues payment); Burns , 589 F.2d at du Leman 406-07 (allowing equivalent charitable contribution in lieu of dues did not constitute undue hardship notwithstanding administrative cost to writing Lake School, union and “grumblings” by other employees); Cooper v. General Dynamics, 533 F.2d 163 (5th Cir. 1976) (religious belief that supporting labor union violated precept of “love thy neighbor,” i.e., including employers, was subject to reasonable accommodation absent undue hardship); Reed v. UAW , 523 F. Supp. Uc Art College! 2d 592 (E.D. Mich.

Oct. 19, 2007) (union was not liable for denial of reasonable accommodation to employee who objected to paying union dues for religious reasons, because union satisfied its accommodation obligation under Title VII by requiring the employee to essay, pay to a charity of his choice an amount equal to full union dues). [193] See McDaniel v. Essex Int’l, Inc. , 696 F.2d 34 (6th Cir. 1982) (finding employee’s proposal to donate amount equivalent to dues to a “mutually agreeable” charity was a reasonable accommodation that would not have posed an undue hardship) and EEOC v. Uc Art Du Leman! Am. Fed’n of State, County Mun. Employees , 937 F. Supp. 166, 168 (N.D.N.Y.

1996) (referring to “mutually agreeable” charity as reasonable accommodation). Some CBAs have charities listed in them, pursuant to the requirements of section 19 of the National Labor Relations Act. See 20 U.S.C. § 169. [194] Commission Guidelines, 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e); Nottelson v. State University! Smith Steel Workers D.A.L.U. 19806 , 643 F.2d 445 (7th Cir. 1981) (charity-substitute religious accommodation for union dues did not pose undue hardship to union where loss of plaintiff’s dues represented only du Leman, .02% of union’s annual budget, and the union presented no evidence that the paper Sevenoaks loss of receipts from plaintiff would necessitate an increase in the dues of College his co?workers); see also Burns , 589 F.2d at 407 (excusing employee from essays for you paying his monthly $19 union dues did not pose an undue hardship, where one union officer testified that the loss “wouldn’t affect us at all” and uc art requirement College du Leman, union’s asserted fear of writing Windermere many religious objectors was based on mere speculation; the uc art College du Leman court noted, however, that if “in the future, the expressed fear of widespread refusal to pay union dues on religious grounds should become a reality, undue hardship could be proved”). One court has held that it may be inappropriate to require the religious objector to website writes essays Washington, pay the requirement College full amount of the reflective essay Windermere union dues to uc art College du Leman, a charitable organization, however, if non-religious objectors are permitted to pay a reduced amount. See O’Brien v. School! Springfield Educ. Du Leman! Ass’n , 319 F. Supp. Writing Warming Oregon (INTO)! 2d 90 (D. Mass.

2003) (not a reasonable accommodation to uc art du Leman, require religious objector to pay full union dues where state statute permitted non-union members to pay a lower amount in form of agency fee). Cf. Madsen v. Associated Chino Teachers, 317 F. Supp. 2d 1175, 1179 (C.D. Cal. 2004) (holding that it was not disparate treatment under Title VII to require religious objectors to pay full amount of dues to charity where non-religious objectors were only School, paying agency fee to uc art requirement College du Leman, union). [195] See EEOC v. Univ. of Detroit , 904 F.2d at 335; see also U.S. v. Ohio and EEOC v. Ohio Civil Service Employees Association , Case No. Essay Windermere! 2:05-CV-799 (S.D.

Ohio consent decree filed Sept. 2006) (lawsuits filed by Civil Rights Division of U.S. Department of uc art requirement Justice and EEOC against Ohio state agencies and their employee union, respectively, over their refusal to accommodate state employees’ religious objections to payment of union dues unless the employees were members of essay for scholarships Shawnigan Lake churches that have “historically held conscientious objections to uc art du Leman, joining or financially supporting” unions; pursuant to settlement reached prior to ruling by court on merits, the consent decree provides that a state employee is permitted to pay an amount equal to essays Washington State University, the union service fee to a mutually agreeable charity if he has sincerely held religious objections to supporting the union, even if he does not belong to requirement College du Leman, such a church); Int’l Assoc. of Machinists , 833 F.2d 165, 169 (9th Cir. 1987) (explaining that because “Title VII defines religion as ‘all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief,’” a union may be required to accommodate an employee who has a sincerely held religious opposition to unionism by allowing equivalent contribution to mutually agreeable charity in lieu of dues payment, even if he “is not a member of an organized religious group that opposes unions”). [196] Wilson, 58 F.3d at 1341-42 (given disruption among co-workers actually caused in workplace, employee’s request to wear at all times a button containing a graphic photograph of a fetus with anti-abortion message posed undue hardship; employer reasonably accommodated employee by offering her several alternatives, including to take the button off or cover up the writing Sevenoaks School photograph portion when she left her work cubicle); cf . Red Robin Gourmet Burgers , 2005 WL 2090677 (denying employer’s motion for summary judgment because issue of whether employee’s Kemetic religious wrist tattoos would disrupt work or otherwise pose an undue hardship raised a disputed factual question to uc art requirement, be decided by jury). [197] Wilson, 58 F.3d at 1341-42 (employer denied certain accommodation options because of demonstrated disruption to co-workers); Brown v. Thinking Studies College! Polk County , 61 F.3d at du Leman 656-57 (there was insufficient evidence to establish that supervisor’s occasional prayers in meetings posed an reflective essay undue hardship because, although the employer asserted that the supervisor’s conduct had polarized employees along religious lines, it adduced no supporting evidence).

[198] EEOC Enforcement Guidance: Vicarious Employer Liability for Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors (1999), https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harassment.html. [199] U.S.F. Logistics (IMC) , 274 F.3d at 476 (employer reasonably accommodated plaintiff’s religious practice of sporadically using the phrase “Have a Blessed Day” when it permitted her to use the phrase with co-workers and supervisors who did not object, but prohibited her from using the phrase with customers where at College least one regular client objected; allowing her to essay School, use the uc art requirement du Leman phrase with customers who objected would have posed an thinking Bishopstrow College undue hardship); Banks v. Serv. Am. Uc Art College! Corp. , 952 F. Supp. 703 (D. Kan. 1996) (plaintiff food service employees at company cafeteria, who were terminated when they refused to stop greeting customers with phrases such as “God Bless You” and “Praise the Lord,” presented a triable issue of writing for scholarships School fact regarding whether they could have been accommodated without undue hardship; in the absence of employer proof that permitting the statements was disruptive or that it had any legitimate reason to fear losing business, a reasonable jury could conclude that no undue hardship was posed; the employer received only 20 to 25 complaints while serving approximately 130,000 to 195,000 customers, which is a complaint rate of between .01025 and .01923%; and the employer produced no evidence of decreased use of the cafeteria or religious polarization among customers).

[200] See infra nn.201-203; see also Johnson v. Requirement College! Halls Merch. , 1989 WL 23201 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 17, 1989) (court found it would have posed undue hardship on employer to permit retail employee’s regular statement to customers “in the name of Jesus Christ of critical thinking studies College Nazareth,” because it offended the du Leman beliefs of writing Sevenoaks some customers and therefore cost the company business). [201] See Knight , 275 F.3d at 164-65 (allowing employee to evangelize clients would cause undue hardship). Compare Baz v. Walters , 782 F.2d 701 (7th Cir. 1986) (government hospital did not violate employee chaplain’s Title VII religious accommodation or First Amendment Free Exercise rights by terminating him for evangelizing patients; it would have posed an undue hardship under Title VII, and would have violated the First Amendment Establishment Clause, to permit chaplain to remain employed given his intention to minister to patients), with Rivera v. Choice Courier Sys., Inc., 2004 WL 1444852 (S.D.N.Y. June 25, 2004) (genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether courier was denied reasonable accommodation where employer could have accommodated courier’s need to evangelize by transferring him to a position with a less stringent dress code that would have allowed employee to continue wearing a patch stating “Jesus is uc art du Leman, Lord”). [202] Moreover, a private employer’s own rights under the First Amendment Free Speech Clause may provide a defense to a Title VII accommodation claim, if the proposed accommodation would require the private employer involuntarily to display a religious message that could be construed as its own.

See also infra § IV-C-7. Similarly, if XYZ were a government employer, the First Amendment Establishment Clause would likely justify its refusal to display a religious message. However, Susan’s display probably would not violate the Establishment Clause, or pose an undue hardship for Title VII purposes, because it has a minimal effect on reflective writing, any co-workers who saw it, whereas Roger’s display might be perceived to constitute government endorsement of a particular religion and uc art, pose an Establishment Clause violation. See Berry v. Dep’t of Social Servs. , 447 F.3d 642 (9th Cir. 2006) (accommodating social worker’s request to display religious items in essay writing global warming University his cubicle and to discuss religion with clients would have posed an undue hardship under Title VII on county social services department since the accommodations sought would create a danger of the employer violating the Establishment Clause); cf. Peloza v. Capistrano Unified Sch. Uc Art Requirement Du Leman! Dist. , 37 F.3d 517 (9th Cir.

1994) (school district’s restriction on teacher’s First Amendment right of writing for scholarships Lake School free speech in prohibiting teacher from talking with students about religion during school day was justified by school district’s interest in avoiding Establishment Clause violation); Draper v. Logan County Pub. Library , 403 F. Supp. 2d 608 (W.D. Ky. 2005) (public library’s decision to bar employee from wearing necklace with cross was not justified by library’s purported interest in avoiding Establishment Clause violation; “[a] different conclusion might be justified, if for example, the library allowed employees to actively proselytize or if it permitted religious banners or slogans to uc art requirement, be hung from the rafters”). [203] Knight , 275 F.3d 156; Grant v. Fairview Hosp. Healthcare Serv., 2004 WL 326694 (D. Minn. 2004) (ultrasound technician was offered a reasonable accommodation of his religious beliefs when hospital excused him from performing ultrasounds on studies Bishopstrow, women contemplating abortions; hospital did not have to allow technician to provide pastoral counseling, as that accommodation would have posed an undue hardship); see also Grossman v. Uc Art Requirement! South Shore Pub.

Sch. Dist. , 507 F.3d 1097 (7th Cir. 2007) (affirming summary judgment for school district on terminated guidance counselor’s First Amendment free exercise and critical studies Bishopstrow, Title VII claims, the court ruled that the school district was permitted to College du Leman, terminate counselor for her conduct, even if her actions of praying with students who approached her for guidance and throwing away school contraceptive education materials were motivated by her religious beliefs; there was insufficient evidence that her termination was based on her religious views alone as opposed to these actions, which the school district was entitled to prohibit). [204] See Townley, 859 F.2d at 619-21 (private employer has First Amendment free exercise right to essay writing Shawnigan, express its religion in the workplace). [205] Young , 509 F.2d 140; see, e.g., EEOC v. Native Angels Homecare Agency , Civil Action No. Requirement College! 7:06-cv-83 (E.D.N.C. consent decree filed March 22, 2007) (settlement prior to website Washington University (INTO), decision by court on the merits of claim alleging that a registered nurse was required to attend a “prayer circle” at requirement du Leman work and to write about in a college essay The University of Birmingham, was then terminated because she objected and requirement College, refused to Windermere, attend). [206] Townley, 859 F.2d at 620-21 (employer must accommodate an uc art requirement College employee’s atheism; no undue hardship because excusing employee from services would not have cost anything nor caused a disruption; employer’s free exercise rights may be overridden where necessary to avoid religious discrimination in violation of Title VII). [207] Young , 509 F.2d 140 (employee was constructively discharged based on her religion in violation of Title VII where her superior advised her that she had obligation to attend monthly staff meetings in their entirety and advised her that she could simply “close her ears” during religious exercises with which meetings began). [208] Although it is beyond the scope of Title VII enforcement, we note for the sake of completeness that the Bishopstrow U.S. Supreme Court has held that wreaths and Christmas trees are “secular” symbols, akin to items such as lights, Santa Claus, and reindeer, and thus that government display of these items does not violate the establishment clause of the requirement First Amendment. See County of Allegheny v. ACLU , 492 U.S.

573 (1989) (stand-alone crèche on county courthouse steps violated establishment clause, but display elsewhere of Christmas tree next to a menorah and a sign proclaiming “liberty” did not); Lynch v. Donnelly , 465 U.S. 668 (1984) (holding that government-sponsored display of crèche did not violate establishment clause because it was surrounded by essay writing Oregon University various secularizing symbols, thus precluding a perception of government endorsement of religion); Federal Workplace Guidelines , supra n.11 at Section D (example (b)). Uc Art Requirement College Du Leman! For a discussion of critical thinking studies Bishopstrow College both Title VII and establishment clause claims arising from holiday decorations in federal government employment context, see, e.g., Spohn v. West , 2000 WL 1459981 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 2, 2000). In the private sector, establishment clause constraints would not apply. As a best practice, however, all employers may find that sensitivity to the diversity of their workplace promotes positive employee relations. [209] An employer may accommodate the uc art requirement du Leman employee’s religious belief by substituting an issues essay The University alternative technique or method that does not conflict with the employee’s religious belief or by excusing the employee from that part of the training program that poses a conflict, if doing so would not pose an uc art undue hardship.

[210] Many employers have policies that require employees to treat each other with “courtesy, dignity and respect.” This terminology fits within the ambit of “professionally” as used in Sevenoaks School the example. See also Peterson v. College! Hewlett-Packard Co. , 358 F.3d 599 (9th Cir. 2004) (it would have constituted undue hardship for employer to issues to write college essay The University of Birmingham, accommodate employee by eliminating portions of its diversity program to which employee raised religious objections; to do so would have “infringed upon the company’s right to promote diversity and College du Leman, encourage tolerance and good will among its workforce”). Reflective Essay Windermere! If training conflicts with an employee’s religious beliefs, the content of the uc art requirement College du Leman training materials may be determinative in deciding whether it would pose an undue hardship to accommodate an employee by paper School excusing him from the uc art requirement College training or a portion thereof. If the training required or encouraged employees to value certain lifestyles or dimensions of diversity, it might be more difficult for an employer to establish that it would pose an undue hardship to accommodate an employee who objects to participating on critical thinking studies Bishopstrow, religious grounds. Buonanno v. ATT Broadband, LLC, 313 F. Supp.

2d 1069 (D. Requirement! Colo. For Scholarships Shawnigan! 2004) (company can require and requirement College du Leman, instruct employees to treat co-workers with respect in accordance with corporate diversity policy, but violation of Title VII occurred where company did not accommodate employee’s refusal on religious grounds to sign diversity policy asking him to “value” homosexual co-workers, which he reasonably believed required him to subscribe to a certain belief system rather than simply agree to treat his co-workers appropriately). [211] Commission Guidelines , 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2. [212] EEOC v. WCM Enter., Inc. , 496 F.3d 393 (5th Cir.

2007) (evidence was sufficient for employee to proceed to trial on claim that he was subjected to hostile work environment harassment based on both religion and national origin where harassment motivated both by his being a practicing Muslim and by having been born in India); Vitug v. Multistate Tax Comm’n , 88 F.3d 506, 515 (7th Cir. 1996) (Catholic Filipino employee made out a prima facie case of national origin and religious discrimination, although he did not prevail on the merits).