Date: 14.10.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 721 #Writing essays Harrow School

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Writing essays Harrow School

Writing essays Harrow School

May/Tue/2018 | Uncategorized

Harrow School - изучение иностранного языка за…

Writing essays Harrow School

Custom Essay Writing Service -
Harrow School — элитная средняя школа для мальчиков в…

AUTO CAD CIVIL 3D Assignment Homework Help. Harrow? AutoCAD is a computer-assisted drafting software application used for creating patterns for a magazine Lord College, computer chips, bridges and buildings. Primarily, drafters use AutoCAD, although architects, surveyors and engineers may have to make use of the applications from Harrow, time to write a introductory paragraph for an essay Alpinum Zuoz time. Program used in architecture, building and writing essays School manufacturing to help in the preparation of other engineering strategies and patterns. Professionals using AutoCAD in many cases are called drafters. Ielts General Essay Topics Curtin University? AutoCAD is a commercial software program for 3D and. AUTO CAD CIVIL 3D Assignment Help. 2D computer-aided design (CAD) drafting and available since 1982 as a cellular net and a desktop computer program advertised as AutoCAD 360. AutoCAD is used across a variety of businesses, project managers by architects, engineers, graphic designers, and writing Harrow School other professionals. 750 training centers support it globally as of 1994.

AutoCAD had become the most omnipresent CAD application globally. The first variation by Autodesk released at the 1982 Comdex. A Magazine Wandsworth? The 2016 release indicated the 30th important launch of AutoCAD for writing Harrow, Windows. The 2014 release indicated the fourth straight year of Lyceum Alpinum, AutoCAD for Mac. For instance, AutoCAD Architecture (previously Architectural Desktop) allows architectural designers to draw 3D items such as windows, doors and walls with more intelligent data connected with them rather than simplethings such as circles and lines. The data might be programmed to signify particular architectural products extracted into a data file for pricing, substances estimate or sold in the building industry and other values associated with the signified things. Added tools create regular 2D drawings including sections and levels from a 3D architectural model.

Likewise, Civil Design 3D, Civil Design, and Civil Design Professional support information-specific objects, easing representations and simple typical civil engineering computations. Essays Harrow? Civil 3D was initially developed as an AutoCAD add-on by an organization in publications School New Hampshire called Softdesk (initially DCA). Autodesk obtained SoftDesk, and Civil 3D was further developed. AutoCAD is licensed for free to qualifying teachers and students with an 18-month renewable permit available. Students Version objects #8220;infect#8221; a commercial variant DWG file, if it is imported in Harrow older variants than AutoCAD 2015. Computer-aided design (CAD) is using computer systems to assist in optimization, alteration, evaluation, or the creation of a layout. CAD applications are used to raise the productivity of the essay in english High, designer, enhance the standard of design, enhance communications through instruction manual and to develop a database for writing essays, production. CAD end product is generally in i write essay Justin-Siena High School the shape of electronic files for print, machining, or alternative fabricating operations. Computer-aided design is used in several areas. Essays Harrow School? In designing electronic systems, 2#8217;s use is called electronic design automation or EDA. In mechanical design, it is writing article College, called mechanical design automation (MDA) or computer-aided design (CAD) including the writing School, procedure for International School, developing a technical drawing together by using computer software.

CAD software for mechanical design uses either vector-based images to depict the items of conventional drafting or may additionally create raster graphics revealing the total look of constructed things. Nevertheless, it includes more than simply contours. As in the manual drafting of engineering and essays Harrow School specialized drawings, CAD#8217;s end product must carry data including materials, procedures, measurements, and fortitude based on program-specific traditions. Ielts Topics University Singapore? CAD could be used to design shapes and curves in two-dimensional (2D) space; curves, surfaces, and Harrow School solids in three dimensional (3D) space. CAD is a significant industrial art widely used in essays on writing several uses including shipbuilding, automotive, aerospace sectors, architectural and industrial design, prosthetics, and a lot more. CAD is also popular to create computer animation for special effects in films, marketing and technical guides frequently called DCC digital content creation.

Use AutoCAD Map 3D applications to get wide-ranging accessibility to CAD and GIS data to support data management, design, and preparation. When people get a perpetual license with Maintenance Subscription, they get adaptable licensing, web support, and E-learning. No upgrades are available without Maintenance Subscription. Organizations using AutoCAD software might have hundreds or even a large number of writing essays Harrow School, drawing files for a particular job. During the course of a job, team members can spend a large amount of time updating sheet index information, renumbering sheets, and collating sheet sets. Tabular information including programs, lists, and Montverde Academy legends is an essential part of several sheet sets.

Creating or upgrading table data using fundamental AutoCAD items such as text and writing School line demands and how can i write essay in english Justin-Siena High School is frequently time-consuming. Using one command, people can immediately create information tables with AutoCAD and after that readily change table content as in normal word processing software. Writing Harrow? Text-based data such as title block data and page numbers is write International of Milan, repeated throughout a complete drawing set. Making upgrades to this text and monitoring changes may be tiresome and error prone procedure. The new Field command simplifies the job of creating, setting, and editing text throughout sheet sets and the drawings.

Upgrades are made automatically, ensuring the truth of the data, and saving the writing essays School, time of people. On Writing Academy? People should work in structural engineering areas that include MEP or the architecture;they have likely used 2D or 3D CAD applications. These applications model a design will perform in real life and writing essays Harrow School will be able to allow them to research design thoughts, visualize theories through photorealistic renderings. AutoCAD software was the first CAD program and it is the most popular CAD application. CAD applications have characteristics that are distinct depending on whether your design procedure includes 2D vector-based images or 3D modeling of solid surfaces.

Most 3D CAD applications leave designs from any angle, and rotate things in harvard business publications School three dimensions allow you to use multiple light sources. People react faster to change and keep more consistent data and procedures can better comprehend job performance.

Academic Proofreading -
Harrow School — элитная средняя школа для мальчиков в…

Hume on Miracles, Frequencies, and Prior Probabilities (1998) Bertrand Russell was reportedly once asked what he would say to God if he were to find himself confronted by the Almighty about why he had not believed in God's existence. He said that he would tell God Not enough evidence, God, not enough evidence![1] But perhaps, if God failed to give Russell enough evidence, it was not God's fault. We are inclined to writing essays Harrow suppose that God could satisfy Russell by essays on writing Montverde Academy performing a spectacular miracle for Russell's benefit. But if the reasoning in David Hume's epistemological argument against belief in miracles [2] is correct, then no matter how hard God tries, God cannot give Russell an essays School, evidentially justified belief in Himself by performing miracles.

According to Hume, no matter what miracles God performs, it is always more reasonable to believe that the a magazine Lord event in question has a natural cause and Harrow School is not miraculous. Hence, if Russell needs a miracle to believe reasonably in God, then Russell is out of luck. Russell cannot complain about God's failure to provide evidence, since none would be sufficient. But God cannot complain about Russell's failure to believe. Hume's argument is article, actually directed against testimony-based belief in the miraculous, although others have extended the argument to the case of miracles directly experienced.[3] It proceeds by two steps. The first step is an argument for the claim that the antecedent probability of an event's occurrence diminishes the credibility of testimony to School it. Ielts General Essay Topics Curtin University. That is, we must not only consider the credibility of the testifier, but also the antecedent probability of that which is testified to. Essays Harrow. The second step in Hume's argument is a defense of his claim that the miraculous nature of a purported event makes its antecedent probability as small as could possibly be imagined; that any combination of natural events, however antecedently improbable, is antecedently more probable than a scenario involving supernatural intervention. Wikipedia An Article International Of Milan. If this argument is successful, then Hume has successfully impugned the rationality of anyone (including millions of Christians who believe in the resurrection of Jesus) who believes that a miracle has occurred.

In recent years, several attempts have been made to bring considerations based on Bayes' theorem to bear on writing essays Harrow Hume's essay.[4] But while Bayesian theory explains clearly how one goes from an antecedent probability to a subsequent probability, Bayesian theory is not so clear on how one establishes prior probabilities in the first place. Some Bayesians have attempted to defend a view that says that prior probabilities can and must be based on the frequency with which event-types occur in experience. This model of prior probabilities, I contend, is implicit within Hume's argument against ielts general writing Singapore, miracles. Writing Essays School. But this theory of prior probabilities is a introductory Lyceum Alpinum, fraught with difficulties and, I contend, cannot be accepted. Without a frequentist foundation for his antecedent probability claims, Hume's argument against miracles collapses. II. Antecedent Probabilities in Hume's Essay.

Hume's argument against miracles makes its case against essays Harrow, miracles on the grounds 1) that one must consider the antecedent probability of the event reported as well as the credibility of the reporter, and 2) that miracles, as violations natural law, are less probable than any set of natural events required to explain the known facts. The first of these principles is elucidated by harvard Hume as follows: When anyone tells me, that he saw a dead man restored to life, I immediately consider with myself, whether it be more probable, that this person should either deceive or be deceived, or that the fact, which he relates, should have really happened. Writing Harrow School. I weigh the one miracle against the other; and a magazine article Lord College according to the superiority, which I discover, I pronounce my decision, and always reject the greater miracle. Writing Essays Harrow School. If the falsehood of the testimony would be more miraculous, than the writing article Wandsworth College event which he relates; then, and not till then, can he pretend to command my belief or opinion.[5] Now I think this passage makes a somewhat question-begging identification of improbability with miraculousness,[6] but it seems commonsensical. I do not accept everything from the same source with equal assurance. If one of the tabloids were to say that Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden were secretly engaged, I would be rather skeptical of the report, coming from such a source. But I would be far more certain that any report, in writing essays Harrow that same tabloid, to the effect that Nicole Brown Simpson rose from the dead and was planning to testify in court could not possibly be true.

Hume quotes a saying, I would not believe such a story if it were told to me by wikipedia an article School of Milan Cato,[7] which captures this point nicely. Clearly, in common sense reasoning, the intrinsic incredibility of an essays, event can overthrow the testimony of otherwise credible witnesses. But when one attempts to develop this idea into mathematical probability theory, one must avoid untoward consequences, and Hume simply did not possess the mathematical sophistication to accomplish this. If the how to a introductory paragraph for an Lyceum Alpinum Zuoz theory of probabilistic inference he himself presents in Of Miracles is taken literally, it has the consequence that if the Arizona Republic were to report that I won the lottery, you should disbelieve the report, because my chance of winning the lottery is less than the percentage of erroneous reports by the Republic. But surely this is implausible. The development of Bayes' theorem allows a person to factor in writing essays School the antecedent probability of an a magazine article College, event's occurrence without being forced by one's theory to reject such things as newspaper reports of lottery victories. Writing Harrow School. According to Singapore Bayes' Theorem: Bayes' theorem isolates three factors: the prior probability of the hypothesis (in this case, that a miracle has occurred) given background knowledge, the probability of the evidence (in this case testimony) given both the hypothesis and background knowledge, and the probability of the evidence given background knowledge alone. So, to apply Bayes' theorem to a piece of testimonial evidence, we need to writing Harrow School ask 1) how antecedently probably the event testified to is, 2) how likely it would be for this piece of testimony to be put forward given the fact that the hypothesis is true, and 3) how likely this piece of testimony would be regardless of whether the hypothesis is true or not.

An antecedently improbable event can be strongly supported by write for an essay Zuoz testimonial evidence if it is highly probable that the event would not be testified to writing essays if it did not occur and would be testified to if it did occur. We can see how Bayes' theorem can handle reports of lottery victories. It is true that, in a million-person lottery in which each person enters but once, each person has a one-in-a-million chance of write a introductory Lyceum Zuoz, winning that lottery. But one's chance of being reported the winner of the lottery is Harrow School, about as great as one's chance of winning the lottery; in fact, lottery victories are typically reported just in case lottery victories occur. P(h/k) (the likelihood that someone won a lottery) may be low in these cases, but p(e/k) (the likelihood that this person would be reported as the School lottery winner) is also equally low.

But in the case of miracles, these are often falsely reported, sometimes even by otherwise credible witnesses. So Hume's suspiciousness of miracle reports seems justified, in that one must carefully consider the prior improbability of the miracle report and accept the report only if accepting the miracle would be accepting a lesser improbability than rejecting the claim and believing that this miracle was falsely reported. III. The Prior Improbability of Miracles. So far, so Humean. But while our argument so far would lead us to reject many miracle reports, it hardly suffices to writing School show that a reasonable person will reject all such reports. All we have shown is that if p(h/k) is sufficiently low, then this factor can require us to write International School of Milan disbelieve the miracle report even when p (e/h k) is high.

What it does not do is Harrow School, show that p(h/k) is, or ought to be, always sufficiently low that no matter how high p(e/h k) is and how low p(e/k) is, belief in the hypothesis that a miracle has occurred will always be unjustified. We can imagine testimony of any finite strength; it is always possible to add more and more independent witnesses, give them almost lethal doses of truth drugs, make denying the miracle very rewarding and make affirming it very painful or lethal, etc. In order to guarantee that disbelief in miracles will always be rational, it is necessary that the prior probability of how to write paragraph for an Lyceum, their occurrence be zero. Or, if not zero, at least very, very, very low. And it is quite true that, for many individuals, miracles are not quite that hard to believe in. So we need an argument for step 2, explaining why miracles should be given a zero or near-zero probability. And indeed Hume provides one:

A miracle is a violation of the laws of nature, and as a firm and writing essays unalterable experience has established these laws, the proof against a miracle, from the general essay topics Curtin Singapore very nature of the fact, is as entire as could possibly be imagined.[8] Now the writing School concept of a miracle as a violation of the laws of nature has its problems, but if an event did not contradict our naturalistic expectations, we would not be inclined to wikipedia School look for a supernatural cause for it. One may say the birth of a baby is a miracle, but one does not mean to Harrow School suggest that births so contradict naturalistic expectation that we should perhaps consider the possibility that they occur by divine intervention. But Hume points out essays Academy, that our confidence in human testimony is based itself on experience; on that past conjunction between testimony and essays Harrow School the truth of on writing Montverde Academy, what is essays School, testified to. Business Publications Moreton Hall School. The experiential basis for confidence in testimony cannot be as strong as the experiential basis for the laws of nature. So, Hume argues, testimony that contradicts expectations generated by natural law should be rejected as false. Essays. That some person deviate from this rule and general writing essay Curtin accept testimony to essays Harrow miracles is, on Hume's view, to be explained in terms of cognitive pathology. To understand this better, let us consider a case that was certainly in the back of Hume's mind when he wrote Of Miracles, the case of the ielts general writing topics resurrection of Jesus. Some people in Hume's time, as well as today, have argued that one ought to believe that Jesus rose from the dead because no believable story can be told about how certain well-established events such as empty tomb reports, appearance claims, and the rapid spread of Christianity, could have occurred had there been no resurrection. They often point out essays, what seems to business Moreton Hall School be the incredibility of naturalistic stories concerning the beginnings of Christianity. For example, some opponents of Jesus's resurrection have maintained that the disciples stole the Harrow School body of Jesus and how can then pretended that the tomb was empty because its occupant had risen from the dead.

But critics of this theft theory have pointed out writing essays School, that we have reason to suppose that many of the apostles, who would have had to how can i write in english High School have been the perpetrators of this hoax, were martyred for proclaiming Jesus's resurrection. Since human beings typically do not die for things they know to be untrue, it is argued that the theft theory is less plausible than the claim that Jesus really did rise from the essays School dead.[9] It is here that Hume's argument goes to work. If twelve people's dying for what they know to be untrue is improbable, it is even less probable that Jesus rose from the dead. A resurrection is a violation of ielts general writing essay topics Curtin, a law of writing, nature, people dying for a known falsehood is at most a psychological oddity. The experiential support for the claim Dead people stay dead is greater than our experiential support for people never die for things they know to be false. So if we must choose between the theft theory and accepting a resurrection (and of course these need not be our only choices), then the a magazine article Lord theft theory, with all its problems, must be accepted. Of course, sometimes we receive evidence that might convince us to alter our beliefs about what the laws of nature are. Writing Harrow School. Thus pre-Einstein, it was thought to be naturally impossible that someone could travel in a near-light-speed spaceship and age almost not at all, while people on earth age fifty years. Writing Essay Topics Curtin University Singapore. But the very reason we have for doubting the expectation we formed based on what we thought the laws of nature were is exactly the reason we have for supposing the event could occur without supernatural intervention.[10] But one might ask Hume at this point, what about God?

Suppose someone already believes in God, or thinks it at least possible that God exists. And suppose one is forced to choose between a theft theory and a resurrection. Now it seems unlikely that God would cause a group of people to writing essays Harrow School engage in a conspiracy to propagate a religious hoax about some teacher's rising from the dead and then give them the courage (or foolhardiness) to defend their hoax to the death. But it does seem to Hall School fit better the traditional picture of God that He might raise a great prophet, or his son, from the dead to certify that person's special place in his scheme of things. And considerations like these are deliberately left out of Hume's account of how one assesses the credibility of miracles. Indeed, these considerations are deliberately left out of Hume's account. Expectations considering the possible intentions of supernatural agents are not grounded in experience, and therefore cannot be factored into reasonings concerning matters of fact.

Though the being to whom the miracle is writing Harrow School, ascribed be almighty, it does not, upon this account become a whit more probable; since it is impossible for write an article International of Milan, us to writing essays Harrow School know the attributes or actions of such a being, otherwise than from the experience we have of his productions, in publications Moreton the usual course of nature. School. This still reduces us to past observation, and obliges us to compare the instance of the violations of truth in the testimony of harvard business publications Moreton School, men, with those of the violation of the laws of nature by miracles, in essays order to judge which of them is most likely and how can essay in english High probable. [11] (italics mine). This is a strong statement of Hume's empiricism concerning the sources of probability judgments, and it is the key to his position on miracles. School. Only those probability judgments that can be directly tied to experienced frequencies (in this case the frequency of false statements as opposed to the frequency of miraculous violations of the laws of wikipedia International School of Milan, nature) can be relevantly employed in assessing the probability that an event has occurred. Much of Hume's discussion in Part I of Of Miracles enunciates a frequentist theory of probability assessment. Consider the following passage, which is typical:

And, as the evidence, derived from witnesses and human testimony, is founded on past experience, so it varies with the experience, and is regarded either as a proof or a probability, according as the conjunction between any particular kind of report and any kind of object has been found to be constant or variable. There are a number of circumstances to be taken into consideration in all judgments of this kind; and the ultimate standard, by School which we determine all disuptes, that may arise concerning them, is always derived from experience and observation.[12] It will be the contention of my subsequent discussion that this connection between experience and probabilities that Hume draws here, while seeming to accord with common sense, really cannot be sustained. I maintain that proper and ielts general Curtin University correct prior probabilities cannot straightforwardly be read off of writing essays Harrow School, experience, although I certainly do not deny that experience plays a vital role in i write essay Justin-Siena High our decisions about what is or is essays, not probable. Wikipedia. The problem is that experience does not come to us in clean-cut pieces of uninterpreted fact.

Rather, what we call experience is interpreted in terms of already-existing theoretical constructs. In this essay it seems that Hume, careful and skeptical thinker that he was, betrays a commitment to the Enlightenment ideal of a perfectly neutral and presupposition-free inquiry, an ideal shown by more recent developments in the philosophy of science to writing essays be impossible to achieve. IV. Probability and its Empirical Foundations. According to write a introductory paragraph Lyceum Zuoz Hume, probabilistic beliefs concerning the intentions of a supernatural being are inadmissible in reasonings concerning matters of writing, fact because these beliefs fail to be grounded in experience. Harvard Business Publications. This insistence has been enunciated by writing essays Harrow School Bayesian theorists, and it is the in english Justin-Siena School frequency theory. Essays School. But the frequency theory has fallen on hard times, and most Bayesian theorists do not accept it, largely because of difficulties related to the problem of the writing a magazine Lord Wandsworth College single case.

The problem is writing essays Harrow, this. Frequencies give us information as to how often event-types have occurred in the past. But we often want to know the International of Milan probability of particular events: this coin-toss, this horse-race, this piece of testimony to the miraculous, etc. If we are to accept Hume's conclusion that testimony to the miraculous ought never to be accepted, we need to essays Harrow show more than just that rejecting testimony to Wandsworth College miracles in general is a good idea because false miracle claims outnumber true ones. Many Christians are skeptical of miracle claims put forward by televangelists, but nonetheless believe that the essays Harrow School evidence in Montverde Academy support of the resurrection of Jesus, and perhaps in support of some modern miracles, is sufficient to overthrow our ordinary presumption against accepting miracle reports. Frequentists have attempted to assess the prior probability of individual purported events by assimiliating them some class of events. Thus, we assess the probability of a particular coin-toss as 1/2 in virtue of writing, its membership in wikipedia write an article of Milan the class of coin-tosses. But the question is which class the relevant reference class is. The claimed resurrection of essays, Jesus falls into how to paragraph for an Alpinum Zuoz many classes: into writing Harrow the class of how can in english High, miracles, into the class of events reported in Scripture, the essays School class of events reported by essays Montverde Academy Peter, the class of events believed by millions to have occurred, into the class of Harrow School, events basic to the belief-system of a religion, etc. Harvard Business Moreton Hall. Of course it is what is at issue between orthodox Christians and their opponents whether the writing class of miracles in the life of write an article of Milan, Jesus is empty or relatively large. Wesley Salmon attempts to solve this problem by defining the conception of an School, epistemically homogeneous reference class.

A class is homogenous just in case so far as we know it cannot be subdivided in wikipedia an article International School a statistically relevant way. Thus, according to Salmon, if Jackson hits .322 overall but hits .294 on Wednesdays, the Wednesday statistic is writing Harrow School, not to harvard business publications Moreton Hall School be treated as relevant unless we know something about Wednesday that makes a difference as to how well Jackson will bat. Thus, according to writing essays Harrow Salmon, the relevant reference class is the largest homogeneous reference class; we should try to get a sample as large as we can without overlooking a statistically relevant factor.[13] There are two difficulties with this method as an write an article International, attempt to satisfy Hume's strong empiricist requirements for writing Harrow, properly grounded probability judgments. First, questions of statisical relevance cannot be fully adjucated by appeal to frequencies. Second, the very heuristic of selecting the largest homogeneous reference class cannot be read off experience. On the harvard publications Moreton Hall first point, consider the situation of a baseball manager who must choose between allowing Wallace to bat or letting Avery pinch-hit for him. School. Wallace has an overall batting average of .272, while Avery's is .262. But the pitcher is left-handed, and while Wallace bats .242 against left-handed pitching, Avery bats .302.

Nevertheless, the pitcher is Williams, and while Avery is 2-for-10 against Williams, Wallace is 4-for-11. Have these batters faced Williams too few times for this last statistic to a introductory paragraph for an essay Lyceum Alpinum count? And can this be straightforwardly determined from experience? What is needed is a judgment call about the relevance of this statistical information, and this judgment cannot simply be read straightforwardly from writing frequencies. The frequentist's epistemology for probabilistic beliefs, insofar as it is an write an article School of Milan, attempt to conform to empiricist/foundationalist constraints, seems impossible to complete. On the second point, is the writing essays Harrow heuristic of selecting the smallest homogeneous reference class justified simply by an appeal to experience? Admittedly it makes a certain amount of common sense. But this attempt to go from a statistical is to an epistemological ought seems to suffer from wikipedia write School of Milan with the writing essays same (or worse) difficulties that getting ought from is suffers from in ethics, and here again Hume's empiricist/foundationalist assumptions impose an harvard Moreton Hall, impossible burden on probability theory. The frequency theory seems clearly to be the theory of priors that Hume would have adopted had he been involved in the contemporary Bayesian debate on prior probabilities. Essays School. But even this theory fails to adjudicate the issue concerning miracles in i write in english Justin-Siena School Hume's favor or in favor of the School defenders of essays Montverde, miracles, because it lacks the writing essays Harrow School resources within itself to select the appropriate reference class. This inability to provide determinate answers to Academy questions of probability is what makes this theory inadequate for resolving the Harrow School question of miracles.

Therefore Hume cannot justify his claim that it is never rational to believe testimony to any miracle on the grounds that miracles are less frequent in experience than false miracle reports.[14] V. Hume's Essay Without Frequency Theory. There are two responses which Humeans might make in defense of Hume's position on business publications School miracles if they are persuaded that the essays frequency theory of prior probability is inadequate. One is to challenge the coherence of the employment of write an article International, probabilistic reasoning on the part of persons committed to the possibility of evidence for essays Harrow, miracles.[15] It might be suggested that, in business publications Moreton virtue of our custom-and-habit imposed commitment to a law-governed universe, persons are committed to writing Harrow a Humean view of miracles, even though, incoherently, they may treat miracles at times as if they were epistemic possibilities or even actualities. Since coherence is a requirement of Bayesian rationality even for people who accept a subjectivist theory of ielts Curtin Singapore, prior probabilities, it might be argued that all miracle-believers are irrational because their belief-systems are incoherent. But it is not clear why it is incoherent to suppose that the vast majority, but not absolutely every, event has a natural cause.

That we usually ignore, for practical purposes, the possibility of supernatural intervention does not mean that we are committed to assigning a vanishing probability to supernatural intervention. Some possibilities are sufficiently remote as to make it unreasonable to try to do anything about writing essays School, them, but not so remote as to require us to disbelieve strong testimony to these possibilities. And, of course, people pray for supernatural intervention; this would be a waste of time unless such intervention were thought possible. Essay Topics Curtin University. Humeans need an argument to show that persons who take divine intervention to writing Harrow School be epistemically possible must have incoherent personal probabilities. Such an argument, to my knowledge, has not been provided by Hume or by anyone else. Michael Root offers an argument in support of Hume that, in essence, makes a charge of self-referential incoherence against ielts general topics Curtin University Singapore, those who employ testimony to support belief in miracles. According to the view Root attributes to Hume, testimony owes its force to essays Harrow School the Principle of the essay Curtin University Uniformity of Nature. If we are to essays Harrow make an inference from the truthfulness of past testimony to the truthfulness of present or future testimony, we need to assume that nature is uniformly lawful; that what goes on in the general essay topics Curtin University future will resemble what went on in the past.

But testimony to a miracle is testimony to the effect that nature is not uniform. Thus, if nature is uniform, then testimony to the miraculous is writing essays Harrow, false, but if nature is not uniform, then testimony is not a reliable source of information, and therefore it fails to justify belief. In neither case is it possible to have a justified, true, belief that a miracle has occurred.[16] But this argument conflates the claim that the future will resemble the past in some respect with the claim that nature is strictly uniform in the sense that it is wikipedia write International School of Milan, deterministic and closed. It should be evident that the possibility of making probabilistic judgments based on testimony does not depend on nature being strictly uniform; that is, on writing strict natural-law determinism being true. If it did, then the general acceptance of indeterminism in the area of quantum mechanics would have destroyed the scientific enterprise which, after all, relies heavily on testimony for its operation. We do need to believe that what has happened in the past is some indication of writing Harrow, what is essays Montverde Academy, likely to happen in the future.

And admittedly we would have little confidence in Harrow our probabilistic beliefs if nature did not behave lawfully to School a very large extent. But the traditional theistic view is that nature obeys its God-given laws almost all the time, and essays those laws, as we understand them, form our expectations concerning what we expect to happen in Academy the future. But sometimes God intervenes for a good reason which is not entirely transparent, but still not entirely opaque, to human beings. Essays School. There are resemblances between the a magazine article Wandsworth College way in which nature behaves in the past and the way it will behave in the future (God the creator of writing essays, nature sees to that). But beliefs about the likely plans and how to a introductory essay Lyceum Zuoz purposes of God must play a role in the credence functions, not only of believers, but of those who think God's existence epistemically possible. What is necessary to make probabilistic judgments is that we have some idea of what would confirm or disconfirm those judgments. It is essays, not necessary to assume nature to be a closed, deterministic system. The other basic line of argument involves the contention that in rejecting Hume's naturalistic constraints on prior probabilities, we open the business floodgates and allow that just any belief may be rational. Writing Harrow School. Dorothy Coleman responds to the charge that Hume's position involves a dogmatic rejection of supernatural causation as follows: The difficulty with this argument is that it justifies too much.

First, unless one assumes that all anomalous events appropriate for God to cause are so caused, one cannot rationally discriminate between those that are and on writing Montverde those that are not. Writing Essays Harrow School. Second, one can no more reasonably assume that an anomalous event is caused by God given a set of assumptions about the existence and write a introductory essay Alpinum Zuoz nature of God any more than one can say the event is caused by unknown alien life-forms, gremlins, demons, fairies, or any other fanciful creature given a similar set of assumptions about their imagined pattern of writing essays Harrow, behavior. The internal consistency of a causal explanation is not sufficient for qualifying it as a reasonable scientific hypothesis.[17] In response to how can Justin-Siena High Coleman's first point, it should be pointed out School, that religious believers, and even religious unbelievers, can, based on their own belief system, have ideas with respect to what they expect God (if God exists) to do. Healings and resurrections are more in character with the Christian God than, say, providing the Notre Dame football team with supernatural assistance in winning championships. Catholics are more likely to believe miracle claims involving the Blessed Virgin Mary than are Protestants. Of course, one can say God did it about anything. But one can discriminate between actions more in character for God and those less in character. Those who believe in miracles typically believe that God has performed many miracles over in english a long period of time, and writing Harrow School can formulate a general theory as to what types of miracles are most likely under certain circumstances.

Expectations concerning the i write essay in english School activities of God are not going to be as precise as expectations concerning electrons; nevertheless they are sufficient to make some miracle claims more plausible than others, relative to a belief system. Of course, Coleman will no doubt respond to this by writing saying that while some miracle claims are more plausible than others relative to some belief system or other, they are not more probable objectively. But if she is asking for objective probabilities, then she needs a theory of essays, objective probability that permits us to grade the writing Harrow School probability of particular events. The frequency theory promised to do this, but, as we have noticed, it is a failure. So in order to object in this manner, she needs to produce a theory of prior probability according to which the most probable miraculous scenario is less probable than the least probable non-miraculous scenario. This is a daunting task, to say the least. As for gremlins, etc., it makes a good deal of difference whether the advocate of a gremlin-theory has some idea of what a gremlin is more or less likely to do. If there is some kind of write a introductory paragraph for an Lyceum Alpinum Zuoz, probability curve for gremlin behavior, then we can see whether anything like the expected gremlin activities are taking place.

If they aren't, then the writing Harrow School gremlin theory is disconfirmed. If the gremlin advocate simply wishes to attribute this, that, and the other to gremlins without offering any suggestion as to what gremlins are likely to a introductory paragraph Lyceum Alpinum do; if the gremlin advocate offers gremlin hypotheses only after the fact, whenever other types of explanation are difficult to find, then gremlin-hypotheses are empirically empty, and are not really hypotheses at all. The miracles attributed to Harrow School God in Lord Wandsworth College the Biblical tradition do not seem to essays Harrow School be typical gremlin-antics. But, I realize that it is logically possible that someone else's credence function might be different from mine. But even on the subjectivist theory of on writing Montverde Academy, prior probabilities I am not required to admit the existence of real rational gremlin-believers. I happen to think that the evidence that gremlins did not raise Jesus from the dead, indeed the evidence that gremlins do not exist, is sufficiently strong that even if one began with a high prior probability for gremlins, this prior would wither in the face of the evidence against their existence. Indeed, I am strongly inclined to suspect irrationality in essays Harrow School those who believe in gremlins.

But what underlies this belief is simply the a posteriori evidence against their existence, and not some general theory of a magazine College, prior probabilities. Writing Essays School. A Bayesian evolutionist might perhaps admit the theoretical possibility that a creationist could be rational, while at the same time maintaining that in how can essay in english School fact all creationists are irrational. An opponent of miracles can indeed maintain that investigation of the Harrow evidence in support of on writing, purported miracles will prove that none of these miracles can be accepted by reasonable people concerning the facts surrounding them. But I maintain that we cannot have what Hume hopes to provide, an essays, argument from the nature of the fact that would make the very investigation of particular miracle claims unnecessary. But, perhaps there is ielts general writing Curtin University Singapore, something inherent in Harrow supernatural hypotheses that makes it the how to a introductory for an essay Lyceum case that they are empirically empty. Keith Parsons, in criticizing attempts to provide scientific support for theistic beliefs, writes: Science is unavoidably naturalistic, or atheistic if you prefer. Science operates in terms of scrutable, independently testable entities that operate in accordance with knowable regularities.

Supernatural beings, on the other hand, are essentially mysterious; claims made on their behalf are not independently checkable, and writing essays there are no laws of supernature governing their behavior. Furthermore, explanations in terms of supernatural entities are inevitably post hoc and untestable. In other words, proponents of supernaturalistic theories can glibly account for things we already know, but become strangely silent when asked to predict something new, something that would allow their theory to be tested.[18] Even though the locus of discussions of miracles is historical rather than scientific, if it is the case that supernaturalist hypotheses are inevitably untestable, this would mean that supernaturalist claims cannot be genuinely supported by evidence. But some points can be made in response to this position. First of all, I see no in principle impossibility in laws of supernature. One cannot, of course, generate deterministic laws governing divine conduct, but one cannot generate such laws concerning the behavior of subatomic particles, either.

One can, of course, form probabilistic expectations concerning the conduct of subatomic particles, but, as we have noted, one can generate probabilistic expectations concerning divine conduct as well. It would disconfirm belief in the Christian God if Jim Bakker were to die and rise again on the third day, ascending into writing a magazine Wandsworth heaven a few weeks later. The laws of supernature that Christians or other theists are inclined to postulate may not be as detailed as the laws scientists hope to Harrow discover in nature, but they leave theistic claims open to confirmation and disconfirmation. Second, someone who postulates a miraculous account of something may try to claim that by on writing Academy admitting a miracle in the background, we render a number of natural events more open to writing School naturalistic explanation. If we find that someone refuses to recant his faith when threatened with death by torture, this occurrence is a natural event.

The explanation for this may be a very strong, sincere belief that a miracle has occurred, again a natural event. Writing Lord Wandsworth. But it may be that the least forced explanation for this sincere belief is that a miracle did occur. It is writing Harrow, a mistake to think that just because a theory involves commitment to the supernatural, that the supernatural content is all that there is to the theory. A supernaturalist theory can have a naturalistic trail of evidence for which can be found or not found. Those who believe that Jesus was raised from the dead believe that Jesus's body will not be found. How To Write A Introductory Paragraph For An Essay Lyceum Alpinum. If it is found (or if it had been found in the first century), traditional Christian belief will be faced with a devastating disconfirmation. If believers choose (or had chosen) to maintain their belief somehow in the face of this kind of counterevidence, this would perhaps show their irrationality, but would not show the untestability of their belief per writing essays Harrow School, se. It is quite true that it is always possible to article College save a supernaturalist hypothesis from refutation by manipulating the theological background beliefs to protect one's theory. Historical evidence against Jesus's resurrection could be passed off as Satanic delusion, for example.

Recall Edmund Gosse's attempt to save creationism by saying that the fossils were put in the ground by writing essays School God to fool the writing Lord Wandsworth scientists. But, as is familiar from Duhem, it is Harrow, possible to save naturalistic theories by on writing Montverde Academy adding auxiliary hypotheses.[19] There may be more temptation to writing do this in the case of supernaturalist hypotheses, but I see no reason why the temptation could not be avoided. Admittedly, many people who have advanced supernaturalist theories in a scientific context have used the supernatural content of their beliefs as a kind of all-purpose escape clause to avoid the impact of ielts writing essay Curtin Singapore, counterevidence. A good example would be scientific creationists of the young earth variety, whose main explanation for writing Harrow, the sedimentation of different life forms is how to for an Zuoz, a worldwide Noachian deluge. As examples of difficulties for this kind of theory, we might mention the fact that it is hard to explain how all earthly species could get into an ark whose dimensions are given in Scripture, the writing essays fact that it is hard to see how species could relocate at such great distances from Ararat after the Flood, and the fact that if the earth is as young as they claim, it is how to a introductory Zuoz, hard to see how there can be stars 500,000 light years away. Writing School. In Abusing Science Philip Kitcher claims that while creationists propose to escape the claim that they are proposing an how can essay in english High, explicitly religious theory by not making specific reference to the revealed character of the Creator, in fact they deal with difficulties for their theory either by ignoring these difficulties or by writing Harrow School appealing to the august and mysterious nature of God as an all-purpose escape clause. A comment like this, for Whitcomb and Morris's The Genesis Flood , is an example of the in english High use of such an essays, escape clause:

The more we study the fascinating story of animal distribution around the earth, the more convinced we have become that this vast river of variegated life forms, moving ever outward from the Asiatic mainland, across the contintents and seas, has not been a chance and haphazard phenomenon. Instead we see the hand of God guiding and i write in english School directing these creatures in ways that man, with all his ingenuity, has never been able to fathom, in order that the great commission to the postdiluvian animal kingdom might be carried out, and that they might breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful and multiply upon the earth (Gen 8.17).[20] Of course, it may be a divine mystery how these things happened. But if it is, the right thing to say from the point of view of science (or even reasonable belief-formation) is that they happened in some other way, in a way that requires less faith in divine mysteries. But while Kitcher quite adeptly diagnoses the use of religious concepts to insulate a theory from writing Harrow empirical disconfirmation, he explicitly indicates that theologically grounded theories need not employ an all-purpose escape clause. In fact, he mentions the nineteenth century Catastrophists, who presented disconfirmable creationist hypotheses, and he even quotes one Catastrophist (Sedgwick) who abandoned his theory in the face of article Lord Wandsworth, contrary evidence.

Although pure versions of Creationism were no longer in writing essays School vogue among scientists by the end of the eighteenth century, they had flourished earlier (in the writings of Thomas Burnet, William Whiston and others). Moreover, variants of wikipedia an article, Creationism were supported by a number of eminient nineteenth century scientists--William Buckland, Adam Sedgwick, and Louis Agassiz, for example. Writing. These Creationists trusted that their theories would accord with the Bible, interpreted in what they saw as the correct way. However, that fact does not affect the scientific status of those theories. Even postulating an unobservable creator need be no more unscientific than postulating unobservable particles.

What matters is the character of the proposals and the ways in which they are articulated and defended . The great scientific creationists of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries offered problem-solving strategies for many of the questions addressed by evolutionary theory. They struggled hard to explain the observed distribution of fossils. Sedgwick, Buckland, and wikipedia School others practiced genuine science. They stuck their necks out and volunteered information about the catastrophes that they invoked to explain biological and theological findings. Because their theories offered definite proposals, those theories were refutable.

Indeed, the theories actually achieved refutation.[21] (italics mine) Young-earth creationists seem to me to be so committed to what they take to be a literal reading of Genesis that they are bound to defend it regardless of what counter-evidence may emerge. But this is writing Harrow School, not something one can infer simply from the fact that they are have supernatuarlist commitments. Both naturalists and supernaturalists can attempt to essays insulate their convictions from counterevidence, in fact Hume's essay on miracles is seen by many defenders of supernaturalism as a very clever attempt to do just that. Writing Essays. But it does seem to be possible for a theist to make an empirically disconfirmable claim, for instance, that Jesus rose from the dead. Evidence can easily be imagined that would show to the satisfaction of most rational people that the whole thing is false. Write A Introductory For An Essay Lyceum Alpinum Zuoz. So long as theistic claims are not employed as all-purpose escape clauses to be employed in the face of writing School, disconfirming evidence, the claims can be supported by empirical evidence. So where does this leave God and Bertrand Russell? Could God have given him enough evidence for business Moreton Hall, his existence?

It is possible that Russell's credence function was such that no possible evidence would have been sufficient to convince him that God exists. But from what I know of Russell this was not the case. Whether Russell ignored available evidence, whether God has a reason for essays, not having given Russell the kind of ielts general writing essay topics Curtin Singapore, evidence he would have needed, or whether God's only excuse is that he does not exist, is a topic far, far beyond the scope of this paper. V. Essays Harrow. Postscript Concerning Apologetics. If my foregoing discussion is on writing, correct, opponents of, say, the resurrection of Jesus cannot appeal to a general theory of probability to writing essays prove that anyone who accepts the resurrection is being irrational. It is also a consequence that different people can reasonably expected to have different credence functions with respect to ielts writing Curtin University Singapore Christian (and other) miracle claims. If you want to convince some people that Christ was resurrected, you have a much heavier burden of proof than you have in convincing others. It must be noted that there is no way, on the model I have presented, to show that everyone who denies the Resurrection is irrational, or engaged in bad faith.

Of course, one can still believe that unbelievers disbelieve because of sin or suppressing the truth, or what have you. But given the legitimate differences that can exist concerning the antecedent probability of the miraculous, I don't see how such charges can be defended. So the Harrow School lesson here, I think, is that both apologetics and anti-apologetics should be engaged in persuasion, not coercion, and that the attempt to ground irrationality charges against one's opponents is i write essay, a misguided enterprise.[22] [1] Wesley Salmon, Religion and writing essays Harrow School Science: A New Look at Hume's Dialogues, in Philosophical Studies 33 (1978), p. 176. [2] David Hume, Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals , ed. L. How Can Essay High School. A. Harrow School. Selby-Bigge, 2nd. Wikipedia International Of Milan. ed. (1902; Oxford, 1972), pp. 109-131. [3] For example Michael Root extends Hume's argument to cover direct experience in Miracles and the Uniformity of Nature American Philosophical Quarterly 26 (October 1989), pp. 338-339. [4] Notably Bruce Langtry, Miracles and the Principles of Relative Likelihood, Internationial Journal for Philosophy of Religion 18 (1985) , pp. 123-131; Jordan Howard Sobel, On the Evidence of Testimony for Miracles: A Bayesian Interpretation of David Hume's Analysis, The Philosophical Quarterly 37 (1987) pp. 66-86; David Owen, Hume Versus Price on Miracles and Prior Probabilities: Testimony and the Bayesian Calculation, The Philosophical Quarterly 37 (1987), pp.

187-202; and Philip Dawid and Donald Gillies, A Bayesian Analysis of Hume's Argument Concerning Miracles, The Philosophical Quarterly 39 (1989) pp. 57-65. [6] See Victor Reppert, Miracles and the Case for Theism, International Journal for writing Harrow School, Philosophy of Religion , (1989) pp. 44-45. [7] Ibid . p. 115. The Cato referred to here is the ancient Roman patriot Cato, not O. Writing A Magazine Article. J. Simpson's houseguest Kato, or Nicole's dog of the same name. [9] For a popular presentation of this type of argument see Josh McDowell, Evidence that Demands a Verdict (Arrowhead Springs, CA: Campus Crusade for Christ International, 1972), 247-257. [10] J. L. Writing Harrow. Mackie, The Miracle of harvard business Moreton Hall School, Theism , pp. 24-25.

[13] Salmon, The Foundations of Scientific Inference (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967), pp. Writing Essays Harrow School. 90-93. [14] These objections were suggested to me by in conversation by Patrick Maher. [15] Howard Sobel mentioned this possibility to harvard business School me in correspondence. [16] Root, Miracles and writing essays School the Uniformity of Nature, pp. 337-338. [17] Dorothy Coleman, Hume, Miracles and Lotteries, Hume Studies (December 1988), pp.

339-40. [18] Keith Parsons, Is there a Case for Christian Theism? in J. P. Moreland and Kai Nielsen, Does God Exist: The Great Debate (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1990) p. 189. [19] Pierre Duhem, Aim and Structure of Scientific Theory , ch. 6. [20] John Whitcomb and Henry M. Morris, The Genesis Flood (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1961), p. 128. [21] Philip Kitcher Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1982), p. 125.

[22] I am indebted to Patrick Maher and Mark Vuletic for helpful comments on previous drafts.

Pay for Essay and Get the Best Paper You Need -
Harrow School, Harrow — British Education …

6 page essay outline Creating an Argument Outline. Essays Harrow School! Although there is no set model of organization for argumentative essays, there are some common patterns that writers might use or that writers might want to combine/customize in i write essay Justin-Siena High, an effective way. For more information on how to create an outline, click here to read Developing an Outline from the Purdue University On-line Writing Lab. Below are 3 different patterns that you can consider. Also, beneath these are 3 additional outlines that you can print and writing Harrow fill in. Body Paragraph 1 : Present your 1st point and Montverde supporting evidence. Body Paragraph 2 : Present your 2nd point and it's supporting evidence. Body Paragraph 3 : Refute your opposition's first point.

Body Paragraph 4 : Refute your opposition's second point. Body Paragraph 2 : Refute your opposition's second point. Body Paragraph 3 : Present your first point and supporting evidence. Body Paragraph 4 : Present your second point and supporting evidence. Body Paragraph 1 : Present your first point and it's supporting evidence, which also refutes one of your opposition's claims.

Body Paragraph 2 : Present your second point and it's supporting evidence, which also refutes a second opposition claim. School! Body Paragraph 3 : Present your third point and it's supporting evidence, which also refutes a third opposition claim. 3 Additional Outlines that You Can Print : Basic 5-Paragraph (Argument) Essay Outline: This outline also serves for other essays such as research papers, or the basic 5-paragraph essay. Highlight-and-print outline to Montverde, fill in. Writing Essays School! Another Argument Essay Outline: This outline asks questions that help you critically think about your topic. Highlight-and-print outline to write School of Milan, fill in. Writing Essays School! Argument/Research Paper Outline Guide: This outline can help guide you through a series of questions. You can highlight-and-print this outline, but it's not a fill-in-the-blank outline; use it as a guide.

Many of my students like to use this outline for both research papers and argumentative papers. Basic 5-Paragraph (Argument) Essay Outline: Introductory Points and Thesis Statement _______________________________________________________________. Refutation Points (if needed) _________________________________________________________________________. The major points I wish to business publications, make in this essay are: __________________________________________________________________________________________ A. ________________________________________________________________________ (Detail or example) B. _________________________________________________________________________(Detail or example) C. _________________________________________________________________________(Detail or example) A. ________________________________________________________________________ (Detail or example) B. Writing! _________________________________________________________________________(Detail or example) C. Ielts General Writing Curtin University Singapore! _________________________________________________________________________(Detail or example) A. ________________________________________________________________________ (Detail or example) B. _________________________________________________________________________(Detail or example) C. Writing Harrow! _________________________________________________________________________(Detail or example) Conclusion Points ________________________________________________________________________________. Another Argument Outline Template. Lord Wandsworth! Working Title: __________________________________________________________________________________. Audience and how you plan to appeal to them: ___________________________________________________________.

Attention Getter: _________________________________________________________________________________. Writing Essays! Explain the interest in this topic. What experiences have caused the International of Milan, writer to become interested (careful using 1st person!)? Background Information, including history and context for essays problem: ___________________________________________. How you will appeal to Ethos: _______________________________________________________________________. Refutation or Opposing Arguments (Explain them, explain how and why there may be value in how to write for an essay Lyceum Alpinum, them, and disagree with the parts you believe to be invalid. Establish common ground): ______________________________________________________________________________________________. Essays Harrow School! Evidence to support your claim, including appeal to logos, and pathos. (Evidence must come from essays on writing, your sources, both primary and secondary: examples, statistics, facts, studies, testimony, data, etc.) Reason 1 supporting your claim: ____________________________________________________________________. Reason 2 supporting your claim: ___________________________________________________________________. Writing Essays Harrow School! Reason 3 supporting your claim: ___________________________________________________________________. Do you have a solution to essays Montverde Academy, the problem? (This may or may not be applicable.) How will it work?

What are its advantages? What does the future look like without some resolution to this problem?______________________________________. Creative, thought-provoking closure: _________________________________________________________________. Argument/Research Paper Outline. Writing Harrow! Some areas of each Roman Numeral may or may not apply to your essay. *Attention Getter is IMPORTANT. Montverde! *Next, explain the current situation. What is the world like “as is” in relation to your issue? Why is it important? What drew you to this topic? *You can include comments and quotations from an informal survey you conducted with people you know, you can also explain how other people you know feel about the subject. *Mention misconceptions related to your topic, if any. * Next you need to provide background information. *What are the details to your problem? *What is the struggle?

Why is it a unique and complicated issue? *Include examples to illustrate the School, struggle or issue. *You can provide official statistics on the problem, current laws related to the topic, or the position the social majority has. This information should be coming from your research. *Don’t forget to appeal to ETHOS. *Now you need to how to write a introductory Lyceum, create a section that CLEARLY establishes your claim. Say to yourself, clear thesis = clear direction, clear thesis = clear direction, clear thesis = clear direction. *Explain the WHY of essays School your thesis in a simple way (i.e. it will solve ____ issue). IV. ARGUMENTS/ YOUR SIDE OF THE ISSUE. *Introduce the first perspective you are willing to look at. Explain how your solution will help the situation. *Explore one main side of the essays, issue. *Provide evidence for any mini claim you make. *Unpack your evidence. *Provide more evidence. *Unpack your evidence some more.

Repeat Step IV as many times as necessary. Keep in mind the length requirements of the essay. Essays! *Now you need to consider the other side of the issue or the opposing argument. High! *As you introduce one refutation point, answer it. *Unpack your evidence. *Provide more evidence. Essays! *Unpack your evidence some more. Step IV V can be reversed in order, depending on the flow of your paper. On Writing Montverde! Also, your refutation concession section might be more than one paragraph. Essays Harrow School! *Here is where you review the main points. *Restate your thesis. *Call to publications Moreton Hall, action.

If you haven’t introduced any sort of solution in your essay, perhaps encourage others to become more aware of your topic. *What does the future look like in relation to your topic? SANDWICH your quotes: Say what your going to essays Harrow School, say, Say it (the quote), then say it again. An Article School Of Milan! [In other words: Set up your quote, give the quote, and writing essays Harrow then provide commentary on wikipedia write an article International School, you quote by answering “why is this quote important?”]

Write my Paper for Cheap in High Quality -
План-конспект урока по английскому языку (9 класс) по…

essay meaning The Academic Essay. The academic essay is writing essays Harrow School, merely a specific writing genre#150;as is the how to write a introductory essay Alpinum Zuoz, love letter, newspaper editorial, or pop-fiction. As a genre, it functions within a set of writing essays School norms, rules, and conventions. The purpose of how can essay High School this discussion is to make clear to you what those rules and writing Harrow norms are, and how to writing a magazine article Lord Wandsworth College, use them to express your argument clearly. The purpose of the academic essay is to School, persuade by reasoned discourse. Scholars use the essay amongst themselves to advance ideas. Its value as an instructional tool is to writing essay topics University Singapore, assist students in developing their critical thinking skills.

As you recall, critical thinking is defined as: the ability to read theory accurately, appropriate it meaningfully, apply it independently, generate results based on writing essays Harrow School, that application, analyze the results, and form a clear argument based on those results that can be defended with a specific line of reasoning. A good academic essay engenders this process and write paragraph for an essay Zuoz clearly demonstrates that the process has been performed successfully. With this in mind let's examine how to write an academic essay. Do you frequently find yourself struggling with the introduction to your essays? Do you not know how to begin the essay? Do you find yourself searching for a generalizing statement that will get things going, and trying to find a delicate balance between BS'ing and saying something meaningful?

If so, that's because you are not following the norms for the introduction to the academic essay. Following this norm actually makes introductions a piece of cake and gets you right into the body of the essay. Writing Essays? Here is the norm: The purpose of the introduction is two-fold: 1. To introduce the wikipedia write an article, theoretical framework that will guide your analysis. 2. Writing Essays? To introduce the thesis statement that will organize your paper. Following this norm allows you to cut to the chase. No more generalizing statements of philosophical speculation that you venture forth hoping that it won't get shot down. You know, crap like Hemingway was perhaps one of the most visionary authors of his time. or The Western is perhaps the most uniquely American of all the genres. Rather, if the purpose of the essay is to harvard business, demonstrate that you have appropriated a theory and writing essays School applied it independently to produce results, then the function of the introduction becomes more focused: to introduce the Wandsworth College, theory#150;or theoretical framework#150;that you have decided to use.

Hence you will find that many essays begin with such statements as In his book. Or, In her essay. IMPORTANT NOTE: One of the main reasons that the norm of the Introduction developed this way is because of an important rule of the Academic Essay: Avoid making statements that you cannot prove. The problem with the writing essays School, generalizing/philosophical/BS'ing statements like Hemingway. How Can School? and The Western. is that they cannot be proven through reasoned discourse. Moreover, to even try and do so would require voluminous amounts of discourse for essays School, something that is not even your thesis: what you actually ARE setting out to prove. As a result, the International School, genre of the Academic Essay has evolved into the above norm. It still meets an introduction's purpose of orienting the reader, it just does so in a very specific manner. Having accomplished that, the expectation for an essay is that you will introduce a thesis statement that is directly related to writing essays School, that theoretical framework (or its application). As a result, a major convention of the essays on writing Academy, academic essay is that: The introduction ends with the thesis statement.

Having stated a thesis, you are expected to then go and prove it through the body of the essay. That said, it is important to discuss what's at stake in making a thesis statement. There are four basic logical forms for a thesis statement: #149; A banal thesis statement. #149; A simple thesis statement. #149; A complex thesis statement. #149; An impossible thesis statement. Let's discuss each of these quickly before moving on.

A banal thesis statement is a statement that does not really say anything#150;it is in fact meaningless because it is either so overly general or so evident as to not be of significance. Here's an example from writing Harrow School literature. A frequent argument students will make is This author used symbolism to make his point. The statement, however, is meaningless precisely because it is not of significance: every author writing literature uses symbolism of one kind or another, either using language metaphorically or metonymically. Thus, to attempt to single out or make a distinction of a piece for using symbolism is to not say anything that even needs proving to begin with. A simple thesis statement is not quite what it may sound like.

A simple thesis statement means that only one main point or argument is going to be proved. The term simple argument can thus be misleading because the argument itself can and frequently is harvard business publications, very theoretically sophisticated. What makes them simple is that in terms of their logical structure, they only take on one line of proof, and essays hence, their organization of proof will be simple. One has to be careful, however, because sometimes one main argument may require SEVERAL supporting arguments. The example here would be the argument that Star Wars belongs within the Western Genre. Here the writer has only one thing to prove, but in order to do so will have to establish the elements that comprise the Western Genre and demonstrate how the i write School, film embodies them--not a small task. Simple thesis statements are eminently preferable in terms of writing School writing an essay for a course. It allows you to focus on essays on writing, your points and School your proofs rather than getting lost in the organization of your arguments. A complex thesis statement means that the thesis has more than one point to prove. Harvard Business Publications? In this respect, the essay will have to organize more than one line of reasoning in so far that more than one thing has to writing essays Harrow School, be proven.

Complex theses are not necessarily more theoretically sophisticated than simple thesis statements, they are only more difficult to organize clearly. In this respect, they are not worth what they entail and should be avoided. An example of a complex thesis statement would be something like: Faulkner's novels critique the ideologies of patriarchy and racism. This would be an appropriate analysis for the work of Faulkner, but I'm not sure it would be worth it. To begin with, it is not clear what the writer has to gain in terms of proving BOTH of writing topics Curtin University Singapore these aspects of the work rather than just the one.

Instead, with this complex thesis, there are going to be long sections of the essay where half of Harrow what needs to writing topics University Singapore, be proved will be left suspended while the other half gets discussed. In addition, the thesis picks the work of Faulkner which necessitates discussing every book, rather than just one. Thus it is that an important convention of the academic essay is that: A complex thesis statement can usually be restructured into a more theoretically sophisticated (if not interesting) simple thesis statement. Making an Argument. As stated earlier, the academic essay is an writing essays School exercise in reasoned persuasion. In this respect, the thesis statement is an important organizational structure insofar as it establishes how the rest of the essay will be organized. Classical logic maintains that there are 3 basic kinds of persuasive statements: statements of fact, statements of value (or evaluation), and statements of policy (or action, which argue what we should do). Unless otherwise specified, the first of these, the how to paragraph for an Lyceum Zuoz, statement of writing Harrow fact, is the form that the a magazine Lord Wandsworth College, thesis statement for an academic essay should take#150;the obvious exception being when you write evaluative criticism (which you will NEVER do in my course). Statements of writing essays Harrow School fact can themselves be grouped into two basic forms: arguments of classification, and arguments of operation or function.

It is possible to make other distinctions, like for ielts topics Curtin University, example, arguments of relationship (how to things relate to each other) but these distinctions can be readily subsumed into these two basic groups. Arguments of classification are when you establish some sort of writing essays Harrow School criteria, and then argue that something meets or fails to writing, meet that criteria. The earlier example that Star Wars belongs within the Western Genre is an example of an argument of classification. Writing Harrow? Having established what comprises the Western Genre, the writer will then go on to prove how Star Wars embodies, contains, or possesses those elements. The writer will, in other words, prove that Star Wars meets that criteria. Arguments of operation or function argues in terms of what something does, or how it functions. How Can I Write Essay Justin-Siena High School? The earlier argument that Faulkner's work critiques the ideology of patriarchy is an example of function. This statement argues that Faulkner's work DOES something: it criticizes the ideology of patriarchy. Note that unlike the argument of classification, the writer of writing this essay SEEMS to have to do more to essays on writing Montverde, prove their thesis. School? They will not only have to general writing essay topics Singapore, define what the ideology of patriarchy is#150;and thus establish criteria#150;they will also have to demonstrate that Faulkner's work DOES something with that criteria. The question of writing essays Harrow HOW leads to a discussion of the business Moreton Hall School, body of the essay.

The Body of the Essay. From a conceptual standpoint, the function of the body of the writing Harrow School, essay is to prove the thesis statement laid out in the introduction. Easy enough. I Write Essay High School? This section discusses how the writer accomplishes that proof. In the discussion of writing types of argument, I made the point that the writer will have to writing a magazine Lord, establish criteria that can be used to prove their argument. Writing Essays School? The body of the on writing Academy, essay is the location where the writer accomplishes that. An introduction is precisely that: It INTRODUCES the essays, theoretical framework and the thesis statement. It does not DESCRIBE or DISCUSS these two things. This is a fairly common mistake that beginning essay writers make. They fear that they have not said enough in on writing Academy, the intro and as a result, go on to discuss aspects of their theory or elaborate on a thesis.

The problem with doing so is that it screws up your organization. Essays School? What comes next is no longer clear to the reader. If you keep it clear to yourself that the purpose of the on writing Montverde, introduction to essays School, your essay is to only INTRODUCE your theoretical framework, and your thesis statement, then the function of the body of your essay will also become evident to the reader. They will expect you to establish criteria so that you can prove your thesis. As a result, another important norm of the academic essay is: A primary function of the body of the essay is to establish the criteria by which the thesis statement will be proven. Thus it is that having argued that Star Wars is general writing topics Singapore, a Western, the School, body of the paper is going to have to first establish the elements that comprise the Western#150;it will have to write of Milan, establish the criteria by which the thesis can be proven. To argue that Faulkner's work criticizes thee ideology of writing School patriarchy is going to require that the writer establish what the ideology of patriarchy is. Establishing the criteria by which the thesis statement will be proven leads to the next logical step: demonstrating how the object under investigation meets those criteria. Clearly it is not enough for publications Moreton School, the Faulkner essayist to writing essays School, just define what the ideology of patriarchy is. A Magazine? Their thesis is Harrow School, that Faulkner's work criticizes that ideology.

As a result, they will have to point to specific things within the text and argue that they relate to those criteria IN A SPECIFIC WAY#150;in this case through a process of criticism. How Can Essay In English High? This process of relating the object of investigation back to the established criteria is another fundamental component of the body of the writing Harrow School, essay. Without it, the proof is not complete. As silly as that sounds, I kid you not that the on writing Montverde, most frequent mistake of essays Harrow beginning essay writers is a failure to relate their analysis back to the criteria they have established. Thus it is that another important norm for the academic essay is: Relate the analysis back to wikipedia write an article, the terms and concepts of the essays School, established criteria. The Star Wars example brings up another fundamental logical task to this process.

From the beginning you have probably thought the Star Wars thesis to not be very feasible. General Writing Curtin University Singapore? The film is not set in the West, and it occurs in the future. The question becomes, however, whether these are ESSENTIAL criteria to the Western, and if not, what is? In terms of proving that thesis statement, the writer is going to have to clearly establish what the elements of the Western Genre are, and then relate aspects of the film back to Harrow School, ALL of those criteria. Herein lies the Academy, essential importance of completeness to that process. If the Star Wars writer establishes the writing School, criteria but can only point to the gun-fighting that occurs in the film, then their essay will fail to persuade. Their essay will fail to persuade precisely because it inadequately addresses the writing a magazine Lord, scope of the criteria. Thus it is that another important norm for this process is: Fully address the established criteria. It is very important to essays, note that fully addressing the scope of the criteria does NOT mean that the object under discussion has to fully meet ALL the criteria. To stick with the Star Wars example, the writer can not IGNORE the issue of i write School setting and even remotely hope to persuade the writing essays, audience. In some way, the writer is going to have to how to paragraph for an, address the fact that both time and place are out essays Harrow, of the bounds of the Western.

This is the point precisely. The author will have to ADDRESS that point#150;those criteria#150;not necessarily MEET those criteria. In this respect, the writer is going to have make a supporting argument about how these criteria relate to each other in terms of comprising the writing a magazine College, genre (or in a logical sense the whole). The important point is that all criteria are addressed adequately. Failure to address any of the established criteria creates a gap in logic. Subsequently, the reasoning process (and its ability to persuade) fails. Fully relating the object of the thesis to the established criteria fulfills the logical requirements necessary to persuade reasonably and essays Harrow School allows the writer to draw conclusions. Before that process is discussed, however, it is necessary to examine an how to a introductory for an Lyceum important component of this relating back process. The Role of Description. Relating the object of investigation or the object of the thesis back to the established criteria is necessarily going to involve description. Description is frequently an unclear and thorny issue for writers of the academic essay#150;especially in terms of scope (how much is writing essays Harrow, enough?).

The purpose of description, however, clarifies the issue of writing a magazine article Lord scope. The purpose of description to is to make clear, or establish WHAT in writing essays Harrow, the object of investigation (the film, the scene, the shot) relates to the criteria being used. It therefore becomes important for the writer to use description in such a manner as to establish the basis of the relationship between the object and write International School of Milan the criteria. Furthermore, the writer should LIMIT description to accomplishing only this task. Added description is not only superfluous, but distracts from trying to prove your argument. As a result, another important norm for writing, the body of the academic essay is: Subordinate description to the purpose of analysis. As stated above the process of fully relating the object of the thesis to the established criteria has the effect of fulfilling the logical requirements. Lord? It is writing School, THAT task which ultimately persuades, not the conclusion itself.

It is for this reason that, in some respects, the conclusion does not seem to have a FUNDAMENTAL role in the process of reasoned persuasion. That in itself probably accounts for how many dopey tips exist for what to do with a conclusion, like: repeat the thesis statement (like people have forgotten it despite the fact that you've been working to prove it the entire time) or some other such thing. What to do with a conclusion if the work of proof is already done? The most effective thing to do with a conclusion is to first signal that the work is coming to close, and write then close off the discussion itself by stating something definitive about the work. Like the introduction, then, the conclusion has a dual role: to signal the transition to closure, and to close the discussion with a definitive statement. The work of the conclusion should reference the thesis, without necessarily repeating the thesis (or the steps by which it was proven) It should then say something definitive that signals closure by pointing to the implications of what you've discussed, by essays Harrow, amplifying what you've discussed, or by contextualizing what you've discussed. In each case, you are striving to close discussion by being definitive, and you are taking caution not to violate rule #1 of the academic essay: avoid statements that you cannot prove. To stay with the running examples, the conclusion to the Faulkner paper could look something like this: . it therefore serves as an example of how literary texts structure their criticisms of dominant ideologies. (pointing to the implications of proving your argument). Thus, far from being a portrait of its time Faulkner's work demonstrates that literary works actively engage ideologies. (amplifying your argument) Rather than a story centered exclusively on war, Hemingway's novel instead participates in the reinforcement of dominant ideologies with American culture. (Contextualizing the argument) Note that the similarity here is how definitive these statements are.

They draw upon the work that has been done, but say something different and i write essay Justin-Siena High School final that is logically based upon what has been discussed. There are, of course, variations on the genre of the academic essay--some rather large difference exist, for essays, example, between the social sciences and the humanites. This discussion is based on the humanties approach. Other variations can result from the idiosyncracies of specific instructors. To the degree that what is essays on writing Montverde, written here sounds heavy handed and inflexible, I caution instead that such tone is trying to reflect the manner in which your own analysis and School writing will need to sound precise and rigorous#150;the standards by which the academic essay is evaluated. The precision and harvard Moreton rigor with which these norms and conventions are applied should function only to essays Harrow, demand that your own analysis and reason engender these standards. They are thus meant to elevate your thinking, not control it.

The principles by which the academic essay structures itself is designed to be a discipline that frees your thinking, not subjugate it. Within its conventions is unlimited creative potential whose only demand, ultimately, is that you say something meaningful that others can be persuaded of via your logic. What I have attempted to do here is make the norms and conventions of the genre explicit so that you can refine your skills working within it. Mastering this genre has the benefit of developing your skill to article Lord, analyze situations using explicit criteria, and be able to make decisions based on that analysis. More than a few people have found that possession of such a skill is invaluable in life and professional endeavors.